RESEARCH REVISION 24 · 12 OCTOBER 2026

Ten gaps, reviewed against the accounts.

New research tests the remaining modern roots against legislation, contracts, government accounts and monetary histories. Same-unit renamings remain profile continuity.

7researched relationships
41new research claims
150/154endpoints with a predecessor
4still need a distinct predecessor

All inherited endpoint codes now have an explicit predecessor review. A missing predecessor means research remains open. No currency has been certified as created de novo. Founding standards and earlier forms of the same currency are identified separately.

Inspect every endpoint and its remaining work →

The graph contains 321 scoped identities, 1238 claims and 603 source records. 57/154 endpoints reach 1500 under the retained rules, including qualified paths and optional founding references. No complete account-unit ancestry chain to Lydia has been established.

Download the complete revision 24 package · Revision 23 archive

Depth coverage

Each cell counts endpoint codes with at least one dated path. Strict ancestry excludes qualified claims and optional relationships. Optional paths may include founding standards or interrupted restoration; none proves that every stage or input is complete.

Reaches yearStrict ancestryAncestry including qualifiedIncluding optional relationships
190043/15485/154100/154
18009/15458/15482/154
17004/15437/15461/154
15004/15432/15457/154
11004/15418/15439/154
8000/1546/1548/154
7000/1546/1548/154
10/1540/1540/154
-6000/1540/1540/154

What this review resolves

Six of the ten remaining endpoints gain qualified main relationships: Haiti, Nepal, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Uruguay. Nepal’s incoming link is a later absorption, not founding ancestry. Uruguay also receives a distinct Brazilian obligation-conversion input.

Thailand reaches a qualified 1687–1688 account observation; Liberia reaches Commonwealth accounting in 1839–1843. Egypt still needs a local para-to-pound identity decision. Cambodia’s interrupted restoration remains optional. Liberia’s 1935 law redefined an existing dollar; the previous interpretation is explicitly superseded.

All ten reviewed gaps

EndpointOutcomeRemaining work
EGPearlier continuity onlyResolve Egyptian medin/para, piastre and pound identity across local accounts and the 1834–1836 reforms. Inspect the 14 April 1836 decree and obligation treatment; do not assume an Istanbul parent.
HTGpredecessor documentedResolve French colonial livre input, Christophe’s northern kingdom and earlier local Spanish-gourde accounting; the admitted branch is Pétion’s republic only.
KHRrestoration onlyFind legal or account evidence for treatment of pre-1975 debts, deposits and notes at the 1980 restoration. New salaries and purchases do not establish redemption.
LRDfounding reference onlyRetrieve Revised Statutes §1210 and the early Uniform Currency Act date. US standard adoption is retained as an optional founding reference; distinct regional-unit differentiation remains unproved.
NPRpredecessor documentedThe admitted paisa-rupee link is later absorption, not founding ancestry. Find the reform decree, balance conversions, other regional unit identities and the earlier mohar-rupee origin.
RONpredecessor documentedResolve dated local leu differentiation in Moldavia and Wallachia, later Ottoman influence and the connection to statutory national accounting; the lion-dollar branch compresses these stages.
SARpredecessor documentedRetrieve the original 1928 regulations and local Hejazi obligation records; distinguish Najd’s parallel currencies and earlier transitions. The admitted Ottoman branch is locally qualified.
THBearlier continuity onlyFind earlier dated baht/tical obligations and adjudicate any genuinely distinct predecessor; La Loubère extends continuity to 1687–1688, not a separate tical parent.
TRYpredecessor documentedResolve akçe-to-kuruş identity and old-obligation treatment across 1690–1719; the 120:1 scale alone does not justify a new ancestor. Trace the Dutch trade-account unit further.
UYUpredecessor documentedResolve peso fuerte versus peso corriente and Portuguese/Brazilian local stages before 1830. The Brazilian contract conversion is a contributing input, not exclusive ancestry.

