{ "version": "reconciled-tree-44", "gaps": [ { "id": "GAP-WEST", "route": "Western late-Roman solidus → Frankish reckoning", "status": "open_narrowed", "claim_ids": [ "C1034", "C1046", "C1047", "C1048", "C1056", "C1065", "C1066", "C1067", "C1068", "C1069", "C1070", "C1071" ], "finding": "743–744 supplies a direct twelve-denarius obligation. The 816 exception requires context-specific legal units.", "next_evidence": "Collate Merovingian legal redactions and dated transactions against the later settlement rules; decide whether these are denominations, coexisting units or continuity epochs.", "admitted_ancestry_edge": false, "latest_research_report": "/revision-21/index.html" }, { "id": "GAP-EGYPT", "route": "Hellenistic → Roman accounting, Egypt", "status": "exchange_evidence_not_ancestry", "claim_ids": [ "C1049", "C1050", "C1051", "C1076" ], "finding": "Dated local exchange evidence is available; an exchange rate alone does not give a succession edge.", "next_evidence": "Collate P.Achm.8 and the Edfu receipts, then trace local obligations across the Ptolemaic/Roman and later reforms.", "admitted_ancestry_edge": false, "latest_research_report": "/revision-21/index.html" }, { "id": "GAP-SARDIS", "route": "Persian → Hellenistic accounting at Sardis", "status": "obligation_found_unit_identity_open", "claim_ids": [ "C1052", "C1053", "C1072", "C1073", "C1074", "C1075" ], "finding": "A mortgage gives a local gold-denominated obligation after the conquest; mapping its unit to daric/Macedonian units remains open.", "next_evidence": "Read I.Sardis I 1 in its critical edition and compare pre-conquest temple obligations; distinguish fiscal continuity from unit continuity.", "admitted_ancestry_edge": false, "latest_research_report": "/revision-21/index.html" }, { "id": "GAP-LYDIA", "route": "Electrum → Croeseids → Persian royal issues", "status": "coinage_succession_supported_identity_grouping_open", "claim_ids": [ "C1035", "C1036", "C1037", "C1054", "C1055" ], "finding": "Issue succession is supported; a standard, issuer or design change alone cannot justify separate currency nodes.", "next_evidence": "Test one continuous account-unit profile versus distinct independently reckoned units using obligations, not treasury inventories alone.", "admitted_ancestry_edge": false }, { "id": "GAP-ISLAM", "route": "Modern dinar/dirham branches → medieval Islamic units", "status": "open", "claim_ids": [ "C1042" ], "finding": "Inherited mint use remains contextual evidence. No universal chain from shared modern names.", "next_evidence": "Select an endpoint and trace its local predecessor obligations before extending into medieval units.", "admitted_ancestry_edge": false }, { "id": "GAP21-ENGLAND", "route": "England", "status": "open", "finding": "Qualified ninth-century pound observations integrated; earlier English and Frankish succession remains open.", "claim_ids": [ "C1057", "C1058", "C1059", "C1060", "C1061", "C1062", "C1063", "C1064" ], "admitted_ancestry_edge": false }, { "id": "GAP21-OFFA", "route": "Offa", "status": "open", "finding": "Frankish coin models, approximate weight targets and silver provenance support contact; account-unit ancestry is unresolved.", "claim_ids": [ "C1092", "C1093", "C1094", "C1095" ], "admitted_ancestry_edge": false }, { "id": "GAP21-ANCIENT-UNITS", "route": "Ancient units", "status": "open", "finding": "Babylonian silver obligations, a 60-shekel mina, Greek mina–drachma reckoning and Lefkandi weights are documented separately. The Babylonian-to-Greek lineage remains unresolved.", "claim_ids": [ "C1077", "C1078", "C1079", "C1080", "C1081", "C1082", "C1083", "C1084", "C1085", "C1086", "C1087", "C1088", "C1089", "C1090", "C1091" ], "admitted_ancestry_edge": false }, { "id": "GAP21-RUBLE", "route": "Ruble", "status": "open", "finding": "Thaler standard influence is supported; a new ancestry edge is not. Three proposed PSZ monetary references were rejected after checking.", "claim_ids": [ "C1096", "C1097", "C1098", "C1099", "C1100", "C1101", "C1102" ], "admitted_ancestry_edge": false } ], "revision_25_decisions": [ { "frontier": "GAP-EGYPT", "route": "Greek/Hellenistic → Roman accounting, Egypt", "decision": "partial_resolution_local_absorption; earlier_identity_grouping_open", "claims": [ "ANC25-02", "ANC25-03", "ANC25-04", "ANC25-05", "ANC25-10", "ANC25-11" ], "admit_edge_if_nodes_admitted": true, "missing_record": "A collation of late-Ptolemaic and early-Roman obligations identifying their silver/bronze reckoning; Monson’s Karanis dossier remains uninspected beyond earlier abstracts and indexed excerpts. Also trace denarius/solidus obligations without turning every standard change into a currency." }, { "frontier": "GAP-SARDIS", "route": "Daric → Macedonian/Hellenistic at Sardis", "decision": "retain_open_contested_conversion", "claims": [ "ANC25-12" ], "existing_claims": [ "C1052", "C1053", "C1072", "C1073", "C1074", "C1075" ], "existing_sources": [ "S504", "S505", "S506", "S507" ], "admit_edge": false, "missing_record": "A matched pre-conquest assessment or an explicit local settlement clause establishing which daric obligation the later chrysous amount continues. Descat/Thonemann reconstruction remains substantive but contested; the mortgage alone does not settle denomination identity." }, { "frontier": "GAP-LYDIA", "route": "Electrum → Croeseid → Persian royal issues", "decision": "retain_issue_succession; add_separate_attested_account_unit", "claims": [ "ANC25-07", "ANC25-08", "ANC25-09" ], "existing_sources": [ "S129", "S485" ], "admit_edge": false, "missing_record": "An obligation or account connecting royal electrum values with Croeseid or daric reckoning. The Ephesian record supplies contemporary account evidence but is not a royal Lydian conversion record." }, { "frontier": "GAP21-ANCIENT-UNITS", "route": "Babylonian mina/shekel → Greek mina/drachma", "decision": "retain_metrological_context_not_ancestry", "existing_claims": [ "C1077", "C1078", "C1079", "C1080", "C1082", "C1083", "C1084", "C1085", "C1086", "C1087", "C1088", "C1089", "C1090", "C1091" ], "admit_edge": false, "missing_record": "A localized series of obligations demonstrating transferred unit identity rather than ratios, borrowed names or compatible weights. The Ephesian mina does not by itself furnish this bridge." }, { "bottleneck": "western Roman solidus → Frankish denier/livre", "decision": "Reviewed; remain unresolved; no new main ancestry edge", "reason": "The existing 743/744,755,794,803 and 816 evidence already demonstrates Frankish obligations and later settlement of Salic-law debts. New critical scholarship shows Roman identification of the forty-denarius formula is disputed. Political succession, coin succession and legal reception do not uniquely settle currency identity.", "remaining_gap": "Critical reconciliation of late-Roman siliqua/solidus values with dated Frankish local accounts and the layered Salic text. Do not treat the name solidus as sufficient, or call this impossible.", "source_keys": [ "B25-BOTHE", "B25-DREW", "S483", "S489", "S501", "S503" ] }, { "bottleneck": "Offa / early English → Frankish", "decision": "Reviewed; extend English account evidence to799–801; retain Frankish relation as accounting/coin-model influence", "reason": "Primary original charters now demonstrate account obligations and penny valuations shortly after Offa. They do not identify those obligations as Frankish units. Mint weights and metal provenance remain supporting cultural/monetary context.", "remaining_gap": "Documented adoption or differentiation of a Frankish account unit, beyond shared architecture. Earlier English laws and pounds of silver require regional and weight/account discrimination.", "source_keys": [ "B25-SAWYER1186A", "B25-SAWYER41", "B25-SAWYER149", "B25-SAWYER9", "S140", "S521" ] }, { "bottleneck": "Ottoman akçe → kuruş", "decision": "Recommend qualified same-identity continuity, with1431–1432 fiscal anchor", "reason": "The lower akçe account scale survives within the kuruş/para system, supported beyond a one-off coin exchange ratio. This is consistent with the project's treatment of lira/kuruş and revaluations.", "remaining_gap": "Earlier fiscal attestations and regional