{ "version": "reconciled-tree-27", "date": "2026-10-12", "scope": "Every baseline modern qualified or optional relationship assigned an individual review. Exact dates and account-unit ancestry are separate evidence questions. Remaining unresolved links are explicitly listed, not labelled de novo. This resolves the reviewed relationships, not every historical root. The root_frontier separately inventories missing ancestors; recent observations do not prove recent origin.", "baseline_relationship_count": 73, "baseline_dispositions": { "supported": 58, "removed_from_ancestry_or_consolidated": 15 }, "current_modern_relationships": 277, "current_qualified_count": 0, "remaining_qualified": [], "relationship_reviews": [ { "edge_id": "R0140", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "1965Act substitutes cedi principalunit and converts all poundreferences in enactments and written/oral obligations at £1=2.40cedis.", "sources": [ "AF27-GH" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "PDF8–9,printed5–6,s2 substituting s13(1)–(3)", "years": [ 1965, 1965 ], "reason": "Direct contractconversion; retain separately sourced commencement day.", "new_claim_id": "C1574", "source_ids": [ "S719" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0234", "decision": "retype", "parent": "CUR-V27-SOMALIS-CFA", "child": "FTM000283", "years": 1949, "assertion": "The1949 law converts resident CFA accounts and obligations into the newly established Djibouti franc.", "sources": [ "AF27-DJ" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Arts1,4,5(misnumbered9),6,10", "kind": "unit_replacement", "role": "replacement", "date_is_creation": false, "date_limits": "March1949 retained; implementing effective day not adjudicated here.", "new_claim_id": "C1575", "source_ids": [ "S720" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0143", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Leone introduced4August1964 at10shillings; contemporary centralbank accounts use leones while WACB currency withdrawn.", "sources": [ "S194" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Claim-specific locators in evidence register", "years": [ 1964, 1964 ], "reason": "Original contemporary account history resolves succession; withdrawal endpoint not required.", "new_claim_id": "C1576", "source_ids": [ "S194" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V25-007", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Federal pound survived1963dissolution;1964–1965nationalcurrency transition divided federal monetary assets/liabilities as oldmoney withdrawn.", "sources": [ "AF27-FED", "S194" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "PDF24,PartVI sections66–70; Claim-specific locators in evidence register", "years": [ 1964, 1965 ], "reason": "Original law and contemporary UN territorialreplacement history support regional succession,not exact independence-daybirth. Supported relationship from explicit contemporary monetary succession; range and missing universal ratio remain scoped limitations, not a doubtful existence claim.", "kind": "territorial_currency_succession", "role": "regional_branch", "new_claim_id": "C1577", "source_ids": [ "S342", "S194" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V25-008", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Federal pound survived1963dissolution;1964–1965nationalcurrency transition divided federal monetary assets/liabilities as oldmoney withdrawn.", "sources": [ "AF27-FED", "S194" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "PDF24,PartVI sections66–70; Claim-specific locators in evidence register", "years": [ 1964, 1965 ], "reason": "Original law and contemporary UN territorialreplacement history support regional succession,not exact independence-daybirth. Supported relationship from explicit contemporary monetary succession; range and missing universal ratio remain scoped limitations, not a doubtful existence claim.", "kind": "territorial_currency_succession", "role": "regional_branch", "new_claim_id": "C1578", "source_ids": [ "S342", "S194" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0138", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "A separate WestAfricanpound succeeded preexisting Britishsterling circulation during1912–1913institution andissue transition; Britishsilver was actuallywithdrawn and repatriated atfacevalue.", "sources": [ "AF27-WAG", "AF27-WAH" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Gardner,AColonialCurrencyRevolution; Hansardanswer12March1923", "years": [ 1912, 1913 ], "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Originalscholarship explicitly identifies separatecurrency andregional succession; primaryanswer confirms withdrawal. Doesnotimply allindigenouscurrencies disappeared.", "new_claim_id": "C1579", "source_ids": [ "S795", "S796" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0144", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "WACB money was gradually replaced by Gambian pounds fromOctober1964 throughJune1968; the contemporary report separately identifies Gambian pound as nationalunit and reports actual exchanges and liabilities.", "sources": [ "AF27-GMB" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed25–26,paragraphs84–86; currencyunitpage", "years": [ 1964, 1968 ], "kind": "territorial_currency_succession", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Direct contemporary monetary and account history resolves regional succession; exact foundingday neednot be invented. Supersedes main bundle and earlier supplement held entry.", "new_claim_id": "C1580", "source_ids": [ "S793" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0226", "decision": "remove", "assertion": "1963 was a name change within the local Malagasy profile; actual French ancestry is supplied by revisedR0398.", "sources": [ "AF27-IMF63", "AF27-MGH" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "IMF footnote; AACB 1963paragraph", "years": 1963, "new_claim_id": "C1581", "source_ids": [ "S890", "S831" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0229", "decision": "retype", "parent": "FTM000270", "child": "FTM000272", "years": [ 1962, 1963 ], "assertion": "Comorian reckoning continues the earlier Madagascar–Comoros regional franc after the two territories become distinct legal-tender areas.", "sources": [ "AF27-CFA45", "AF27-IMF63", "AF27-COM77", "AF27-COM79" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "1950law art1 p474; IMF opening3–4/IEM section;1977paragraph54;1979arts4,6", "kind": "regional_currency_continuity", "role": "regional_branch", "date_is_creation": false, "date_limits": "1962–1963 documents transition and separate legal-tender areas, not a forced exact birth date or new institution-based identity.", "new_claim_id": "C1582", "source_ids": [ "S888", "S890", "S832", "S833" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V25-005", "decision": "retype", "assertion": "1913law mandates metropolitan-system publicaccounts from1914 and equivalents in private documents; territorialescudo adoption is explicit.", "sources": [ "TR25-S1" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "printedpp3540–3541,article1; prior territorial25.json", "years": [ 1911, 1914 ], "reason": "Account adoption firm; law alone doesnot prove newlydistinct regionalunit. Preserve profilepending independentboundary evidence.", "kind": "territorial_account_system_adoption", "role": "regional_branch", "new_claim_id": "C1583", "source_ids": [ "S652" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V25-006", "decision": "retype", "assertion": "1913law mandates metropolitan-system publicaccounts from1914 and equivalents in private documents; territorialescudo adoption is explicit.", "sources": [ "TR25-S1" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "printedpp3540–3541,article1; prior territorial25.json", "years": [ 1911, 1914 ], "reason": "Account adoption firm; law alone doesnot prove newlydistinct regionalunit. Preserve profilepending independentboundary evidence.", "kind": "territorial_account_system_adoption", "role": "regional_branch", "new_claim_id": "C1584", "source_ids": [ "S652" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V25-009", "decision": "retype", "parent": "FTM000175", "child": "FTM000263", "years": 1945, "assertion": "The western territorial CFA lineage branches from metropolitan-franc reckoning in1945 and continues through later union institutions.", "sources": [ "AF27-CFA45", "AF27-IMF63", "TR25-S6" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Decree art1; IMF opening1; Barthélémy275–277", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "date_is_creation": false, "new_claim_id": "C1585", "source_ids": [ "S888", "S890", "S655" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V25-010", "decision": "retype", "parent": "FTM000175", "child": "FTM000264", "years": 1945, "assertion": "The central territorial CFA lineage branches from metropolitan-franc reckoning in1945 and continues through later union institutions.", "sources": [ "AF27-CFA45", "AF27-IMF63", "TR25-S8" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Decree art1; IMF opening2;1972convention arts7–9,12", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "date_is_creation": false, "new_claim_id": "C1586", "source_ids": [ "S888", "S890", "S657" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0368", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "SouthAfricanlocal pound reckoning developed from Britishsterling account andredemption practices into a separatelyidentified monetaryunit duringthe wartime/postwar transition; byJanuary1925commissioners explicitly distinguishedtheSouthAfricanunit fromsterling.", "sources": [ "AF27-SA22", "AF27-SA25" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "1922pp1325–1329;1925p172paragraph11", "years": [ 1914, 1925 ], "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Contemporaryaccount andcontract-redemption history plusoriginalcommissionexplicit unitdistinction supportsancestry. Rangeisresearchenvelope,notexactbirth;1922firstnotes are notcreationproof.", "new_claim_id": "C1587", "source_ids": [ "S797", "S798" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0399", "parent": "FTM000175", "child": "FTM000278", "decision": "retype", "assertion": "Frenchfranc was adopted as Tunisia’s monetaryreference in1891,while the actual localreplacement was Tunisianpiastre→Tunisianfranc. KeepFrenchconnection as context for account-system adoption,not a second replacementparent.", "sources": [ "AF27-TNM" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Monnayage du Royaume de Tunisie sous le protectorat français, first paragraph (web lines241–247); preceding Husaynid section228–235", "years": 1891, "kind": "account_system_adoption", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "reason": "The localpiastreparent supplies directsuccession; Frenchmodeladoption alone doesnot prove a separateflow ofFrench-unit debts intoTunisianunit. Excludefromancestryreachmetrics.", "new_claim_id": "C1588", "source_ids": [ "S465" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R-V26-007", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "1967decree retained Nigerianmoney; January1968replacement establishes Biafran monetarysuccession; actual1969oil obligation denominated in Biafranpounds independently establishes contractualidentity.", "sources": [ "S713", "S708" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Attributed article beginning below the page introduction; The Bank of Biafra; The first Republic of Biafra Bank note issue; final recall paragraphs before Bibliography; Opening facts (February 1969 oil sale); discussion of Decree 48/1968; final paragraphs on absence of official conversion and prohibited substitution", "years": [ 1968, 1968 ], "reason": "Originalnumismaticresearch reproduces law; directjudgment proves realunit. Exactfirstday and universalratio withheld. Supported relationship from explicit contemporary monetary succession; range and missing universal ratio remain scoped limitations, not a doubtful existence claim.", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "new_claim_id": "C1589", "source_ids": [ "S713", "S708" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V26-008", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Katanga separated its own franc unit from the Congolese monetary territory during1960–1962secession; the contemporary report explicitly records that unit's creation and its later return conversion.", "sources": [ "AF27-KWB" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed18,paragraph52", "years": [ 1960, 1962 ], "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Original contemporary monetary research suffices for scoped regional succession; retain range because original founding account law not inspected. Parity alone is not the argument. This supersedes the main bundle's keep_qualified disposition.", "new_claim_id": "C1590", "source_ids": [ "S792" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0402", "decision": "merge", "assertion": "The Barbados colonial-dollar profile represents a territorial administration of the existing British West Indian dollar, continued as the principal unit under regional currency arrangements. The1951transfer of note issue does not create an additional currency identity.", "sources": [ "BBHANSARD1946", "BBARMSTRONG" ], "status": "supported_inference", "locator": "Hansard423cc1994–1995, first ministerial answer; Armstrong93,110–112", "years": [ 1946, 1951 ], "reason": "Primary contemporary ministerial evidence explicitly identifies the proposed common principal unit as an existing unit. Under the project's unit-of-account identity rule, the instrument/issuer boundary should be merged, while account observations and institutional history remain. This supersedes the earlier unresolved classification; not a parity-only merger.", "new_claim_id": "C1591", "source_ids": [ "S848", "S736" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0404", "decision": "remove", "assertion": "Sterlingcoin circulation does not establish sterling as the accountunit immediately replaced in1894. Primary1894ordinance instead makes USDgold the standardforcontracts.", "sources": [ "BZ1913", "BZCB" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printedp22/PDFp22, BritishHonduras, excerptOrdinance31of1894; 1894reform paragraph and earliercirculation chronology", "years": 1894, "reason": "Remove foundingancestry; retainmixedcirculation/standard context. Do not autoaddUSDparent until BZDseparation fromthe adoptedUSDunit is evidenced.", "new_claim_id": "C1592", "source_ids": [ "S732", "S104" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0412", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Law1528 expressly transforms existing USD obligations andbankdeposits intoDominicanpesos inphase2 beginning1February1948, while preserving1937subsidiarycoins.", "sources": [ "DO1528", "DO4921" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "PDFpp1,3,7–8: arts1–2,5,20(1)–(2); Appended decree, resolution paragraph4; Gaceta6749,11Feb1948", "years": 1948, "reason": "Direct accountconversion resolves earlier note-onlylimitation. Legalnewunit enacted1947; operativegeneralaccounttransition1948.", "kind": "account_unit_replacement", "role": "founding_or_early_ancestry", "new_claim_id": "C1593", "source_ids": [ "S727", "S728" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-017", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "The1896monetary reform established the colón after Costa Rican peso accounting; the new unit subsequently denominated bank capital under1900law.", "sources": [ "CRBANK" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Historical paragraphs1–3", "years": 1896, "kind": "currency_replacement", "role": "founding_or_early_ancestry", "reason": "Authoritative monetary history identifies prior peso obligations and subsequent principal colón unit. Do not assert a conversion ratio or merge as mere rename without further evidence.", "new_claim_id": "C1594", "source_ids": [ "S626" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-052", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Original tradeaccountresearch explicitly identifiesHonduranpeso as unitreplaced bylempira under1926decree102, withcirculationin1931.", "sources": [ "HNLEDEZMA" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printedp120,section1.1 and note5; DOI10.1017/S0212610917000180", "years": [ 1926, 1931 ], "reason": "Fulltext nowinspected, correcting obsoleteindexed-only limitation. Supportedlocalreplacement; exact obligationconversiondate/rate withheld.", "kind": "account_unit_replacement", "role": "founding_or_early_ancestry", "new_claim_id": "C1595", "source_ids": [ "S545" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0407", "decision": "upgrade", "status": "supported", "years": [ 1987, 1990 ], "sources": [ "ONT27-FKP" ], "locator": "ss 1 commencement note,3,4,8,12,15; PDF pp 3–7", "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "regional_branch", "assertion": "The Currency Ordinance defines the Falkland Islands pound and substitutes that local currency into sterling-denominated local obligations and enactments. This establishes the sterling relationship; the earlier independent-unit boundary is not dated by the 1899 note issue.", "reason": "Sections 3–4 and 8 establish the unit and inherited obligation framework; 1987–1990 is the inspected legal attestation, not a claim that no local distinction existed earlier.", "new_claim_id": "C1596", "source_ids": [ "S893" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V23-007", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Archivalresearch documentsDutch-to-Curaçaounit separation culminatinginroyalapproval17October1942 andthe1943regulation, followingearlierdisputes.", "sources": [ "CU1993" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printedpp234–235/PDF46–47,notes106–108", "years": [ 1937, 1943 ], "reason": "Replacevague1827–1945envelope by evidencedseparationprocess; do notassign1937noteissue as exactbirth.", "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "founding_or_early_ancestry", "new_claim_id": "C1597", "source_ids": [ "S735" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V23-022", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "The nascent Salvadoran republic inherited the Spanish real system, including its multiples and subdivisions, through independence and the Central American federation.", "sources": [ "SVMUA" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "PDF5 introductory historical paragraph", "years": [ 1821, 1841 ], "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "founding_or_early_ancestry", "reason": "Original university museum history explicitly states inherited monetary system. Existing Salvadoran peso/colón profile can include real denominations; avoid an extra node for decimalisation.", "new_claim_id": "C1598", "source_ids": [ "S836" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V25-001", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "The Surinamese guilder separated from the Netherlands monetary system in1940, beginning local monetary autonomy.", "sources": [ "SRBANK" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Historical paragraphs1827–1940and1940–present", "years": 1940, "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "founding_or_early_ancestry", "reason": "Explicit monetary-authority account of separation establishes branching without requiring an uninspected universal conversion clause. Does not make USD peg ancestry.", "new_claim_id": "C1599", "source_ids": [ "S835" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V25-003", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "1881law mandatesnationalunit contracts andconversionofexistingobligations; localbank emissions mustrenew inmoneda nacional withintwoyears. BuenosAirespeso isone localinput.", "sources": [ "AR1130" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Articles1,5,7–8,11,13–15", "years": [ 1881, 1883 ], "reason": "Typedunification supported;no inventeduniversal25:1ratio, noexclusiveBAparent.", "kind": "multiple_currency_unification", "role": "founding_or_early_ancestry", "new_claim_id": "C1600", "source_ids": [ "S629" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0403", "decision": "merge", "assertion": "Bahamianpoundnotes were localsterlinginstruments withinBritishsterling moneyofaccount expresslygoverningcontracts andliabilities.", "sources": [ "BSPRIMARY", "BSRABUSHKA" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Chapter300 complete substantive section;29November1838; adjacent ch301CurrencyNoteAct1936; Printedpp6,10,23; Appendix1936CurrencyNoteActpp52ff", "years": [ 1838, 1966 ], "reason": "MergeT-FTM000522intoT-FTM000497; preserve1919notehistoryand1966dollaraccountreplacement withinredirectededges.", "new_claim_id": "C1601", "source_ids": [ "S729", "S730" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0405", "decision": "merge", "assertion": "The modern locally issued Bermuda pound is sterling accounting, rather than a demonstrated separate principal account unit. British currency replaced the earlier local reckoning in1842; the1970dollar transition superseded this sterling system.", "sources": [ "BMWOOL", "BMA50" ], "status": "supported_inference", "locator": "Woolhouse112; BMA decimalisation passage", "years": [ 1842, 1970 ], "reason": "Current graph's branch is supported by local issue alone. Merge the modern local-sterling profile into sterling; preserve any independently evidenced pre1842local currency separately. This is ontology adjudication, not a claim that parity alone proves identity.", "new_claim_id": "C1602", "source_ids": [ "S837", "S202" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0411", "decision": "retype", "assertion": "QuetzalUSDfoundingrelation isgoldstandardparity; actuallocalpredecessor wasGuatemalanpeso, exchanged60:1.", "sources": [ "GT2024" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printedpp108,119/PDF112,123; discussion decrees879,1379 and1925lawchVIarts49–57", "years": [ 1924, 1926 ], "reason": "ExcludeUSDparity fromancestrypaths; addexistingpeso→quetzal replacement.", "kind": "standard_alignment", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "new_claim_id": "C1603", "source_ids": [ "S733" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0413", "decision": "retype", "assertion": "Law84of28June1904 establishesbalboa; USDgoldlegal equivalence issharedstandard/legal tender, not evidenceofUSDaccountunit succession.", "sources": [ "PA84" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "PDFp2, GacetaOficial33,5July1904,rightcolumn arts1–6", "years": 1904, "reason": "Correctlawdate; Colombianlimitedcoinredemption doesnot establishgeneralaccountconversion.", "kind": "standard_alignment", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "new_claim_id": "C1604", "source_ids": [ "S734" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0416", "decision": "retype", "assertion": "USDparity doesnotestablish córdobaancestry; primary1913law converts localpeso contracts,statutes,feesandfines to córdobas.", "sources": [ "NI1913" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Articles 1–2 and 4; La Gaceta103,8May1913", "years": [ 1912, 1913 ], "reason": "Replaceancestrypath by documentedexistingpeso parent; retainUSDstandard ascontext.", "kind": "standard_alignment", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "new_claim_id": "C1605", "source_ids": [ "S726" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0377", "decision": "upgrade", "years": [ 1903, 1906 ], "assertion": "The locally used Mexican-dollar reckoning differentiated into the Straits dollar through the1903–1906 reform: Mexican dollars were the1890 standard within existing commercial dollar accounts; local dollars replaced them and obtained an independent exchange value.", "sources": [ "AS27F-STRAITS" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "ChapterXI pp.136–141", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Actual dollar accounts plus explicit local replacement establish ancestry; metal equivalence alone is not the basis.1906 completes independent valuation, not a further node.", "new_claim_id": "C1606", "source_ids": [ "S840" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-035", "decision": "upgrade", "years": [ 1914, 1947 ], "assertion": "Seychelles developed its local rupee accounting from the inherited Mauritian rupee system: local issue began1914, sterling-based rules replaced earlier redemption rules in1936, and Mauritian instruments largely ceased locally in1947.", "sources": [ "AS27M-SEY" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed pp.2–4 and5–6", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Regional differentiation is supported by inherited unit, legal evolution and actual rupee deposit accounts. Neither issuer change alone nor identical exchange parity supplies the edge.", "new_claim_id": "C1607", "source_ids": [ "S540" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-036", "decision": "upgrade", "years": [ 1872, 1949 ], "assertion": "The Ceylon rupee developed from local Indian-rupee accounting: public accounts used rupees and cents from1872; an independent Ceylon rupee subsequently separated from INR, with the link explicitly severed in1949.", "sources": [ "AS27M-CEY", "AS27M-EXTER" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Fernando §§14,17,19; Exter pp.3–5", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Regional descent is documented; the broad interval represents differentiation, not uncertainty that the ancestry exists. Do not equate local note issue with the sole creation date.", "new_claim_id": "C1608", "source_ids": [ "S804", "S805" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-054", "decision": "upgrade", "years": [ 1937, 1947 ], "assertion": "Burma differentiated its rupee from the Indian rupee system: the1937 arrangement retained INR linkage and RBI management; the1946 currency law established local rupee accounting, and the currency board assumed prior liabilities in1947.", "sources": [ "AS27M-HANS", "AS27M-BUR" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Hansard17July1946 opening; Diehl pp.8–9, Act1946 §§10,25", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "The parent relationship is supported despite multiple institutional stages. Kyat naming/decimalization remains within the existing Myanmar identity under project policy.", "new_claim_id": "C1609", "source_ids": [ "S807", "S806" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0408", "decision": "upgrade", "years": [ 1877, 1934 ], "assertion": "Mauritius adopted the Indian rupee at par effective1January1877, replacing its earlier dollar at two rupees per dollar; local rupee accounting later separated its anchor from India in1934.", "sources": [ "AS27M-MAU" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed pp.174–175 and178", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Account adoption, local loan accounts and later independent valuation establish regional descent, not a metal-standard resemblance.", "new_claim_id": "C1610", "source_ids": [ "S189" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V23-009", "decision": "upgrade", "years": [ 1894, 1906 ], "assertion": "Macao pataca accounting was explicitly established as one Mexican dollar per pataca in1894; the subsequent local currency adopted that accounting unit.", "sources": [ "AS27M-MAC" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Opening paragraph", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "This is explicit adoption of an existing monetary account, not etymology or coin weight alone. Local issue chronology remains bounded; the ancestry is supported.", "new_claim_id": "C1611", "source_ids": [ "S808" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "id": "R-V24-001", "operation": "upgrade_narrow_scope", "parent": "CUR-V24-NPL-PAISA16", "child": "FTM000384", "years": [ 1901, 1908 ], "status": "supported", "kind": "absorbed_into_existing_currency", "role": "later_unification_or_absorption", "creates_currency": false, "founding_predecessor": false, "assertion": "The concurrent16-ganda paisa-rupee account was abolished during the reported nationwide consolidation into mohar-rupee accounting.", "sources": [ "S577", "S576" ], "locator": "S577 pp9–11 item10; S576 p73", "date_note": "Bounded reporting envelope, not an exact decree date.", "qualification": "No universal conversion ratio, redemption rule or wholesale debt carry-over is asserted. If graph absorption requires documented balance conversion rather than administrative replacement of accounting, retain qualified status while recording the now-supported narrower consolidation claim.", "edge_id": "R-V24-001", "decision": "upgrade", "reason": "Bounded reporting envelope, not an exact decree date.", "new_claim_id": "C1612", "source_ids": [ "S577", "S576" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0414", "decision": "retype", "assertion": "The 