New source findings

ClaimStatusFindingSources
C1205supported inferenceThe 16-ganda paisa rupee was absorbed into standardized mohar-rupee accounting during the reforms reported in 1908. This is a qualified later consolidation of concurrent account units, not the founding of the Nepalese rupee; exact decree and balance-conversion rules remain unlocated.S577, S577, S576
C1206supported inferenceDomestically managed Ottoman esedi/kuruş accounting developed from the Dutch esedi trade-unit convention. This qualified regional transition compresses local stages; it does not assert universal redemption of Dutch coins or obligations.S601, S599, S557
C1207supported inferenceRegional leu accounting continued the lion-thaler convention after the trade coin receded. This qualified branch compresses regional differentiation and later Ottoman influence; it does not equate every local leu with Dutch or Ottoman money.S602, S603, S553, S554
C1208supported inferenceSaudi reckoning adapted Ottoman gold-piastre accounting in the Hejazi monetary system. Contemporary reporting describes the 1928 substitution and inherited theoretical piastres; the qualified branch concerns this local account tradition, not uniform replacement across Najd or ancestry inferred from coin weight.S611, S612
C1209supported inferenceNational gourde reckoning in Pétion’s republic developed from the Spanish gourde/peso rated in local law. The 1811–1813 laws combine national denomination, commercial acceptance, tax accounts and treasury conversion. The regional identity grouping is qualified; northern Haiti and French-livre inputs remain open.S592, S593
C1210supported inferenceThe Uruguayan peso corriente developed as a regional branch of inherited Spanish-American peso accounting amid Portuguese, Brazilian and local monetary changes. Official history identifies inherited reckoning and original research documents an independent eight-real account unit. Intervening regional stages remain qualified.S594, S595, S596
C1211supported inferenceThe 1831 reform converted obligations and deposits payable in Brazilian copper into the local Uruguayan monetary system. Attribution to the Brazilian real is a qualified contributing account-conversion input, not an exclusive founding parent or a claim that circulated coins alone create ancestry.S596, S594
C1212supportedAn October 1855 royal endowment records distinct amounts in mohar rupees and 16-ganda paisa rupees. Their separately valued accounting establishes the latter as an account unit, not merely a coin or subdivision.S577, S576
C1213supportedThe 1908 reform retrospective reports the abolition of several local ganda reckonings and nationwide use of the standardized mohar rupee. The report supplies a reform interval, not a founding date.S577
C1214supported inferenceLa Loubère records tribute obligations in ticals and identifies Baat as the Siamese name for the tical. Association with the continuing baht is qualified across the intervening centuries; alternative names and foreign exchange comparisons create no separate parent.S590
C1215supported inferenceDutch esedi/lion-dollar accounting is documented before and during the adoption of domestically managed Ottoman reckoning. This scoped trade account identity excludes generic thalers and undifferentiated kuruş references; 1575 minting is not used as its account-unit birth.S601, S557
C1216supported inferenceThe esedi account unit reported in 1690 is associated with the continuing Ottoman kuruş/lira identity. Regular coin minting in 1719 and later lira-scale changes do not create separate currency nodes.S599, S600, S601
C1217supported inferenceAn April–May 1704 mint account reckons output and profit in esedi kuruş, corroborating account use before regular kuruş coin production. Association with the continuing identity remains qualified.S599
C1218supported inferenceA published study reports a 1757 Moldavian document reckoning 5,000 lei as ten bags. It extends the qualified regional leu profile; the underlying manuscript and every later local transition have not been independently verified.S602, S553, S554
C1219supportedInstructions effective 23 March 1936 abolished gold-piastre reckoning, required affected government revenues to be doubled in Saudi piastres, and retained revenues already based on Saudi piastres. This is an account conversion within the Saudi profile.S612
C1220supported inferenceThe 27 June 1811 law retained the existing piastre-gourde valuation while prescribing local alteration of circulating pieces. Association with the national gourde is a qualified continuity observation, not a currency birth from piercing coins.S593
C1221supportedThe 6 July 1813 finance circular assessed export duties in gourdes and centimes, documenting national public accounting.S593
C1222supported inferenceOfficial issuer history identifies adoption of peso corriente accounting in 1830; newspaper-based research identifies a fixed eight-real unit from 1831. The regional association with the continuing Uruguayan peso remains qualified.S594, S595, S596
C1223supported inferencePublic-payment rules in 1829 use peso-denominated tax thresholds before national coin issues. Connecting this local observation to the later Uruguayan peso is qualified.S598
