Iran: inherited accounts and an adopted Indian basis
The Persian toman–dinar profile now includes a qualified association with Ilkhanid fiscal accounting in 1335 and a regional kepaki-toman payment in 1506. Firm descriptions of toman accounting in 1626 and 1637 precede the previously recorded 1651–1652 witness. Scholarship explicitly describes inherited money of account through the intervening dynasties; regional differences remain visible.
In 1740 Nader Shah deliberately aligned Iranian rupee/naderi reckoning with Indian rupees: one Iranian silver toman was set equal to 20 silver rupees. This is recorded as a qualified unit-adoption step-parent. It preserves Iranian ancestry and does not assert an enduring market peg. Inspect the decree reports, implementation and limits →
India: the rupee reaches Mughal accounts
A new Mughal rupee–dam account profile is grounded in the Ain-i-Akbari’s salaries, duties and accounting rules. It distinguishes the fixed salary reckoning of 40 dams per rupee from market exchange rates. The textual witness is dated conservatively to the 1590s. Sher Khan’s earlier rupee is profile context; minting and dynastic changes do not create extra nodes.
The Mughal profile connects to Calcutta sicca through qualified Bengal and Nawabi regional stages. This extends the existing path onward to the Indian rupee and its descendants while preserving the separate Patna and current-rupee account questions.
China: peso-derived yuan, distinct taels and Qin evidence
Von Glahn explicitly identifies the yuan as a money of account derived from the Spanish peso. A qualified ancestry link now records that inheritance through regional dollar systems and later national consolidation. The existing yuan profile extends to a firm 1910 account witness; it does not absorb every eighteenth-century local dollar standard.
The Shanghai tael now has an 1857 account observation and the Haikwan customs tael an 1880 contemporary witness. These remain distinct profiles. A new Qin cash (qian) fiscal account is grounded in an excavated ordinance concerning cash obligations and loans, dated approximately to 221 BCE or shortly afterward. Its connection through Han and Sui to Tang accounting remains open.
Chinese coin models and imported coins do not yet establish Tang-account ancestry for Japanese mon. The reviewed source also distinguishes Edo gold, silver and copper accounts, so ryō, mon and silver monme remain separate. Korea’s earlier silver won/nyang and the 1905 yen-based reform need a coherent identity review before another ancestry edge is added. The four retained Korean profiles now appear in East Asian navigation; that move does not change their ancestry.
Bengal and Company sicca accounting inherited the Mughal rupee system through regional Nawabi arrangements. Admit compressed regional ancestry, retaining distinctions among sicca, current and Patna accounts. The immediate stages and differentiation dates remain qualified.
Chinese yuan money of account developed from Spanish-peso reckoning through regional dollar traditions, later Mexican-dollar predominance and national consolidation. Admit compressed inherited ancestry, not uniform eighteenth-century national currency or a perpetual peso peg.
Nader Shah’s implemented 1740 reform deliberately aligned Iranian rupee/naderi reckoning with Indian rupees and set one silver toman equal to 20 silver rupees. Record a qualified unit-adoption event, preserving Iranian ancestry; no continuing market peg is inferred.
SP-V35-001 · Unit-adoption event; excluded from ancestry and depth.
Effect on ancestry depth
21 inherited endpoint codes gain earlier witnesses. The step-parent contributes none of that depth. No Qin-to-modern, daric-to-rial or kahapana-to-rupee chain is asserted.
Tang → Japanese mon needs account transmission evidence beyond copied or imported coins.
Earlier Korean silver accounts and the 1905 Japanese adoption need one coherent identity adjudication.
Claims and inspection limits
C1997 · qualified
Extend Persian toman/dinar accounting into its inherited Ilkhanid and post-Ilkhanid tradition. Scholarship explicitly identifies inherited money of account. Earlier regional dinars and tomans retain qualified identity associations; no universal common value across regions is asserted.
The Monetary History of Iran: From the Safavids to the Qajars (2013) pp. 20–22 (notes 50–55), 159–160 (notes 77–80); Safavid standards; Rumlu payment in 1506; western/Khorasan distinctions — Scholarly book OCR mirror; cited VOC/EIC orders and travel accounts inspected as reproduced, not archival originals.
Coins and Coinage, Encyclopaedia Iranica VI/1 (1992) pp. 20–22 (notes 50–55), 159–160 (notes 77–80); Safavid standards; Rumlu payment in 1506; western/Khorasan distinctions — Relevant substantive scholarly passages inspected; underlying documents not independently collated.
