{
  "version": "reconciled-tree-44",
  "scope": "All 16 v31 context relationships reviewed; selected operational anchors added. No exhaustive worldwide peg audit.",
  "context_reviews": [
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0399",
      "decision": "admitted",
      "reason": "Reclassified with preserved ID; new claim and independent source review establish deliberate unit adoption.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1588"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0404",
      "decision": "held",
      "reason": "Sterling coin circulation and earlier ratings do not establish the operational sterling anchor for the scoped Belize unit. Inspect the later Belize peg legislation separately.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1592"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0411",
      "decision": "admitted",
      "reason": "Reclassified with preserved ID; new claim and independent source review establish deliberate unit adoption.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1603"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0413",
      "decision": "held",
      "reason": "The 1904 US-gold legal-tender equivalence is preserved. Inspect the operative account definition and implementation before treating it as adopted-unit reference or sustained anchor.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1604"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0416",
      "decision": "held",
      "reason": "Local peso conversion is established; retained evidence does not yet specify enough about deliberate USD-unit adoption or operational parity to assign a step-parent.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1605"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0414",
      "decision": "held",
      "reason": "1903 gold-peso definition and US-gold tender rule are promising; commencement depended on coin supply. Resolve implementation before admitting a dated step-parent.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1613"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R-V23-015",
      "decision": "excluded",
      "reason": "Restoring a currency name does not adopt an external unit or exchange anchor.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1614"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0267",
      "decision": "held",
      "reason": "The named reference is the Ostmark, while the current endpoint is a broader German mark profile. Resolve the reference-unit mapping and implemented account definition.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1648"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0239",
      "decision": "held",
      "reason": "French silver standard adoption alone does not establish adoption of the principal account unit under the new test. Inspect the Swiss enactment and account conversion.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1652"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0240",
      "decision": "held",
      "reason": "Retained evidence concerns the French decimal silver standard. Inspect operative account-unit clauses rather than promoting metal or subdivision alignment.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1653"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0306",
      "decision": "held",
      "reason": "One-sixth Spanish-dollar valuation alone is insufficient to distinguish a designed account-unit adoption from an equivalence quotation.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1654"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0375",
      "decision": "held",
      "reason": "Local silver issues and circulating imported dollars do not identify the precise unit-adoption event. Later HK anchors are independently admitted.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1655"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "R0401",
      "decision": "held",
      "reason": "The early 1825–1850 coin-rating record remains contextual. The separately evidenced 1965–1976 anchor episode does not retroactively validate this earlier interval.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1656"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "CTX-V29-014",
      "decision": "excluded",
      "reason": "Transmission of shilling subdivisions does not adopt the principal monetary unit or establish an exchange anchor.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1850"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "CTX-V31-015",
      "decision": "excluded",
      "reason": "Imported libra reckoning adds a scale; the Frankish node is a tradition rather than an identified contemporary reference currency.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1945"
      ]
    },
    {
      "relationship_id": "CTX-V31-016",
      "decision": "excluded",
      "reason": "A surviving rent with a peseta equivalent is an individual contractual valuation, not a general monetary adoption.",
      "prior_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C1946"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "admitted_relationship_ids": [
    "R0399",
    "R0411",
    "SP-V32-001",
    "SP-V32-002",
    "SP-V32-003",
    "SP-V32-004",
    "SP-V32-005",
    "SP-V32-006",
    "SP-V32-007",
    "SP-V32-008",
    "SP-V32-009",
    "SP-V35-001"
  ],
  "remaining_claim_queue": [
    {
      "claim_id": "C202",
      "assertion": "Bundesbank records NAD–rand parity and continuing rand legal tender in Namibia.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C314",
      "assertion": "Newfoundland aligned its dollar with Canada’s in 1895; parity is not proof that its local coinage ended.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C400",