1903 Philippine reform defined a gold peso and made US gold dollars tender at two pesos per dollar. The date is enactment; commencement depended on the stipulated coin supply. Spanish and Mexican predecessors are additional inputs, not erased by the new standard.", "sources": [ "S474" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Existing individual source inspection and revision27 ontology review; retained source evidence behind C996", "years": [ 1903, 1903 ], "reason": "The1903 US-dollar statutory ratio is monetary-standard/legal-tender influence. It is not in itself conversion of prior USD account obligations into a new Philippine unit. Keep optional standard-adoption context, excluded from ancestry.", "kind": "standard_alignment", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "new_claim_id": "C1613", "source_ids": [ "S474" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "id": "R-V23-015", "operation": "reclassify_non_ancestral_context", "parent": "FTM000144", "child": "T-FTM000719", "years": 1980, "status": "supported", "kind": "historical_name_restoration", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "creates_currency": false, "founding_predecessor": false, "ancestry_traversable": false, "count_toward_depth": false, "assertion": "The national currency name was restored after abolition; an account-balance succession between the two riels has not been established.", "sources": [ "ONT27-VICKERY-KHR", "ONT27-GAO-KHR", "ONT27-PRASSO-KHR", "S574" ], "locator": "As above", "preservation": "Preserve context and source history; remove from optional ancestry traversal as well as primary traversal.", "edge_id": "R-V23-015", "decision": "retype", "reason": "Account-unit source adjudication.", "new_claim_id": "C1614", "source_ids": [ "S591", "S838", "S839", "S574" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-037", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Mongolian yanchaan accounting was displaced by togrog in institutional budgets, financial statements, tax returns and prices by1927.", "sources": [ "AS27-MNT" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "1925–27 reform paragraphs", "years": [ 1925, 1927 ], "kind": "account_unit_replacement", "role": "replacement", "reason": "Exact Chinese identity of scoped yanchaan parent is a root uncertainty; it does not weaken the explicitly described local account transition.", "new_claim_id": "C1615", "source_ids": [ "S308" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-050", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Decision87-CP converted southern deposits, capital accounts, wages, pensions and prices into nationwide dong at0.80southern dong to1newdong, while northern dong converted1:1.", "sources": [ "AS27-VN" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Articles2 and8", "years": 1978, "kind": "absorbed_into_existing_currency", "role": "absorption", "reason": "Article8 removes note-only uncertainty. Under no-new-node-for-issuer/scale policy, northern account continuity stays with existingVND; southern account is absorbed. Earlier South Vietnamese phases still require their own evidence.", "new_claim_id": "C1616", "source_ids": [ "S738" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V23-011", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "December1947 reform established northern money as sole unlimited public/private settlement medium, converted prior common-unit instruments at par and regulated existing deposits and debts.", "sources": [ "AS27-NK" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Articles1–6,8–9", "years": 1947, "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "branch", "reason": "Distinct northern settlement jurisdiction together with legal withdrawal of cross-border common instruments and handling of balances supports regional branch; do not create a Soviet-ruble parent.", "new_claim_id": "C1617", "source_ids": [ "S570" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-046", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Riau payroll and pensions switched fromKR to ordinary IndonesianRp in1964; pre-existing KR payment/deduction obligations required a ministerial settlement procedure.", "sources": [ "AS27-RIAUPAY64" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Preamble, arts1,3,6; explanation art3", "years": 1964, "kind": "absorbed_into_existing_currency", "role": "absorption", "reason": "Actual statutory remuneration and residual KR obligations establish account-unit absorption, not merely note withdrawal. June1tender andJuly1salary commencement are separate milestones.", "new_claim_id": "C1618", "source_ids": [ "S741" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-010", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Act1088 explicitly made won the unit of account from10June1962, at1won:10hwan, regulating outstanding hwan-denominated debts and deposits.", "sources": [ "AS27-KR62" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Articles2–4", "years": 1962, "kind": "account_unit_replacement", "role": "replacement", "reason": "Principal account-unit replacement retained under clarified project ontology; exact conversion does not itself imply identity.", "new_claim_id": "C1619", "source_ids": [ "S747" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0340", "decision": "merge", "assertion": "The Russian national ruble continues the inherited ruble account unit: the 1992 implementing resolution carries Soviet instruments into all payments and bank accounts at their nominal amounts. Issuer succession does not create a separate currency identity.", "sources": [ "EA_RU92", "EA_RULAW" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Paragraphs 2 and 4; Articles 3, 6, 9, 12", "years": 1992, "reason": "Merge Soviet/inherited ruble-zone identity into Russian ruble continuity; retain Soviet era and 1993 instrument withdrawal as profile events. This adjudicates the unit boundary, without denying territorial separations elsewhere.", "kind": "same_unit_continuity", "role": "continuity_event", "new_claim_id": "C1620", "source_ids": [ "S748", "S749" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-029", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Kazakhstan replaced inherited ruble currency with the tenge in November 1993: Decree 1399 establishes payments and deposits in tenge; Decree 1400 orders the outgoing ruble notes exchanged for it.", "sources": [ "EA_KZ1399", "EA_KZ1400" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Paragraphs 1–3; Paragraph 1", "years": 1993, "reason": "Direct statutory replacement establishes ancestry. Do not generalize a 500:1 ratio to every account from these two decrees, which do not specify that ratio.", "kind": "currency_replacement", "role": "founding_or_early_ancestry", "new_claim_id": "C1621", "source_ids": [ "S750", "S751" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-026", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "The Belarusian account rubel separated from the inherited ruble zone during 1992–1994. IMF chronology identifies a national noncash rubel in July 1992; the 1994 finance instruction concerns denomination of its assets and liabilities.", "sources": [ "EA_BYIMF", "EA_BY94" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Historical monetary chronology: July 1992 noncash rubel and May 1994 sole legal tender; Implementation of joint Resolution 15/1 of 12 August 1994; asset and liability denomination", "years": [ 1992, 1994 ], "reason": "Ancestry is directly documented; the broad transition date remains intentional. Do not equate May 1992 coupon issue, May 1994 tender declaration and August 1994 denomination.", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "new_claim_id": "C1622", "source_ids": [ "S753", "S752" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-032", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Libya’s Currency Law expressly converts existing Cyrenaican Egyptian-pound obligations into Libyan pounds; the 11 March 1952 announcement supplies 97.5 Egyptian piastres per Libyan pound.", "sources": [ "EA_LY4", "EA_LY16" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Articles 10–13; Operative conversion rates under Currency Law sections 12,13,24", "years": 1952, "reason": "Regional limitation remains: this is the Cyrenaica predecessor, with separate Tripolitania and Fezzan parents.", "kind": "currency_replacement", "role": "regional_branch", "new_claim_id": "C1623", "source_ids": [ "S764", "S765" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-042", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Lebanon’s pound branches from the common Syrian-Lebanese monetary unit: the 1937 agreement separated currencies, while 1948 agreements and withdrawal ended their effective interchangeability.", "sources": [ "EA_LBWB", "S289" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed pp31–35, paragraphs 96–104; PDF pages41–45; Evolution of Lebanese Currency, 1964 entry", "years": [ 1937, 1948 ], "reason": "The broad interval distinguishes legal institutional separation from operational monetary separation; it is not merely two note designs.", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "new_claim_id": "C1624", "source_ids": [ "S766", "S289" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-043", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "The new Syrian-Lebanese currency replaced the Egyptian currency used under the postwar occupation. The common unit is documented from 1920 and formalized in the 1924 concession.", "sources": [ "S289", "EA_LBWB" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Evolution of Lebanese Currency, 1964 entry; Printed pp31–35, paragraphs 96–104; PDF pages41–45", "years": [ 1920, 1924 ], "reason": "Issuer authoritative history explicitly identifies replacement; no claim that a French-franc peg supplies the Egyptian ancestry.", "kind": "currency_replacement", "role": "regional_branch", "new_claim_id": "C1625", "source_ids": [ "S289", "S766" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V24-004", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "The Hejazi Saudi account system adapted Ottoman theoretical gold-piastre reckoning in 1928. The March 1936 finance instructions explicitly superseded that gold-piastre revenue unit with Saudi piastres, doubling stated revenue amounts.", "sources": [ "S611", "S612" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "British Library IOR/R/15/2/310, fol.120v, printed p.17, paragraphs 2–4; British Library IOR/R/15/2/310, fol.121r, printed p.18, translated enclosure, clauses 1–7", "years": [ 1928, 1936 ], "reason": "Direct contemporary account-unit lineage and later legal revenue conversion support regional ancestry. Do not generalize it to every currency circulating in Najd.", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "new_claim_id": "C1626", "source_ids": [ "S611", "S612" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V25-014", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Sudan replaced Egyptian currency with its own pound in 1957 at parity; the Currency Board exchanged Egyptian notes from 8 April to 7 July and subsequently coins, assuming the earlier government coin liability.", "sources": [ "EA_CBSTAT", "S667" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed pp213–215 (South Arabia); pp228–229 (Sudan); p.150 footnote1; p.169 currency settlement; money-supply table5 and table notes in HTML counterpart", "years": 1957, "reason": "Documented actual monetary replacement, not inference from a sterling peg. Exact cash windows do not define every obligation.", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "new_claim_id": "C1627", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S667" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V25-013", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "The Sudanese dinar succeeded the Sudanese pound at ten pounds per dinar. The 2002 Act expressly defines the dinar as the unit; the 1992 note introduction and July 1999 IFS unit/reporting milestone must remain separate.", "sources": [ "S664", "S665" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Chapter I interpretation; Chapter IV capital; Chapter V currency unit (§19), legal tender; Country Notes printed p.194, PDF920, Sudan 732: Exchange Rates and Monetary Authorities", "years": [ 1992, 1999 ], "reason": "Upgrade ancestry while preserving date uncertainty: 1992 cash issue is not assumed to establish every account conversion. Original implementing transition instrument still missing.", "kind": "currency_replacement", "role": "founding_or_early_ancestry", "new_claim_id": "C1628", "source_ids": [ "S664", "S665" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0152", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Covered rupee contractual references became florins1:1 under the1920Order; local commencement proclamation dated July19.", "sources": [ "EU27-KENYA" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed pp4–5, Currency", "years": 1920, "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Direct legal-account substitution with note overlap; no universal cash extinction.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1629", "source_ids": [ "S335" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0289", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "March25,1919 legislation converted covered crown contracts and Austrian-resident checking deposits at par into Austrian stamped-crown obligations.", "sources": [ "EU27-AUSTRIA" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed pp9–10,14 (PDF14–15,19)", "years": 1919, "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Explicit account distinction and resident/nonresident exceptions resolve stamping-only concern.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1630", "source_ids": [ "S768" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0297", "decision": "upgrade", "years": 1939, "assertion": "The Protectorate retained the inherited Czechoslovak koruna locally after the 1939 territorial partition. Article 10 retained koruna payments and article 12 existing law; subsequent Protectorate budgets and claims remained koruna-denominated within the distinct occupation monetary regime.", "sources": [ "EA_CZ1939", "EA_CNB1939" ], "status": "supported", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "locator": "Decree articles 10, 12; central-bank history paragraphs 1–5", "reason": "The connection is local continuation of the former common account system after territorial separation. There was no new unit created merely by renaming the bank or printing new notes. The 10:1 Reichsmark rating is a peg/control relation, not its ancestry.", "new_claim_id": "C1631", "source_ids": [ "S816", "S817" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0311", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "The1927Saorstat pound established a local account unit; future domestic contracts defaulted to its legal currency while prior sterling obligations were not universally converted.", "sources": [ "EU27-IRELAND", "EU27-IRISH-ACT" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed pp90–92; Section10; compare section4", "years": [ 1927, 1928 ], "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Original historical analysis plus indexed operative contract clause supports regional branch, not restoration of pre1826unit.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1632", "source_ids": [ "S153", "S770" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0328", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "June24,1948 eastern monetary reform converted Reichsmark-system balances under differentiated statutory ratios.", "sources": [ "EU27-EASTMARK" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Sections1,4–9; ZVOBlNr20 June28,1948 p217", "years": 1948, "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Account conversions and exceptions establish distinct territorial unit, beyond note stamping.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1633", "source_ids": [ "S771" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "id": "R0343", "operation": "remove_self_edge_after_identity_merge", "parent": "FTM000254", "child": "T-FTM000938", "assertion": "Dinar-for-dinar retained-unit extension becomes a dated profile observation.", "sources": [ "ONT27-MIJATOVIC" ], "locator": "p46", "edge_id": "R0343", "decision": "merge", "status": "supported", "reason": "Account-unit source adjudication.", "new_claim_id": "C1634", "source_ids": [ "S788" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "id": "R0344", "operation": "upgrade", "parent": "FTM000322", "child": "T-FTM000937", "years": [ 1919, 1920 ], "status": "supported", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "creates_currency": true, "assertion": "Inherited crown accounting continued within the separated SouthSlav monetary area.", "sources": [ "ONT27-MIJATOVIC" ], "locator": "pp46–48", "date_note": "Exact separation day unproved; explicit account anchor13January1920.", "edge_id": "R0344", "decision": "upgrade", "reason": "Exact separation day unproved; explicit account anchor13January1920.", "new_claim_id": "C1635", "source_ids": [ "S788" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0347", "decision": "upgrade", "years": 1945, "assertion": "The DFJ dinar replaced Serbian occupation dinars in the 1945 monetary unification. The April rates law valued 100 occupation Serbian dinars at 5 DFJ dinars and applied conversion to wartime obligations; prewar Yugoslav obligations were treated separately.", "sources": [ "EA_YUILIC", "EA_YUREVIEW", "EA_YU1945LAW" ], "status": "supported", "kind": "multiple_currency_unification", "role": "replacement", "locator": "Ilić section 2 notes 9–10; Jugoslovenski pregled November 1983 p. 433; official conversion schedule", "reason": "Actual replacement and obligation conversion are directly documented. The Serbian branch is one incoming currency among several, not the exclusive origin of the postwar unit. Dates remain year level to avoid imposing a universal territorial changeover day.", "new_claim_id": "C1636", "source_ids": [ "S820", "S819", "S818" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0361", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "The Tongan local pound branched from the earlier sterling reckoning,with a separate legally administered exchange regime established in1935–1936.", "sources": [ "EU27-TONGA", "EU27-TONGANRBT" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Little pp48–49,1935Treasury Notes Act and1936Gazette;NRBT1936chronology", "years": [ 1935, 1936 ], "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Original statutory research and official monetary history distinguish Tongan obligations from both sterling and Australian currency. Australian pound is the selected anchor, not demonstrated adopted predecessor.1919/1921notes remain prior sterling-issue context; Little speculation about1929not admitted.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1637", "source_ids": [ "S772", "S240" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0363", "decision": "merge", "assertion": "Western Samoan pound is retained as a local-issue alias of the New Zealand pound,which was replaced by the tala in1967.", "sources": [ "EU27-SAMOA1959", "EU27-SAMOA-BUNDES", "EU27-SAMOA1966LAW", "EU27-SAMOA-HISTORY" ], "status": "supported_inference", "locator": "1959s39;Bundesbank SamoaPDF209;1966ss3–5", "years": [ 1959, 1967 ], "kind": "identity_continuity", "role": "continuity", "reason": "Affirmative same-currency statutory wording plus authoritative explicit alias and replacement evidence supports consolidating the issuer node.1961section3remains uninspected but no positive independentaccountunit evidence overrides explicit alias. Preserve local legal-note/issuer chronology as profile epochs.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "merge_into": "T-FTM000510", "remove_self_edge": true, "new_claim_id": "C1638", "source_ids": [ "S774", "S825", "S826", "S451" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-020", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "1924regulation converted covered private-law claims payable inPolishmarks intozlotys under a datedvaluation scale.", "sources": [ "EU27-ZLOTY1924", "S535" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "DU1924No42item441§§1–2,pp653–654", "years": 1924, "kind": "account_unit_replacement", "role": "replacement", "reason": "Direct account-obligation conversion establishes1924edge; laterwar/postwar continuity is a separate profilequestion.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1639", "source_ids": [ "S786", "S535" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-041", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "East African-shilling obligations payable in the Somali Republic were converted at parity into Somali shillings in1961,with accounting records required in that unit.", "sources": [ "EU27-SOMALI1961", "EU27-SOMALI-RATIFY" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Arts8–11,printed pp5–6", "years": 1961, "kind": "territorial_currency_replacement", "role": "absorption", "reason": "Explicit primary account/debt conversion resolves the ancestry, independently of later1962 note issue. Regional northern input is an absorption into an already established southern lineage. Exact conversion day remains unspecified.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1640", "source_ids": [ "S821", "S822" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-045", "decision": "upgrade", "status": "supported", "years": 1922, "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "regional_branch", "assertion": "The Icelandic króna became a separate currency when Iceland exited its monetary union with Denmark in1922. This documents regional monetary succession; earlier local note issues are not treated as separate currency creation.", "sources": [ "ROOT27-ICELAND" ], "locator": "Dissertation chapter2, section2.3, p70; original central-bank working paper68 p10", "reason": "Original monetary-history research explicitly identifies the shared system and its separation. No inferred branch from a banknote issue alone.", "new_claim_id": "C1641", "source_ids": [ "S829" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V22-048", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "CurrencyOrdinance§8 converted covered UKcurrency obligations and statutory references to equivalent local StHelenacurrency, with overseas-payment exception.", "sources": [ "EU27-STHELENA" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Sections3–4,8,12,21; commencement header", "years": [ 1975, 1976 ], "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Direct account substitution establishes scoped branch even at parity; multiple commencement dates require care.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1642", "source_ids": [ "S775" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0312", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Malta pound developed from sterling into an independently legislated local account currency by1968;1972decimalization retained that principal unit.", "sources": [ "EU27-MALTA", "EU27-MALTAWB", "EU27-MALTA1971" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Licari pp17–18;Findlay/Wellisz p268;ActXX1971s2", "years": [ 1949, 1968 ], "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Explicit original monetary history plus legal independence and primary continuity establish ancestry.1949is lowerbound of permanent local issue,1968firm independentlegalregime; do not make1914notes or1972subdivision change a newcurrencybirth.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1643", "source_ids": [ "S776", "S824", "S823" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0314", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Cyprus currency inherited sterling reckoning; by1949 domestic contracts and statutory shilling references were explicitly construed in local legalcurrency and Cyprusshillings.", "sources": [ "EU27-CYPRUS1949", "S434" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "CurrencyLaw1949§§5,8–9,12–13,pp95–97", "years": [ 1879, 1949 ], "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Actual local obligation-denomination clauses resolve ancestry beyond metrology. Range denotes emergence before firm1949anchor, not exact1879creation.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1644", "source_ids": [ "S785", "S434" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0358", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Australian pound separated from the common sterling account system during1929–1936monetary breakup; earlier local sterling use and notes are continuity observations.", "sources": [ "EU27-DECKER", "EU27-AUSTRALIA", "S93" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Decker2022pp375–379;AGSOpinion1564", "years": [ 1929, 1936 ], "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Original account-unit research explicitly identifies regional separation. Earlier common-unit evidence affects branchdate/profileepoch, not existence of ancestry.1825/1910notproven distinct-unit birth.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1645", "source_ids": [ "S784", "S777", "S93" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0359", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "1933legislation established distinctive NZcurrency and default local contract denomination, with redemption of earlier local notes into new legalcurrency.", "sources": [ "EU27-NZ", "EU27-NZLAW" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed p48,PDF47; footnote40; Section7", "years": [ 1933, 1935 ], "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Original central-bank legal study explicitly distinguishes NZpounds from sterlingissuedinNZ; indexed contract provision corroborates. No fixed sterling conversion ratio asserted.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1646", "source_ids": [ "S779", "S778" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0360", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Fiji developed a separate local pound from sterling during1929–1933;1933 legislation placed local monetary obligations on their own sterling-exchange basis.", "sources": [ "EU27-FIJITAMMARO", "EU27-FIJIKRUS" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Tammaro pp41–43,52; Krus/Schuler pp107–110; Currency Notes Ordinance No6 of1933, effective1November", "years": [ 1929, 1933 ], "kind": "account_unit_branching", "role": "regional_branch", "reason": "Original monetary research documents local monetary-account continuity from British currency and subsequent independent legal monetary regime.1914 issuer creation alone is not the unit birth.1929 is earliest observed market separation;1933 is firm legal endpoint for the bounded branch, not an exact claim of1929 legal founding.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1647", "source_ids": [ "S789", "S189" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0267", "decision": "retype", "assertion": "The Estonian mark founding standard referenced the Ostmark; this standard reference is retained as context and excluded from ancestry traversal.", "sources": [ "EU27-ESTONIA", "S410" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed p9,PDF10; Estonian mark; first kroon; occupation; second kroon sections", "years": 1918, "kind": "standard_alignment", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "reason": "Retain supported optional standard_reference, not ancestry; keep_qualified denotes unresolved proposed ancestry only. Do not downgrade existing parity fact.