exceptions may extend/refine scope. Ilkhanid coin designs and matching standards remain insufficient for an older predecessor.", "source_keys": [ "B25-ARVANID", "B25-SAHILLIOGLU", "S557", "S599", "S600" ] } ], "latest_research_report": "/revision-25/index.html", "revision26_note": "Five additional ancient accounting identities; no newly asserted ancient succession chain or complete modern-to-Lydia path.", "revision27_note": "Revision 27 cleans currency identities and modern ancestry; earlier ancient frontiers remain open. No complete modern-to-Lydia path is asserted.", "revision28_note": "Revision 28 extends dated account evidence and reviews earlier regional continuity; ancient frontiers remain open. No complete modern-to-Lydia path is asserted.", "revision29_note": "Revision 29 extends dated account evidence and reviews earlier regional continuity; ancient frontiers remain open. No complete modern-to-Lydia path is asserted.", "revision30_note": "Revision 30 extends dated account evidence and reviews earlier regional continuity; ancient frontiers remain open. No complete modern-to-Lydia path is asserted.", "revision31_note": "Revision 31 extends dated account evidence and reviews earlier regional continuity; ancient frontiers remain open. No complete modern-to-Lydia path is asserted.", "revision_33_review": { "report_url": "/revision-33/index.html", "audit_file": "roman-audit.json", "note": "Older gap entries are historical findings. R-V25-004 is currently an admitted qualified local absorption, not an unresolved absence of all Egyptian integration.", "rows": [ { "id": "ROM33-EARLIER", "route": "Earlier Roman bronze/as → denarius reckoning", "decision": "Open predecessor boundary", "finding": "An internal bronze-to-silver accounting history is plausible, but retrospective ratios are not a dated transition record.", "next_evidence": "Collate early obligations and the bronze/silver reform chronology; decide whether continuity, rescaling or a distinct successor unit is supported.", "claim_ids": [ "C1973", "C1972" ], "source_ids": [ "S1028", "S1027" ], "new_ancestry_edge": false, "new_adopted_basis_edge": false }, { "id": "ROM33-GREEK", "route": "Greek / South Italian systems → Rome", "decision": "No ancestry or step-parent admitted", "finding": "The inspected sources do not establish deliberate adoption of a named Greek account unit. A Greek-looking coin, shared weight or translated drachma label is insufficient.", "next_evidence": "Find an explicit founding-unit adoption or conversion of obligations; identify the particular Greek account community rather than generic Greek coinage.", "claim_ids": [ "C1972" ], "source_ids": [ "S1027" ], "new_ancestry_edge": false, "new_adopted_basis_edge": false }, { "id": "ROM33-INTERNAL", "route": "Republican → imperial denarius / sestertius accounts", "decision": "Same profile, earlier witnesses added", "finding": "The profile now has Republican literary evidence alongside the retained 57 CE debt and 301 price-ceiling witnesses. These observations do not certify an uninterrupted lifespan.", "next_evidence": "Add contemporary Republican inscriptions or surviving accounts; investigate early boundaries without splitting denominations into currencies.", "claim_ids": [ "C1970", "C1971", "C1976", "C1844", "C1283" ], "source_ids": [ "S1023", "S1024", "S1025", "S1026", "S1027", "S641", "S966", "S642", "S643" ], "new_ancestry_edge": false, "new_adopted_basis_edge": false }, { "id": "ROM33-EGYPT", "route": "Roman-Egyptian drachma/talent → denarius accounts", "decision": "Existing qualified later absorption retained", "relationship_ids": [ "R-V25-004" ], "finding": "This local integration is already represented. Its 296–351 interval is a research envelope, not a founding date or instant extinction of Egyptian accounting. It does not make Egypt Rome's original parent.", "next_evidence": "Trace local obligations across the reforms and distinguish the earlier Ptolemaic/bronze-drachma question from this later integration.", "claim_ids": [ "C1323", "C1325", "C1849" ], "source_ids": [ "S640", "S641" ], "new_ancestry_edge": false, "new_adopted_basis_edge": false }, { "id": "ROM33-GOLD", "route": "Denarius reckoning → solidus / nomisma accounts", "decision": "Transition researched; ancestry edge held", "finding": "The available evidence describes gold's growing role alongside older reckoning, not a demonstrated universal replacement. The existing solidus account profile remains separate.", "next_evidence": "Inspect the primary 352 transaction and dated conversions or succession of account obligations; do not equate a mint reform with unit replacement.", "claim_ids": [ "C1974", "C1327", "C1846" ], "source_ids": [ "S641", "S640", "S968" ], "new_ancestry_edge": false, "new_adopted_basis_edge": false }, { "id": "ROM33-WEST", "route": "Late Roman money → Frankish denier / livre", "decision": "Western bridge remains open", "finding": "Gallic solidus revenues and Merovingian obligations are real leads. Forty-denar legal reckoning cannot be equated automatically with Roman denarii or the later twelve-denier solidus.", "next_evidence": "Collate the monetary clauses by manuscript/redaction and connect dated Gallic transactions to the later Frankish account system.", "claim_ids": [ "C1975", "C1832", "C1833", "C1834" ], "source_ids": [ "S1029", "S951", "S949", "S950", "S947", "S948" ], "new_ancestry_edge": false, "new_adopted_basis_edge": false }, { "id": "ROM33-EAST", "route": "East Roman solidus / nomisma → later Byzantine accounts", "decision": "Regional expansion not yet adjudicated", "finding": "Egyptian solidus/nomisma accounting is already evidenced, but that scoped identity is not automatically a universal Byzantine unit extending through every later coin reform.", "next_evidence": "Inspect dated imperial and regional account texts through later nomisma and hyperpyron usage; test continuity versus local differentiation. A requested Dumbarton Oaks coinage resource returned 403 and supplies no new admitted evidence.", "claim_ids": [ "C1380", "C1381", "C1846" ], "source_ids": [ "S694", "S693", "S640", "S968" ], "new_ancestry_edge": false, "new_adopted_basis_edge": false }, { "id": "ROM33-ARAB", "route": "East Roman accounts → early Arab administration / dinar usage", "decision": "Existing local continuity retained; later dinar branch open", "finding": "Inherited nomisma obligations survive the conquest in the existing Egyptian profile; the Palestinian bilingual dinar/solidus equation remains a qualified regional association. Neither conquest nor a new coin inscription alone creates a child.", "next_evidence": "Connect the local obligations to later explicitly denominated dinar accounts and identify any genuine new unit boundary; do not jump to a modern dinar by name.", "claim_ids": [ "C1838", "C1839", "C1840", "C1841", "C1842", "C1852" ], "source_ids": [ "S957", "S960", "S958", "S959" ], "new_ancestry_edge": false, "new_adopted_basis_edge": false } ] }, "revision_34_review": { "report_url": "/revision-34/index.html", "audit_file": "roman-iberian-audit.json", "supersedes": "Revision 33 held the Western solidus→Frankish link; revision 34 admits it with regional and chronological qualifications.", "holds": [ "Classical Roman denarius accounting → imperial solidus: parallel use and changing dominance still need a scoped account transition.", "Greek or South Italian account unit → Roman: external ancestry unresolved.", "Visigothic → Astur-Leonese/Galician: continuity unresolved.", "León → Portugal: immediate parent unresolved.", "Almoravid → maravedí: candidate unit adoption awaits an account profile." ] }, "revision_35_review": { "report_url": "/revision-35/index.html", "audit_file": "eastern-audit.json", "finding": "Iranian, Mughal and Chinese account traditions extended; ancient Qin admitted as a scoped account witness without an inferred modern path.", "holds": [ "Persian account tradition → Sasanian/Achaemenid predecessors remains open.", "Delhi tanka → Suri/Mughal account continuity needs a focused review.", "Regional Afghan, Nepalese, Hyderabad and Patna identities need individual ancestry evidence.", "Qin → Han/Sui → Tang account continuity remains untraced here.", "Tang → Japanese mon needs account transmission evidence beyond copied or imported coins.", "Earlier Korean silver accounts and the 1905 Japanese adoption need one coherent identity adjudication." ] }, "revision_36_review": { "report_url": "/revision-36/index.html", "audit_file": "drachm-audit.json", "finding": "Drachm descendants admitted with scoped account evidence; modern continuity and extinction remain separate open questions.", "holds": [ "Eastern drahm/dirham → Ilkhanid dinar–toman → Iranian rial: medieval account bridge still unverified.", "Pratihara dramma → Delhi accounts → Suri/Mughal rupee: intervening inheritance still unverified.", "Egyptian drachma → Roman denarius is retained as local integration; later denarius-to-solidus continuity remains open.", "Indo-Greek → Western Satrap → Gupta coin descent must be checked against actual regional account units.", "Modern Greek drachma, Armenian dram and modern dirhams must follow their documented predecessors; shared names alone do not connect them to antiquity.", "No verified modern endpoint is not a finding of extinction; complete endings of these account branches remain unresolved." ] }, "revision_37_review": { "report_url": "/revision-37/index.html", "audit_file": "regional-accounts-audit.json", "finding": "Local regional account witnesses admitted; disconnected branches are not classified as extinct or independently invented.", "holds": [ "Madras pagoda: earlier Indian parentage and the exact boundary between new-pagoda and Star-pagoda reckoning need further work;1818 account conversion and1835 unification are compressed, not one event.", "Bombay xeraphin: inspect Goa identity and later rupee conversion. Cochin panam: adjudicate puttan and rupee transitions before linking.", "Odisha cowries: separate silver tax settlement from account conversion; do not infer a hard peg from an official collection rate.", "Upper Burmese kyat→colonial rupee→modern kyat: intervening account succession remains unresolved.", "Nguyễn quan and Cambodian bat→Indochinese piastre: look for conversion of obligations, not just coin circulation. Earlier Chinese and Thai parentage remains open.", "Java masa, Bali masaka and Bali pisis: legal and epigraphic accounts are established; interregional inheritance and later balance conversions remain open.", "Laguna copperplate: local provenance and wider account identity remain qualified; no inferred route to the modern Philippine peso.", "Buganda shells, coastal cloth and Ujiji beads: document successor accounts and endings separately; no inferred extinction or ancestry from exchange.", "German East African rupee: inspect original Tanganyika conversion law; do not apply Kenya/Uganda clauses to Tanganyika.", "Zanzibar rupee and riyal, Kilwa/Shanga coinages, Lao nen and historical Malagasy ariary remain candidates; identity/account evidence is not yet sufficient for new links.", "This is a bounded regional pass, not a completed historical inventory. Presentation redesign is deferred." ] }, "revision_39_review": { "report_url": "/revision-39/index.html", "audit_file": "roman-bactria-audit.json", "finding": "Roman gold-account reform ancestry admitted as qualified synthesis; earlier holds remain archived. Bactrian and Indus identity limits are explicit.", "holds": [ "Roman gold-account ancestry is a qualified synthesis. Inspect more regional obligation conversions and independent gold-account emergence before asserting an immediate parent, fixed rate or one universal transition date.", "The silver-siliqua name is not sufficient evidence of a hard peg. No new adopted-basis record is created.", "Late denarius, myriad and nummus usage needs document-specific semantic review; the566 witness does not establish an unchanged denomination across six centuries.", "The earlier bronze/as witness remains retrospectively and chronologically qualified. Roman provincial assaria require their own local identification.", "Bactrian drachma observations are qualified associations with the broad Attic tradition; the independent regional identity boundary remains open.", "Asangorna staters require denomination and identity adjudication before creating or merging a currency profile.", "Aï Khanoum’s Indian treasury categories do not establish a complete Taxila account regime or equality with drachmas.", "Gandharan/Persian weight transmission is a candidate, not yet proven account ancestry. Harappan metrology does not by itself connect to historical kārṣāpaṇa.", "Rob’s gold-dinar fines establish a local account. Earlier Kushan gold-account succession and later regional continuation remain to be evidenced." ] }, "current_review": { "revision": 41, "report_url": "/revision-41/index.html", "finding": "English, Valencian and Mallorcan accounts reconnect through qualified Frankish ancestry. Earlier Roman branches retained; missing origins remain research gaps.", "drachm_modern_endpoints": [ "AOA", "AUD", "BMD", "BRL", "BSD", "BWP", "CAD", "CVE", "DJF", "EUR", "FJD", "FKP", "GBP", "GHS", "GIP", "GMD", "GNF", "HKD", "JMD", "KMF", "KYD", "LSL", "MGA", "MRU", "MWK", "MZN", "NAD", "NGN", "NZD", "PGK", "SBD", "SHP", "SLE", "STN", "SZL", "TOP", "UYU", "VUV", "WST", "XAF", "XOF", "XPF", "ZAR", "ZMW" ], "strict_ancestry_unchanged": true }, "revision_41_review": { "report_url": "/revision-41/index.html", "audit_file": "early-europe-audit.json", "finding": "Three qualified European account ancestry links admitted; missing local intermediates and northwestern Iberian origins remain open.", "holds": [ "English transmission: identify the regional intermediate accounts and adoption chronology; do not label Offa's coin reform a documented universal account conversion.", "Galician and Astur-Leonese origins: distinguish surviving Visigothic reckoning, Frankish accounting influence and use of imported silver. The ninth-century identities cannot be assigned an earlier parent from names alone.", "Valencia and Mallorca: older Frankish ancestry is admitted as a synthesis. Immediate relationships among Barcelona, Jaca, Valencia and Mallorca still need account-level transition evidence.", "Portuguese libra: the Frankish ancestry is admitted; an immediate León-to-Portugal branch remains unproved.", "Castilian silver real/peso and maravedí/real de vellón: a coin tariff alone does not merge these account identities or finish the silver-real family's earlier ancestry.", "Almoravid basis of the Castilian maravedí: retain the unit-adoption candidate pending a scoped donor account identity and chronology.", "Pound Scots and the older Irish pound: English models and a wider sterling area require a focused account-identity and differentiation review before admitting a founding branch." ] }, "revision_42_review": { "report_url": "/revision-42/index.html", "audit_file": "regional-accounts-audit.json", "finding": "Scottish accounting placed from dated witnesses, with a qualified sterling branch and no false 1707 account ending.", "holds": [ "Establish the medieval Scottish account witnesses and precise boundary between common sterling reckoning and the distinct pound Scots. The qualified branch does not assert a 1136 account-unit foundation.", "Do not convert the 1707 coinage union into an instantaneous replacement of all Scots-denominated accounts.", "Scots dollar coins and imported rex dollars are coin denominations or circulation evidence, not automatically another account currency." ] }, "revision_43_review": { "report_url": "/revision-43/index.html", "audit_file": "regional-accounts-audit.json", "finding": "All 98 prior map roots reviewed; one documented conversion restored. Other gaps remain explicit research questions.", "holds": [ { "id": "CUR-V19-DARIC", "label": "Achaemenid daric payment unit", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Daric-denominated military pay is established. Persian continuation of Croeseid coin issues does not resolve a Croeseid-account to daric identity boundary; the proposed later Sardian conversion also lacks an exact conquest-date anchor.", "claim_ids": [ "C1037", "C1038", "C1055", "C1333" ], "source_ids": [ "S129", "S485", "S646" ] }, { "id": "FTM000296", "label": "Afghan rupee — Kabuli account