{
  "version": "reconciled-tree-31",
  "scope": "Iberian account-unit and regional-identity audit; not a complete historical currency census.",
  "summary": {
    "strict_improved_endpoints": 1,
    "including_optional_improved_endpoints": 6,
    "new_observations": 44,
    "relationship_reviews": 1,
    "new_ancestry_edges": 2,
    "new_currency_identities": 9,
    "new_claims": 68,
    "new_source_records": 31
  },
  "realm_audit": [
    {
      "realm": "Portugal",
      "status": "bounded_pass_completed",
      "coverage": "Medieval principal account scales and real succession",
      "earliest_supported_account_year": 1145,
      "earliest_qualified_account_year": 1090,
      "firm_libra_account_year": 1253,
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V28-PORTUGUESE-LIBRA",
        "FTM000053"
      ],
      "result": "Earlier local legal accounting admitted without denomination-only nodes; inherited real succession retained; French reckoning adoption separated from currency ancestry.",
      "sources": [
        "COIMBRA",
        "LOPES",
        "PERES",
        "S930"
      ],
      "remaining": "Exact Leonese territorial branch and any deeper Roman continuity unresolved; gold morabitino account role needs separate contracts.",
      "earliest_witness_display": "1145; qualified regional evidence 1090–1091"
    },
    {
      "realm": "Castile",
      "decision": "existing_identity_extended",
      "currency_ids": [
        "T-FTM000621",
        "T-FTM000476"
      ],
      "assertion": "Maravedí account witness extends to 1182. No earlier real account witness was verified;1350 coin introduction alone is insufficient. Realdevellón is the later 34-maravedí scale; documented public-account successor is 1864 escudo.",
      "sources": [
        "C31-OLIVA",
        "C31-CANO",
        "C31-BILL1864",
        "C31-LAW1864"
      ],
      "locator": "p488",
      "node_ids": [
        "T-FTM000621",
        "T-FTM000476"
      ],
      "remaining": "",
      "earliest_witness_display": "1182, qualified association with later profile",
      "result": "The 1182 maravedí witness is firm, but association with the later billon profile is qualified. Real de vellón is its later 34-maravedí scale, with supported 1864 public-account replacement by the escudo. The separate silver-real profile already has a 1473 account anchor; this pass verifies no earlier one."
    },
    {
      "realm": "León",
      "decision": "new_scoped_account_unit",
      "currency_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-LEONESE-SILVER-SOLIDUS"
      ],
      "assertion": "894 contract proves silver-solidus reckoning. Do not create another currency at the later political change fromAsturias toLeón.",
      "sources": [
        "C31-TODESCA"
      ],
      "locator": "p52note68",
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-LEONESE-SILVER-SOLIDUS"
      ],
      "remaining": "",
      "earliest_witness_display": "894",
      "result": "894 contract proves silver-solidus reckoning. Do not create another currency at the later political change fromAsturias toLeón."
    },
    {
      "realm": "Asturias",
      "decision": "shared_regional_profile_with_limits",
      "currency_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-LEONESE-SILVER-SOLIDUS"
      ],
      "assertion": "Asturian-realm documents fromLeón establish the account profile;796 Liébana solidus/tremissis valuation is earlier contextual evidence, not proved identical silver reckoning.",
      "sources": [
        "C31-TODESCA",
        "C31-NUNEZ"
      ],
      "locator": "Todescap52;Núñezp359note14",
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-LEONESE-SILVER-SOLIDUS"
      ],
      "remaining": "",
      "earliest_witness_display": "894 in the shared regional profile;796 remains context",
      "result": "Asturian-realm documents fromLeón establish the account profile;796 Liébana solidus/tremissis valuation is earlier contextual evidence, not proved identical silver reckoning."
    },
    {
      "realm": "Galicia",
      "decision": "new_scoped_account_unit",
      "currency_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-GALICIAN-SOLIDUS"
      ],
      "assertion": "905 and 962 contracts support a locally specified solidus. Metal/Frankish/Suevic derivation remains contested; geographical name alone supplies noRoman ancestry.",
      "sources": [
        "C31-TODESCA",
        "C31-NUNEZ"
      ],
      "locator": "Todescapp46–49;Núñezpp358–362",
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-GALICIAN-SOLIDUS"
      ],
      "remaining": "",
      "earliest_witness_display": "905",
      "result": "905 and 962 contracts support a locally specified solidus. Metal/Frankish/Suevic derivation remains contested; geographical name alone supplies noRoman ancestry."