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "new_claim_id": "C1648", "source_ids": [ "S780", "S410" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0364", "decision": "retype", "assertion": "In Samoa,the New Zealand-pound account unit,locally called Western Samoan pound,was converted to tala at2tala per pound on10July1967.", "sources": [ "EU27-SAMOA-BUNDES", "EU27-SAMOA1966LAW" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Bundesbank SamoaPDF209;1966ss3–5", "years": 1967, "kind": "decimal_currency_replacement", "role": "replacement", "reason": "Redirect existing replacement after merger; preserve original local scope and10July1967date. Do not turn into universal replacement ofNZpound everywhere.", "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review", "parent": "T-FTM000510", "child": "FTM000190", "new_claim_id": "C1649", "source_ids": [ "S825", "S826" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "id": "R0345", "operation": "update_scope_and_date_after_merge", "parent": "T-FTM000937", "child": "FTM000254", "years": [ 1920, 1923 ], "status": "supported", "kind": "absorbed_into_existing_currency", "role": "later_unification_or_absorption", "creates_currency": false, "assertion": "Crown accounting was absorbed into retained dinar accounting through1920–1923unification.", "sources": [ "ONT27-MIJATOVIC" ], "locator": "pp46–49", "valuation": { "numerator": 4, "denominator": 1, "from_unit": "crown", "to_unit": "dinar", "scope": "Principal unification ratio; not every holder net proceeds after withholding." }, "edge_id": "R0345", "decision": "upgrade", "reason": "Account-unit source adjudication.", "new_claim_id": "C1650", "source_ids": [ "S788" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R-V23-019", "decision": "upgrade", "assertion": "Panama's balboa system established in1904succeeded the locally circulating Colombian silver-peso monetary system.", "sources": [ "PA44" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Printed228–232", "years": 1904, "kind": "currency_replacement", "role": "founding_or_early_ancestry", "reason": "Original historical narrative plainly establishes local succession. Existing broad Colombian peso profile may retain silver/paper distinctions as qualifications; does not imply mainland depreciated paper pesos converted on identical terms. No universal contractual ratio asserted.", "new_claim_id": "C1651", "source_ids": [ "S803" ], "application": "updated_relationship" }, { "edge_id": "R0239", "decision": "retype", "kind": "standard_adoption", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "status": "supported", "assertion": "The federal Swiss franc adopts the French silver-franc standard. Standard relationship, not French currency replacement in Switzerland.", "reason": "The retained evidence establishes a metal or valuation standard, not succession of the principal unit of account. Keep it as profile context; exclude it from ancestry traversal.", "sources": [ "S388" ], "locator": "; retained source evidence behind C781", "new_claim_id": "C1652", "source_ids": [ "S388" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0240", "decision": "retype", "kind": "standard_adoption", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "status": "supported", "assertion": "Belgium legislates the French decimal silver-franc standard. Law date; does not assert a blanket 1:1 exchange of every preceding local unit.", "reason": "The retained evidence establishes a metal or valuation standard, not succession of the principal unit of account. Keep it as profile context; exclude it from ancestry traversal.", "sources": [ "S398" ], "locator": "; retained source evidence behind C782", "new_claim_id": "C1653", "source_ids": [ "S398" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0306", "decision": "retype", "kind": "unit_standard_adoption", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "status": "supported", "assertion": "The phoenix was valued at one sixth of the Spanish dollar. A valuation standard, not evidence that all dollars were compulsorily converted into phoenixes.", "reason": "The retained evidence establishes a metal or valuation standard, not succession of the principal unit of account. Keep it as profile context; exclude it from ancestry traversal.", "sources": [ "S429" ], "locator": "; retained source evidence behind C863", "new_claim_id": "C1654", "source_ids": [ "S429" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0375", "decision": "retype", "kind": "local_issue_on_imported_currency_standard", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "status": "supported", "assertion": "Hong Kong’s local silver-dollar issue developed from circulating Spanish and Mexican silver dollars. One traced standard input; the 1935 sterling link is not its origin.", "reason": "The retained evidence establishes a metal or valuation standard, not succession of the principal unit of account. Keep it as profile context; exclude it from ancestry traversal.", "sources": [ "S453" ], "locator": "; retained source evidence behind C954", "new_claim_id": "C1655", "source_ids": [ "S453" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0401", "decision": "retype", "role": "non_ancestry_context", "kind": "standard_alignment", "status": "supported", "sources": [ "SHANNON1952" ], "locator": "Convertibility of Colonial Currencies, first paragraph; Appendix I Trinidad and Tobago(i)", "assertion": "Sterling coins and the sterling rating coexisted with the inherited British West Indian dollar account unit. They do not make sterling its account-unit parent.", "reason": "The independently sourced Spanish-dollar ancestry replaces the earlier mixed-circulation inference.", "new_claim_id": "C1656", "source_ids": [ "S830" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0395", "decision": "remove", "assertion": "Retire the umbrella currency endpoint; distribute its actual territorial ancestry below.", "sources": [ "AF27-CFA45", "AF27-IMF63" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "1945decree art1; IMF opening1–6", "reason": "The grouping is not demonstrated to be one account unit. Preserve evidence as noncurrency context.", "new_claim_id": "C1657", "source_ids": [ "S888", "S890" ], "application": "profile_context_only" }, { "edge_id": "R0398", "decision": "retype", "parent": "FTM000175", "child": "FTM000270", "years": 1945, "assertion": "The territorial Malagasy franc separated from metropolitan-franc reckoning in the1945 regional reform.", "sources": [ "AF27-CFA45", "AF27-MOLET" ], "status": "supported", "locator": "Decree art1; Molet42–43", "kind": "territorial_currency_separation", "role": "regional_branch", "date_is_creation": false, "new_claim_id": "C1658", "source_ids": [ "S888", "S889" ], "application": "updated_relationship" } ], "root_reviews": [ { "id": "CUR-V22-SOUTH-VIETNAM-DONG", "decision": "add bounded Indochina regional parent; retain1975rescale observation" }, { "id": "CUR-V22-JINAN-YUAN", "decision": "add scoped ROC/fabi local replacement1941–42" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-MANCHUKUO-YUAN", "decision": "add named Harbin dayang predecessor; not claim all inputs complete" }, { "id": "CUR-V22-MONGOLIA-YANCHAAN", "decision": "merge scoped alias into ROCyuan; retain local absorption" }, { "id": "FTM000138", "decision": "add Mexican-piastre regional adoption parent1878–87" }, { "node": "FTM000226", "decision": "resolved", "assertion": "Add the Egyptian-pound parent using explicit conversion of obligations in the 1927 Order. Scope the primary Order to its stated territory; do not generalize its exact commencement to Transjordan.", "sources": [ "NE_PALORDER", "NE_BOARDS" ] }, { "node": "FTM000227", "decision": "resolved", "assertion": "Add Palestine-pound regional succession at parity in 1948. Retain both identities because the predecessor continued outside Israel; merging the entire Palestine identity into Israel would erase that branching.", "sources": [ "NE_ISRAELLAW", "NE_BOARDS" ] }, { "node": "FTM000198", "decision": "resolved", "assertion": "Broaden the federal profile to the Southern Rhodesian/Central African continuity and add sterling regional ancestry. The 1932–1940 formation interval is a dating limit, not an unresolved parental relationship.", "sources": [ "NE_RH1933", "NE_BOARDS" ] }, { "node": "T-FTM000830", "decision": "resolved", "assertion": "Broaden to the national peseta/ekwele continuity and add Spanish-peseta ancestry in 1969. No peso identity or additional renaming node is needed.", "sources": [ "NE_EG1972", "NE_EGBEAC" ] }, { "node": "FTM000355", "decision": "resolved", "supersedes": "Earlier Moldova root hold in research27-eurasia.json", "assertion": "July 1993 local coupon currency and November conversion of accounts establish more than an issuer-specific ruble banknote.", "sources": [ "EA_MD94", "EA_MDDEC" ] }, { "node": "CUR-V27-LIBYA-MAL", "decision": "resolved", "assertion": "The predecessor is the Italian metropolitan lira; regional separation is documented in the contemporary advisers report.", "sources": [ "EA_MAL" ] }, { "id": "FTM000053", "label": "Portuguese real", "decision": "held", "reason": "Earlier Portuguese real/preceding libra account conversion not newly inspected; existing medieval identity retained.", "sources": [ "S477", "S479", "S480", "S565" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "FTM000166", "label": "Spanish peseta", "decision": "held", "reason": "Spanish peseta root requires local real/escudo accounts conversion statute, not LMU metal standard; no new admitted bridge.", "sources": [ "S347", "S348" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "FTM000247", "label": "Italian lira", "decision": "held", "reason": "Italian lira requires precise Sardinian/Piedmont account continuity and absorbed regional currencies; national issuer formation alone insufficient.", "sources": [ "S347", "S348" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "FTM000254", "label": "Serbian dinar — nineteenth-century national currency", "decision": "held", "reason": "Serbian1873coinage at Frenchfranc standard is not French account ancestry; kingdom continuation handledR0343.", "sources": [ "S445", "S446", "S447" ], "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review" }, { "id": "FTM000321", "label": "Austrian gulden — pre-1892 unit", "decision": "held", "reason": "Austrian gulden predecessor accounting stages not newly resolved; do not infer parent fromsilverstandard.", "sources": [ "S426" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "FTM000337", "label": "Dutch guilder (euro predecessor)", "decision": "held", "reason": "Dutchguilder earlier account continuity remains existingresearch; Banco florin is not automatically its parent.", "sources": [ "S347", "S348", "S563", "S564", "S562", "S622", "S623", "S619", "S620", "S621", "S700" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "FTM000383", "label": "Thai baht", "decision": "held", "reason": "Thai baht existing deep account observations retained; no earlier named predecessor asserted from weightetymology.", "sources": [ "S297", "S541", "S578", "S590", "S614" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "T-FTM000795", "label": "Luxembourg franc", "decision": "held", "reason": "Luxembourg franc needs local pre1848 obligations conversion; Belgian parityalone insufficient.", "sources": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S399" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "T-FTM000807", "label": "Bulgarian lev — linked twentieth-century scales", "decision": "held", "reason": "Bulgarian lev predecessor must separate earlier1881unit from twentiethcentury scales; no new original conversionlaw inspected.", "sources": [ "S98", "S347", "S348" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "T-FTM000808", "label": "European unit of account (EUA)", "decision": "held", "reason": "EUA is contractual compositeaccountunit; basket constituents are standard inputs, not currencyreplacement ancestors.", "sources": [ "S353", "S354", "S355" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "T-FTM000876", "label": "Ostmark — eastern occupation mark", "decision": "held", "reason": "Ostmark independent-account scope versus Germanmark remains unresolved; stamp/issuer/peg alone cannot settle.", "sources": [ "S410", "S416" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "T-FTM000880", "label": "Latvian ruble — 1919-era currency", "decision": "held", "reason": "Latvian1919rublerates versus Russianruble/ostmoney found as leads; no original compulsory accountconversion inspected.", "sources": [ "S413" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "CUR-V22-ALBANIAN-FRANG", "label": "Albanian gold franc / frang", "decision": "held", "reason": "Albanian1925frang standard and bank charter do not by themselves establish specific inherited account obligations.", "sources": [ "S249" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "FTM000226", "label": "Palestine pound", "decision": "held", "reason": "Palestine1927CurrencySubstitutionOrdinanceNo37 is strong legal lead for Egyptian/Turkishaccountreferences; large scan inaccessible, not admitted from snippets.", "sources": [ "S238" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "FTM000227", "label": "Israeli pound", "decision": "held", "reason": "Israelipound may continue Palestineaccountunit; need actual1948CurrencyOrdinance clauses beforemerger orregionalbranch.", "sources": [ "S536", "S237" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "CUR-V22-PENGO", "label": "Hungarian pengő", "decision": "held", "reason": "1925/1927Hungariankorona→pengő statutory obligation conversion still requires inspection; distinct-unit principal decision not challenged.", "sources": [ "S534" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "FTM000314", "label": "Polish mark", "decision": "held", "reason": "Polishmarkroot requires1916/1917legalaccount adoption versus Germanmark; equalconvertibility alone is not lineage.", "sources": [ "S535" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "CUR-V22-BOSNIAN-DINAR", "label": "Bosnia and Herzegovina dinar", "decision": "held", "reason": "Bosnian1992dinar requires actualconversion/debtscope fromYugoslavdinars; no issuer-only parent admitted.", "sources": [ "S98", "S245" ], "inspection_scope": "existing_evidence_review_with_search_leads_only" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-DANZIG-GULDEN", "label": "Danzig gulden", "decision": "resolved", "reason": "Resolved by new1923accountconversion edge;1939return toGermanmark must be temporal return to avoidgraphcycle.", "sources": [ "EU27-DANZIG1", "EU27-DANZIG2", "EU27-DANZIG3" ], "inspection_scope": "fresh_source_review" }, { "node": "FTM000351", "decision": "parent_added", "assertion": "Statutory accounts and contract conversion establishes ruble ancestry.", "sources": [ "EA_UA549" ] }, { "node": "FTM000358", "decision": "parent_added", "assertion": "Ruble-zone separation is supported; retain April-to-August distinction between initial issue and sole-tender operation.", "sources": [ "S529", "EA_GEMUSEUM", "EA_GE363" ] }, { "node": "FTM000365", "decision": "parent_added", "assertion": "Retain the temporary coupon account identity, with accounting inception bounded between November 1993 and February 1994. It was not a new account unit merely on the first note issue date.", "sources": [ "EA_UZ550", "EA_UZ45" ] }, { "node": "FTM000355", "decision": "identity_held", "assertion": "Coupon instruments are explicitly ruble equivalents; available official decree excerpts do not yet establish when a separate Moldovan coupon account system arose. Preserve existing node provisionally; no unsupported coupon-origin edge.", "sources": [ "EA_MD137", "EA_MD200" ] }, { "node": "FTM000369", "decision": "parent_added", "assertion": "The 1995 national ruble is distinct by comprehensive domestic price/account conversion. Russian cash and inherited noncash balances had different conversion treatment.", "sources": [ "EA_TJD" ] }, { "node": "FTM000301", "decision": "parents_added", "assertion": "Both the Gulf-rupee founding-account transition and the temporary Saudi-currency replacement are explicit, with distinct scopes.", "sources": [ "EA_QD" ] }, { "node": "CUR-V22-YEMEN-DINAR", "decision": "parent_added", "assertion": "East African shilling is the actual replaced currency, rather than inferring ancestry solely from sterling parity.", "sources": [ "EA_CBSTAT" ] }, { "node": "FTM000375", "decision": "held_predecessor", "assertion": "Egyptian piastre/medin accounting is already incorporated into the pound identity. Existing1790saccounts and1834/1885reform evidence support continuity locally; an earlier Ottoman-to-local account separation is not individually established by this pass.", "sources": [ "S647", "S649", "S558" ] }, { "node": "FTM000031", "decision": "held_predecessor", "assertion": "Qeran/toman is an established account identity. Coin standard changes alone do not establish an additional parent. Earlier Persian accounting continuity requires adjudicating the regional toman/dinar systems, not adding an abbasi coin as a currency node.", "sources": [] }, { "node": "FTM000296", "decision": "held_predecessor", "assertion": "Kabuli rupee identity and its conversion to afghani are established. Its earlier Mughal/Persian ancestry cannot be inferred from shared rupee name, weight, or abbasi/qeran subdivision names.", "sources": [ "S539" ] }, { "id": "FTM000120", "decision": "identity_retained_parent_review_continues", "assertion": "1953Order13article2expressly established hwan as account unit,1hwan:100won. Pre1953southern won identity needs mapping to commonKorean profile before parent is inserted.", "sources": [ "AS27-KR53" ], "status": "supported", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V22-MONGOLIA-YANCHAAN", "decision": "held", "assertion": "Local account is real; identify which Chinese dollar unit was meant from1921–27 treasury/bank ledgers. Generic silver weight or Chinese origin does not identify a parent.", "sources": [ "AS27-MNT" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN", "decision": "held", "assertion": "Instrument exchange1946is established; whether prior yen is a separate Taiwanese account or ordinary Japanese yen remains unresolved. Need1899/1904bank/currency law and1946old account/debt continuity terms before merge or parent insertion.", "sources": [ "AS27-TAIWAN", "S615" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V22-RIAU-RUPIAH", "decision": "parent_added", "assertion": "Malayan dollar parent supported by1963legal conversion and actual government-payment regime. Retain distinct KR unit.", "sources": [ "AS27-RIAU63", "AS27-RIAUPAY63", "AS27-RIAUPAY64" ], "status": "supported", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V22-JINAN-YUAN", "decision": "identity_supported_parent_held", "assertion": "Retain distinct debt/pricing unit. Exact dated fiscal decree and conversion of fabi-denominated obligations remain needed forROCparent; protected coexistence alone is insufficient.", "sources": [ "AS27-JINAN" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V22-SOUTH-VIETNAM-DONG", "decision": "held", "assertion": "1978termination/account absorption is firm;1955regional piastre/dong branch still needs liquidation/adoption agreement’s account clauses and1975balance conversion.", "sources": [ "AS27-VN", "S98" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "FTM000118", "decision": "held", "assertion": "1947common Korean unit predecessor is explicit. Need1905currency-reorganization law and institutional accounts to decide Japanese-yen adoption versus independent Korean won continuity; coin parity alone inadequate.", "sources": [ "AS27-NK", "S571" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "FTM000138", "decision": "held", "assertion": "Need1885piastre statutory money-of-account clause and conversion of colonial treasury balances from prior local dollar reckoning; later1955breakups do not identify founding parent.", "sources": [ "S573", "S574" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V24-NPL-PAISA16", "decision": "held", "assertion": "Distinct accounting documented inRegmi, not merely denomination; exact origin from earlier paisa conventions remains untraced. No speculativeINRorweight parent.", "sources": [ "S577", "S576" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V26-SHANGHAI-TAEL", "decision": "held", "assertion": "Commercial obligations and1933conversion documented. Earlier local guild/ledger history needed to connect to a scoped prior tael; pure tael weight cannot serve as generic parent.", "sources": [ "S541", "S697" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HAIKWAN-TAEL", "decision": "held", "assertion": "Customs account unit documented. Need earliest Customs tariff account definition and conversion from treaty/local silver reckonings; generic tael not admitted.", "sources": [ "S541", "AS27-YAN" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CUSTOMS-GOLD-UNIT", "decision": "parent_added", "assertion": "Haikwan fiscal parent for import-duty accounting is explicit in1930order account; export-tax branch remains separately scoped.", "sources": [ "AS27-YAN", "S541" ], "status": "supported", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HYDERABAD-RUPEE", "decision": "held", "assertion": "1912law and separate later accounts secure identity; need pre1855/1912treasury ledgers or transition decree to connect Mughal/local rupee ancestry, not coin imitation.", "sources": [ "S541", "S699" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TRAVANCORE-SIRKAR", "decision": "held", "assertion": "1861accounts and later Sirkarrupee coexistence are known; earlier fanam/chakram account continuity requires dated treasury conversion.", "sources": [ "S698", "S541" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V26-MANCHUKUO-YUAN", "decision": "held", "assertion": "1932statute creates locally defined unit and replaces multiple currencies; exact provincial account identities and conversion tables must be scoped individually. Neither Japanese yen nor genericChinese yuan inferred solely bysilver.", "sources": [ "S541" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TIBET-TANGKA", "decision": "held", "assertion": "1933account anchor secured; earlier Nepalese mohar imports alone do not establish a tangka account parent. Need Tibetan account/obligation records relating mohar,tangka,srang.", "sources": [ "S541" ], "status": "unresolved", "inspection_scope": "Newly inspected sources named AS27; prior inspected evidence reused for existing anchors." } ], "terminal_reviews": [ { "code": "CUR-V26-MANCHUKUO-YUAN", "decision": "local_successor_documented", "successor_id": "CUR-V27-NORTHEAST-YUAN", "years": 1946, "assertion": "Local replacement documented; global unit ending remains open.", "sources": [ "AS27F-NELOCAL" ] }, { "code": "CUR-V26-TIBET-TANGKA", "decision": "ending_unresolved", "assertion": "1959–1962 RMB transition is firm, but tangka/srang profile identity must be adjudicated before attaching exact account replacement.", "sources": [ "AS27F-TIB" ] }, { "code": "CUR-V26-CUSTOMS-GOLD-UNIT", "decision": "ending_unresolved", "assertion": "1948 CGU instrument redemption documented; fiscal CGU account abolition still needs tariff/assessment order.", "sources": [ "AS27F-CGU" ] }, { "code": "CUR-V26-TRAVANCORE-SIRKAR", "decision": "ending_unresolved", "assertion": "1950 legal-tender end documented; no account conversion established by this source.", "sources": [ "AS27F-TRAV" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000456", "decision": "local_redemption_documented_global_ending_unresolved", "assertion": "Shanghai1949gold-yuan redemption is firm; no global end assigned because territorial rates and residual debts differ. Need ShanghaiMay28order account clauses plus other regional settlement laws.", "sources": [ "AS27-BOC" ], "family_fate": "not_established", "ending_years": null }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HAIKWAN-TAEL", "decision": "ending_documented", "assertion": "Customs account use discontinued per10March1933announcement, contemporary report.1930import-duty successorCGUadded; remaining export-account successor not imposed without exact conversion decree.", "sources": [ "S541", "AS27-YAN" ], "family_fate": "not_established", "ending_years": 1933 }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CUSTOMS-GOLD-UNIT", "decision": "ending_unresolved", "assertion": "1948CGUnote withdrawal is a strong lead but fiscal-account endpoint not inspected. Need1948customs valuation order or1942unit integration law; cash redemption alone is not sufficient.", "sources": [ "S541" ], "family_fate": "not_established", "ending_years": null }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TRAVANCORE-SIRKAR", "decision": "ending_unresolved", "assertion": "Post1949political integration and Indian stamp/coin adoption do not date settlement of Sirkar obligations. Need currency unification order and treasury balance conversion.", "sources": [ "S541", "S698" ], "family_fate": "not_established", "ending_years": null }, { "id": "CUR-V26-MANCHUKUO-YUAN", "decision": "ending_unresolved", "assertion": "1945bank/regime collapse alone does not end the unit. Regional Northeast currency replacement and continuing old balances need postwar account conversion laws.", "sources": [ "S541" ], "family_fate": "not_established", "ending_years": null }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TIBET-TANGKA", "decision": "ending_unresolved", "assertion": "Last tangka coin or1959political transition cannot date account extinction. Need tangka/srang receivable and tax conversion regulations intoRMB.", "sources": [ "S541" ], "family_fate": "not_established", "ending_years": null } ], "merges": [ { "currency_id": "T-FTM000522", "canonical_currency_id": "T-FTM000497", "reason": "British Currency Act expressly keeps local contracts/payments/liabilities in sterling even alongside local-note issue. Preserve Bahamas use as sterling regional observation and dollar conversion.", "prior_node": { "id": "T-FTM000522", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Bahamas pound", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [ "T-FTM000522" ], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "FTM000522" ], "claim_ids": [ "C196", "C985", "C1556", "C1601" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S468", "S729", "S730" ], "profile_id": "T-FTM000522", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "ET0774", "scope": "local_issue_on_imported_currency_standard: The Bahamas Currency Board issued local pounds against sterling at par.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1919, "latest_year": 1919, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1919" }, "claim_ids": [ "C985" ], "source_ids": [ "S468" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000522" } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "Sterling and early English", "identity_decision_ids": [], "identity_claim_ids": [], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped currency identity; not a claim that its entire lifespan or ancestry is proven.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "unreviewed", "unknown_dates": "Use open endpoints or labelled date bands, never a fabricated birth year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000522", "label": "Bahamas pound", "aliases": [ "Bahamas pound" ], "unit_epochs": [], "events": [], "associated_records": [], "relationship_ids": [ "R0059", "R0403" ], "claim_ids": [ "C196", "C985", "C1556", "C1601" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S468", "S729", "S730" ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000522", "label": "Bahamas pound", "navigation_group": "Sterling and early English", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "T-FTM000521" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C196", "C985" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S468" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R0059" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." }, "research_updates": [ { "title": "Historical account research", "text": "British Currency Act expressly keeps local contracts/payments/liabilities in sterling even alongside local-note issue. Preserve Bahamas use as sterling regional observation and dollar conversion.", "report_url": "/historical.html" }, { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "Bahamianpoundnotes were localsterlinginstruments withinBritishsterling moneyofaccount expresslygoverningcontracts andliabilities. MergeT-FTM000522intoT-FTM000497; preserve1919notehistoryand1966dollaraccountreplacement withinredirectededges.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" } ] } }, { "currency_id": "FTM000347", "canonical_currency_id": "FTM000349", "reason": "Source review establishes a continuing account unit; local issues and naming epochs remain profile evidence.", "prior_node": { "id": "FTM000347", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Soviet ruble and inherited ruble-zone unit", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [ "FTM000347" ], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "FTM000872", "FTM000873", "FTM000874", "FTM000875", "FTM000929", "FTM000930", "FTM000931" ], "claim_ids": [ "C820", "C822", "C823", "C824", "C827", "C828", "C833", "C837", "C905", "C906", "C907", "C908", "C910", "C911", "C1104", "C1105", "C1128", "C1130", "C1131", "C1620", "C1621", "C1622" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219", "S748", "S749", "S750", "S751", "S753", "S752" ], "profile_id": "FTM000347", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "ET0607", "scope": "territorial_adoption: Estonia introduced Soviet rubles at 1.25 rubles per kroon.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1940, "latest_year": 1940, "precision": "month", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1940-11", "iso_date": "1940-11" }, "claim_ids": [ "C820" ], "source_ids": [ "S411" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0609", "scope": "monetary_reform: The Soviet ruble underwent monetary reform in 1947.