C1224supported inferenceThe Commonwealth adopted US monetary standards in 1839 and used local dollar obligations, taxes and bill redemption by the 1843 compilation. Association with the continuing Liberian dollar is qualified; the compilation date is not the enactment date of its undated currency act.S604, S605, S541, S607
C1225supportedThe 1933 official survey identifies the Liberian dollar as the monetary unit while reporting British West African coins as the principal circulating money.S541
C1226qualifiedVickery describes the 1980 riel entering use through state salaries and purchases. This evidence does not establish redemption of pre-1975 balances; the restoration relationship remains optional and qualified.S591
C1227qualifiedAkçe accounting is documented by 1525, and a 1704 mint order specifies 120 akçe per esedi kuruş. That ratio alone cannot decide whether akçe and kuruş require distinct currency identities or a same-unit scale history.S557, S600
C1228supportedThe 1936 diplomatic report describes the 1928 Saudi rules as adapting older Turkish gold-account reckoning while substituting the Saudi riyal for the mejidie. It separately reports continued non-Saudi currency use in Najd.S611
C1229supportedAlleaume identifies a Majlis-i Mülkiyye decree of 14 April 1836 establishing a bimetallic reform and tariff. The study also reproduces an 1834 tariff in paras. These milestones do not themselves establish the identity boundary between earlier Egyptian para accounting and the continuing pound.S613
C1230qualifiedPamuk describes the Egyptian medin/para as an account unit retained under Ottoman rule and continuing into the late eighteenth century. Local links to Istanbul money and later standard reforms do not by themselves identify a distinct predecessor transition to EGP.S557
C1231supportedThe 4 May 1808 law rated the Spanish gourde in local livres and escalins; the valuation change was repealed on 26 July. Concurrent reckoning does not establish an exclusive livre-to-gourde replacement.S592
C1232supportedThe 8 May 1813 coin law denominated national pieces as fractions of the Spanish gourde and required commercial acceptance as Spanish money. Later orders addressed equal pricing and exchange of pierced pieces at the treasury.S593
C1233supportedAct 348 authorized treasury paper for a coin withdrawal. Its 120,000-gourde authorization is distinct from the compilation’s editorial report of 300,000 gourdes issued; neither figure establishes an account-unit founding date.S593
C1234supportedArticles 35–38 of the 1831 law regulate existing Brazilian-copper obligations and deposits through local notes and their prescribed conversion. This is evidence about obligations, beyond circulation or metal standards.S596
C1235supportedThe 1839 law authorized copper fractions of the existing current silver real and limited mandatory acceptance. The issue is profile evidence, not a new currency identity.S597
C1236supportedThe Commonwealth constitution adopted United States monetary standards on 5 January 1839, while reserving local currency-valuation authority.S604
C1237supportedBy the 1843 official compilation, Commonwealth law reckoned debts, judicial thresholds, taxes, currency redemption and militia pay in dollars and cents. The Uniform Currency Act recognized earlier Commonwealth bills issued after 21 January 1840.S604
C1238supportedThe 1847 constitution continued compatible Commonwealth laws into the Republic until repeal.S605
C1239supported inferenceThe Commonwealth dollar reckoning and the Republic’s continuing dollar account unit can be represented as an earlier qualified phase of FTM000114, rather than separate nodes for independence, notes or coins. This is an adjudicated continuity inference, not a proved uninterrupted chain of every intervening enactment.S604, S605, S541, S607, S609
C1240supportedThe 1917 BBWA agreement maintained government debit and repayment obligations in dollars despite British banking and currency circulation; the agreement alone does not identify the dollar denomination more narrowly.S608
C1241supportedThe Liberian dollar was identified as the country’s monetary unit in 1933, before the 1935 gold-content act.S541
C1242supportedThe 1935 gold-content act amended an existing Revised Statutes provision and should be treated as a standard reform of an existing dollar unit.S606
C1243supportedKemmerer’s 1939 report explicitly distinguishes Liberian-dollar government accounts from sterling wages and prices and US-dollar debt.S607
C1244supported inferenceSterling and West African pound circulation did not extinguish the official Liberian-dollar account unit; the 1942–43 circulating-medium replacement is therefore insufficient to make the West African pound the predecessor of LRD.S541, S607, S609
C1245qualifiedThe 1839 Commonwealth constitution adopted United States monetary standards; local dollar obligations and currency redemption are documented by 1843. This supports an earlier optional founding-unit reference, while a distinct USD-to-Liberian account transition remains unestablished.S604, S605