    },
    {
      "realm": "Catalonia / Barcelona",
      "status": "local_account_identity_added_with_qualified_parent",
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-BARCELONA-LLIURA"
      ],
      "coverage": "Dated 972 prices,1404 bank accounts,1835/1842 rents and 1878 peseta equivalence. Carolingian importation explicitly documented in original scholarship.",
      "remaining": "Complete medieval local sequence, regional identity boundary, and general cessation/conversion instrument remain open; no de novo conclusion.",
      "earliest_witness_display": "972",
      "result": "One Barcelona-focused account profile with a qualified Carolingian regional parent; a 1878 peseta valuation is context, not proof of universal replacement.",
      "sources": [
        "CA31-JARRETT",
        "CA31-TAULA",
        "CA31-IEC1912"
      ]
    },
    {
      "realm": "Aragon",
      "scope": "Kingdom of Aragon versus wider composite Crown",
      "decision": "One Jaca account identity, not one currency covering every territory ruled by its king.",
      "sources": [
        "AR31-BURNS",
        "AR31-POY"
      ],
      "locator": "Burns dated Egea/Jaca documents; Poy pp.241–242,283,290",
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-ARAGONESE-JACA-ACCOUNT"
      ],
      "remaining": "",
      "earliest_witness_display": "1263",
      "result": "One Jaca account identity, not one currency covering every territory ruled by its king."
    },
    {
      "realm": "Valencia",
      "scope": "Local account system and documented extra-territorial use",
      "decision": "Admit one identity; pound/sou/diner scales remain grouped. Palma1288 use belongs here, not a new Mallorcan node.",
      "sources": [
        "AR31-BURNS",
        "AR31-MATEU"
      ],
      "locator": "Burns chapter4; Mateu pp.129–130",
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-VALENCIAN-ACCOUNT"
      ],
      "remaining": "",
      "earliest_witness_display": "1247 in scholarly account history;1288 directly dated contract",
      "result": "Admit one identity; pound/sou/diner scales remain grouped. Palma 1288 use belongs here, not a new Mallorcan node."
    },
    {
      "realm": "Mallorca",
      "scope": "Distinguish pre-local Valencian accounting from later separately valued Mallorcan treasury accounting",
      "decision": "Admit one later account identity, securely evidenced1310–1330; political separation1276 is not its demonstrated birthday.",
      "sources": [
        "AR31-LLOMPART",
        "AR31-BURNS",
        "AR31-MATEU"
      ],
      "locator": "Llompart pp.108–115; Burns chapter4; Mateu pp.142–143",
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-MALLORCAN-ACCOUNT"
      ],
      "remaining": "",
      "earliest_witness_display": "1310–1330 ledger series; specific 1318 debt",
      "result": "Admit one later account identity, securely evidenced 1310–1330; political separation 1276 is not its demonstrated birthday."