unit", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Kabuli-rupee reckoning is established as the predecessor replaced by the afghani in 1925–1926. A Mughal-to-Kabuli regional account inheritance is still missing; the rupee name and old standard-match candidate do not supply it.", "claim_ids": [ "C1136", "C2014" ], "source_ids": [ "S1041", "S324", "S539", "S913" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-ALBANIAN-FRANG", "disposition": "earlier_history_same_identity", "finding": "Existing gold-franc reckoning precedes national bank issuance; no issuer-based new identity or demonstrated founding parent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1768", "C1769", "C1770", "C1809" ], "source_ids": [ "S918", "S919", "S920" ], "label": "Albanian gold franc / frang" }, { "id": "FTM000276", "disposition": "qualified_candidate_unresolved", "finding": "French fiscal use precedes Algerian accounts distinguished by 1878; separation enactment and date unresolved; unreviewed LEG00281.", "claim_ids": [ "C1811", "C1774" ], "source_ids": [ "S856", "S857" ], "label": "Algerian franc" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-ASANTE-PEREDWAN", "label": "Asante gold-account reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Peredwan and its fractions denominate fines and distributions. Metrological relationships to other gold standards do not establish an inherited parent, and full lifecycle termination remains unresolved.", "claim_ids": [ "C1356", "C1726" ], "source_ids": [ "S671" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V31-LEONESE-SILVER-SOLIDUS", "label": "Astur-Leonese and Castilian solidus–dinero accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Local charter solidus/dinero obligations are documented and retained within one account profile. Frankish denarii as their source is explicitly hypothetical; Visigothic-to-northwestern-Iberian continuity and the León-to-Portugal boundary remain unresolved.", "claim_ids": [ "C1891", "C1892", "C1983", "C1995", "C2095" ], "source_ids": [ "S1033", "S993" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-ATHENIAN-DRACHMA", "label": "Attic drachma accounting — Athenian, Alexandrine and Bactrian traditions", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Attic treasury and property obligations establish the account, with qualified Alexandrine/Bactrian regional continuations grouped inside it. Neither those witnesses nor separate kasapana records demonstrate an earlier Lydian or Persian account parent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1377", "C1378", "C2018", "C2088", "C2089" ], "source_ids": [ "S1051", "S1067", "S1093", "S1094", "S1095", "S689", "S690" ] }, { "id": "FTM000321", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Convention and Austrian-standard changes retained within identity; outgoing krone conversion documented; LEG00327 unreviewed.", "claim_ids": [ "C1786", "C1787", "C844" ], "source_ids": [ "S937", "S426" ], "label": "Austrian gulden — pre-1892 unit" }, { "id": "CUR-V37-BALI-PISIS", "label": "Balinese cash / pisis accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Balinese cash/pisis legal reckoning is recorded as cash displaced older measures. The inspected wording does not establish carry-over of masaka balances or a precise conversion, so the earlier account remains a candidate rather than parent.", "claim_ids": [ "C2060", "C2061" ], "source_ids": [ "S1078", "S1079" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V37-BALI-MASAKA", "label": "Balinese masaka accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Sukawana and Sembiran inheritance provisions value heterogeneous estates in masaka/ma. Shared scales and later legal wording do not establish a preceding Javanese parent or continuous conversion into pisis.", "claim_ids": [ "C2058", "C2059", "C2061" ], "source_ids": [ "S1078", "S1079" ] }, { "id": "FTM000246", "disposition": "standard_only", "finding": "French decimal silver-franc standard adoption deliberately withheld from principal-account succession; policy review possible, not rendering omission.", "claim_ids": [ "C782", "C1653" ], "source_ids": [ "S398" ], "label": "Belgian franc" }, { "id": "FTM000063", "label": "Boliviano", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The 1826 salary-peso observation is documented, but its identity with the 1863 boliviano across strong/feble peso practices remains unresolved. The old eight-soles candidate is not a supported incoming conversion.", "claim_ids": [ "C1340", "C1341", "C1342" ], "source_ids": [ "S660", "S661" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V37-BOMBAY-XERAPHIN", "label": "Bombay xeraphin accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The 1674 Aungier Convention's annual xeraphin contribution establishes Bombay obligations. A Portuguese xerafim predecessor cannot be assumed from the name without an account-identity bridge.", "claim_ids": [ "C2045", "C2046" ], "source_ids": [ "S1072" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V37-BUGANDA-SIMBI", "label": "Buganda simbi / kiasa reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Buganda shell counting establishes local simbi/kiasa obligations. The later cent design's kiasa influence does not prove cowrie-account ancestry of an existing rupee; neither an earlier parent nor full successor conversion is established.", "claim_ids": [ "C2064", "C2065", "C2066", "C2069" ], "source_ids": [ "S1081", "S1082", "S1083" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V37-CAMBODIA-BAT", "label": "Cambodian bat–ligature legal accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Aymonier distinguishes legal bat/ligature/damleng accounts from weights. Ten-tiền subdivision imitation is limited influence; derivation of the whole account from Thai money and later piastre absorption remain unverified.", "claim_ids": [ "C2055", "C2056" ], "source_ids": [ "S1077" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000719", "label": "Cambodian riel", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The 1980 riel restored the currency name and entered salary/purchase accounts after abolition. Carry-over or redemption of pre-1975 balances is not established, so R-V23-015 remains a name-restoration context link rather than ancestry.", "claim_ids": [ "C1175", "C1226", "C1292", "C1614" ], "source_ids": [ "S574", "S591", "S650", "S838", "S839" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CENTRAL-MEXICO-QUACHTLI", "label": "Central Mexican quachtli reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "A 20-quachtli land transaction and Cuernavaca purchase description support the scoped cloth-value account. They do not establish inheritance from cacao or another named regional unit.", "claim_ids": [ "C1361", "C1362" ], "source_ids": [ "S679" ] }, { "id": "FTM000066", "label": "Chilean peso", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The 1851 law defines Chilean peso decimal accounting and later peso-to-escudo succession is documented. The preceding Spanish-peso to Chilean national account boundary is not established by the retained evidence; LEG00056 remains unreviewed.", "claim_ids": [ "C1272", "C1017" ], "source_ids": [ "S624", "S625", "S98" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V37-COCHIN-PANAM", "label": "Cochin panam / fanam accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Paolino records local panam prices during 1776–1789 and exchange against outside rupees. This distinguishes Cochin reckoning but does not establish a rupee parent or inheritance from other fanam-named accounts.", "claim_ids": [ "C2044" ], "source_ids": [ "S1071" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CONGO-MITAKO", "label": "Congo state-regulated mitako reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Mitako prices and reported decrees regulate salary use and conversion to state currency. The original laws are uninspected and do not establish the unit's inherited predecessor or a universal extinction/conversion event.", "claim_ids": [ "C1355", "C1725" ], "source_ids": [ "S670" ] }, { "id": "FTM000248", "disposition": "origin_unresolved", "finding": "Autonomous 1887 Congolese unit; 1886 franc budgeting