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1947, "latest_year": 1947, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1947" }, "claim_ids": [ "C822" ], "source_ids": [ "S410" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0610", "scope": "redenomination: The 1961 reform rescaled the Soviet ruble tenfold.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1961, "latest_year": 1961, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1961" }, "claim_ids": [ "C823" ], "source_ids": [ "S410" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0611", "scope": "territorial_currency_separation: Estonia generally exchanged 10 rubles per kroon.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1992, "latest_year": 1992, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1992-06-20", "iso_date": "1992-06-20" }, "claim_ids": [ "C824" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0614", "scope": "territorial_adoption: The Soviet currency system displaced the lats, withdrawn on 25 March 1941.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1940, "latest_year": 1941, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1940–1941" }, "claim_ids": [ "C827" ], "source_ids": [ "S414" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0615", "scope": "territorial_currency_separation: Latvian rubles entered alongside Soviet and Russian notes at 1:1.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1992, "latest_year": 1992, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1992-05-07", "iso_date": "1992-05-07" }, "claim_ids": [ "C828" ], "source_ids": [ "S412" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0620", "scope": "territorial_adoption: Soviet rubles entered Lithuania at 0.9 ruble per litas.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1940, "latest_year": 1940, "precision": "month", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1940-11", "iso_date": "1940-11" }, "claim_ids": [ "C833" ], "source_ids": [ "S417" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0624", "scope": "territorial_currency_separation: Lithuania replaced rubles with talonas at 1:1.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1992, "latest_year": 1992, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1992-10-01", "iso_date": "1992-10-01" }, "claim_ids": [ "C837" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S415" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0692", "scope": "redenomination: One 1922 ruble replaced 10,000 earlier paper rubles.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1922, "latest_year": 1922, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1922" }, "claim_ids": [ "C905" ], "source_ids": [ "S439" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0693", "scope": "co_circulating_money_conversion: The 1922 conversion also accepted earlier tsar-era paper money.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1922, "latest_year": 1922, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1922" }, "claim_ids": [ "C906" ], "source_ids": [ "S439" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0694", "scope": "redenomination: One 1923 ruble replaced 100 rubles of 1922.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1923, "latest_year": 1923, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1923" }, "claim_ids": [ "C907" ], "source_ids": [ "S439" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0695", "scope": "redenomination: One treasury gold ruble replaced 50,000 rubles of the 1923 sovznak scale.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1924, "latest_year": 1924, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1924" }, "claim_ids": [ "C908" ], "source_ids": [ "S439" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0697", "scope": "instrument_withdrawal: The 1947 reform ended the separate chervonets banknote unit.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1947, "latest_year": 1947, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1947" }, "claim_ids": [ "C910" ], "source_ids": [ "S439" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "ET0698", "scope": "territorial_currency_separation: Russian national issues emerged from the inherited Soviet ruble system.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1991, "latest_year": 1993, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1991–1993" }, "claim_ids": [ "C911" ], "source_ids": [ "S439" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000347" }, { "event_id": "OBS22-C1104-FTM000347", "scope": "Armenia introduced the dram against the Soviet rubles circulating locally in November 1993; some Soviet notes remained temporarily valid. Only this local transition is asserted; other inputs and earlier stages may remain untraced.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1993, "latest_year": 1993, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1993" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1104" ], "source_ids": [ "S218" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_transition", "date_is_creation": false }, { "event_id": "OBS22-C1105-FTM000347", "scope": "Azerbaijan introduced the manat alongside rubles in August 1992, prescribing ten rubles per manat in settlements; the manat became sole tender in 1994. Only this local transition is asserted; other inputs and earlier stages may remain untraced.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1992, "latest_year": 1994, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1992–1994" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1105" ], "source_ids": [ "S528", "S219" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_transition", "date_is_creation": false }, { "event_id": "OBS22-C1128-FTM000347", "scope": "Ruble-zone currency → Belarusian ruble, 1992–1994. Only this local transition is asserted; other inputs and earlier stages may remain untraced.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1992, "latest_year": 1994, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1992–1994" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1128" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_transition", "date_is_creation": false }, { "event_id": "OBS22-C1130-FTM000347", "scope": "Ruble-zone currency → Kyrgyz som, 1993. Only this local transition is asserted; other inputs and earlier stages may remain untraced.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1993, "latest_year": 1993, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1993" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1130" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_transition", "date_is_creation": false }, { "event_id": "OBS22-C1131-FTM000347", "scope": "Ruble-zone currency → tenge, 1993. Only this local transition is asserted; other inputs and earlier stages may remain untraced.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1993, "latest_year": 1993, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1993" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1131" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_transition", "date_is_creation": false } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "Ruble", "identity_decision_ids": [], "identity_claim_ids": [], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped currency identity; not a claim that its entire lifespan or ancestry is proven.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "unreviewed", "unknown_dates": "Use open endpoints or labelled date bands, never a fabricated birth year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "FTM000347", "label": "Soviet ruble and inherited ruble-zone unit", "aliases": [ "Soviet ruble and inherited ruble-zone unit" ], "unit_epochs": [ { "evidence_entity_id": "FTM000873", "label": "Soviet ruble — pre-1947 scale", "original_kind": "account_unit", "creates_currency": false, "claim_ids": [ "C820", "C822", "C827", "C833" ] }, { "evidence_entity_id": "FTM000874", "label": "Soviet ruble — 1947 scale", "original_kind": "account_unit", "creates_currency": false, "claim_ids": [ "C822", "C823" ] }, { "evidence_entity_id": "FTM000875", "label": "Soviet ruble — 1961 scale, continuing Baltic ruble-zone use", "original_kind": "account_unit", "creates_currency": false, "claim_ids": [ "C823", "C824", "C828", "C837" ] }, { "evidence_entity_id": "FTM000929", "label": "Soviet / inherited paper rubles — pre-1922 scale", "original_kind": "account_unit", "creates_currency": false, "claim_ids": [ "C905" ] }, { "evidence_entity_id": "FTM000930", "label": "Soviet ruble — 1922 scale", "original_kind": "account_unit", "creates_currency": false, "claim_ids": [ "C905", "C906", "C907" ] }, { "evidence_entity_id": "FTM000931", "label": "Soviet ruble — 1923 scale", "original_kind": "account_unit", "creates_currency": false, "claim_ids": [ "C907", "C908" ] } ], "events": [ { "id": "R0270", "kind": "monetary_reform", "date": { "earliest_year": 1947, "latest_year": 1947, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1947" }, "claim_ids": [ "C822" ], "scope": "The Soviet ruble underwent monetary reform in 1947. No uniform conversion ratio asserted: cash, deposits and other claims require separate treatment.", "valuation_ids": [], "track": "FTM000347", "currency_id": "FTM000347", "creates_currency": false }, { "id": "R0271", "kind": "redenomination", "date": { "earliest_year": 1961, "latest_year": 1961, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1961" }, "claim_ids": [ "C823" ], "scope": "The 1961 reform rescaled the Soviet ruble tenfold.", "valuation_ids": [ "V0160" ], "track": "FTM000347", "currency_id": "FTM000347", "creates_currency": false }, { "id": "R0335", "kind": "redenomination", "date": { "earliest_year": 1922, "latest_year": 1922, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1922" }, "claim_ids": [ "C905" ], "scope": "One 1922 ruble replaced 10,000 earlier paper rubles.", "valuation_ids": [ "V0192" ], "track": "FTM000347", "currency_id": "FTM000347", "creates_currency": false }, { "id": "R0337", "kind": "redenomination", "date": { "earliest_year": 1923, "latest_year": 1923, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1923" }, "claim_ids": [ "C907" ], "scope": "One 1923 ruble replaced 100 rubles of 1922.", "valuation_ids": [ "V0194" ], "track": "FTM000347", "currency_id": "FTM000347", "creates_currency": false }, { "id": "R0338", "kind": "redenomination", "date": { "earliest_year": 1924, "latest_year": 1924, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1924" }, "claim_ids": [ "C908" ], "scope": "One treasury gold ruble replaced 50,000 rubles of the 1923 sovznak scale.", "valuation_ids": [ "V0195" ], "track": "FTM000347", "currency_id": "FTM000347", "creates_currency": false } ], "associated_records": [ { "original_track_id": "T-FTM000928", "label": "Russian state credit notes — imperial issues", "record_types": [ "instrument_family" ], "disposition": "profile_context", "association_only": true, "claim_ids": [ "C901", "C902", "C903", "C904", "C906" ], "source_ids": [ "S439", "S440", "S441" ] }, { "original_track_id": "T-FTM000932", "label": "Soviet chervonets — banknote unit", "record_types": [ "account_unit" ], "disposition": "profile_context", "association_only": true, "claim_ids": [ "C909", "C910" ], "source_ids": [ "S439" ] } ], "relationship_ids": [ "LEG00354", "LEG00357", "LEG00358", "LEG00360", "LEG00362", "LEG00365", "LEG00368", "R0269", "R0272", "R0275", "R0276", "R0280", "R0282", "R0336", "R0339", "R0340", "R-V22-002", "R-V22-003", "R-V22-026", "R-V22-028", "R-V22-029" ], "claim_ids": [ "C820", "C822", "C823", "C824", "C827", "C828", "C833", "C837", "C905", "C906", "C907", "C908", "C910", "C911", "C1104", "C1105", "C1128", "C1130", "C1131", "C1620", "C1621", "C1622" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219", "S748", "S749", "S750", "S751", "S753", "S752" ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "FTM000347", "label": "Soviet ruble and inherited ruble-zone unit", "navigation_group": "Ruble", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "FTM000349", "FTM000354", "FTM000360", "FTM000362", "FTM000363", "FTM000364", "FTM000368", "FTM000387" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C820", "C822", "C823", "C824", "C827", "C828", "C833", "C837", "C905", "C906", "C907", "C908", "C910", "C911", "C1104", "C1105", "C1128", "C1130", "C1131" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R0272", "R0276", "R0282", "R0340", "R-V22-002", "R-V22-003", "R-V22-026", "R-V22-028", "R-V22-029" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." }, "research_updates": [ { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "The Russian national ruble continues the inherited ruble account unit: the 1992 implementing resolution carries Soviet instruments into all payments and bank accounts at their nominal amounts. Issuer succession does not create a separate currency identity. Merge Soviet/inherited ruble-zone identity into Russian ruble continuity; retain Soviet era and 1993 instrument withdrawal as profile events. This adjudicates the unit boundary, without denying territorial separations elsewhere.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" }, { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "Kazakhstan replaced inherited ruble currency with the tenge in November 1993: Decree 1399 establishes payments and deposits in tenge; Decree 1400 orders the outgoing ruble notes exchanged for it. Direct statutory replacement establishes ancestry. Do not generalize a 500:1 ratio to every account from these two decrees, which do not specify that ratio.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" }, { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "The Belarusian account rubel separated from the inherited ruble zone during 1992–1994. IMF chronology identifies a national noncash rubel in July 1992; the 1994 finance instruction concerns denomination of its assets and liabilities. Ancestry is directly documented; the broad transition date remains intentional. Do not equate May 1992 coupon issue, May 1994 tender declaration and August 1994 denomination.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" } ] } }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000938", "canonical_currency_id": "FTM000254", "reason": "Original research explicitly says new kingdom retained Serbian dinar as monetary unit. National extension and renamed issuing bank do not create a new unit; retain all unification and later-partition observations. This is a qualified continuity merge, not invented conversion.", "prior_node": { "id": "T-FTM000938", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes / Yugoslav dinar", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [ "T-FTM000938" ], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "FTM000938" ], "claim_ids": [ "C919", "C921", "C922", "C1557", "C1634" ], "source_ids": [ "S300", "S445", "S446", "S788" ], "profile_id": "T-FTM000938", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "ET0706", "scope": "currency_area_extension: The new South Slav kingdom retained the Serbian dinar as its monetary unit.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1918, "latest_year": 1920, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1918–1920" }, "claim_ids": [ "C919" ], "source_ids": [ "S445", "S446" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000938" }, { "event_id": "ET0708", "scope": "multiple_currency_unification: Crown exchange into dinars began at four crowns per dinar.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1920, "latest_year": 1920, "precision": "month", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1920-02", "iso_date": "1920-02" }, "claim_ids": [ "C921" ], "source_ids": [ "S445" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000938" }, { "event_id": "ET0709", "scope": "territorial_currency_separation: Occupied Serbia acquired a separate Serbian dinar after Yugoslavia’s partition.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1941, "latest_year": 1941, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1941" }, "claim_ids": [ "C922" ], "source_ids": [ "S300", "S445" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000938" } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "European predecessor branches", "identity_decision_ids": [], "identity_claim_ids": [], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped currency identity; not a claim that its entire lifespan or ancestry is proven.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "unreviewed", "unknown_dates": "Use open endpoints or labelled date bands, never a fabricated birth year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000938", "label": "Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes / Yugoslav dinar", "aliases": [ "Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes / Yugoslav dinar" ], "unit_epochs": [], "events": [], "associated_records": [], "relationship_ids": [ "R0343", "R0345", "R0346" ], "claim_ids": [ "C919", "C921", "C922", "C1557", "C1634" ], "source_ids": [ "S300", "S445", "S446", "S788" ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000938", "label": "Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes / Yugoslav dinar", "navigation_group": "European predecessor branches", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "FTM000256", "FTM000258", "FTM000387" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C919", "C921", "C922" ], "source_ids": [ "S300", "S445", "S446" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R0346" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." }, "research_updates": [ { "title": "Historical account research", "text": "Original research explicitly says new kingdom retained Serbian dinar as monetary unit. National extension and renamed issuing bank do not create a new unit; retain all unification and later-partition observations. This is a qualified continuity merge, not invented conversion.", "report_url": "/historical.html" }, { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "Dinar-for-dinar retained-unit extension becomes a dated profile observation. Account-unit source adjudication.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" } ] } }, { "currency_id": "FTM000189", "canonical_currency_id": "T-FTM000510", "reason": "Source review establishes a continuing account unit; local issues and naming epochs remain profile evidence.", "prior_node": { "id": "FTM000189", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Western Samoan pound — local New Zealand-pound issues", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [ "FTM000189" ], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "FTM000950" ], "claim_ids": [ "C942", "C943", "C1638" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S451", "S774", "S825", "S826" ], "profile_id": "FTM000189", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "ET0729", "scope": "local_issue_succeeds_imported_currency: Post-independence Samoa’s local bank issue succeeded the Bank of New Zealand pound-note system.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1962, "latest_year": 1967, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1962–1967" }, "claim_ids": [ "C942" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S451" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000189" }, { "event_id": "ET0730", "scope": "decimal_currency_replacement: Samoa converted its existing pound unit to two tala per pound.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1967, "latest_year": 1967, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1967-07-10", "iso_date": "1967-07-10" }, "claim_ids": [ "C943" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000189" } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "Sterling and early English", "identity_decision_ids": [], "identity_claim_ids": [], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped currency identity; not a claim that its entire lifespan or ancestry is proven.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "unreviewed", "unknown_dates": "Use open endpoints or labelled date bands, never a fabricated birth year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "FTM000189", "label": "Western Samoan pound — local New Zealand-pound issues", "aliases": [ "Western Samoan pound — local New Zealand-pound issues" ], "unit_epochs": [], "events": [], "associated_records": [], "relationship_ids": [ "LEG00187", "R0363", "R0364" ], "claim_ids": [ "C942", "C943", "C1638" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S451", "S774", "S825", "S826" ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "FTM000189", "label": "Western Samoan pound — local New Zealand-pound issues", "navigation_group": "Sterling and early English", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "FTM000190" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C942", "C943" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S451" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R0364" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." }, "research_updates": [ { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "Western Samoan pound is retained as a local-issue alias of the New Zealand pound,which was replaced by the tala in1967. Affirmative same-currency statutory wording plus authoritative explicit alias and replacement evidence supports consolidating the issuer node.1961section3remains uninspected but no positive independentaccountunit evidence overrides explicit alias. Preserve local legal-note/issuer chronology as profile epochs.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" } ] } }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN", "canonical_currency_id": "T-FTM000117", "reason": "Merge issuer-defined Taiwan yen profile into Japanese yen for the established common-unit period. Contemporary1933–1934report expressly identifies the same monetary unit;1933USsurvey confirms Japanese currency law. Preserve1898–1904silver dealings as held regional accounting scope, not an automatic founding date of this merged unit.", "prior_node": { "id": "CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Taiwanese yen", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "E-V22-CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN" ], "claim_ids": [ "C1141", "C1266", "C1559" ], "source_ids": [ "S543", "S615", "S827", "S541", "S828" ], "profile_id": "CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "OBS22-C1141-CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN", "scope": "Taiwan dollars replaced Taiwanese yen in May 1946. The 1949 dollar rescaling belongs to the same Taiwan-dollar profile. Only this local transition is asserted; other inputs and earlier stages may remain untraced.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1946, "latest_year": 1946, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1946" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1141" ], "source_ids": [ "S543" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_transition", "date_is_creation": false }, { "event_id": "OBS25-C1266-CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN-1899", "scope": "Taiwan's existing yen identity is attested by circulating Bank of Taiwan notes denominated in yuan/yen in1899. This is a denomination/circulation observation, not an independently inspected1899ledger or proof of its precise founding date. A parent edge from Japan or earlier silver-dollar units remains open.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1899, "latest_year": 1899, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1899" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1266" ], "source_ids": [ "S615" ], "anchor_role": "dated_denominated_currency_observation", "date_is_creation": false } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "East Asian lineages", "identity_decision_ids": [ "ID22-CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN" ], "identity_claim_ids": [ "C1141" ], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped account unit; complete lifespan and earlier ancestry remain open.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "supported", "unknown_dates": "Open endpoints; not a fabricated founding year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN", "label": "Taiwanese yen", "aliases": [ "Taiwanese yen" ], "unit_epochs": [ { "id": "EPOCH25-C1266-1899", "label": "Taiwanese yen", "date": { "earliest_year": 1899, "latest_year": 1899, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1899" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1266" ], "source_ids": [ "S615" ], "kind": "same_currency_continuity" } ], "events": [], "associated_records": [], "relationship_ids": [ "R-V22-039" ], "claim_ids": [ "C1141", "C1266", "C1559" ], "source_ids": [ "S543", "S615", "S827", "S541", "S828" ], "account_unit_observations": [ { "event_id": "OBS25-C1266-CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN-1899", "scope": "Taiwan's existing yen identity is attested by circulating Bank of Taiwan notes denominated in yuan/yen in1899. This is a denomination/circulation observation, not an independently inspected1899ledger or proof of its precise founding date. A parent edge from Japan or earlier silver-dollar units remains open.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1899, "latest_year": 1899, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1899" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1266" ], "source_ids": [ "S615" ], "anchor_role": "dated_denominated_currency_observation", "date_is_creation": false } ], "research_updates": [ { "title": "Earlier unit continuity", "text": "Taiwan's existing yen identity is attested by circulating Bank of Taiwan notes denominated in yuan/yen in1899. This is a denomination/circulation observation, not an independently inspected1899ledger or proof of its precise founding date. A parent edge from Japan or earlier silver-dollar units remains open.", "report_url": "/revision-25/index.html" }, { "title": "Historical account research", "text": "Merge issuer-defined Taiwan yen profile into Japanese yen for the established common-unit period. Contemporary1933–1934report expressly identifies the same monetary unit;1933USsurvey confirms Japanese currency law. Preserve1898–1904silver dealings as held regional accounting scope, not an automatic founding date of this merged unit.", "report_url": "/historical.html" } ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN", "label": "Taiwanese yen", "navigation_group": "East Asian lineages", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "T-FTM000462" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1141", "C1266" ], "source_ids": [ "S543", "S615" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R-V22-039" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." } } }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V27-GUINEA-ESCUDO", "canonical_currency_id": "FTM000152", "reason": "Source review establishes a continuing account unit; local issues and naming epochs remain profile evidence.", "prior_node": { "id": "CUR-V27-GUINEA-ESCUDO", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Portuguese Guinea escudo", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "E-V27-CUR-V27-GUINEA-ESCUDO" ], "claim_ids": [ "C1442", "C1460" ], "source_ids": [ "S721", "S652" ], "profile_id": "CUR-V27-GUINEA-ESCUDO", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "OBS27-C1442-CUR-V27-GUINEA-ESCUDO-1975", "scope": "TerritorialGuineanescudo preceded1976peso reform.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1975, "latest_year": 1975, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1975" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1442" ], "source_ids": [ "S721" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_observation", "date_is_creation": false }, { "event_id": "OBS27-C1460-CUR-V27-GUINEA-ESCUDO-1914", "scope": "Guinea includedin1913law public/privateaccount adoption ofmetropolitanescudoreckoning; separate regionalidentity boundary notthereby fixed.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1914, "latest_year": 1914, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1914" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1460" ], "source_ids": [ "S652" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_observation", "date_is_creation": false } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "African and Pacific account systems", "identity_decision_ids": [], "identity_claim_ids": [ "C1442" ], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped account unit; complete lifespan and earlier ancestry remain open.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "supported", "unknown_dates": "Open endpoints; not a fabricated founding year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "CUR-V27-GUINEA-ESCUDO", "label": "Portuguese Guinea escudo", "aliases": [ "Portuguese Guinea escudo" ], "unit_epochs": [], "events": [], "associated_records": [], "relationship_ids": [], "claim_ids": [ "C1442", "C1460" ], "source_ids": [ "S721", "S652" ], "account_unit_observations": [ { "event_id": "OBS27-C1442-CUR-V27-GUINEA-ESCUDO-1975", "scope": "TerritorialGuineanescudo preceded1976peso reform.