    },
    {
      "realm": "al-Andalus",
      "scope": "Broad medieval geographic and political designation",
      "result": "Account evidence found; not a single timeless realm currency.",
      "admit": [
        "CUR-V31-CORDOBAN-DINAR-DIRHAM"
      ],
      "note": "916–c996 anchors support the scoped Cordoban identity. Taifa, Almoravid and Almohad succession remains held.",
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-CORDOBAN-DINAR-DIRHAM"
      ],
      "remaining": "916–c 996 anchors support the scoped Cordoban identity. Taifa, Almoravid and Almohad succession remains held.",
      "earliest_witness_display": "916, scoped to Córdoba",
      "sources": [
        "A31-CHALMETA"
      ]
    },
    {
      "realm": "Granada",
      "scope": "Granadan regional accounting, including 1326 Algeciras",
      "result": "One supported account identity with several fixed denomination scales.",
      "admit": [
        "CUR-V31-GRANADA-DIRHAM-ACCOUNT"
      ],
      "note": "1326 is an observation, not a founding date. No separate dynasty, silver-dinar, nominal-gold-dinar or reform-scale node.",
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-GRANADA-DIRHAM-ACCOUNT"
      ],
      "remaining": "1326 is an observation, not a founding date. No separate dynasty, silver-dinar, nominal-gold-dinar or reform-scale node.",
      "earliest_witness_display": "1326",
      "sources": [
        "A31-ALGECIRAS",
        "A31-CORPUS",
        "A31-NAZARI2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "realm": "Andalusia under Castilian rule",
      "scope": "Local post-conquest accounting rather than one political currency",
      "result": "Record surviving Granadan usage within its profile and Castilian usage where evidenced; no generic Andalusian node.",
      "admit": [],
      "note": "Political conquest is not used as an account-unit ending or succession date.",
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-GRANADA-DIRHAM-ACCOUNT",
        "T-FTM000621"
      ],
      "remaining": "Political conquest is not used as an account-unit ending or succession date.",
      "earliest_witness_display": "1496 Granadan accounting survives conquest",
      "sources": [
        "A31-ALGECIRAS",
        "A31-CORPUS",
        "A31-NAZARI2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "realm": "Navarre",
      "decision": "admit_distinct_regional_account",
      "node_ids": [
        "CUR-V31-NAVARRE-ACCOUNT"
      ],
      "earliest_strict_year": 1198,
      "conclusion": "Navarre had distinct payment and contract reckoning, not merely a local mint using a shared foreign account. Direct anchors span royal receipts, fiscal assessments and contract laws. Add one profile; external ancestry and the final Spanish conversion remain held.",
      "sources": [
        "NAV31-GONI",
        "NAV31-MONEDAJE",
        "NAV31-CRISIS",
        "NAV31-FRANCISCO",
        "NAV31-SORAUREN"
      ],
      "remaining_scope": "No claim that 1198 is inception. Earlier Navarre/Aragon separation and post 1828 account absorption need individual evidence. Lower Navarre afterpartition is not silently included.",
      "remaining": "No claim that 1198 is inception. Earlier Navarre/Aragon separation and post 1828 account absorption need individual evidence. Lower Navarre afterpartition is not silently included.",
      "earliest_witness_display": "1198",
      "result": "Navarre had distinct payment and contract reckoning, not merely a local mint using a shared foreign account. Direct anchors span royal receipts, fiscal assessments and contract laws. Add one profile; external ancestry and the final Spanish conversion remain held."
    }
  ],
  "held": [
    {
      "target": "León→Portuguese account branch",
      "decision": "held",
      "assertion": "Pre-independence contracts and later coin imitation suggest a shared regional background, but do not date or define the territorial account-unit separation.",
      "sources": [
        "PERES"
      ],
      "locator": "pp.24–25",
      "next_research": "Inspect PMH Diplomata et Chartae doc744(1090) and adjacent1091contract; then compare independently dated Portuguese royal accounts after independence.",
      "subject": "León→Portuguese account branch"
    },
    {
      "target": "Roman denarius→Portuguese dinheiro",
      "decision": "no_direct_ancestry_edge",
      "assertion": "Latin denomination vocabulary and broad Roman-French system labels do not establish an unbroken local account-unit succession.",
      "sources": [
        "S930"
      ],
      "locator": "Opening account-system paragraph",
      "subject": "Roman denarius→Portuguese dinheiro"
    },
    {
      "target": "Morabitino→libra substitution",
      "decision": "held",
      "assertion": "Gold-standard importance and coexistence with soldo/dinheiro accounts require separate liability-unit analysis; gold coins alone do not prove another required ancestor.",
      "sources": [
        "S930",
        "PERES"
      ],
      "locator": "Puntoniopening framework; Perespp.25–26",
      "subject": "Morabitino→libra substitution"
    },
    {
      "target": "Valério1991 periodization",
      "decision": "not_used_beyond_lead",
      "reason": "Search indexed 16-pagePDF but full retrieval repeatedly failed(timeout/403). Do not treat the 1253 founding claim as independently inspected.",
      "url": "https://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/bitstream/10400.5/9512/1/ee-nv-1991.pdf",
      "subject": "Valério1991 periodization"
    },
    {
      "subject": "Silver-real account origin before1473",
      "reason": "The inherited profile already contains a 1473 account observation. No earlier account witness was verified in this pass; a 1350 coin-issue date is insufficient."
    },
    {
      "subject": "Astur-Leonese andGalician solidus ancestry",
      "reason": "No automaticFrankish/Roman/Suevic parent. Gold-to-silver accounting transition is regionally staggered and lacks universal fixed conversion; no newnodes merelyfor eachmetal/realm."