identity unresolved; Belgian circulation and standard conformity do not establish Belgian ancestry.", "claim_ids": [ "C1462", "C1717", "C1772", "C1810" ], "source_ids": [ "S724", "S855", "S921" ], "label": "Congolese franc, pre-1967" }, { "id": "CUR-V31-CORDOBAN-DINAR-DIRHAM", "label": "Cordoban dinar-dirham accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Cordoban prices, pensions and notarial formulae establish dinar-dirham reckoning. They do not document the incoming account transition from an eastern Islamic unit or outgoing abolition/conversion into later Andalusian systems.", "claim_ids": [ "C1913", "C1914", "C1915", "C1950", "C1956" ], "source_ids": [ "S1007" ] }, { "id": "FTM000072", "label": "Costa Rican peso", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Costa Rican peso obligations are attested by 1839 employee-payment vouchers and its later colón replacement is supported. Earlier Federal and Spanish account succession remains unproved in the retained record.", "claim_ids": [ "C1273", "C1510", "C1594" ], "source_ids": [ "S626" ] }, { "id": "FTM000331", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Outgoing krone conversion documented; LEG00337 incoming standard match unreviewed.", "claim_ids": [ "C1110" ], "source_ids": [ "S251" ], "label": "Danish rigsdaler" }, { "id": "FTM000337", "disposition": "earlier_history_same_identity", "finding": "Qualified Carolusguilder continuity from 1526 retained within identity; no separate 1694 or 1816 currency; earlier LEG00343 unreviewed.", "claim_ids": [ "C1270" ], "source_ids": [ "S620", "S621", "S619" ], "label": "Dutch guilder (euro predecessor)" }, { "id": "T-FTM000480", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Scoped Dutch lion-dollar trade account identity excludes generic thalers and mint-date birth; no demonstrated account predecessor.", "claim_ids": [ "C1215" ], "source_ids": [ "S601", "S557" ], "label": "Dutch lion-dollar trade account unit" }, { "id": "CUR-V37-COAST-DOTI", "label": "East African coastal doti-merikani reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Coastal export values were reckoned in four-yard doti-merikani by 1870. Variable inland cloth lengths prevent assuming a single cloth currency, and market exchange does not establish a monetary parent or successor.", "claim_ids": [ "C2067", "C2069" ], "source_ids": [ "S1082", "S1083" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V23-EAST-SWISS-REICHSGULDEN", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Contracts and outgoing federal-franc conversion documented, no founding parent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1162" ], "source_ids": [ "S551" ], "label": "Eastern Swiss Reichswährung gulden (contract unit)" }, { "id": "FTM000375", "label": "Egyptian pound", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Egyptian medin/para, piastre and pound are retained as one local account identity. Their changing principal scale does not create successive currency parents; a preceding distinct Ottoman or Mamluk account-unit transfer remains unproved.", "claim_ids": [ "C1188", "C1291", "C1884", "C1885" ], "source_ids": [ "S557", "S558", "S647", "S648", "S649", "S906", "S978" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V25-EPHESOS-GOLD", "label": "Ephesian Artemision gold account unit", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Artemision receipts are aggregated in pure-gold minas, supporting a scoped treasury account. Bullion reckoning coexisting with electrum coins does not establish Lydian electrum or Croeseid ancestry.", "claim_ids": [ "C1328", "C1329", "C1330" ], "source_ids": [ "S644" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000808", "disposition": "benchmark_only", "finding": "New basket benchmarked to SDR value; explicitly not SDR replacement.", "claim_ids": [ "C652", "C653" ], "source_ids": [ "S353" ], "label": "European unit of account (EUA)" }, { "id": "CUR-V31-GALICIAN-SOLIDUS", "label": "Galician solidus accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Galician-usage solidi denominate charter purchases paid in varied goods. Proposed Frankish derivation remains a hypothesis; the gallicanus name, possible French coin use and twelve-part scale do not identify the inherited predecessor unit.", "claim_ids": [ "C1893", "C1894", "C2095" ], "source_ids": [ "S1033", "S993" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GAMBIA-BAR", "label": "Gambia River trade bar", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Trade purchases and a reported 300-bar obligation establish Gambia bar reckoning. Equating the author's bars/crowns terminology with another named crown currency would require an account inheritance record absent from these observations.", "claim_ids": [ "C1350", "C1351" ], "source_ids": [ "S668" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-CURRENT", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Distinct commercial accounts and outgoing replacement documented, no founding parent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1404", "C1405", "C1563", "C1803" ], "source_ids": [ "S705", "S935" ], "label": "Genoese commercial lira — lira fuori banco" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-BANCO", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Distinct denomination and continuity across banks documented, no founding predecessor.", "claim_ids": [ "C1401", "C1402", "C1562" ], "source_ids": [ "S705" ], "label": "Genoese lira di banco" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-PERMESSO", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Separate tax and debt-service denomination documented, not founding genealogy.", "claim_ids": [ "C1406", "C1564" ], "source_ids": [ "S705" ], "label": "Genoese lira di permesso" }, { "id": "CUR-V29-GOVARDHANA-KAHAPANA", "label": "Govardhana / Nasik kahapana account", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Govardhana endowment principal and recurring entitlements establish local kahapana accounts. Greek/Persian coin standards and Harappan weights do not demonstrate account inheritance; separate Bactrian kasapana terms have disputed equivalence.", "claim_ids": [ "C1823", "C1824", "C1857", "C2035", "C2089", "C2090", "C2091" ], "source_ids": [ "S1064", "S1067", "S1096", "S1097", "S971", "S972" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V31-GRANADA-DIRHAM-ACCOUNT", "label": "Granadan dirham–dinar / pesante reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Granadan contracts, debt rescaling and later tax accounts establish local dirham/dinar/pesante continuity. Those scales are internal denominations; an incoming Cordoban-to-Granadan account bridge is not supplied and 1492 is not a demonstrated ending.", "claim_ids": [ "C1916", "C1917", "C1918", "C1952", "C1957" ], "source_ids": [ "S1008", "S1009", "S1010" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000905", "disposition": "valuation_only", "finding": "One-sixth Spanish-dollar valuation is expressly a standard, not compulsory dollar replacement.", "claim_ids": [ "C863", "C1654" ], "source_ids": [ "S429" ], "label": "Greek phoenix" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HAIKWAN-TAEL", "label": "Haikwan customs tael", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Customs duties and statistics establish Haikwan account use; the 1930 import-duty transition to customs gold units is documented. The 1880 comparison with Kuping taels explicitly leaves the Haikwan standard's origin unexplained.", "claim_ids": [ "C1385", "C1665", "C1730", "C2008" ], "source_ids": [ "S1046", "S541", "S745" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000491", "disposition": "valuation_only", "finding": "Spanish dollar rated five local shillings; customary continuation after disallowance; no founding account descent demonstrated.", "claim_ids": [ "C160", "C316" ], "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156" ], "label": "Halifax pound of account" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HAMBURG", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Compulsory banco denomination and outgoing Reichsmark conversion documented, no founding