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1975, "latest_year": 1975, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1975" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1442" ], "source_ids": [ "S721" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_observation", "date_is_creation": false }, { "event_id": "OBS27-C1460-CUR-V27-GUINEA-ESCUDO-1914", "scope": "Guinea includedin1913law public/privateaccount adoption ofmetropolitanescudoreckoning; separate regionalidentity boundary notthereby fixed.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1914, "latest_year": 1914, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1914" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1460" ], "source_ids": [ "S652" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_observation", "date_is_creation": false } ], "research_updates": [ { "title": "Historical account research", "text": "TerritorialGuineanescudo preceded1976peso reform.", "report_url": "/historical.html" }, { "title": "Historical account research", "text": "Guinea includedin1913law public/privateaccount adoption ofmetropolitanescudoreckoning; separate regionalidentity boundary notthereby fixed.", "report_url": "/historical.html" } ] } }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000524", "canonical_currency_id": "T-FTM000497", "reason": "Source review establishes a continuing account unit; local issues and naming epochs remain profile evidence.", "prior_node": { "id": "T-FTM000524", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Bermuda pound", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [ "T-FTM000524" ], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "FTM000524" ], "claim_ids": [ "C197", "C441", "C987", "C1602" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S202", "S837" ], "profile_id": "T-FTM000524", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "ET0776", "scope": "territorial_unit_derivation: The Bermuda pound replaced in 1970 was the locally issued sterling-denominated predecessor of the Bermuda dollar.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1970, "latest_year": 1970, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1970" }, "claim_ids": [ "C987" ], "source_ids": [ "S202" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000524" } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "Sterling and early English", "identity_decision_ids": [], "identity_claim_ids": [], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped currency identity; not a claim that its entire lifespan or ancestry is proven.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "unreviewed", "unknown_dates": "Use open endpoints or labelled date bands, never a fabricated birth year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000524", "label": "Bermuda pound", "aliases": [ "Bermuda pound" ], "unit_epochs": [], "events": [], "associated_records": [], "relationship_ids": [ "R0060", "R0405" ], "claim_ids": [ "C197", "C441", "C987", "C1602" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S202", "S837" ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000524", "label": "Bermuda pound", "navigation_group": "Sterling and early English", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "T-FTM000523" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C197", "C441", "C987" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S202" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R0060" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." }, "research_updates": [ { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "The modern locally issued Bermuda pound is sterling accounting, rather than a demonstrated separate principal account unit. British currency replaced the earlier local reckoning in1842; the1970dollar transition superseded this sterling system. Current graph's branch is supported by local issue alone. Merge the modern local-sterling profile into sterling; preserve any independently evidenced pre1842local currency separately. This is ontology adjudication, not a claim that parity alone proves identity.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" } ] } }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000960", "canonical_currency_id": "T-FTM000515", "reason": "Source review establishes a continuing account unit; local issues and naming epochs remain profile evidence.", "prior_node": { "id": "T-FTM000960", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Barbados colonial dollar accounts and note issues", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [ "T-FTM000960" ], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "FTM000960" ], "claim_ids": [ "C983", "C984", "C1473", "C1591", "C1656" ], "source_ids": [ "S467", "S736", "S848", "S830" ], "profile_id": "T-FTM000960", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "ET0772", "scope": "territorial_unit_derivation: Barbados’s colonial currency combined sterling coinage with local dollar-denominated bank notes by 1850.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1825, "latest_year": 1850, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1825–1850" }, "claim_ids": [ "C983" ], "source_ids": [ "S467" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000960" }, { "event_id": "ET0773", "scope": "multiple_currency_unification: BCCB notes took over the note circulation of Barbados, British Guiana and Trinidad in 1951.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1951, "latest_year": 1951, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1951" }, "claim_ids": [ "C984" ], "source_ids": [ "S467" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000960" }, { "event_id": "OBS27-C1473-T-FTM000960-1949", "scope": "Barbados governmentaccounts changefromsterling to dollarsandcents effective1April1949 underPublicAccountsAct1.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1949, "latest_year": 1949, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1949" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1473" ], "source_ids": [ "S736" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_observation", "date_is_creation": false } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "1500 coverage branches", "identity_decision_ids": [], "identity_claim_ids": [], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped currency identity; not a claim that its entire lifespan or ancestry is proven.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "unreviewed", "unknown_dates": "Use open endpoints or labelled date bands, never a fabricated birth year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000960", "label": "Barbados colonial dollar accounts and note issues", "aliases": [ "Barbados colonial dollar accounts and note issues" ], "unit_epochs": [], "events": [], "associated_records": [], "relationship_ids": [ "R0401", "R0402" ], "claim_ids": [ "C983", "C984", "C1473", "C1591", "C1656" ], "source_ids": [ "S467", "S736", "S848", "S830" ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000960", "label": "Barbados colonial dollar accounts and note issues", "navigation_group": "1500 coverage branches", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "T-FTM000515", "T-FTM000516", "T-FTM000519", "T-FTM000520" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C983", "C984" ], "source_ids": [ "S467" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R0402" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." }, "account_unit_observations": [ { "event_id": "OBS27-C1473-T-FTM000960-1949", "scope": "Barbados governmentaccounts changefromsterling to dollarsandcents effective1April1949 underPublicAccountsAct1.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1949, "latest_year": 1949, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1949" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1473" ], "source_ids": [ "S736" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_observation", "date_is_creation": false } ], "research_updates": [ { "title": "Historical account research", "text": "Barbados governmentaccounts changefromsterling to dollarsandcents effective1April1949 underPublicAccountsAct1.", "report_url": "/historical.html" }, { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "The Barbados colonial-dollar profile represents a territorial administration of the existing British West Indian dollar, continued as the principal unit under regional currency arrangements. The1951transfer of note issue does not create an additional currency identity. Primary contemporary ministerial evidence explicitly identifies the proposed common principal unit as an existing unit. Under the project's unit-of-account identity rule, the instrument/issuer boundary should be merged, while account observations and institutional history remain. This supersedes the earlier unresolved classification; not a parity-only merger.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" }, { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "Sterling coins and the sterling rating coexisted with the inherited British West Indian dollar account unit. They do not make sterling its account-unit parent. The independently sourced Spanish-dollar ancestry replaces the earlier mixed-circulation inference.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" } ] } }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V22-MONGOLIA-YANCHAAN", "canonical_currency_id": "T-FTM000456", "reason": "Source review establishes a continuing account unit; local issues and naming epochs remain profile evidence.", "prior_node": { "id": "CUR-V22-MONGOLIA-YANCHAAN", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Chinese yanchaan accounting in Mongolia", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "E-V22-CUR-V22-MONGOLIA-YANCHAAN" ], "claim_ids": [ "C1139", "C1615" ], "source_ids": [ "S308" ], "profile_id": "CUR-V22-MONGOLIA-YANCHAAN", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "OBS22-C1139-CUR-V22-MONGOLIA-YANCHAAN", "scope": "Mongolia’s togrog displaced Chinese yanchaan in budgets, accounts, prices and domestic transactions by 1927. The predecessor is scoped to this local accounting use; its exact Chinese currency identity remains qualified. Only this local transition is asserted; other inputs and earlier stages may remain untraced.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1925, "latest_year": 1927, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1925–1927" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1139" ], "source_ids": [ "S308" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_transition", "date_is_creation": false } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "East Asian lineages", "identity_decision_ids": [ "ID22-CUR-V22-MONGOLIA-YANCHAAN" ], "identity_claim_ids": [ "C1139" ], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped account unit; complete lifespan and earlier ancestry remain open.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "qualified", "unknown_dates": "Open endpoints; not a fabricated founding year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "CUR-V22-MONGOLIA-YANCHAAN", "label": "Chinese yanchaan accounting in Mongolia", "aliases": [ "Chinese yanchaan accounting in Mongolia" ], "unit_epochs": [], "events": [], "associated_records": [], "relationship_ids": [ "R-V22-037" ], "claim_ids": [ "C1139", "C1615" ], "source_ids": [ "S308" ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "CUR-V22-MONGOLIA-YANCHAAN", "label": "Chinese yanchaan accounting in Mongolia", "navigation_group": "East Asian lineages", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "FTM000350" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1139" ], "source_ids": [ "S308" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R-V22-037" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." }, "research_updates": [ { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "Mongolian yanchaan accounting was displaced by togrog in institutional budgets, financial statements, tax returns and prices by1927. Exact Chinese identity of scoped yanchaan parent is a root uncertainty; it does not weaken the explicitly described local account transition.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" } ] } }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000876", "canonical_currency_id": "FTM000309", "reason": "Source review establishes a continuing account unit; local issues and naming epochs remain profile evidence.", "prior_node": { "id": "T-FTM000876", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Ostmark — eastern occupation mark", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [ "T-FTM000876" ], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "FTM000876" ], "claim_ids": [ "C818", "C832", "C1534", "C1648" ], "source_ids": [ "S410", "S416", "S876", "S780" ], "profile_id": "T-FTM000876", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "ET0605", "scope": "unit_standard_adoption: The Estonian mark was initially defined at parity with the ostmark.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1918, "latest_year": 1918, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1918-11-30", "iso_date": "1918-11-30" }, "claim_ids": [ "C818" ], "source_ids": [ "S410" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000876" }, { "event_id": "ET0619", "scope": "currency_replacement: Lithuania introduced litas and began exchanging ostmarks.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1922, "latest_year": 1922, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1922-10-02", "iso_date": "1922-10-02" }, "claim_ids": [ "C832" ], "source_ids": [ "S416" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000876" } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "European predecessor branches", "identity_decision_ids": [], "identity_claim_ids": [], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped currency identity; not a claim that its entire lifespan or ancestry is proven.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "unreviewed", "unknown_dates": "Use open endpoints or labelled date bands, never a fabricated birth year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000876", "label": "Ostmark — eastern occupation mark", "aliases": [ "Ostmark — eastern occupation mark" ], "unit_epochs": [], "events": [], "associated_records": [], "relationship_ids": [ "R0267", "R0279" ], "claim_ids": [ "C818", "C832", "C1534", "C1648" ], "source_ids": [ "S410", "S416", "S876", "S780" ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000876", "label": "Ostmark — eastern occupation mark", "navigation_group": "European predecessor branches", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "FTM000349", "FTM000354", "FTM000360", "FTM000362", "FTM000363", "FTM000364", "FTM000368", "FTM000387" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C818", "C832" ], "source_ids": [ "S410", "S416" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R0279", "R0267" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." }, "research_updates": [ { "title": "Historical account research", "text": "Ost loan notes were instruments in the common German mark account unit. Statute forbids distinguishing instruments in payment contracts; preserve note history as profile evidence.", "report_url": "/historical.html" }, { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "The Estonian mark founding standard referenced the Ostmark; this standard reference is retained as context and excluded from ancestry traversal. Retain supported optional standard_reference, not ancestry; keep_qualified denotes unresolved proposed ancestry only. Do not downgrade existing parity fact.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" } ] } }, { "currency_id": "FTM000299", "canonical_currency_id": "FTM000285", "reason": "Inspected enabling law authorizes special notes of the Indian rupee for external circulation, not a new account denomination. Fold Gulf episode into Indian rupee and retain its regional conversion observations. This rejects a note-series identity; any later independently denominated Gulf contract unit requires new evidence.", "prior_node": { "id": "FTM000299", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Gulf rupee — external Indian note currency", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [ "FTM000299" ], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "FTM000956" ], "claim_ids": [ "C967", "C968", "C969", "C970", "C975", "C1555" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234", "S460", "S461", "S894" ], "profile_id": "FTM000299", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "ET0754", "scope": "territorial_currency_separation: India introduced a separate rupee-note currency for Gulf circulation.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1959, "latest_year": 1959, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1959-05-11", "iso_date": "1959-05-11" }, "claim_ids": [ "C967" ], "source_ids": [ "S460", "S461" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000299" }, { "event_id": "ET0755", "scope": "territorial_currency_replacement: Kuwait’s dinar replaced the circulating Gulf rupee.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1961, "latest_year": 1961, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1961-04-01", "iso_date": "1961-04-01" }, "claim_ids": [ "C968" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000299" }, { "event_id": "ET0756", "scope": "territorial_currency_replacement: Ten Gulf rupees converted to one Bahraini dinar.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1965, "latest_year": 1965, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1965-10-16", "iso_date": "1965-10-16" }, "claim_ids": [ "C969" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000299" }, { "event_id": "ET0757", "scope": "territorial_currency_replacement: Qatar temporarily substituted borrowed Saudi-riyal notes for Gulf rupees.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1966, "latest_year": 1966, "precision": "month", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1966-06", "iso_date": "1966-06" }, "claim_ids": [ "C970" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000299" }, { "event_id": "ET0762", "scope": "territorial_currency_replacement: Oman replaced Gulf rupees with the rial Saidi.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1970, "latest_year": 1970, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1970-05-07", "iso_date": "1970-05-07" }, "claim_ids": [ "C975" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "original_track_id": "FTM000299" } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "Rupee", "identity_decision_ids": [], "identity_claim_ids": [], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped currency identity; not a claim that its entire lifespan or ancestry is proven.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "unreviewed", "unknown_dates": "Use open endpoints or labelled date bands, never a fabricated birth year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "FTM000299", "label": "Gulf rupee — external Indian note currency", "aliases": [ "Gulf rupee — external Indian note currency" ], "unit_epochs": [], "events": [], "associated_records": [], "relationship_ids": [ "LEG00307", "R0385", "R0386", "R0387", "R0388", "R0393" ], "claim_ids": [ "C967", "C968", "C969", "C970", "C975", "C1555" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234", "S460", "S461", "S894" ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "FTM000299", "label": "Gulf rupee — external Indian note currency", "navigation_group": "Rupee", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "FTM000243", "FTM000244", "FTM000300", "FTM000303" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C967", "C968", "C969", "C970", "C975" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234", "S460", "S461" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R0386", "R0387", "R0393" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." }, "research_updates": [ { "title": "Historical account research", "text": "Inspected enabling law authorizes special notes of the Indian rupee for external circulation, not a new account denomination. Fold Gulf episode into Indian rupee and retain its regional conversion observations. This rejects a note-series identity; any later independently denominated Gulf contract unit requires new evidence.", "report_url": "/historical.html" } ] } }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH", "canonical_currency_id": "T-FTM000839", "reason": "Official archive explicitly identifies old francs in Zurich accounts as Helvetic francs. Regional contract scope is an observation, not a separate unit. Preserve all aliases and 1851 conversion observations.", "prior_node": { "id": "CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "Old Swiss franc account unit (Zurich contracts)", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "E-V23-CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH" ], "claim_ids": [ "C1163", "C1184", "C1550" ], "source_ids": [ "S551", "S552" ], "profile_id": "CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "OBS23-C1163-CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH-1852", "scope": "Section 3 converted old Swiss-franc contracts at sixteen old francs to ten Zurich gulden, then to federal francs. The legislative act dates from 28 January 1851; implementation is scoped to the 1851–1852 federal reform. Only this local transition is asserted; other inputs and earlier stages may remain untraced.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1851, "latest_year": 1852, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1851–1852" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1163" ], "source_ids": [ "S551" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_transition", "date_is_creation": false }, { "event_id": "OBS23-C1184-CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH-1803", "scope": "Zurich 1803 records also reckon in old/Helvetic francs.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1803, "latest_year": 1803, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1803" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1184" ], "source_ids": [ "S552" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_transition", "date_is_creation": false } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "Carolingian pound", "identity_decision_ids": [ "ID23-CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH" ], "identity_claim_ids": [ "C1163" ], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped account unit; complete lifespan and earlier ancestry remain open.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "supported", "unknown_dates": "Open endpoints; not a fabricated founding year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH", "label": "Old Swiss franc account unit (Zurich contracts)", "aliases": [ "Old Swiss franc account unit (Zurich contracts)" ], "unit_epochs": [ { "id": "EPOCH23-C1184-1803", "label": "Earlier accounting observation", "date": { "earliest_year": 1803, "latest_year": 1803, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1803" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1184" ], "source_ids": [ "S552" ], "kind": "same_currency_continuity" } ], "events": [], "associated_records": [], "relationship_ids": [ "R-V23-003" ], "claim_ids": [ "C1163", "C1184", "C1550" ], "source_ids": [ "S551", "S552" ], "research_updates": [ { "title": "Earlier unit continuity", "text": "Zurich 1803 records also reckon in old/Helvetic francs.", "report_url": "/revision-23/index.html" }, { "title": "Historical account research", "text": "Official archive explicitly identifies old francs in Zurich accounts as Helvetic francs. Regional contract scope is an observation, not a separate unit. Preserve all aliases and 1851 conversion observations.", "report_url": "/historical.html" } ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH", "label": "Old Swiss franc account unit (Zurich contracts)", "navigation_group": "Carolingian pound", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "FTM000245" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1163", "C1184" ], "source_ids": [ "S551", "S552" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R-V23-003" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." } } } ], "withheld": [ { "currency_id": "T-FTM000819", "reason": "1945law identifies grouped territorial currencies;1963study differentiates six legal-tender units. A universally shared unit is not established. This does not negate regional currency continuity.", "prior_node": { "id": "T-FTM000819", "kind": "currency", "node_role": "currency_continuity", "label": "CFA franc — early shared unit", "codes": [], "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "former_track_ids": [ "T-FTM000819" ], "evidence_entity_ids": [ "FTM000819" ], "claim_ids": [ "C743", "C745", "C748", "C749", "C750", "C751", "C767", "C771", "C776", "C977", "C1254", "C1255", "C1581", "C1657", "C1714" ], "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657", "S890", "S831", "S888" ], "profile_id": "T-FTM000819", "profile_file": "currency-profiles.json", "dates": { "anchors": [ { "event_id": "ET0530", "scope": "parity_framework: The decree establishes the CFA grouping and its metropolitan-franc parity.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1945, "latest_year": 1945, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1945-12-26", "iso_date": "1945-12-26" }, "claim_ids": [ "C743" ], "source_ids": [ "S396" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000819" }, { "event_id": "ET0532", "scope": "peg: Initial CFA/metropolitan parity.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1945, "latest_year": 1945, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1945-12-26", "iso_date": "1945-12-26" }, "claim_ids": [ "C745" ], "source_ids": [ "S396" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000819" }, { "event_id": "ET0535", "scope": "peg: The CFA parity becomes two old French francs.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1948, "latest_year": 1948, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1948-10-17", "iso_date": "1948-10-17" }, "claim_ids": [ "C748" ], "source_ids": [ "S267" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000819" }, { "event_id": "ET0536", "scope": "peg: France’s new unit restates the CFA parity.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1960, "latest_year": 1960, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1960-01-01", "iso_date": "1960-01-01" }, "claim_ids": [ "C749" ], "source_ids": [ "S267" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000819" }, { "event_id": "ET0537", "scope": "regional_institutional_continuity: The western CFA branch develops under BCEAO.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1959, "latest_year": 1959, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1959" }, "claim_ids": [ "C750" ], "source_ids": [ "S267", "S379" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000819" }, { "event_id": "ET0538", "scope": "regional_institutional_continuity: The central CFA branch develops through its own central-bank institutions.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1959, "latest_year": 1972, "precision": "period", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1959–1972" }, "claim_ids": [ "C751" ], "source_ids": [ "S381" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000819" }, { "event_id": "ET0554", "scope": "regional_currency_continuity: The Malagasy franc designation marks the independent national branch.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1963, "latest_year": 1963, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1963-07-01", "iso_date": "1963-07-01" }, "claim_ids": [ "C767" ], "source_ids": [ "S402" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000819" }, { "event_id": "ET0558", "scope": "regional_currency_continuity: Comoros has local franc issues under BMC and then IEC.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1950, "latest_year": 1975, "precision": "period", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1950–1975" }, "claim_ids": [ "C771" ], "source_ids": [ "S385" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000819" }, { "event_id": "ET0563", "scope": "territorial_currency_separation: Djibouti’s separate dollar-linked franc follows the territorial CFA period.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1949, "latest_year": 1949, "precision": "month", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1949-03", "iso_date": "1949-03" }, "claim_ids": [ "C776" ], "source_ids": [ "S253", "S396", "S403", "S404" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000819" }, { "event_id": "ET0766", "scope": "territorial_currency_separation: The CFA unit separates from the metropolitan-franc monetary system in the 1945 reform.