    },
    {
      "subject": "Solidus→maravedí lineage",
      "reason": "Concrete contractual units now documented, but no full local successor-account sequence inspected."
    },
    {
      "subject": "Maravedí1182→1477continuity",
      "reason": "Earlieraccountusefirm, identityassociationqualified. Historical rescaling alone doesnot warrant extra maravedínodes."
    },
    {
      "subject": "T-FTM000476 andT-FTM000621 scope",
      "decision": "retain_distinction_extend_vellon_alias",
      "status": "supported",
      "assertion": "Retain realdevellón within maravedí accounting, not the silverreal/peso identity. The 1864 replacement descends fromT-FTM 000621.",
      "sources": [
        "C31-CANO",
        "C31-BILL1864"
      ],
      "locator": "Cano2016pp304,307;May1864expositionp1",
      "reason": "No extra 34-maravedíscale node; nofalse equivalence of 20 vellónreales and 8 silverreales.",
      "review_origin": "research31-castile.json"
    },
    {
      "candidate": "Unqualified Carolingian→Barcelona edge",
      "decision": "retain_qualified_regional_sequence",
      "assertion": "Explicit imported account ancestry is stronger than a common scale, but it does not supply a complete local sequence or exact identity boundary.",
      "sources": [
        "CA31-JARRETT"
      ],
      "locator": "p219",
      "subject": "Unqualified Carolingian→Barcelona edge"
    },
    {
      "candidate": "Barcelona→peseta universal absorption",
      "decision": "hold_ancestry_edge",
      "assertion": "One surviving contract’s equivalence is not proof of general replacement; obtain legislation or original accounting history covering conversion of local balances.",
      "sources": [
        "CA31-IEC1912"
      ],
      "locator": "1878 contract",
      "subject": "Barcelona→peseta universal absorption"
    },
    {
      "candidate": "1000 mancus rate and Islamic predecessor",
      "decision": "no_parent_edge",
      "assertion": "Jarrett identifies the often-cited 6 solidi/mancus rate as a misreading of a price containing both amounts. Gold instruments alone do not identify account ancestry.",
      "sources": [
        "CA31-JARRETT"
      ],
      "locator": "pp225–226",
      "subject": "1000 mancus rate and Islamic predecessor"
    },
    {
      "candidate": "All Catalan county monies or grosso/curribile variants as nodes",
      "decision": "not_admitted",
      "assertion": "Regional coin and valuation differences need individually scoped account identity evidence; the present node is Barcelona-focused.",
      "sources": [
        "CA31-JARRETT"
      ],
      "locator": "pp226–230",
      "subject": "All Catalan county monies or grosso/curribile variants as nodes"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR31-MALLORCA-PARENT",
      "parent": "CUR-V31-VALENCIAN-ACCOUNT",
      "child": "CUR-V31-MALLORCAN-ACCOUNT",
      "years": [
        1288,
        1310
      ],
      "status": "held_account_boundary",
      "assertion": "Valencian contractual use in Palma, later Mallorcan accounting and gradual coin replacement make regional ancestry plausible. Exact account succession is not yet demonstrated; retain as frontier/context, not supported ancestry. Dates bracket sampled evidence, not exclusive use.",
      "sources": [
        "AR31-BURNS",
        "AR31-LLOMPART",
        "AR31-MATEU"
      ],
      "locator": "Burns chapter4; Llompart pp.108–115; Mateu pp.142–143",
      "subject": "AR31-MALLORCA-PARENT"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR31-OTHER-PARENTS",
      "status": "unresolved",
      "assertion": "Jaca and Valencia origins are not connected to Barcelona, Carolingian or Castilian accounts by exchange ratios or shared libra/sou/diner structure. Earlier account documents remain the next targeted front.",
      "subject": "AR31-OTHER-PARENTS"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR31-TERMINATION",
      "status": "unresolved",
      "assertion": "No inspected source proves obligatory replacement of these local account identities by Castilian or national Spanish money. Distinct accounting in 1790 rules out treating 1707 or mint closure as their demonstrated end.",
      "sources": [
        "AR31-POY",
        "AR31-MATEU"
      ],
      "locator": "Poy pp.241–242,283,290; Mateu p.130",
      "subject": "AR31-TERMINATION"
    },
    {
      "frontier": "Cordoban accounting before916",
      "decision": "hold earlier strict date",
      "missing_record": "A dated price, debt or fiscal obligation earlier than 916 explicitly using this scoped unit. The 769 treasure total is insufficient by itself.",
      "sources": [
        "A31-CHALMETA"
      ],
      "locator": "p118 sections2.1–2.2",
      "subject": "Cordoban accounting before916",
      "reason": "A dated price, debt or fiscal obligation earlier than 916 explicitly using this scoped unit. The 769 treasure total is insufficient by itself."