parent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1396", "C1397", "C1423", "C1435" ], "source_ids": [ "S112", "S702" ], "label": "Hamburg mark banco" }, { "id": "CUR-V29-SARDIS-CHRYSOUS", "label": "Hellenistic Sardian chrysous account", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The Mnesimachos mortgage establishes chrysous principal, penalty and tribute reckoning. Proposed derivation from Persian daric assessment remains contested and cannot be assigned a 334 BC conversion merely from conquest chronology.", "claim_ids": [ "C1822", "C1856", "C1861", "C1072", "C1073", "C1333" ], "source_ids": [ "S491", "S504", "S505", "S507", "S646", "S969" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000839", "disposition": "model_only", "finding": "French-inspired decimal scheme uses Bernese monetary basis with different silver standard; French succession withheld, Bernese predecessor research gap.", "claim_ids": [ "C778" ], "source_ids": [ "S401" ], "label": "Helvetic franc, 1799" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HYDERABAD-RUPEE", "label": "Hyderabad Osmania / Hali sicca rupee", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Osmania/Hali sicca legal tender, reserves and local price series establish a distinct Hyderabad account. Their later Indian-rupee absorption does not establish a prior Mughal parent without the missing regional account-inheritance evidence.", "claim_ids": [ "C1387", "C1388", "C1764", "C1765", "C2014" ], "source_ids": [ "S1041", "S541", "S913", "S914" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000604", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Sterling assimilation documented; medieval mint/circulation evidence explicitly not uninterrupted unit genealogy.", "claim_ids": [ "C296", "C297", "C298", "C303", "C304" ], "source_ids": [ "S152", "S153", "S155" ], "label": "Irish pound — pre-1826 account unit" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-JPN-GINME", "label": "Japanese silver monme / ginme accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Independent Japanese silver-monme accounts and their later conversion to gold/cash obligations are documented. They are not subdivisions of ryō or mon, and Chinese coin-model transmission does not establish a silver-account parent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1382", "C1383", "C1419", "C1420", "C2015" ], "source_ids": [ "S1047", "S695", "S696" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-KONGO-NZIMBU", "label": "Kongo nzimbu reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The reported 1575 letter and tribute liabilities establish nzimbu reckoning. The separately reported 1782 measures do not establish a prior currency parent or warrant projecting their factors onto the earlier account.", "claim_ids": [ "C1354" ], "source_ids": [ "S670" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-KOVE-TAMBU", "label": "Kove tambu obligation reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Loans and bride payments establish quantified Kove tambu obligations. Shared tambu terminology with Tolai is not an attested account transfer; survival is observed in 1966–1972, with origin and later fate unreviewed.", "claim_ids": [ "C1359", "C1728" ], "source_ids": [ "S674" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V37-LAGUNA-SUWARNA", "label": "Laguna kati–suwarna debt accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The Laguna inscription records a specific kati/suwarna debt. Shared Javanese monetary vocabulary does not establish inherited account identity or a continuous route into the Philippine peso, and this one witness is not an archipelago-wide currency.", "claim_ids": [ "C2062", "C2063" ], "source_ids": [ "S1080" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V37-MADRAS-PAGODA", "label": "Madras pagoda–fanam accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Madras pagoda expenses and fanam subdivisions are documented, followed by 1818 rupee conversion. Association of earlier new pagodas with the later Star-pagoda profile is qualified; an incoming regional pagoda account parent is not established.", "claim_ids": [ "C2041", "C2042", "C2072" ], "source_ids": [ "S1068", "S1069", "S1070" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V27-MOROCCO-HASSANI", "label": "Moroccan Hassani reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Hassani transaction reckoning is distinguished from Spanish pesetas and French francs, with its 1920 franc exchange documented. The shared peseta label and conversion do not establish Spanish ancestry of the earlier Hassani account.", "claim_ids": [ "C1443", "C1661", "C1729" ], "source_ids": [ "S725" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V35-MUGHAL-RUPEE", "label": "Mughal rupee–dam accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Mughal rupee/dam/jital salary and fiscal accounts form one identity, with a qualified Bengal/Company successor branch. Delhi tanka-to-Suri/Mughal account continuity remains open; ancient drachm coin circulation is not that bridge.", "claim_ids": [ "C2002", "C2004", "C2010", "C2014", "C2035" ], "source_ids": [ "S1041", "S1042", "S1043", "S1064", "S1067", "S913" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V24-NPL-PAISA16", "label": "Nepalese 16-ganda paisa rupee", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The 1855 endowment distinguishes 16-ganda paisa rupees from mohar rupees, and later consolidation is documented. Its own origin or inherited earlier account unit is not established by the conversion between concurrently valued units.", "claim_ids": [ "C1212", "C1511", "C1612" ], "source_ids": [ "S576", "S577" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000606", "disposition": "documented_edge_omitted", "finding": "R0137 is primary supported statutory pound-to-dollar public-account succession in raw data but profile_relationship in identity review; 4 dollars per pound, 1 November 1860; optional pound columns remain. If both identities retained show connection; merging would require separate identity adjudication.", "claim_ids": [ "C388", "C389", "C397" ], "source_ids": [ "S187" ], "missing_edge_id": "R0137", "label": "New Brunswick decimal dollar" }, { "id": "T-FTM000639", "disposition": "valuation_only", "finding": "Existing local pound and sovereign rating documented, not GBP founding descent; statutory dollar successor R0137 omitted.", "claim_ids": [ "C385", "C387", "C388", "C389", "C397" ], "source_ids": [ "S186", "S187" ], "label": "New Brunswick pound of account" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-NEWJERSEY-POUND", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Qualified local accounts distinct from sterling obligations documented, no founding conversion.", "claim_ids": [ "C1370", "C1371", "C1372", "C1373" ], "source_ids": [ "S684", "S685" ], "label": "New Jersey provincial pound of account" }, { "id": "T-FTM000494", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "1863/1865 decimalization, 1895 Canadian alignment and coinage end documented; founding predecessor unresolved.", "claim_ids": [ "C163", "C314", "C315" ], "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S161" ], "label": "Newfoundland dollar" }, { "id": "CUR-V37-NGUYEN-QUAN", "label": "Nguyễn quan–tiền fiscal accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Nguyễn salary and fiscal records establish quan/tiền accounts. Reported Annamese influence on Cambodian ligature subdivisions does not establish an incoming Chinese parent or full outgoing Cambodian account ancestry.", "claim_ids": [ "C2052", "C2053", "C2054", "C2056" ], "source_ids": [ "S1075", "S1076", "S1077" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-ETHIOPIA-AMOLE", "label": "Northern Ethiopian amole reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Tax schedules and prices establish amole reckoning. Earlier salt trade in 525 is only commodity context, not documented continuous ancestry; 1935 is a study boundary rather than proven unit termination.", "claim_ids": [ "C1352", "C1353", "C1724" ], "source_ids": [ "S669" ] }, { "id": "FTM000335", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Outgoing 1875 replacement documented; LEG00341 incoming