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1945, "latest_year": 1945, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1945-12-26", "iso_date": "1945-12-26" }, "claim_ids": [ "C977" ], "source_ids": [ "S463" ], "original_track_id": "T-FTM000819" }, { "event_id": "OBS25-C1254-T-FTM000819-1962", "scope": "Reconnect western CFA profile to the existing early CFA account lineage. Evidence documents inherited notes and same-unit recognition through 1955/1959/1962 institutions. Do not add BAO/institute/BCEAO issuer nodes or label 1962 a monetary birth. This is regional continuity of an existing currency; exact west/central differentiation remains unadjudicated. An identity merge/alias may be preferable if the parent is only an issuer-era duplicate. Only this local transition is asserted; other inputs and earlier stages may remain untraced.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1945, "latest_year": 1962, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1945–1962" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1254" ], "source_ids": [ "S654", "S655" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_transition", "date_is_creation": false, "date_is_research_envelope": true }, { "event_id": "OBS25-C1255-T-FTM000819-1972", "scope": "Reconnect central CFA profile to the early CFA lineage, supported by institutional history and 1972 transfer of monetary liabilities. Retain a qualified regional edge and avoid treating 1972 institutional renaming as a new currency. Regional division existed before 1972; date range labels evidence coverage, not a claim the split occurred in 1972. Only this local transition is asserted; other inputs and earlier stages may remain untraced.", "date": { "earliest_year": 1945, "latest_year": 1972, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1945–1972" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1255" ], "source_ids": [ "S656", "S657" ], "anchor_role": "account_unit_transition", "date_is_creation": false, "date_is_research_envelope": true } ], "policy": "Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan." }, "group": "France and western antecedents", "identity_decision_ids": [ "ID17-CFA" ], "identity_claim_ids": [ "C977" ], "display_evidence": { "currency_line_style": "solid", "meaning": "Scoped currency identity; not a claim that its entire lifespan or ancestry is proven.", "identity_status": "scoped_draft", "identity_evidence_status": "supported", "unknown_dates": "Use open endpoints or labelled date bands, never a fabricated birth year.", "ancestor_uncertainty_propagates": false } }, "prior_profile": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000819", "label": "CFA franc — early shared unit", "aliases": [ "CFA framework of 1945" ], "unit_epochs": [], "events": [], "associated_records": [ { "original_track_id": "T-FTM000818", "label": "French overseas territorial francs before 1945", "record_types": [ "regional_context" ], "disposition": "profile_context", "association_only": true, "claim_ids": [ "C742", "C743", "C744" ], "source_ids": [ "S383", "S396" ] } ], "relationship_ids": [ "R0203", "R0205", "R0208", "R0209", "R0210", "R0211", "R0226", "R0229", "R0234", "R0395", "R-V25-009", "R-V25-010" ], "claim_ids": [ "C743", "C745", "C748", "C749", "C750", "C751", "C767", "C771", "C776", "C977", "C1254", "C1255", "C1581", "C1657", "C1714" ], "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657", "S890", "S831", "S888" ], "historical_audit": { "currency_id": "T-FTM000819", "label": "CFA franc — early shared unit", "navigation_group": "France and western antecedents", "endpoint_codes": [], "added_in_revision26": false, "graph_status": "main_path_to_modern", "modern_reachable_ids": [ "FTM000263", "FTM000264", "FTM000268", "FTM000271", "FTM000272", "FTM000283" ], "lifecycle": { "status": "ending_not_reviewed_in_this_sweep", "ending_years": null, "assertion": "No new lifecycle adjudication in this sweep. Existing relationships and dated observations are retained.", "claim_ids": [], "source_ids": [], "successor_ids": [], "family_fate": "not_established" }, "claim_ids": [ "C743", "C745", "C748", "C749", "C750", "C751", "C767", "C771", "C776", "C977", "C1254", "C1255" ], "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ], "successor_relationship_ids": [ "R0226", "R0229", "R0234", "R-V25-009", "R-V25-010" ], "temporal_successor_ids": [], "whole_family_extinction": "not_established", "review_scope": "Graph inventory for every identity; source-level lifecycle assessment only where explicitly supplied." }, "research_updates": [ { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "1963 was a name change within the local Malagasy profile; actual French ancestry is supplied by revisedR0398. ", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" }, { "title": "Modern account-unit review", "text": "Retire the umbrella currency endpoint; distribute its actual territorial ancestry below. The grouping is not demonstrated to be one account unit. Preserve evidence as noncurrency context.", "report_url": "/modern-cleanup.html" } ] }, "profile_owners": [ "FTM000263", "FTM000264", "FTM000270", "FTM000272", "CUR-V27-SOMALIS-CFA" ] } ], "ontology_review": { "revision": 27, "baseline_revision": 26, "scope": "All 361 current nodes screened; high-risk focused source adjudication; no repository edits.", "policy": { "currency": "A scoped unit in which prices, debts, taxes or equivalent monetary obligations are independently denominated.", "not_currency_by_itself": [ "issuer", "coin or banknote issue", "bank balance credit risk", "metal standard", "weight ratio", "name", "circulation restriction", "same-unit scaling" ], "principal_units": "Genuinely different principal units remain separate despite conversion (pound→dollar, peso→córdoba, franc→zaire). Same-unit rescale/rename and issuer succession do not create nodes.", "merger": "Require positive common-unit/continuity evidence; missing independent evidence leads to withhold, not invented merger.", "lifecycle": "Instrument withdrawal/bank closure/no modern descendant alone never establishes unit extinction or a short-lived family." }, "summary": { "total_screened": 361, "v26_additions_screened": 36, "verdict_counts": { "keep": 356, "merge": 5 }, "audit_levels": { "baseline_record_screen": 336, "coordinated_source_review": 5, "fresh_source_adjudication": 20 }, "limitation": "Every node has a verdict and record links, but only targeted high-risk cases had fresh source inspection. Baseline retains are explicitly not blanket re-certification.", "retained_identity_unresolved": 1 }, "sources": [ { "key": "ONT27-ZURICH", "title": "Staatsarchiv Zürich, Actum 1803", "url": "https://www.zh.ch/content/dam/zhweb/bilder-dokumente/themen/politik-staat/recherche-im-staatsarchiv/z%C3%BCrcher-geschichte/staatsarchiv_zuerich_actum_1803.pdf", "locator": "Appendix 2, printed p.168 (PDF p.167 zero-based)", "inspection": "Full appendix inspected: old francs expressly identified as Helvetic francs, distinguished from new federal francs; local gulden and coin circulation separately described.", "existing_source_id": "S552" }, { "key": "ONT27-SHP", "title": "Saint Helena Currency Ordinance 1975, consolidated", "url": "https://www.sainthelena.gov.sh/documents/20250707_currency-ordinance_consolidated/", "locator": "ss 3,4,8,12,15", "inspection": "Full relevant clauses inspected: s 3 local unit, s 8 independently local obligations and laws; sterling parity and continued UK-note use do not establish common-unit identity.", "existing_source_id": null }, { "key": "ONT27-FKP", "title": "Falkland Islands Currency Ordinance 1987, consolidated 24 July 2025", "url": "https://legislation.gov.fk/download/pdf/4b2fecd6-d7d8-4406-ad08-00a53100b8b8/a24bbb7e-8d1f-4530-95e3-28b83bf2b575/fiord-1987-14_2025-07-24.pdf", "locator": "ss 1 commencement note,3,4,8,12,15; PDF pp 3–7", "inspection": "Full statute inspected. Local unit and obligations explicit. Commencement note limits nominal 1987 start: relevant coinage provisions postponed to 31 January 1990; do not infer 1899 unit boundary from note issue.", "existing_source_id": null }, { "key": "ONT27-CS-DOLLAR", "title": "US Supreme Court, Thorington v Smith,75 US 1(1868)", "url": "https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/75/1/", "locator": "pp 12–14, facts of 28 November 1864 land contract", "inspection": "Full relevant judgment inspected: contractual Confederate dollars differed in kind and value from US dollars; historical USD-value recovery is not note redemption.", "existing_source_id": "S707" }, { "key": "ONT27-GULF-LAW", "title": "Reserve Bank of India Act 1934,s 28 A inserted 1959; primary legal text in mirror", "url": "https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/bareacts/reservebankofindia/28a.php", "locator": "s 28 A(1)–(7)", "inspection": "All seven subsections inspected. Authorizes special banknotes denominated in rupees for external circulation, changes legal-tender and redemption geography, does not create differently denominated unit. Official 1959 PDF retrieval failed; mirror is explicitly identified.", "existing_source_id": null }, { "key": "ONT27-EARLY-BANKS", "title": "Roberds and Velde, Early Public Banks (2014 revised), Chicago WP 2014-03", "url": "https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/working-papers-federal-reserve-bank-chicago-5285/early-public-banks-533919/fulltext", "locator": "Venice pp 21–26; Amsterdam pp 35–39", "inspection": "Full relevant passages inspected: bills and account units distinguish banco/current money, not merely balance credit risk. Venice bank unit explicitly survives metallic devaluation; Amsterdam 1659 dual valuation.", "existing_source_id": "S704" }, { "key": "ONT27-GENOA", "title": "Giuseppe Felloni, Il debito consolidato della repubblica di Genova nel secolo XVIII e la sua liquidazione (1969; reprint 1998), Appendix", "url": "https://memoriedigitaliliguri.it/Docs/Biblioteca_Digitale/SB/396b22c37e8bbc6c44c30828fc127900/Estratti/7597dc7c083dec726cd415aedad31b87.pdf", "locator": "Appendix, printed pp 193–198 (PDF pp 28–33)", "inspection": "Full passages inspected. Banco, current and permesso independently denominated obligations;1748 new banks use same banco unit;1751 permesso used for taxes, debt service, distributions; bank closures not unit abolition proof.", "existing_source_id": "S705" }, { "key": "ONT27-SILVER1933", "title": "US Department of Commerce, Monetary Use of Silver in 1933", "url": "https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/books/musilver_comm_1933.pdf", "locator": "China customs-gold discussion, printed p.40 footnote 38; Ceylon and Mauritius country sections (Mauritius printed p.79)", "inspection": "Existing local full-text file inspected at relevant country passages. Customs unit explicitly bookkeeping unit; Mauritius account unit explicitly British Indian rupee, hence earlylocal-note issuance does not establish separate monetary identity.", "existing_source_id": "S541" }, { "key": "ONT27-CUBA", "title": "Willis Fletcher Johnson, History of Cuba,Vol 5,chXXXIII", "url": "https://skedbooks.com/books/the-history-of-cuba-vol-5/the-history-of-cuba-chapter-xxxiii-money-and-banking/", "locator": "pp 363–364 money-and-banking discussion", "inspection": "Full chapter inspected: imaginary peso oro español is unit of value and account, unlike circulating pesetas. Conversion of accounts byJune 1916. Garbled metrological details excluded.", "existing_source_id": "S586" }, { "key": "ONT27-JINAN", "title": "Handan Party History, Jinan Bank history", "url": "https://www.handandangshi.gov.cn/dangshishijian/521.html", "locator": "paragraph 2 fiscal revenues/expenditures, trade and creditor/debtor settlements", "inspection": "Coordinated original-source inspection by asian_roots: policy designates Jinan denomination as pricing tool in obligations. Not independently reopened in this audit turn.", "existing_source_id": null }, { "key": "ONT27-RIAU", "title": "Indonesia Perpres 21/1963", "url": "https://www.klaussa.com/peraturan/perpres-no-21-tahun-1963-peraturan-pembayaran-gaji-pegawai-negeri-sipil-anggota-kepolisian-anggota", "locator": "arts 1–2 and explanation; read with Penpres 9/1963 art 1 and Perpres 24/1964", "inspection": "Coordinated full-law inspection by asian_roots: national-Rp salary calculations versus KR-Rp payments, residual KR liabilities separately settled in 1964.", "existing_source_id": null }, { "key": "ONT27-BAHAMAS", "title": "Bahamas revised laws 1964,ch 300, British Currency Act 1838", "url": "https://bs.vlex.com/vid/sub-title-finance-general-42457162", "locator": "ch 300 entire body, contract/payment/liability clause", "inspection": "Coordinated full primary-law inspection by atlantic_roots: all contracts and liabilities sterling, operative alongside local 1936 note act.", "existing_source_id": null }, { "key": "ONT27-SERBIA", "title": "Serbia/Yugoslavia: from 1884 to 1940", "url": "https://nbs.rs/export/sites/NBS_site/documents-eng/publikacije/konferencije/seemhn_dctf/download/pdf/VII._SERBIA.pdf", "locator": "pp 295–296", "inspection": "Coordinated full original-research inspection by western_roots: Serbian monetary system retained, dinar retained, bank transformed and renamed 26 January 1920. No independent debt-denomination conversion located.", "existing_source_id": "S445" }, { "key": "ONT27-MIJATOVIC", "creator": "Boško Mijatović", "title": "Zamena austrijskih kruna za dinare 1920. godine, Istorija 20. veka 1/2014, pp27–50", "url": "https://istorija20veka.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2014_1_02_Mijatovic.pdf", "locator": "Printed pp46–49, especially government decision13January1920 and unchanged creditor/debtor relations p47", "inspection": "Full relevant passages inspected: local crown accounts, unchanged debts, partial monetary separation, eventual dinar absorption. Original research cites contemporary press and official gazette." }, { "key": "ONT27-TAIWAN-UNIT", "creator": "A. R. Ovens, British Consul at Tamsui; Department of Overseas Trade", "title": "Economic Conditions in Japan1933–1934 (1935), AnnexI: Formosa", "url": "https://dspace.gipe.ac.in/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10973/22310/GIPE-011274.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=3", "locator": "Printed p112, PDF page114, General Statistics: Monetary Unit and Rate of Exchange", "inspection": "Downloaded complete primary report, extracted text and visually inspected page114. Report explicitly states Taiwan monetary unit is the same as Japan. Local file taiwan-contemporary-report.pdf; rendered evidence taiwan-unit-page.png." }, { "key": "ONT27-BRYAN", "creator": "Steven Bryan", "title": "The Gold Standard at the Turn of the Twentieth Century (Columbia UP2010)", "url": "https://dokumen.pub/the-gold-standard-at-the-turn-of-the-twentieth-century-rising-powers-global-money-and-the-age-of-empire-0231152523-9780231152525.html", "locator": "Chapter9, pp160–164", "inspection": "Full relevant passages inspected in text mirror:1898two-tier Taiwan arrangement separated Japanese gold bookkeeping for officials/trade from other silver dealings. Earlier silver accounting deserves separate scoped research; cannot simply backdate1930s common-unit evidence." } ], "high_risk_adjudications": [ { "id": "CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH", "verdict": "merge", "rationale": "Official archive explicitly identifies old francs in Zurich accounts as Helvetic francs. Regional contract scope is an observation, not a separate unit. Preserve all aliases and 1851 conversion observations.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-ZURICH" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "merge_target": "T-FTM000839" }, { "id": "T-FTM000839", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Keep Helvetic franc including its post-1803 old-franc contract usage; collapse redundant Zurich old-franc node, not federal Swiss franc.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-ZURICH" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "FTM000225", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Local monetary unit and local obligations are explicitly denominated independently of sterling. Statutory parity and UK-note co-circulation do not erase this boundary.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SHP" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "FTM000223", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Statute defines Falkland pound and all local monetary contracts/liabilities in that currency. Distinct unit despite sterling parity;1899 note issue does not prove independent identity then.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-FKP" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "boundary_status": "Earliest independent-unit law inspected1987–1990; earlier boundary unresolved." }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CONFEDERATE-DOLLAR", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Court explicitly distinguishes contract dollars in kind and value from US dollars. Admission rests on independently denominated land-price and debt obligations, not merely depreciated notes or issuer risk.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-CS-DOLLAR" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "FTM000299", "verdict": "merge", "rationale": "Inspected enabling law authorizes special notes of the Indian rupee for external circulation, not a new account denomination. Fold Gulf episode into Indian rupee and retain its regional conversion observations. This rejects a note-series identity; any later independently denominated Gulf contract unit requires new evidence.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-GULF-LAW" ], "confidence": "supported_inference", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "merge_target": "FTM000285" }, { "id": "T-FTM000522", "verdict": "merge", "rationale": "British Currency Act expressly keeps local contracts/payments/liabilities in sterling even alongside local-note issue. Preserve Bahamas use as sterling regional observation and dollar conversion.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-BAHAMAS" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "coordinated_source_review", "merge_target": "T-FTM000497" }, { "id": "T-FTM000938", "verdict": "merge", "rationale": "Original research explicitly says new kingdom retained Serbian dinar as monetary unit. National extension and renamed issuing bank do not create a new unit; retain all unification and later-partition observations. This is a qualified continuity merge, not invented conversion.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SERBIA" ], "confidence": "supported_inference", "audit_level": "coordinated_source_review", "merge_target": "FTM000254" }, { "id": "T-FTM000937", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Retain regional crown account unit: treasuries, prices and debts used crowns; local monetary separation is established. Stamping alone is not the admission basis.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-MIJATOVIC" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "identity_status_recommendation": "supported", "boundary_status": "Regional separation bounded1919–1920; exact onset is date uncertainty, not uncertain relationship." }, { "id": "CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN", "verdict": "merge", "rationale": "Merge issuer-defined Taiwan yen profile into Japanese yen for the established common-unit period. Contemporary1933–1934report expressly identifies the same monetary unit;1933USsurvey confirms Japanese currency law. Preserve1898–1904silver dealings as held regional accounting scope, not an automatic founding date of this merged unit.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-TAIWAN-UNIT", "ONT27-SILVER1933", "ONT27-BRYAN" ], "confidence": "supported_inference", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "identity_status_recommendation": "merged_alias", "merge_target": "T-FTM000117", "boundary_status": "1933–1934common-unit observation firm;1911law extension corroborates. Earlier silver account and1945–1946regional separation require distinct observations, not blanket continuity." }, { "id": "FTM000189", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Retain provisionally with identity unresolved. Current record positively describes local New Zealand-pound issues and issuer succession, but 1959 common-currency clause has uninspected local-law exceptions. The note evidence cannot establish independent denomination, and the incomplete statute cannot establish a merger. Inspect local obligations before changing identity.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "identity_unresolved", "audit_level": "coordinated_source_review", "identity_status_recommendation": "unresolved", "affirmative_instrument_evidence": "Local note or circulation episode established; account-unit distinctness remains open." }, { "id": "CUR-V22-JINAN-YUAN", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Designated unit for fiscal accounting, commercial dealings and creditor/debtor settlement. Rename label Jinan yuan; bank issuer belongs in profile metadata.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-JINAN" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "coordinated_source_review" }, { "id": "CUR-V22-RIAU-RUPIAH", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Separate KR-rupiah salary/payment liabilities and explicit subsequent conversion into national rupiah establish independent account unit, beyond regional notes.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-RIAU" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "coordinated_source_review" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-BANCO", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Separately denominated account obligations demonstrated in Felloni: banco transfer accounts, commercial obligations, or permesso taxes/debt-service/distributions. Different banks sharing one lira must not be split. Closure of a bank is not termination of an account unit.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-GENOA" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-CURRENT", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Separately denominated account obligations demonstrated in Felloni: banco transfer accounts, commercial obligations, or permesso taxes/debt-service/distributions. Different banks sharing one lira must not be split. Closure of a bank is not termination of an account unit.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-GENOA" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-PERMESSO", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Separately denominated account obligations demonstrated in Felloni: banco transfer accounts, commercial obligations, or permesso taxes/debt-service/distributions. Different banks sharing one lira must not be split. Closure of a bank is not termination of an account unit.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-GENOA" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-AMSTERDAM", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Banco versus current florins separately denominate bills, accounts and commercial transactions;1659 recognition supports identity beyond issuer credit risk.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-EARLY-BANKS" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-VENICE", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Revise admission argument: premium alone is insufficient. Bank account denomination, its distinct relation to current/coin money and continued unit despite metallic devaluation support scoped banco ducat. Preserve one unit across institutions unless an account split is established.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-EARLY-BANKS" ], "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HAMBURG", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "1619 charter loan clauses denominate principal and interest in Mark Banco; bill-clearing mandate alone would be insufficient. Retain independently denominated bank unit, with 1873 account conversion distinct from 1875 institution closure.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CUSTOMS-GOLD-UNIT", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Fiscal bookkeeping denomination is sufficient under account-unit ontology even where contemporary author contrasts it with circulating currency. Notes are incidental; do not describe gold content or note issue as identity basis.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SILVER1933" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HAIKWAN-TAEL", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Customs assessments and trade valuations independently denominated in Haikwan taels. A unit need not have a circulating coin or general retail use.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SILVER1933" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-SHANGHAI-TAEL", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Local contracts and payments denominated in Shanghai taels required account conversion into yuan; independent account denomination rather than weight standard alone.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SILVER1933" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "FTM000099", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Peso oro español is expressly an imaginary unit of account/value distinct from circulating coins; contract/account conversion corroborates denomination. Metal phrase in label does not make it only a gold coin.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-CUBA" ], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication" }, { "id": "FTM000291", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Retain later territorial/national rupee identity; earliest colonial note and coin evidence does not by itself date independent account denomination. Do not merge entire later currency into INR because early circulating standard was Indian rupee.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SILVER1933" ], "confidence": "boundary_unresolved", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "boundary_status": "Earlier distinct-account boundary requires statute/contracts; local issuer date is not currency birth." }, { "id": "FTM000293", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Retain later territorial/national rupee identity; earliest colonial note and coin evidence does not by itself date independent account denomination. Do not merge entire later currency into INR because early circulating standard was Indian rupee.", "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SILVER1933" ], "confidence": "boundary_unresolved", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "boundary_status": "Earlier distinct-account boundary requires statute/contracts; local issuer date is not currency birth." }, { "id": "FTM000294", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Retain later territorial/national rupee identity; earliest colonial note and coin evidence does not by itself date independent account denomination. Do not merge entire later currency into INR because early circulating standard was Indian rupee.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "boundary_unresolved", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "boundary_status": "Earlier distinct-account boundary requires statute/contracts; local issuer date is not currency birth." }, { "id": "FTM000120", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Retain hwan as genuinely named principal unit under explicit user ontology. Exact conversion to won does not establish a same-unit rescale.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "FTM000118", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Baseline 1947 regional settlement reform supports common Korean obligation scope before bifurcation. Japanese-parent versus common Korean-unit boundary remains uninspected; do not infer independence from Bank of Chosen note issuer alone.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "boundary_unresolved", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GAMBIA-BAR", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Reckoning of multi-good prices and a 300-bar payment liability; bar is account measure, not an iron-object node.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-ETHIOPIA-AMOLE", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Tax schedules and a price structure expressed in amoles distinguish accounting from mere salt trade; worn commodity bars are not separate currencies.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-KONGO-NZIMBU", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Counted monetary tribute and obligations establish scoped account reckoning; shell species and counting scales stay in profile.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CONGO-MITAKO", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Goods priced in mitako and salary/valuation rules establish account function; original decrees remain uninspected, so scope stays qualified.