    },
    {
      "frontier": "Cordoban dinar-dirham → Almoravid / Almohad / Granadan systems",
      "decision": "no ancestry edge",
      "missing_record": "A local legal or contractual conversion, continued old obligation, or demonstrable accounting sequence across these transitions. Shared dinar/dirham labels and metrological comparisons do not establish succession.",
      "sources": [
        "A31-CHALMETA",
        "A31-NAZARI2025"
      ],
      "locator": "Chalmeta pp118–121; Jiménez Puertas section2",
      "subject": "Cordoban dinar-dirham → Almoravid / Almohad / Granadan systems",
      "reason": "A local legal or contractual conversion, continued old obligation, or demonstrable accounting sequence across these transitions. Shared dinar/dirham labels and metrological comparisons do not establish succession."
    },
    {
      "frontier": "Almoravid-derived gold maravedí as a separate node",
      "decision": "hold separate node pending identity boundary adjudication",
      "missing_record": "Resolve whether the existing maravedí identity should encompass its gold contractual phase or requires a separate independently scoped gold unit; document the gold-to-billon obligation relationship. Do not create an issuer-only duplicate.",
      "sources": [
        "A31-FRANCISCO",
        "A31-OLIVA"
      ],
      "locator": "Francisco Olmos pp293–294; Oliva Manso pp494–496,1219 debt dispute",
      "subject": "Almoravid-derived gold maravedí as a separate node",
      "reason": "Resolve whether the existing maravedí identity should encompass its gold contractual phase or requires a separate independently scoped gold unit; document the gold-to-billon obligation relationship. Do not create an issuer-only duplicate."
    },
    {
      "frontier": "Granadan pesante → Castilian maravedí",
      "decision": "no replacement edge or1492 termination",
      "missing_record": "A law or actual obligation series extinguishing or converting Granadan-denominated liabilities into Castilian units. Tax exchange quotations alone are insufficient.",
      "sources": [
        "A31-NAZARI2025"
      ],
      "locator": "pp11–12",
      "subject": "Granadan pesante → Castilian maravedí",
      "reason": "A law or actual obligation series extinguishing or converting Granadan-denominated liabilities into Castilian units. Tax exchange quotations alone are insufficient."
    },
    {
      "subject": "Granadan silver dinar, nominal gold dinar and dirham",
      "decision": "one_account_identity_with_fixed_scales",
      "status": "supported",
      "assertion": "The silver account dinar equals 10 dirhams; the nominal gold dinar at customary silver exchange equals 75. These interchangeable scales differ from actual gold coins with fluctuating prices.",
      "sources": [
        "A31-NAZARI2025"
      ],
      "locator": "pp2–4 section2",
      "review_origin": "research31-andalus.json"
    },
    {
      "subject": "Granadan old/new pesante reform",
      "decision": "retain_same_unit_era_not_new_rescaling_node",
      "status": "supported_inference",
      "assertion": "The explicit old-debt conversion supports a scale-era entry within the account profile.",
      "sources": [
        "A31-NAZARI2025"
      ],
      "locator": "p11 section3.2.2 note82",
      "review_origin": "research31-andalus.json"
    },
    {
      "subject": "Castilian maravedí Islamic antecedent",
      "decision": "antecedent_documented_but_no_new_typed_parent_edge",
      "status": "qualified",