standard match unreviewed.", "claim_ids": [ "C1111" ], "source_ids": [ "S263" ], "label": "Norwegian speciedaler" }, { "id": "T-FTM000493", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "1860 decimal transition and later Canadian 75:73 alignment documented; retained claims do not explicitly identify predecessor and ratio.", "claim_ids": [ "C162", "C313" ], "source_ids": [ "S11", "S160" ], "label": "Nova Scotia decimal dollar" }, { "id": "CUR-V37-ODISHA-COWRIE", "label": "Odisha / Orissa cowrie accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Orissa public accounts were reported in cowries in 1803. The differing official and market rupee rates and required silver tax payment do not prove a rupee parent, general account succession or enduring peg.", "claim_ids": [ "C2047", "C2048" ], "source_ids": [ "S1073" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-OLD-ASSYRIAN-SILVER", "label": "Old Assyrian silver reckoning at Kanesh", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Kanesh loans, investments and balances in silver minas/shekel fractions establish monetary obligations. Shared silver-weight words do not establish succession from Ur III Umma or another earlier local account.", "claim_ids": [ "C1374", "C1375" ], "source_ids": [ "S168", "S687", "S688" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-OLD-BABYLONIAN-SILVER", "label": "Old Babylonian silver shekel reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Hammurabi-law physician fees and divorce compensation establish silver-shekel liabilities. The date belongs to the legal collection, not currency creation; inheritance from an earlier Mesopotamian unit remains undocumented here.", "claim_ids": [ "C1376" ], "source_ids": [ "S510" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V37-JAVA-MASA", "label": "Old Javanese masa–suwarna accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Old Javanese masa/suwarna monetary expressions are documented. Later updates to legal vocabulary and shared Laguna names do not establish transferred balances, a fixed conversion or one continuous Java–Bali–Philippines account.", "claim_ids": [ "C2057", "C2061", "C2063" ], "source_ids": [ "S1078", "S1079", "S1080" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V28-OLD-PIEDMONT-LIRA", "disposition": "earlier_history_same_identity", "finding": "Existing identity extends before restoration; outgoing conversion documented, no earlier founding parent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1745", "C1788", "C1802" ], "source_ids": [ "S935" ], "label": "Old Piedmont lira —20-soldi account unit" }, { "id": "CUR-V30-LEVANT-SULTANI", "label": "Ottoman Levantine sultani gold account", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Damascus debt and Jerusalem endowment capital/proceeds establish sultani gold-account use. Valuation of para assets in sultanis does not itself show an inherited akçe/para parent or a single continuous account identity.", "claim_ids": [ "C1862", "C1874", "C1875", "C1889" ], "source_ids": [ "S980" ] }, { "id": "FTM000088", "label": "Paraguayan peso fuerte", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Paraguayan peso-fuerte salaries, real-denominated taxes and the 1842 retention of familiar monetary reckoning are recorded. The complete Spanish-to-local account lineage across later reorganizations is not established solely by the coinage authorization.", "claim_ids": [ "C1274", "C1305", "C1306" ], "source_ids": [ "S627" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V28-PATNA-SANWAT", "label": "Patna Sanwat / Azeemabadee rupee account", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The 1775 rent grant establishes distinct Sanwat Azeemabadee reckoning and a later conversion of that liability into sicca. An earlier Mughal-to-Patna account inheritance and universal abolition are not established by this local contract.", "claim_ids": [ "C1742", "C1798", "C1813", "C2014" ], "source_ids": [ "S1041", "S910", "S913" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-PENNSYLVANIA-POUND", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Local obligation reckoning documented, not founding descent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1365", "C1366", "C1367" ], "source_ids": [ "S682" ], "label": "Pennsylvania pound of account" }, { "id": "FTM000031", "label": "Persian toman–dinar accounting — Ilkhanid and later traditions", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Persian dinar/toman accounting is extended through qualified Ilkhanid inheritance; Ghazan's six-dirham account is an epoch within that identity. The intervening inheritance from early eastern Islamic dirham accounts remains unestablished; the 1740 Mughal alignment is a later adopted basis.", "claim_ids": [ "C1997", "C1998", "C2033", "C2034" ], "source_ids": [ "S1038", "S1039", "S1040", "S1061", "S1062", "S1063" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V27-PERUVIAN-SOL-1863", "label": "Peruvian sol — nineteenth-century account unit", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The 1863 law defines the sol as principal account unit and 1901 legislation converts prior sol obligations into pounds. The preceding peso-to-sol account bridge is not established in these retained claims.", "claim_ids": [ "C1449", "C1450", "C1688", "C1737" ], "source_ids": [ "S852", "S853" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000607", "disposition": "valuation_only", "finding": "1848 sterling reporting par does not establish founding descent; outgoing PEI-dollar R0110 already present.", "claim_ids": [ "C306", "C307" ], "source_ids": [ "S156" ], "label": "Prince Edward Island pound of account" }, { "id": "FTM000307", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Outgoing 3 marks per thaler documented; incoming LEG00313 unreviewed standard match.", "claim_ids": [ "C879" ], "source_ids": [ "S435" ], "label": "Prussian thaler — nineteenth-century unit" }, { "id": "CUR-V35-QIN-CASH", "label": "Qin cash (qian) fiscal accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "A probably early-imperial Qin ordinance establishes cash obligations and repayment. It provides an earlier scoped account witness, without a documented incoming monetary ancestor or continuity through intervening dynasties into Tang accounting.", "claim_ids": [ "C2009", "C2016" ], "source_ids": [ "S1048" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-RAMESSIDE-COPPER-DEBEN", "label": "Ramesside copper-deben value reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "UC 39606 aggregates goods supplied for a bull in copper-deben value. The Ramesside date is a broad envelope; this witness establishes no inherited earlier account or bridge into later Egyptian drachma accounting.", "claim_ids": [ "C1379" ], "source_ids": [ "S691", "S692" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V39-ROB-GOLD-DINAR", "label": "Rob gold-dinar legal accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Rob legal documents denominate fines in gold dinars associated with Kushano-Sasanian issues. That regional coin context does not establish account transition from Bactrian drachmas, a Roman denarius parent or continuity to modern dinars.", "claim_ids": [ "C2092", "C2093" ], "source_ids": [ "S1098", "S1099" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-SHANGHAI-TAEL", "label": "Shanghai tael", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Shanghai taels independently denominate commercial obligations and are converted into existing yuan accounts. Reported merchant adoption in 1857 is not proof of origin or inheritance from Haikwan or another tael standard.", "claim_ids": [ "C1384", "C1421", "C2007" ], "source_ids": [ "S1044", "S541", "S697" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000915", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Only outgoing 12 marks per 7 florins documented.", "claim_ids": [ "C880" ], "source_ids": [ "S435" ], "label": "South German florin — nineteenth-century unit" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-NEWENGLAND-WAMPUM", "label": "Southern New England wampum reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Named fathom counting