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-ASANTE-PEREDWAN", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Peredwan value scale in fees/fines is an account identity; subsidiary weights do not receive separate nodes.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TOLAI-TAMBU", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Prices and administration work payments are expressed in a common tambu scale; material shell medium does not disqualify accounting.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-KOVE-TAMBU", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Quantified loans, interest and bride obligations in fathoms establish local account function; no shared identity with Tolai inferred from name/material.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TLAXCALA-CACAO", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Dated official ordinary-goods price schedule uses counted cacao units; these are not merely commodity stock quantities.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CENTRAL-MEXICO-QUACHTLI", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Land consideration and purchasing reckoning provide unit evidence; geographical continuity between records remains qualified.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-NEWENGLAND-WAMPUM", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Treaty installment and per-capita obligations are denominated in white fathoms; token forms/colour ratios stay within scope.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-PENNSYLVANIA-POUND", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Local contract accounting and pre-paper-issue reward prices establish unit independently of issuer or notes.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-VIRGINIA-POUND", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Receivables and contracts denominated in Virginia currency, settled in produce if agreed, are direct account evidence.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-NEWJERSEY-POUND", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Local salary reckoning distinguished from note par supports account unit; provincial bill issuer alone would not.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-OLD-ASSYRIAN-SILVER", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Loan principal, repayment term and interest plus aggregate caravan accounts establish one Kanesh silver account scope; mina/shekel/grain are its scales.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-OLD-BABYLONIAN-SILVER", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Hammurabi fee and compensation obligations in silver shekels establish accounting; mina is larger denomination, not another currency.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-ATHENIAN-DRACHMA", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Treasury principal/interest and security-inscription debt establish common Athenian account identity; talent/drachma/obol are grouped scales.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-RAMESSIDE-COPPER-DEBEN", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Bull transaction aggregates dissimilar goods into copper-deben value; qualified Ramesside scope, not each copper ring a currency.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-EGYPT-SOLIDUS-NOMISMA", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "481 loan and 613 debt use solidus/nomisma value with fractions and alternative-kind settlement. Local Syene standard is scoped, not new node per fineness deduction.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-JPN-GINME", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Merchants price goods and make loans in monme/ginme even after related silver coins recede; account unit rather than coin weight alone.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HYDERABAD-RUPEE", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Separate Osmania-rupee obligations and reserve accounts, with British-rupee contractual exception, establish local accounting beyond note issuer.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TRAVANCORE-SIRKAR", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Government accounts use an unminted full Sirkar rupee; fanam/cash subdivisions belong to same scale. Earlier/later local grouping remains qualified.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-MANCHUKUO-YUAN", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Statutory regional yuan and separately denominated exchange/payment area support account unit; central-bank founding alone would not.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TIBET-TANGKA", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Contemporary official monetary-unit account description supports qualified tangka scope; tangka/srang regrouping needs accounting evidence, not denomination ratio alone.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-BIAFRAN-POUND", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Litigated palm-oil debt explicitly Biafran, distinguished from Nigerian pounds; note failure and no conversion do not erase prior account identity.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-DANZIG-GULDEN", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Currency law expressly defines gulden unit and subdivisions; sterling valuation is standard relation, not proof of unit identity with sterling.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" }, { "id": "CUR-V26-KATANGA-FRANC", "verdict": "keep", "rationale": "Diplomatic payment obligations distinguish Katanga and Congo francs and discuss their conversion; not merely different-bank franc notes.", "adjudication_source_keys": [], "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen" } ], "node_verdicts": [ { "id": "FTM000053", "label": "Portuguese real", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1001", "C1010", "C1011", "C1168" ], "source_ids": [ "S477", "S479", "S480", "S565" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1001", "assertion": "Brazilian réis developed from Portuguese money, with imported coin circulation followed by provincial recoinage. A documented unit-family branch; intervening coin ratings and Spanish-coin inputs remain to be expanded.", "source_ids": [ "S477", "S479", "S480", "S565" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1010", "assertion": "Banco de Portugal traces the real replaced in 1911 to the reign of Duarte, by 1435. An institutional history of the unit, not an exact first-coin date.", "source_ids": [ "S477", "S479", "S480", "S565" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1011", "assertion": "Portugal established the escudo at one thousand réis per escudo.", "source_ids": [ "S477", "S479", "S480", "S565" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1168", "assertion": "Cabo Verde’s real/escudo continuity is provisionally traced to regional differentiation from Portuguese-real accounting during 1853–1865. Local currency arrangements and issues support this qualified branch; the exact account-law boundary remains open.", "source_ids": [ "S565" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000057", "label": "Argentine peso — 1881–1985 continuity", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1014", "C1015", "C1013", "C1012", "C1248", "C1309" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S481", "S629", "S595" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1014", "assertion": "Peso ley converted into Peso argentino at 10000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S481", "S629", "S595" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1015", "assertion": "Peso argentino converted into Austral at 1000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S481", "S629", "S595" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1013", "assertion": "Peso moneda nacional converted into Peso ley at 100 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S481", "S629", "S595" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1012", "assertion": "Argentina’s national monetary line dates to the 1881 peso moneda nacional reform.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S481", "S629", "S595" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1248", "assertion": "Buenos Aires peso moneda corriente was one local input to the national-currency unification and compulsory banknote renewal ordered in 1881. Qualified identification of one input; implementation date and exact conversion schedule require the implementing acts. No claim of exclusive parentage.", "source_ids": [ "S629", "S595" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1309", "assertion": "Law 1130 required existing contracts to settle in equivalent national currency and issuing banks to renew their note circulation in national currency. ", "source_ids": [ "S629" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000060", "label": "Austral", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1015", "C1016" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S481" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1015", "assertion": "Peso argentino converted into Austral at 1000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S481" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1016", "assertion": "Austral converted into Argentine peso at 10000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S481" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000061", "label": "Argentine peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C490", "C1016" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S225", "S481" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C490", "assertion": "The peso became effective on 1 January 1992 at 10,000 australs per peso; the issuer attributes the change to Decree 2128 of 10 October 1991.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S225", "S481" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1016", "assertion": "Austral converted into Argentine peso at 10000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S225", "S481" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000063", "label": "Boliviano", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1019", "C1023", "C1340", "C1341", "C1342" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S482", "S660", "S661" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1019", "assertion": "Boliviano converted into Peso boliviano at 1000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S482", "S660", "S661" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1023", "assertion": "Bolivia’s 1863 law established its decimal boliviano or peso fuerte.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S482", "S660", "S661" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1340", "assertion": "Independent Bolivia legislated official remuneration in pesos by12September1826.", "source_ids": [ "S660" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1341", "assertion": "The1863 law calls the boliviano a peso fuerte, decimalizes its value, rates newly specified money against circulating money, and requires state-office payment reckoning in the new decree’s bolivianos/pesos.", "source_ids": [ "S661" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1342", "assertion": "1826 salary-peso observation is genuine, but identifying that account currency with1863 boliviano requires dated accounting/contract transition evidence across strong/feble peso practices.", "source_ids": [ "S660", "S661" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000064", "label": "Peso boliviano", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1019", "C1020" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1019", "assertion": "Boliviano converted into Peso boliviano at 1000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1020", "assertion": "Peso boliviano converted into Boliviano at 1000000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000065", "label": "Boliviano", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C491", "C1020" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S226" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C491", "assertion": "Law 901 establishes the boliviano from 1 January 1987 at one million pesos bolivianos per boliviano. Article 9 converts legal references; article 10 schedules exchange through 31 December 1987 and demonetisation from 1 January 1988.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S226" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1020", "assertion": "Peso boliviano converted into Boliviano at 1000000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S226" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000066", "label": "Chilean peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1017", "C1272" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S624", "S625" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1017", "assertion": "Chilean peso converted into Chilean escudo at 1000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S624", "S625" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1272", "assertion": "Chile’s 9 January 1851 law defined the peso and its decimal divisions within the monetary system continued before the 1960 escudo reform. Same local peso profile; no node for the decimal system or gold denominations.", "source_ids": [ "S624", "S625" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000067", "label": "Chilean escudo", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1017", "C1018" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1017", "assertion": "Chilean peso converted into Chilean escudo at 1000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1018", "assertion": "Chilean escudo converted into Chilean peso at 1000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000068", "label": "Chilean peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C587", "C1018" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S320" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C587", "assertion": "The central bank's 1979 table records the 1975 change from escudos to pesos at 1,000 escudos per peso.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S320" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1018", "assertion": "Chilean escudo converted into Chilean peso at 1000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S320" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000070", "label": "Colombian peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C570", "C1178", "C1179", "C1200" ], "source_ids": [ "S304", "S584", "S473" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C570", "assertion": "The bank's centenary history describes provisional 1923 notes made from overprinted gold-deposit certificates, followed by regular American Bank Note Company issues in 1924.", "source_ids": [ "S304", "S584", "S473" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1178", "assertion": "Colombian peso/real reckoning continued the inherited Spanish-American monetary system, with the 1821 Congress ordering return to its eight-real silver peso. This is a qualified regional branch; local wartime stages and incomplete implementation remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S584" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1179", "assertion": "Panama’s own monetary system succeeded Colombian currency in circulation at independence; the balboa was established in 1904.", "source_ids": [ "S473" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1200", "assertion": "The 1821 monetary legislation retained the Spanish eight-real peso system in independent Colombia.", "source_ids": [ "S584" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000071", "label": "Panamanian balboa", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C558", "C995", "C1179" ], "source_ids": [ "S292", "S473" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C558", "assertion": "The official legal catalogue identifies Law 84 of 28 June 1904, published in Gazette 33 of 5 July, as establishing the balboa and American gold-dollar legal tender.", "source_ids": [ "S292", "S473" ] }, { "claim_id": "C995", "assertion": "The new Panamanian gold peso, named balboa, used the contemporary US dollar weight and fineness at parity. A founding unit-standard relationship. The Colombian circulation it displaced remains a separate input.", "source_ids": [ "S292", "S473" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1179", "assertion": "Panama’s own monetary system succeeded Colombian currency in circulation at independence; the balboa was established in 1904.", "source_ids": [ "S473" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000073", "label": "Costa Rican colón", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C492", "C1119" ], "source_ids": [ "S227" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C492", "assertion": "The central bank dates establishment of the colón to the monetary reform of 1896.", "source_ids": [ "S227" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1119", "assertion": "Costa Rica’s colón reform followed the local peso-denominated monetary system documented by its central bank.", "source_ids": [ "S227" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000074", "label": "Guatemalan peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C992" ], "source_ids": [ "S471" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C992", "assertion": "The quetzal replaced the Guatemalan peso at sixty pesos per quetzal.", "source_ids": [ "S471" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000075", "label": "Guatemalan quetzal", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C495", "C992", "C993" ], "source_ids": [ "S230", "S471" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C495", "assertion": "The issuer states that the November 1924 monetary law created the quetzal as a gold-standard monetary unit.", "source_ids": [ "S230", "S471" ] }, { "claim_id": "C992", "assertion": "The quetzal replaced the Guatemalan peso at sixty pesos per quetzal.", "source_ids": [ "S230", "S471" ] }, { "claim_id": "C993", "assertion": "The new quetzal was defined as equal to one US dollar at its creation. Founding unit definition, not inference from a later exchange-rate peg.", "source_ids": [ "S230", "S471" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000077", "label": "Honduran lempira", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C493", "C1154" ], "source_ids": [ "S228", "S545" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C493", "assertion": "The issuer dates creation of the lempira to 3 April 1926, but says it entered circulation in the 1930s.", "source_ids": [ "S228", "S545" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1154", "assertion": "The historical trade-account study reports the peso-to-lempira reform under decree 102 of 1926, with circulation beginning in 1931. The repository’s indexed passage was available; its full PDF could not be retrieved.", "source_ids": [ "S545" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000078", "label": "Nicaraguan peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C997" ], "source_ids": [ "S476" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C997", "assertion": "The córdoba succeeded Nicaragua’s peso-denominated treasury currency under the 1912 law, circulating in 1913.", "source_ids": [ "S476" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000079", "label": "Nicaraguan córdoba — 1912 unit, including 1988 scale", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C999", "C1000", "C997", "C998" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S475", "S476" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C999", "assertion": "The new córdoba replaced the old córdoba at one to one thousand. Sources differ between 14 and 15 February; month precision avoids conflating reform announcement and implementation.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S475", "S476" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1000", "assertion": "The córdoba oro supplemented and then replaced the 1988 córdoba. Introduced as an account unit and later cash in 1990; floated against the prior córdoba until March 1991. No constant transition ratio asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S475", "S476" ] }, { "claim_id": "C997", "assertion": "The córdoba succeeded Nicaragua’s peso-denominated treasury currency under the 1912 law, circulating in 1913.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S475", "S476" ] }, { "claim_id": "C998", "assertion": "The first córdoba was established at the value of one US dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S475", "S476" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000081", "label": "Córdoba oro", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C497", "C1000" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S232", "S476" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C497", "assertion": "The issuer's historical table says that from 30 April 1991 the córdoba replaced the old córdobas and became sole legal currency.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S232", "S476" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1000", "assertion": "The córdoba oro supplemented and then replaced the 1988 córdoba. Introduced as an account unit and later cash in 1990; floated against the prior córdoba until March 1991. No constant transition ratio asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S232", "S476" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000083", "label": "Salvadoran colón", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C598", "C1182", "C1203" ], "source_ids": [ "S330", "S589", "S587" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C598", "assertion": "The official survey instructions identify the Monetary Integration Law, effective from January 2001, as setting 8.75 colones per US dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S330", "S589", "S587" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1182", "assertion": "Salvadoran peso/colón accounting developed from the Spanish-colonial peso of eight reales retained during the Central American Federation. This is a qualified regional branch with unresolved local stages, not an exact founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S589" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1203", "assertion": "The Salvadoran peso was renamed colón in 1892 for official documents; monetary reform and naming do not create a separate currency identity.", "source_ids": [ "S587", "S589" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000085", "label": "Sol de oro", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1021", "C1275", "C1307", "C1308" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S628" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1021", "assertion": "Sol de oro converted into Inti at 1000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S628" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1275", "assertion": "Law 6746 of 11 February 1930 established the sol-oro and rated existing silver soles at the same legal value. ", "source_ids": [ "S628" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1307", "assertion": "Decree-Law 7126 required debts in Peruvian libras to be paid at ten soles per libra. Actual obligation conversion. Whether libra is a separate currency identity or a larger accounting denomination remains held for review.", "source_ids": [ "S628" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1308", "assertion": "The 14 February 1863 law named the sol as monetary unit; extending the existing sol-de-oro profile to this point requires review of the intervening libra system. Do not create a silver-sol node merely for a metal or standard change.", "source_ids": [ "S628" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000086", "label": "Inti", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1021", "C1022" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1021", "assertion": "Sol de oro converted into Inti at 1000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1022", "assertion": "Inti converted into Peruvian sol at 1000000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000087", "label": "Peruvian sol", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C536", "C1022" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S270" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C536", "assertion": "The BCRP communication sets the nuevo sol from 1 July 1991 at one million intis per nuevo sol, citing Law 25295 and Regulation 001-91-EF/90.