Sources

  1. S577 · Introduction of Paper Currency (summary translations of 1945 orders)

    Mahesh C. Regmi, Regmi Research Series16; translated government orders · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  2. S576 · Currency System in Nineteenth-Century Nepal

    Mahesh C. Regmi, Regmi Research Series14 · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  3. S601 · Metin Coşgel, Ellen Nye and Emre Özer, Currency transition: the use of foreign coins and dollarization in seventeenth-century Ottoman Istanbul

    Metin Coşgel · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  4. S599 · Ömerül Faruk Bölükbaşı, Darbhâne-i Âmire Para Basımından Nasıl Gelir Elde Ediyordu?

    Ömerül Faruk Bölükbaşı · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  5. S557 · Şevket Pamuk, A Monetary History of the Ottoman Empire, Cambridge2000

    Şevket Pamuk · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  6. S602 · Elena Arcuș-Jantovan,Dutch Coins in the Principality of Moldova1711–1859

    Elena Arcuș-Jantovan · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  7. S603 · Dragoş Ungureanu,Coins Used on the Wallachian Monetary Market during the First Half of the18thCentury

    Dragoş Ungureanu · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  8. S553 · Mugur Isărescu, 140 de ani de la instituirea sistemului monetar național modern, BNR25April2007; university-hosted copy

    Mugur Isărescu · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  9. S554 · Georgeta Ghionea, Istoria băncilor urbane din Oltenia (1880–1948)

    Georgeta Ghionea · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  10. S611 · Report on Saudi monetary regulations, 29 March 1936

    British Minister at Jedda · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  11. S612 · Saudi currency instructions effective 23 March 1936

    Saudi Ministry of Finance; translated diplomatic enclosure · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  12. S592 · Recueil général des lois et actes du gouvernement d’Haïti, tome I,1804–1808

    Haitian legislative acts, edited by S. Linstant Pradine · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  13. S593 · Recueil général des lois et actes du gouvernement d’Haïti, tome II,1809–1817 (Paris,A.Durand,1860)

    Haitian legislative acts, edited by Linstant Pradine · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  14. S594 · Memoria y balance general1896–1917, chapterXIII: La moneda metálica nacional y el Banco de la República

    Banco de la República Oriental del Uruguay,1918 · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  15. S595 · La moneda circulante en el Río de la Plata y el surgimiento de un mercado financiero,1813–1850: de horizonte homogéneo a volatilidad estructural

    Julio Djenderedjian and Juan Luis Martirén, América Latina en la Historia Económica32(1),2025; DOI10.18232/20073496.1488 · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  16. S596 · Ley24,26January1831, effective15April1831

    República Oriental del Uruguay, reproduced FundaciónMonROU · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  17. S590 · A New Historical Relation of the Kingdom of Siam

    Simon de La Loubère; translated A.P.; London, 1693; EEBO Text Creation Partnership transcription · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  18. S600 · Hüseyin Al and Mehmet Çetin,18.Yüzyılda İzmir ve Çevresinde Para Tedavülü, Sorunlar ve Çözüm Arayışları

    Hüseyin Al and Mehmet Çetin · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  19. S598 · Decreto11July1829 (promulgated13July), regulating public receipts and payments

    República Oriental del Uruguay, reproduced FundaciónMonROU · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  20. S604 · Constitution and Laws of the Commonwealth of Liberia, Part First

    Commonwealth of Liberia; printed by Hilary Teage · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  21. S605 · Constitution of the Republic of Liberia, 1847

    Republic of Liberia · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  22. S541 · Monetary Use of Silver in 1933

    United States Department of Commerce · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  23. S607 · Plan for Monetary Reform, Republic of Liberia

    Edwin Walter Kemmerer; transmitted by US Department of State to Treasury · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  24. S591 · Kicking the Vietnam Syndrome in Cambodia

    Michael Vickery · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  25. S613 · Monetary Causes of the Financial Crisis and Bankruptcy of Egypt, 1875–8, in Nelly Hanna (ed.), Money, Land and Trade (2002)

    Ghislaine Alleaume · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  26. S597 · Ley208,20June1839

    República Oriental del Uruguay, reproduced FundaciónMonROU · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  27. S609 · The Rise and Fall of Sterling in Liberia, 1870–1943

    Leigh A. Gardner · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  28. S608 · Memorandum of Agreement between the Government of Liberia and the Bank of British West Africa

    Republic of Liberia and Bank of British West Africa; enclosed by Minister James L. Curtis · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.

  29. S606 · An Act Fixing the Gold Content of the Liberian Dollar

    Legislature of the Republic of Liberia · Claim-specific scope in the evidence register.