C1998 · qualified
Mustawfi’s revenues for 1335 are reported in currency dinars, including 2,871,200 for Fars and 325,000 for Khuzistan. The fiscal witness is explicit; association with the later Persian account lineage is qualified.
The Monetary History of Iran: From the Safavids to the Qajars (2013) p. 54 note 1; reported 1335 revenues; pp. 20–22 (notes 50–55), 159–160 (notes 77–80) — Scholarly book OCR mirror; cited VOC/EIC orders and travel accounts inspected as reproduced, not archival originals.
C1999 · qualified
Rumlu reports a payment of 300 kepaki tomans in 1506. Preserve the regional name and qualify its association with the later consolidated Persian profile.
Coins and Coinage, Encyclopaedia Iranica VI/1 (1992) Safavid standards; Rumlu payment in 1506; western/Khorasan distinctions — Relevant substantive scholarly passages inspected; underlying documents not independently collated.
C2000 · supported
Barker’s 1626 account describes reckoning in tomans and decimal amounts rather than naming the coins used in payment.
The Mughal rupee–dam account system relates rupee salary payments to 40 dams, despite variable market rates, and divides the dam into 25 imaginary jitals for accounting. Treat these as denominations within one scoped account system, not separate coin currencies.
Ain-i-Akbari, volume I, Book I Ain 10, Silver Coins and Copper Coins, pp. 31–32; salary and accountants’ reckoning; Chapter 5, pp. 99–111; imperial, Nawabi and Company account arrangements — English transcription inspected; site header attribution inconsistent with translation/pagination, so no Persian manuscript verification claimed.
The Ain-i-Akbari sets the rupee’s salary rating at 40 dams and identifies Sher Khan’s rupee as the antecedent of Akbar’s issue. The 1590s date bounds this textual witness, not the currency’s origin.
Ain-i-Akbari, volume I, Book I Ain 10, Silver Coins and Copper Coins, pp. 31–32; salary and accountants’ reckoning; Completion in the 42nd regnal year, additions in the 43rd; use bounded 1590s witness — English transcription inspected; site header attribution inconsistent with translation/pagination, so no Persian manuscript verification claimed.
Ain-i-Akbari, introductory material Ain 10, Silver Coins and Copper Coins, pp. 31–32; salary and accountants’ reckoning; Completion in the 42nd regnal year, additions in the 43rd; use bounded 1590s witness — Translator biography inspected by research reviewer; approximate composition decade used to avoid misleading CE gloss.
C2004 · supported
The Ain-i-Akbari gives rupee-denominated horse duties and trooper salary schedules, and describes salary accounts in dams settled partly in rupees (Book I Ain 79; Book II Ains 5 and 14).
Ain-i-Akbari, volume I, later Book I and Book II Book I Ain 79 p. 215; Book II Ain 5 p. 250 and Ain 14 pp. 264–265; Completion in the 42nd regnal year, additions in the 43rd; use bounded 1590s witness — English transcription of account and salary passages inspected; no manuscript collation.
Ain-i-Akbari, introductory material Book I Ain 79 p. 215; Book II Ain 5 p. 250 and Ain 14 pp. 264–265; Completion in the 42nd regnal year, additions in the 43rd; use bounded 1590s witness — Translator biography inspected by research reviewer; approximate composition decade used to avoid misleading CE gloss.
C2005 · supported
Extend the retained yuan profile through late-Qing and Republic of China mainland accounting. Earlier regional dollar traditions supply ancestral evidence; they are not all treated as one eighteenth-century national unit.
Secular Trends of Rice Prices in the Yangzi Delta, 1644–1935 Printed pp. 339–340; especially p. 340, silver yuan 1910–1935; Abstract and sections 5–6; dollar accounts and Shanghai tael — Scanned PDF first two pages visually inspected, especially printed p. 340.
Wang identifies the silver yuan as China’s official monetary unit during 1910–1935, discussing the 1910, 1914 and 1933 standards within that account history.
Chinese and Western merchants adopted Shanghai’s abstract tael money of account in 1857. This reported adoption is not a universal origin date for all Shanghai silver references.
Seward’s 29 April 1880 memorandum describes actual customs collections using Haikwan taels and tabulates their local relation to Kuping taels. Officials did not explain the Haikwan standard’s origin.