      "assertion": "The WACB pound exchanged at sterling parity, with commissions; parity did not imply costless remittance.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C461",
      "assertion": "Section 21(4) preserves former British Caribbean Currency Board tender until 1 January 1966 or an earlier date specified by Gazette notice.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C498",
      "assertion": "The pula launched on 23 August 1976, replacing the South African rand. The issuer reports an initial 100-day rand-for-pula exchange period with parity guaranteed.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C500",
      "assertion": "The UAE Currency Board first issued UAE currency on 19 May 1973. The issuer explicitly excepts the 1,000-dirham note, which entered circulation in January 1976.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C530",
      "assertion": "The currency board began its new issue on 1 May 1972. Jamaican currency returned through banks was exchanged for an equivalent Cayman amount; Jamaican notes and coins remained legal tender through 31 August 1972.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C594",
      "assertion": "The government history dates the transfer of currency issuance from the Burma Currency Board to the Union Bank's currency department to 1 July 1952.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C600",
      "assertion": "The consolidated Currency Ordinance identifies the Saint Helena pound divided into 100 pence and sterling parity; the underlying ordinance dates to 1975.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C605",
      "assertion": "Articles 14 and 16 authorise local government currency notes, payable on demand in current coin and legal tender with a Currency Board-office exception.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C610",
      "assertion": "The report dates transfer of the local Currency Board’s powers, duties and liabilities to the East African Currency Board to 31 July 1920.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C626",
      "assertion": "Bundesbank’s table dates the Zambian pound to 16 November 1964 at parity with a unit it labels Rhodesian pound; precise federal predecessor mapping remains unresolved.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C630",
      "assertion": "Krus and Schuler date the Southern Rhodesia Currency Board’s establishment to 3 January 1939 and its currency fund to 1 April; these are institutional milestones.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C632",
      "assertion": "They describe Central Africa Currency Board succession on 12 March 1954 and Bank of Rhodesia and Nyasaland succession on 1 April 1956; these do not independently prove new units.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C635",
      "assertion": "Section 66 preserves the federal pound’s sterling parity until demonetisation; it does not prescribe a national successor’s cash-exchange rate.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C743",
      "assertion": "The decree establishes the CFA grouping and its metropolitan-franc parity. Signed 25 December; effective 26 December. It groups existing territorial francs, not a single universal cash exchange.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C745",
      "assertion": "Initial CFA/metropolitan parity.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C746",
      "assertion": "Initial Pacific/metropolitan parity.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C747",
      "assertion": "Early CFP dollar parity. Exchange anchor, not US-dollar ancestry.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C748",
      "assertion": "The CFA parity becomes two old French francs.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C749",
      "assertion": "France’s new unit restates the CFA parity. The CFA unit itself is not divided by 100.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C773",
      "assertion": "Signed cooperation agreement defines the Comorian parity. Date of signature; not asserted as the legal effective date.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C774",
      "assertion": "Comoros adopts its distinct devalued parity. Not the CFA rate of 100 per French franc.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C787",
      "assertion": "Luxembourg–Belgium parity is formalized.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C789",
      "assertion": "Equal Luxembourg–Belgium parity is restored.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C818",
      "assertion": "The Estonian mark was initially defined at parity with the ostmark. Initial standard, not proof of exclusive replacement of every circulating currency.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C855",
      "assertion": "Czech and Slovak monetary areas were reunified into the Czechoslovak koruna at 1:1. Parity of monetary units; unrestricted conversion of all cash or deposits is not implied.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C868",
      "assertion": "The Saorstat pound established a national currency at sterling parity under the 1927 Act, followed by the 1928 issue. National monetary separation with continuing sterling circulation; not a revival conversion from the pre-1826 Irish unit.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C883",
      "assertion": "Goldmark was a gold-value accounting unit, distinct from circulating marks. Date anchors divergence from gold parity, not the birth of this accounting convention.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C941",
      "assertion": "The Tongan pound moved to 1.25 per sterling pound, matching the Australian pound. A parity change, not Australian-pound ancestry.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C947",