      "assertion": "Toledo property contracts use old Almoravid gold maravedís in 1112 and morabiti mithqals in 1115; a 1173 sale uses Alfonsine gold mithqals. This establishes local adoption history, but not every step linking gold obligations to later billon accounting.",
      "sources": [
        "A31-FRANCISCO",
        "A31-OLIVA"
      ],
      "locator": "Francisco Olmos pp293–294 notes17,21; Oliva Manso pp494–496",
      "review_origin": "research31-andalus.json"
    },
    {
      "code": "NAV31-FRANKISH-PARENT",
      "decision": "hold",
      "assertion": "Shared libra/sueldo/dinero arithmetic is insufficient to date an actual Frankish-to-Navarre adoption. No ancestry edge proposed.",
      "sources": [
        "NAV31-ALEGRIA"
      ],
      "locator": "p.303, Monedas.",
      "subject": "Research finding"
    },
    {
      "code": "NAV31-MORLAN-PARENT",
      "decision": "hold",
      "assertion": "Morlan and tournois were valued alongside sanchetes; cross-currency rates do not establish either as the Navarrese account’s predecessor.",
      "sources": [
        "NAV31-ALEGRIA"
      ],
      "locator": "p.303, Table 1.",
      "subject": "Research finding"
    },
    {
      "code": "NAV31-TOURNOIS-1355",
      "decision": "hold",
      "assertion": "The unproved 1355 implementation prevents treating its Tours-model prescription as demonstrated replacement ancestry.",
      "sources": [
        "NAV31-CRISIS"
      ],
      "locator": "pp.114–115.",
      "subject": "Research finding"
    },
    {
      "code": "NAV31-CASTILE-1513",
      "decision": "reject_as_unit_conversion",
      "assertion": "The 1513 alignment concerns coin standards; 1524 still requires local contract accounting.",
      "sources": [
        "NAV31-FRANCISCO"
      ],
      "locator": "pp.76–77.",
      "subject": "Research finding"
    },
    {
      "code": "NAV31-SPAIN-END",
      "decision": "hold",
      "assertion": "No inspected source establishes a final, territory-wide conversion of Navarrese obligations into Spanish accounting. No 1841 unit-death claim or successor edge is admitted.",
      "sources": [
        "NAV31-SORAUREN",
        "NAV31-SANTOS"
      ],
      "locator": "Soraurenpp.657–658; Santospp.417–418.",
      "subject": "Research finding"
    }
  ],
  "new_currency_ids": [
    "CUR-V31-LEONESE-SILVER-SOLIDUS",
    "CUR-V31-GALICIAN-SOLIDUS",
    "CUR-V31-BARCELONA-LLIURA",
    "CUR-V31-ARAGONESE-JACA-ACCOUNT",
    "CUR-V31-VALENCIAN-ACCOUNT",
    "CUR-V31-MALLORCAN-ACCOUNT",
    "CUR-V31-CORDOBAN-DINAR-DIRHAM",
    "CUR-V31-GRANADA-DIRHAM-ACCOUNT",
    "CUR-V31-NAVARRE-ACCOUNT"
  ],
  "new_relationship_ids": [
    "R-V31-001",
    "R-V31-002"
  ],
  "source_id_map": {
    "PERES": "S988",
    "LOPES": "S989",
    "COIMBRA": "S990",
    "S930": "S930",
    "MINT": "S991",
    "C31-OLIVA": "S992",
    "C31-TODESCA": "S993",
    "C31-NUNEZ": "S994",
    "C31-BILL1864": "S995",
    "C31-LAW1864": "S931",
    "C31-VELLON": "S996",
    "C31-PR1865": "S997",
    "C31-CANO": "S998",
    "CA31-JARRETT": "S999",
    "CA31-TAULA": "S1000",
    "CA31-IEC1912": "S1001",
    "CA31-MNAC": "S1002",
    "AR31-BURNS": "S1003",
    "AR31-LLOMPART": "S1004",
    "AR31-MATEU": "S1005",
    "AR31-POY": "S1006",
    "A31-CHALMETA": "S1007",
    "A31-ALGECIRAS": "S1008",
    "A31-NAZARI2025": "S1009",
    "A31-CORPUS": "S1010",
    "A31-OLIVA": "S992",
    "A31-FRANCISCO": "S1011",
    "NAV31-GONI": "S1012",
    "NAV31-MONEDAJE": "S1013",
    "NAV31-CRISIS": "S1014",
    "NAV31-FRANCISCO": "S1015",
    "NAV31-ALEGRIA": "S1016",
    "NAV31-SORAUREN": "S1017",
    "NAV31-SANTOS": "S1018"
  }
}