and treaty obligations establish a scoped wampum account. These liabilities do not identify an earlier inherited currency, and settlement comparisons with colonial money are not ancestry evidence.", "claim_ids": [ "C1363", "C1364" ], "source_ids": [ "S680", "S681" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000476", "label": "Spanish real / peso de a ocho", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Real/peso accounting and the eight-real denomination are documented. Rating reales in maravedis establishes coexistence and valuation, not a proved maravedí-to-real principal account succession; R0123 remains secondary.", "claim_ids": [ "C336", "C953", "C1278" ], "source_ids": [ "S171", "S630", "S99" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-SWEDISH-SPECIE", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Qualified riksgalds descendant documented, not specie founding parent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1155" ], "source_ids": [ "S550" ], "label": "Swedish riksdaler specie" }, { "id": "CUR-V29-TANG-CASH", "label": "Tang cash / guan accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Tang tax and price accounts in cash/strings are documented. The Qin witness does not establish intervening inheritance through Han and Sui; changing cash inscriptions alone cannot fill the account gap.", "claim_ids": [ "C1815", "C1816", "C1854", "C2016" ], "source_ids": [ "S1048", "S953", "S954", "S955" ] }, { "id": "FTM000383", "label": "Thai baht", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Thai tical/baht is a continuing local account identity with qualified older price witnesses and legal obligations. The 1928 name/standard change is not a tical parent; no earlier distinct inherited unit is established.", "claim_ids": [ "C1157", "C1214", "C1261", "C1748", "C1749" ], "source_ids": [ "S541", "S590", "S614", "S897", "S898" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TIBET-TANGKA", "label": "Tibetan tangka accounting", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The contemporary survey establishes official tangka accounting, separately rated against British rupees. The later srang-to-RMB conversion is documented but its identity link to this tangka account is unadjudicated; rupee circulation does not establish its parent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1393", "C1513" ], "source_ids": [ "S541", "S845" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TLAXCALA-CACAO", "label": "Tlaxcala cacao account unit", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "A local price ruling values ordinary goods in counted cacao beans with quality adjustments. It establishes this account witness, not descent from another cacao account or succession into colonial peso balances.", "claim_ids": [ "C1360" ], "source_ids": [ "S677", "S678" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TOLAI-TAMBU", "label": "Tolai tambu reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Road-work payments and prices establish tambu accounting. Contemporary shilling exchange quotations vary by goods and do not prove sterling ancestry; the European-trade prohibition did not terminate local usage.", "claim_ids": [ "C1357", "C1358", "C1727" ], "source_ids": [ "S672", "S673" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TRAVANCORE-SIRKAR", "label": "Travancore Sirkar rupee", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Sirkar rupees denominate local accounts despite no full-rupee coin, with qualified linkage among observations. Neither earlier inheritance from an outside rupee nor the final account conversion is established by the 1950 coin legal-tender cessation.", "claim_ids": [ "C1390", "C1391", "C1515" ], "source_ids": [ "S541", "S698", "S847" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V27-TUNISIAN-PIASTRE", "label": "Tunisian piastre / riyal reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Tunisian piastre/riyal fiscal obligations and replacement by francs in 1891 are established. The shared piastre name does not demonstrate earlier Ottoman account inheritance.", "claim_ids": [ "C1445", "C1446", "C1677" ], "source_ids": [ "S465", "S794" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V37-UJIJI-SOFI", "label": "Ujiji / Kawélé sofi reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Cameron's 1874 prices and moneychangers establish a local sofi bead account. Daily cloth exchange is neither a hard peg nor evidence that cloth accounting was its inherited parent; full successor transition remains open.", "claim_ids": [ "C2068", "C2069" ], "source_ids": [ "S1082", "S1083" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V37-BURMA-KYAT", "label": "Upper Burmese kyat debt reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "Burmese mortgage and sale deeds establish kyat-denominated debts with alloy descriptions. They do not establish a preceding account parent, colonial rupee succession or continuity to modern Myanmar kyat merely from the shared name.", "claim_ids": [ "C2049", "C2050", "C2051" ], "source_ids": [ "S1074" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V29-GIRSU-BARLEY-GUR", "label": "Ur III Girsu barley-gur reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "MVN 8,179 offsets a barley-denominated obligation partly with silver credited in barley units. It establishes barley as account denomination, not succession from Umma silver accounting or a universal Mesopotamian currency.", "claim_ids": [ "C1827", "C1848", "C1859" ], "source_ids": [ "S974", "S975" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V29-UMMA-SILVER-SHEKEL", "label": "Ur III Umma silver-shekel reckoning", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "MVN 1,240 values varied goods and balances in silver minas/shekels. Girsu barley reckoning is a distinct contemporaneous accounting practice; common exchange calculations do not make it a predecessor.", "claim_ids": [ "C1825", "C1826", "C1847", "C1858" ], "source_ids": [ "S973", "S975" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-VENICE", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Distinct scriptural accounts documented; premium alone expressly insufficient; no predecessor transition claim.", "claim_ids": [ "C1399", "C1566" ], "source_ids": [ "S703", "S704" ], "label": "Venetian banco ducat — Banco del Giro accounts" }, { "id": "FTM000094", "label": "Venezolano", "disposition": "retain_open_root", "finding": "The 1871 venezolano reform required public/private account conversion from 1872. The 1865 peso-fuerte/venezolano-de-oro relationship to that unit awaits direct statutory comparison; a naming distinction is not enough to create its missing predecessor.", "claim_ids": [ "C1277", "C1310" ], "source_ids": [ "S544" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-VIRGINIA-POUND", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "Local accounts and contracts documented, not founding descent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1368", "C1369" ], "source_ids": [ "S683" ], "label": "Virginia pound of account" }, { "id": "CUR-V23-ZURICH-GULDEN", "disposition": "research_gap", "finding": "1803 local reckoning and outgoing federal-franc conversion documented, no founding parent.", "claim_ids": [ "C1183", "C1161" ], "source_ids": [ "S552", "S551" ], "label": "Zurich gulden account unit" } ] }, "revision_44_review": { "report_url": "/revision-44/index.html", "audit_file": "regional-accounts-audit.json", "finding": "European predecessor evidence integrated with explicit limits on indirect account transmission and local branching.", "holds": [ "Earlier ancestry of Bernese franc, Zurich gulden and eastern Swiss Reichsgulden remains unresolved; matching names and equivalent values are insufficient.", "The Spanish real’s French gros coin model does not establish French account-unit adoption or an enforced continuing parity.", "The immediate medieval Italian/Pavian parent of Genoese reckoning and its conversion remain open.", "French standards for Belgian and Swiss francs remain distinct from replacement of local account units. Swiss conversion ratios apply to specified Zurich contracts, not every old coin or canton." ] } }