      "assertion": "The South African pound retained the British pound coin system while national notes succeeded commercial-bank issues. 1922 anchors a documented national stage, not a claimed first origin date; derivation rests on the inherited unit, not parity alone.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C967",
      "assertion": "India introduced a separate rupee-note currency for Gulf circulation. The original domestic notes were displaced through a regional changeover; no modern peg is being promoted into ancestry.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C985",
      "assertion": "The Bahamas Currency Board issued local pounds against sterling at par. An issue-system derivation; the later dollar peg is a different relationship.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C990",
      "assertion": "Mauritius combined local currency-board notes with the Indian rupee as its prescribed monetary unit. The history supports unit descent; precise changeover terms and early local-note denominations remain expandable.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C991",
      "assertion": "Ugandan shilling issues succeeded the East African Currency Board currency. The national-note history and separate coin timeline differ in milestone dates; retain the 1966–1967 interval. The 1987 confiscatory reform remains a continuity event requiring fuller scope.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C995",
      "assertion": "The new Panamanian gold peso, named balboa, used the contemporary US dollar weight and fineness at parity. A founding unit-standard relationship. The Colombian circulation it displaced remains a separate input.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1051",
      "assertion": "Mitthof locates explicit parity evidence in the Flavian period; these receipts cannot alone prove Augustan parity or unit ancestry.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1115",
      "assertion": "The Iraqi currency-board system succeeded Indian-rupee circulation, which the Central Bank dates through 1932.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1156",
      "assertion": "Burma’s separate currency developed from Indian-rupee circulation through the 1937 issues, postwar currency board and 1952 central-bank succession. The compressed regional link to the continuing rupee/kyat profile is qualified; wartime occupation currency remains a separate unresolved input.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1169",
      "assertion": "Macao adopted the local practice of accounting for a Mexican silver dollar as one pataca into its territorial currency. The 1894–1906 association is qualified; neither the first note issue nor the later Hong Kong-dollar peg establishes a currency birth.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1170",
      "assertion": "Liberia’s 1935 dollar definition matched the US dollar gold content; later law provided parity and interchangeability. This is an optional founding-standard reference, not demonstrated account-unit succession.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1246",
      "assertion": "The autonomous Surinamese guilder branched from the Dutch monetary system used locally since 1827. Official history identifies monetary autonomy, corroborated by later separate exchange values; not an ancestry claim from the US-dollar peg.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1250",
      "assertion": "The 1913 law expressly imports metropolitan account rules and requires equivalence of existing obligations; represent a qualified Portuguese-system regional branch into Mozambique, with unresolved earlier territorial differentiation. This is account adoption, not inferred solely from a peg. 1911–1914 is a legal-adoption window, not first circulation. Do not treat the Chartered Company territory as covered by every later state-administered monetary reform.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1259",
      "assertion": "Egyptian pound as actually used in Sudan replaced at parity by first Sudanese pound. Original1964 study supports local currency settlement and account-series continuity; exact1956Act uninspected. Original article passages retrieved from index, not complete download. Date1957 versus1956note dating must be kept separate. ",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1300",
      "assertion": "Contemporary1964research records the Sudanese pound replacing local Egyptian-pound use at parity in1957. The earlier Sudanese pound is a scoped account identity; a1956note imprint is not a proved account commencement date.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1347",
      "assertion": "1 Egyptian pound = 1 first Sudanese pound. Egyptian pound as actually used in Sudan replaced at parity by first Sudanese pound. Original1964 study supports local currency settlement and account-series continuity; exact1956Act uninspected.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1504",
      "assertion": "Currency Ordinance defines local pound and independently denominates local contracts/liabilities despite sterling parity.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1516",
      "assertion": "The British West Indian dollar already existed as a principal unit before the regional currency-board reforms; the1946conference proposed retaining it as chief unit.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1538",
      "assertion": "The Southern Rhodesia Currency Board was established in 1939 and issued notes from March 1940, with extension to Nyasaland and Northern Rhodesia during 1940. This dates regional monetary administration and instruments, not a fresh account denomination.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1539",
