Javanese picis / cash accounting
A ferry crossing could carry an obligation to the court.1
- Years
- Under research
- Where
- Java
- Family
- Other origins
- Status
- Under research
A ferry crossing could carry an obligation to the court. The charter of 1358 assessed an annual festival payment of 400 cash for each ferryman. Cash was a way of stating what people owed.1
The Karang Bogem charter of 1387 gives a larger example: a fisherman’s debt of 120,000 cash. The same passage measures a delivery of fish preserve by the weight of cash, a different use of the coins from counting the debt itself.2
A fuller story is under research.
Timeline
Coins and notes
Images are under research. Each image will carry its caption, collection credit and public-domain or CC0 license.
How do we know?
Old Javanese masa–suwarna accounting → Javanese picis / cash accounting
Qualified account system transition · 1296–1358
Old Javanese legal adaptations express fines or payments first in indigenous ma–su–ku terms and also in cash amounts. Wicks connects this re-expression of values with the move to picis reckoning around 1300. The account succession is qualified: the legal glosses are not precisely dated, and 1296–1358 bounds the dated evidence rather than an exact conversion decree.3
Verbatim source excerpt under research. The linked notes identify the source and passage supporting this connection.
Legal history and sources
- Dated obligations
- 1358 and 1387
- Earlier account link
- Masa–suwarna succession inferred; precise conversion date uncertain
The 1358 Ferry Charter assesses an annual festival payment of 400 cash for each ferryman. This is a dated obligation in the Javanese picis system.1
The 1387 Karang Bogem charter records a fisherman’s debt of 120,000 cash. The cash amount denotes a debt; a separate fish-preserve delivery in the passage is measured by the weight of cash.2
Old Javanese legal adaptations express fines or payments first in indigenous ma–su–ku terms and also in cash amounts. Wicks connects this re-expression of values with the move to picis reckoning around 1300. The account succession is qualified: the legal glosses are not precisely dated, and 1296–1358 bounds the dated evidence rather than an exact conversion decree.3
Legal texts also re-expressed older ma–su–ku amounts as cash values. That provides a qualified connection to earlier Javanese reckoning, although the glosses have no precise conversion date. Imported coins alone do not establish a Chinese account-unit parent.3
Source notes
- Robert S. Wicks · Monetary Developments in Java between the Ninth and Sixteenth Centuries: A Numismatic Perspective, Indonesia 42 (1986), 42–77
pp. 59–62, especially p. 60 n. 67; 1294/1296 inscriptions, legal translations, 1358 ferry tax and 1387 debt
- Robert S. Wicks · Monetary Developments in Java between the Ninth and Sixteenth Centuries: A Numismatic Perspective, Indonesia 42 (1986), 42–77
pp. 59–62, especially p. 60 n. 67; 1294/1296 inscriptions, legal translations, 1358 ferry tax and 1387 debt
- Robert S. Wicks · Monetary Developments in Java between the Ninth and Sixteenth Centuries: A Numismatic Perspective, Indonesia 42 (1986), 42–77
pp. 59–62, especially p. 60 n. 67; 1294/1296 inscriptions, legal translations, 1358 ferry tax and 1387 debt
Full claim history and source register →
Cite this currency
“Javanese picis / cash accounting.” The Family Tree of Money. Field Technologies, Inc. Data v51; accessed 15 October 2026.
A surprising money story every week.
Discover the people, places and unexpected connections behind your money.