A Qin ordinance orders counties to discharge cash obligations and permits borrowing imperial cash repayable in the amount lent. Tong dates it probably to 221 BCE or shortly afterward. Admit a scoped Qin cash account, with approximate dating and no automatic Tang successor.
Bengal and Company sicca accounting inherited the Mughal rupee system through regional Nawabi arrangements. Admit compressed regional ancestry, retaining distinctions among sicca, current and Patna accounts. The immediate stages and differentiation dates remain qualified.
Ain-i-Akbari, volume I, Book I Chapter 5, pp. 99–111; imperial, Nawabi and Company account arrangements; Ain 10, Silver Coins and Copper Coins, pp. 31–32; salary and accountants’ reckoning — English transcription inspected; site header attribution inconsistent with translation/pagination, so no Persian manuscript verification claimed.
C2011 · qualified
Chinese yuan money of account developed from Spanish-peso reckoning through regional dollar traditions, later Mexican-dollar predominance and national consolidation. Admit compressed inherited ancestry, not uniform eighteenth-century national currency or a perpetual peso peg.
Secular Trends of Rice Prices in the Yangzi Delta, 1644–1935 Abstract and sections 5–6; dollar accounts and Shanghai tael; Printed pp. 339–340; especially p. 340, silver yuan 1910–1935 — Scanned PDF first two pages visually inspected, especially printed p. 340.
C2012 · qualified
Nader Shah’s implemented 1740 reform deliberately aligned Iranian rupee/naderi reckoning with Indian rupees and set one silver toman equal to 20 silver rupees. Record a qualified unit-adoption event, preserving Iranian ancestry; no continuing market peg is inferred.
The reviewed account continuity does not close the gap to Sasanian or Achaemenid money. A shared dinar name or coin-weight imitation does not establish those ancestry links.
Coins and Coinage, Encyclopaedia Iranica VI/1 (1992) Safavid standards; Rumlu payment in 1506; western/Khorasan distinctions; pp. 20–22 (notes 50–55), 159–160 (notes 77–80) — Relevant substantive scholarly passages inspected; underlying documents not independently collated.
The Monetary History of Iran: From the Safavids to the Qajars (2013) Safavid standards; Rumlu payment in 1506; western/Khorasan distinctions; pp. 20–22 (notes 50–55), 159–160 (notes 77–80) — Scholarly book OCR mirror; cited VOC/EIC orders and travel accounts inspected as reproduced, not archival originals.
C2014 · qualified
Delhi tanka to Suri rupee remains a promising account-continuity question. Ancient kahapana and the separate Afghan, Nepalese, Hyderabad and Patna regional lines require their own evidence; they are not assigned a Mughal parent by name alone.
Ain-i-Akbari, volume I, Book I Ain 10, Silver Coins and Copper Coins, pp. 31–32; salary and accountants’ reckoning; Chapter 5, pp. 99–111; imperial, Nawabi and Company account arrangements — English transcription inspected; site header attribution inconsistent with translation/pagination, so no Persian manuscript verification claimed.
The museum distinguishes Chinese coin models, medieval one-coin/one-mon reckoning, and independent Edo gold, silver and copper values. This does not by itself establish Tang-account to Japanese-mon ancestry or merge mon, ryō and silver monme.
Historical events and currencies in use Ancient/medieval sections and independent Edo gold, silver and copper accounts — Central-bank museum retrospective, including limits of its coin-model statements.
C2016 · qualified
Qin cash obligations establish an earlier Chinese account witness. The reviewed ordinance does not establish the intervening account continuity through Han and Sui to the Tang profile.
Korean silver won/nyang accounts predate the 1905 yen-based reform. The relation between earlier local continuity, the adopted Japanese basis and the retained Korean profile needs a separate identity adjudication; this pass does not create an extra currency merely for rescaling.
Currency reorganization of 1905, Our History Net January edicts, June implementation and July redemption; note 129; 1894 salary schedule and 1896 budget; coexistence of silver won, nyang and later gold hwan — Korean scholarly institutional text inspected; original edicts not independently collated.
Won (원) January edicts, June implementation and July redemption; note 129; 1894 salary schedule and 1896 budget; coexistence of silver won, nyang and later gold hwan — Korean encyclopedia article inspected; its cited salary schedule and budget not independently collated.
All earlier evidence, identifiers, aliases and archives remain available. Data, chronology, kinship, layout and interaction checks accompany the release. Static render inspection and DOM-stub tests are not browser QA. This is a bounded research pass, not a claim to have completed these regional histories.