      "assertion": "The Southern Rhodesia board became the Central African Currency Board in 1954; the federal bank succeeded it in 1956 while inherited currency continued. These are institutional stages of the continuity profile.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1549",
      "assertion": "Monetary cooperation contemplated national arrangements while preserving the existing unit and parity.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1552",
      "assertion": "Local monetary unit and local obligations are explicitly denominated independently of sterling. Statutory parity and UK-note co-circulation do not erase this boundary.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1553",
      "assertion": "Statute defines Falkland pound and all local monetary contracts/liabilities in that currency. Distinct unit despite sterling parity;1899 note issue does not prove independent identity then.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1609",
      "assertion": "Burma differentiated its rupee from the Indian rupee system: the1937 arrangement retained INR linkage and RBI management; the1946 currency law established local rupee accounting, and the currency board assumed prior liabilities in1947.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1627",
      "assertion": "Sudan replaced Egyptian currency with its own pound in 1957 at parity; the Currency Board exchanged Egyptian notes from 8 April to 7 July and subsequently coins, assuming the earlier government coin liability.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1640",
      "assertion": "East African-shilling obligations payable in the Somali Republic were converted at parity into Somali shillings in1961,with accounting records required in that unit.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1674",
      "assertion": "The South Arabian dinar replaced East African shillings in1965; the currency-board research traces the replacement and exchange, with outgoing currency retained for a three-month overlap.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1701",
      "assertion": "The Indochinese piastre developed from local Mexican-dollar/piastre reckoning after unsuccessful franc introductions. Conant describes acceptance of the piastre unit and local fractional issues followed by1885piastre coinage; the colonial common currency retained Mexican-dollar parity. This is regional account-unit adoption, not descent inferred only from a metal standard.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1709",
      "assertion": "Israel's 1948 Currency Ordinance substitutes the Israel pound for existing and future Palestine-pound references, and the Bank Notes Ordinance exchanges notes at the same numerical amount. This is a documented regional account succession at parity; it does not imply termination of the Palestine pound in Jordan or Gaza in 1948.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1710",
      "assertion": "The Southern Rhodesian account pound developed as a regional continuation of British sterling reckoning, subsequently administered by the Southern Rhodesia Currency Board, Central African Currency Board and federal bank. Contemporary evidence identifies the inherited British pound account system; local coinage, withdrawal of British coins and board note issue separate the regional currency during 1932–1940. This date range records institutional separation, not a claim that a new unit was created by the first local coin.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1711",
      "assertion": "Equatorial Guinea introduced its own peseta in 1969 after previously forming part of the Spanish monetary area using the Spanish peseta. The national unit was initially at parity with the Spanish peseta and was subsequently renamed ekwele in 1975. The parent is the Spanish peseta; the earlier national name was peseta, not peso.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1718",
      "assertion": "Separate Algerian Treasury balances and interterritorial debt settlement establish local account usage in1878. Equal parity does not justify merger with France.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "C1810",
      "assertion": "Preserve1887defined-unit anchor, attach1886franc budget observation with explicit identity uncertainty. Do not assert a truly de novo monetary origin or Belgian-franc parent solely from parity.",
      "disposition": "not_fully_adjudicated_for_step_parent",
      "reason": "Candidate discovered in retained evidence; requires scope, mechanism, dates and canonical endpoint review."
    }
  ],
  "access_limits": [
    "The ECCB overview and original BMA HTML page failed retrieval; issuer PDF and OECS-hosted ECCB release were read instead.",
    "The 2015 ECCB report was indexed only and not used for an admitted date; the 2012 issuer PDF supplies the reviewed 1965 witness.",
    "No current peg census or automatic continuation to October 2026 is claimed."
  ],
  "revision_35_review": {
    "new_relationship_ids": [
      "SP-V35-001"
    ],
    "report_url": "/revision-35/index.html"
  },
  "revision_36_review": {
    "new_relationship_ids": [],
    "report_url": "/revision-36/index.html"
  },
  "revision_37_review": {
    "new_relationship_ids": [],
    "report_url": "/revision-37/index.html"
  },
  "revision_39_review": {
    "new_relationship_ids": [],
    "report_url": "/revision-39/index.html"
  },
  "revision_41_review": {
    "new_relationship_ids": [],
    "report_url": "/revision-41/index.html"
  },
  "revision_42_review": {
    "new_relationship_ids": [],
    "report_url": "/revision-42/index.html"
  },
  "revision_43_review": {
    "new_relationship_ids": [],
    "report_url": "/revision-43/index.html"
  },
  "revision_44_review": {
    "new_relationship_ids": [],
    "report_url": "/revision-44/index.html"
  }
}