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S270" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1022", "assertion": "Inti converted into Peruvian sol at 1000000 old units per new unit. Country-specific currency-history entry. Cash introduction and accounting implementation can differ; earlier unit inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S270" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000089", "label": "Paraguayan guaraní", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C494", "C1120" ], "source_ids": [ "S229", "S533" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C494", "assertion": "Decree-Law 655 of 5 October 1943 established the guaraní. The issuer separately dates first banknote circulation to 1944.", "source_ids": [ "S229", "S533" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1120", "assertion": "The guaraní law replaced the peso fuerte monetary unit in 1943.", "source_ids": [ "S533" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000092", "label": "Uruguayan peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C535", "C1204", "C1210", "C1211", "C1222", "C1223", "C1234", "C1235" ], "source_ids": [ "S269", "S588", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S598", "S597" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C535", "assertion": "Article 1 sets the peso uruguayo from 1 March 1993 at 1,000 nuevos pesos per peso uruguayo.", "source_ids": [ "S269", "S588", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S598", "S597" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1204", "assertion": "The 1862 law established the national peso from 1 January 1863 and altered its account subdivision; it does not by itself prove a distinct predecessor under the no-rescaling rule.", "source_ids": [ "S588" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1210", "assertion": "The Uruguayan peso corriente developed as a regional branch of inherited Spanish-American peso accounting amid Portuguese, Brazilian and local monetary changes. Official history identifies inherited reckoning and original research documents an independent eight-real account unit. Intervening regional stages remain qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S594", "S595", "S596" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1211", "assertion": "The 1831 reform converted obligations and deposits payable in Brazilian copper into the local Uruguayan monetary system. Attribution to the Brazilian real is a qualified contributing account-conversion input, not an exclusive founding parent or a claim that circulated coins alone create ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S596", "S594" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1222", "assertion": "Official issuer history identifies adoption of peso corriente accounting in 1830; newspaper-based research identifies a fixed eight-real unit from 1831. The regional association with the continuing Uruguayan peso remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S594", "S595", "S596" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1223", "assertion": "Public-payment rules in 1829 use peso-denominated tax thresholds before national coin issues. Connecting this local observation to the later Uruguayan peso is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S598" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1234", "assertion": "Articles 35–38 of the 1831 law regulate existing Brazilian-copper obligations and deposits through local notes and their prescribed conversion. This is evidence about obligations, beyond circulation or metal standards.", "source_ids": [ "S596" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1235", "assertion": "The 1839 law authorized copper fractions of the existing current silver real and limited mandatory acceptance. The issue is profile evidence, not a new currency identity.", "source_ids": [ "S597" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000098", "label": "Venezuelan bolívar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C580", "C581", "C601", "C1142" ], "source_ids": [ "S314", "S333", "S544" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C580", "assertion": "The resolution divides specified prices and financial balances by 1,000,000 for the new scale and applies the wage-adjustment rule from 1 October 2021.", "source_ids": [ "S314", "S333", "S544" ] }, { "claim_id": "C581", "assertion": "Article 7 allows qualifying older banknotes of at least 10,000 bolívares to circulate after 1 October 2021 pending a separate demonetisation resolution.", "source_ids": [ "S314", "S333", "S544" ] }, { "claim_id": "C601", "assertion": "ISO Amendment 170 assigns VED as an auxiliary redenomination code and explicitly leaves VES in place; it does not identify a separate digital currency species.", "source_ids": [ "S314", "S333", "S544" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1142", "assertion": "Venezuela’s 1879 reform established the bolívar as monetary unit after the venezolano introduced in 1871. Later bolívar scales remain within the modern profile.", "source_ids": [ "S544" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000100", "label": "Cuban peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C599", "C1180", "C1201" ], "source_ids": [ "S331", "S585", "S586" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C599", "assertion": "Decree-Law 17 sets monetary unification from 1 January 2021 and initially provides 180 days for withdrawing the convertible peso; this does not establish the final deadline after later amendments.", "source_ids": [ "S331", "S585", "S586" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1180", "assertion": "Cuba’s national peso replaced local Spanish-gold peso accounting through the 1914–1916 monetary reform.", "source_ids": [ "S585", "S586" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1201", "assertion": "The national peso was established by the 1914 law, and practical conversion of accounts to the new system was reported complete by June 1916.", "source_ids": [ "S585", "S586" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000113", "label": "Dominican peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C496", "C994", "C1336" ], "source_ids": [ "S231", "S472", "S651" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C496", "assertion": "The central bank records its first national paper issue in 1947, including RD$1, RD$5 and RD$10 notes. This is an issuer-era anchor, not a claim that every Dominican peso began in 1947.", "source_ids": [ "S231", "S472", "S651" ] }, { "claim_id": "C994", "assertion": "National Dominican peso notes replaced circulating US dollars in the 1947 monetary reform. Earlier Dominican and foreign-currency inputs remain additional historical branches.", "source_ids": [ "S231", "S472", "S651" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1336", "assertion": "The Dominican issuer dates national currency legislation to1937 while US dollar notes continued. The1947dollar withdrawal remains documented; its role as founding rather than later conversion is unresolved.", "source_ids": [ "S651" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000114", "label": "Liberian dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1170", "C1193", "C1224", "C1225", "C1236", "C1237", "C1238", "C1239", "C1240", "C1241", "C1242", "C1243", "C1244", "C1245", "C1349" ], "source_ids": [ "S345", "S604", "S605", "S541", "S607", "S609", "S608", "S606" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1170", "assertion": "Liberia’s 1935 dollar definition matched the US dollar gold content; later law provided parity and interchangeability. This is an optional founding-standard reference, not demonstrated account-unit succession.", "source_ids": [ "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1193", "assertion": "Liberia’s 7 June 1935 statute established a national dollar account unit, reenacted in the 1956 Code. This is an earlier observation, not evidence that coin issuance in 1962 created the unit.", "source_ids": [ "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1224", "assertion": "The Commonwealth adopted US monetary standards in 1839 and used local dollar obligations, taxes and bill redemption by the 1843 compilation. Association with the continuing Liberian dollar is qualified; the compilation date is not the enactment date of its undated currency act.", "source_ids": [ "S604", "S605", "S541", "S607" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1225", "assertion": "The 1933 official survey identifies the Liberian dollar as the monetary unit while reporting British West African coins as the principal circulating money.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1236", "assertion": "The Commonwealth constitution adopted United States monetary standards on 5 January 1839, while reserving local currency-valuation authority.", "source_ids": [ "S604" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1237", "assertion": "By the 1843 official compilation, Commonwealth law reckoned debts, judicial thresholds, taxes, currency redemption and militia pay in dollars and cents. The Uniform Currency Act recognized earlier Commonwealth bills issued after 21 January 1840.", "source_ids": [ "S604" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1238", "assertion": "The 1847 constitution continued compatible Commonwealth laws into the Republic until repeal.", "source_ids": [ "S605" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1239", "assertion": "The Commonwealth dollar reckoning and the Republic’s continuing dollar account unit can be represented as an earlier qualified phase of FTM000114, rather than separate nodes for independence, notes or coins. This is an adjudicated continuity inference, not a proved uninterrupted chain of every intervening enactment.", "source_ids": [ "S604", "S605", "S541", "S607", "S609" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1240", "assertion": "The 1917 BBWA agreement maintained government debit and repayment obligations in dollars despite British banking and currency circulation; the agreement alone does not identify the dollar denomination more narrowly.", "source_ids": [ "S608" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1241", "assertion": "The Liberian dollar was identified as the country’s monetary unit in 1933, before the 1935 gold-content act.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1242", "assertion": "The 1935 gold-content act amended an existing Revised Statutes provision and should be treated as a standard reform of an existing dollar unit.", "source_ids": [ "S606" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1243", "assertion": "Kemmerer’s 1939 report explicitly distinguishes Liberian-dollar government accounts from sterling wages and prices and US-dollar debt.", "source_ids": [ "S607" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1244", "assertion": "Sterling and West African pound circulation did not extinguish the official Liberian-dollar account unit; the 1942–43 circulating-medium replacement is therefore insufficient to make the West African pound the predecessor of LRD.", "source_ids": [ "S541", "S607", "S609" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1245", "assertion": "The 1839 Commonwealth constitution adopted United States monetary standards; local dollar obligations and currency redemption are documented by 1843. This supports an earlier optional founding-unit reference, while a distinct USD-to-Liberian account transition remains unestablished.", "source_ids": [ "S604", "S605" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1349", "assertion": "The1839adoption of US monetary standards, together with local dollar-denominated public obligations and redemption recorded by1843, supports a qualified regional USD-to-Liberian-dollar branch. Neither exclusive parentage nor universal redemption is asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S604", "S605" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000121", "label": "South Korean won", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C524", "C1112", "C1303" ], "source_ids": [ "S259", "S617", "S618" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C524", "assertion": "The 10 June 1962 reform introduced won-denominated notes at ten hwan per won. The issuer expressly excepts 10- and 50-hwan coins from the immediate prohibition on hwan circulation.", "source_ids": [ "S259", "S617", "S618" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1112", "assertion": "The 1962 Korean reform replaced the hwan account unit with the won; some hwan coins remained valid at their converted value.", "source_ids": [ "S259" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1303", "assertion": "The hwan and won remain distinct, provisionally scoped account units under the existing replacement decision. The 1953 and 1962 reform ratios alone neither establish nor disprove identity; the broader South Korean continuity question remains open. No new currency is admitted solely for a note issuer change.", "source_ids": [ "S617", "S618", "S259" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000122", "label": "North Korean won", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C573", "C1171" ], "source_ids": [ "S307", "S570", "S571" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C573", "assertion": "KDI reports a 2009 exchange of existing notes for new notes at 100:1 while state-set prices were left unchanged.", "source_ids": [ "S307", "S570", "S571" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1171", "assertion": "North Korea’s December 1947 reform separated its currency from the common Korean account system by replacing Bank of Chosen and Soviet occupation notes with a sole northern settlement currency. The law directly supports conversion; identifying a distinct northern currency is the territorial-branching inference. Soviet notes are instruments in the common accounting unit, not a ruble parent.", "source_ids": [ "S570", "S571" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000140", "label": "Vietnamese đồng", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C554", "C1152" ], "source_ids": [ "S288", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C554", "assertion": "A 1 April 1978 resolution directed monetary unification; the issuer says old northern and southern notes had been recalled by 2 May 1978 as the unified notes circulated nationwide.", "source_ids": [ "S288", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1152", "assertion": "South Vietnamese đồng → unified đồng, 1978.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000143", "label": "Lao kip", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C549", "C1172", "C1194" ], "source_ids": [ "S283", "S572", "S573" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C549", "assertion": "The present kip was introduced in 1979 at one new kip per 100 liberated kip.", "source_ids": [ "S283", "S572", "S573" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1172", "assertion": "In June 1976 the Vientiane kip was withdrawn in favour of the separately circulating Liberation kip, at 20:1; the Liberation kip belongs to the modern Lao kip continuity despite its 1979 rescaling. No precise 1976 day asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S572", "S573" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1194", "assertion": "The Liberation kip circulated in a separate Lao zone before national adoption; its 1979 exchange 100 old to 1 new is retained as a rescaling within the modern Lao kip profile. 1968 founding date is research-history report; 1976 existence corroborated by the contemporary World Bank report. Kangkai predecessor boundary not adjudicated.", "source_ids": [ "S573", "S572" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000145", "label": "Brazilian real (réis)", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1001", "C1002", "C1211" ], "source_ids": [ "S477", "S478", "S479", "S596", "S594" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1001", "assertion": "Brazilian réis developed from Portuguese money, with imported coin circulation followed by provincial recoinage. A documented unit-family branch; intervening coin ratings and Spanish-coin inputs remain to be expanded.", "source_ids": [ "S477", "S478", "S479", "S596", "S594" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1002", "assertion": "Brazilian real (réis) converted into Cruzeiro at 1000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S477", "S478", "S479", "S596", "S594" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1211", "assertion": "The 1831 reform converted obligations and deposits payable in Brazilian copper into the local Uruguayan monetary system. Attribution to the Brazilian real is a qualified contributing account-conversion input, not an exclusive founding parent or a claim that circulated coins alone create ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S596", "S594" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000146", "label": "Brazilian cruzeiro — 1942 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1002", "C1003", "C1004", "C1008" ], "source_ids": [ "S478" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1002", "assertion": "Brazilian real (réis) converted into Cruzeiro at 1000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S478" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1003", "assertion": "Cruzeiro converted into Cruzeiro novo / cruzeiro at 1000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S478" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1004", "assertion": "Cruzeiro novo / cruzeiro converted into Cruzado at 1000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S478" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1008", "assertion": "Cruzeiro novo was renamed cruzeiro without rescaling.", "source_ids": [ "S478" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000148", "label": "Brazilian cruzado / cruzeiro — 1986–1994 continuity", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1004", "C1005", "C1006", "C1007", "C1009" ], "source_ids": [ "S478" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1004", "assertion": "Cruzeiro novo / cruzeiro converted into Cruzado at 1000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S478" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1005", "assertion": "Cruzado converted into Cruzado novo / cruzeiro at 1000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S478" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1006", "assertion": "Cruzado novo / cruzeiro converted into Cruzeiro real at 1000 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S478" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1007", "assertion": "Cruzeiro real converted into Brazilian real at 2750 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S478" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1009", "assertion": "Cruzado novo was renamed cruzeiro at par. This face-unit statement does not describe the separate restrictions on financial balances.", "source_ids": [ "S478" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000151", "label": "Brazilian real", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C534", "C1007" ], "source_ids": [ "S268", "S478" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C534", "assertion": "The real entered circulation on 1 July 1994; one real equalled one URV or 2,750 cruzeiros reais at conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S268", "S478" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1007", "assertion": "Cruzeiro real converted into Brazilian real at 2750 old units per new unit.", "source_ids": [ "S268", "S478" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000152", "label": "Portuguese escudo", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C682", "C683", "C1011", "C1250", "C1251" ], "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S480", "S652", "S541" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C682", "assertion": "1 EUR = 200.482 PTE.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S480", "S652", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C683", "assertion": "Portugal: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S480", "S652", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1011", "assertion": "Portugal established the escudo at one thousand réis per escudo.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S480", "S652", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1250", "assertion": "The 1913 law expressly imports metropolitan account rules and requires equivalence of existing obligations; represent a qualified Portuguese-system regional branch into Mozambique, with unresolved earlier territorial differentiation. This is account adoption, not inferred solely from a peg. 1911–1914 is a legal-adoption window, not first circulation. Do not treat the Chartered Company territory as covered by every later state-administered monetary reform.", "source_ids": [ "S652", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1251", "assertion": "Connect São Tomé’s local escudo account profile to the explicitly adopted metropolitan monetary system, qualified for unresolved earlier local history. ", "source_ids": [ "S652" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000153", "label": "Cape Verdean escudo", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C584", "C1160", "C1168", "C1191", "C1295" ], "source_ids": [ "S317", "S531", "S565", "S652" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C584", "assertion": "The bank's institutional timeline dates the first national currency issue to 1977.", "source_ids": [ "S317", "S531", "S565", "S652" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1160", "assertion": "Cabo Verde’s national escudo notes replaced Banco Nacional Ultramarino notes in 1977. This documents an issuer/issue transition; a distinct colonial-to-national account-unit boundary has not been established.", "source_ids": [ "S531" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1168", "assertion": "Cabo Verde’s real/escudo continuity is provisionally traced to regional differentiation from Portuguese-real accounting during 1853–1865. Local currency arrangements and issues support this qualified branch; the exact account-law boundary remains open.", "source_ids": [ "S565" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1191", "assertion": "Cabo Verde had locally differentiated real issues by 1865 and escudo accounting from 1914. This is a qualified extension of the existing identity; the 1977 issuer change does not create another currency.", "source_ids": [ "S565" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1295", "assertion": "Cabo Verde receives an independent statutory account-conversion anchor for 1914; retain existing older Cape Verde ancestry and do not invent another 1914 currency. ", "source_ids": [ "S652" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000156", "label": "Angolan kwanza", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C569", "C1124" ], "source_ids": [ "S303", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C569", "assertion": "The 2025 State of the Nation address dates the creation of the kwanza to 1977.", "source_ids": [ "S303", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1124", "assertion": "Angolan escudo → kwanza, 1977.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000159", "label": "Mozambican metical", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C561", "C1123" ], "source_ids": [ "S295", "S532" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C561", "assertion": "The notice takes effect on 1 July 2006 and provides simultaneous circulation of the old and new metical families through 31 December 2006, followed by bank and central-bank exchange phases.", "source_ids": [ "S295", "S532" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1123", "assertion": "The metical replaced the escudo circulating in Mozambique in June 1980.", "source_ids": [ "S532" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000162", "label": "São Tomé dobra", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C562", "C1140" ], "source_ids": [ "S296", "S542" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C562", "assertion": "The issuer brochure describes the dobra's 1976 legal creation, first issuance in 1977, and the planned 2018 rescaling at 1,000 old dobras per new-family dobra.", "source_ids": [ "S296", "S542" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1140", "assertion": "Decree-law 23/76 governed the transition from the São Tomé escudo to the dobra, whose first series circulated in 1977.", "source_ids": [ "S542" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000166", "label": "Spanish peseta", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C668", "C669" ], "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C668", "assertion": "1 EUR = 166.386 ESP.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348" ] }, { "claim_id": "C669", "assertion": "Spain: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000171", "label": "Haitian gourde", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C571", "C1209", "C1220", "C1221", "C1231", "C1232", "C1233" ], "source_ids": [ "S305", "S592", "S593" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C571", "assertion": "The BRH history dates a first paper issue of 300,000 gourdes to May 1813.", "source_ids": [ "S305", "S592", "S593" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1209", "assertion": "National gourde reckoning in Pétion’s republic developed from the Spanish gourde/peso rated in local law. The 1811–1813 laws combine national denomination, commercial acceptance, tax accounts and treasury conversion. The regional identity grouping is qualified; northern Haiti and French-livre inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S592", "S593" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1220", "assertion": "The 27 June 1811 law retained the existing piastre-gourde valuation while prescribing local alteration of circulating pieces. Association with the national gourde is a qualified continuity observation, not a currency birth from piercing coins.", "source_ids": [ "S593" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1221", "assertion": "The 6 July 1813 finance circular assessed export duties in gourdes and centimes, documenting national public accounting.", "source_ids": [ "S593" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1231", "assertion": "The 4 May 1808 law rated the Spanish gourde in local livres and escalins; the valuation change was repealed on 26 July. Concurrent reckoning does not establish an exclusive livre-to-gourde replacement.", "source_ids": [ "S592" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1232", "assertion": "The 8 May 1813 coin law denominated national pieces as fractions of the Spanish gourde and required commercial acceptance as Spanish money. Later orders addressed equal pricing and exchange of pierced pieces at the treasury.", "source_ids": [ "S593" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1233", "assertion": "Act 348 authorized treasury paper for a coin withdrawal. Its 120,000-gourde authorization is distinct from the compilation’s editorial report of 300,000 gourdes issued; neither figure establishes an account-unit founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S593" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000175", "label": "French franc — 1795 to euro conversion", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C672", "C673", "C212", "C219", "C220", "C732", "C733", "C734", "C735", "C736", "C737", "C738", "C740", "C742", "C745", "C746", "C748", "C749", "C752", "C753", "C773", "C774", "C778", "C781", "C782", "C783", "C977", "C978", "C980", "C981", "C982" ], "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C672", "assertion": "1 EUR = 6.55957 FRF.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C673", "assertion": "France: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C212", "assertion": "Chicago inventories 100- and 1,000-franc assignats dated 18 Nivôse III, January 1795.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C219", "assertion": "The law of 18 Germinal III names the monetary unit franc instead of livre and calls its hundredths centimes.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C220", "assertion": "Delage quotes the 15 August 1795 law defining a five-gram franc at nine-tenths silver.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C732", "assertion": "The revolutionary monetary unit reuses the historic franc name. Not one continuously circulating national currency since 1360.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C733", "assertion": "The law of 18 germinal III names the franc in place of the livre. Naming law; separate from silver specification and later conversion tariff.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C734", "assertion": "The silver franc is defined as 5 g at 900‰ fineness: 4.5 g fine silver. 28 thermidor III; metal definition is not the earliest naming of the modern unit.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C735", "assertion": "The tariff equates 1.0125 livres tournois with 1 franc. Preferred reported date: 25 germinal IV / 14 April 1796 (S16). S17 says 24 germinal. Day remains withheld pending the original act.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C736", "assertion": "The germinal reform establishes the franc’s bimetallic regime. 7 germinal XI; not a new currency born in 1803.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C737", "assertion": "The new franc replaces 100 old francs.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C738", "assertion": "The euro succeeds the French franc at the irrevocable conversion rate. Book-money adoption; cash followed in 2002.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C740", "assertion": "France’s dual-circulation period ends. Legal-tender end is distinct from later redemption deadlines.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C742", "assertion": "Metropolitan French coins circulate in colonial Guinea. An attested regional extension; this row does not assign one first-adoption date to every overseas territory.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C745", "assertion": "Initial CFA/metropolitan parity.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C746", "assertion": "Initial Pacific/metropolitan parity.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C748", "assertion": "The CFA parity becomes two old French francs.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C749", "assertion": "France’s new unit restates the CFA parity. The CFA unit itself is not divided by 100.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C752", "assertion": "Western CFA devaluation takes effect. Decision on 11 January; not a new CFA unit.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C753", "assertion": "Central CFA devaluation takes effect. Decision signed 11 January; publication on 24 March is not the effective date.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C773", "assertion": "Signed cooperation agreement defines the Comorian parity. Date of signature; not asserted as the legal effective date.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C774", "assertion": "Comoros adopts its distinct devalued parity. Not the CFA rate of 100 per French franc.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C778", "assertion": "The Helvetic franc uses a French-inspired decimal scheme on a Bernese monetary basis. Different silver standard; no 1:1 French-franc identity.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C781", "assertion": "The federal Swiss franc adopts the French silver-franc standard. Standard relationship, not French currency replacement in Switzerland.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C782", "assertion": "Belgium legislates the French decimal silver-franc standard. Law date; does not assert a blanket 1:1 exchange of every preceding local unit.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C783", "assertion": "France participates in the Latin Monetary Union convention. Coordination of national coinages, not creation of a single currency.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C977", "assertion": "The CFA unit separates from the metropolitan-franc monetary system in the 1945 reform. Earlier territorial issues remain expandable; this records shared unit descent, not a 1.70-to-one exchange of old local notes.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C978", "assertion": "The Pacific franc separates from the metropolitan-franc monetary system in the same reform.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C980", "assertion": "Distinct Malagasy franc issues followed the French currency introduced after annexation in 1896.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C981", "assertion": "Tunisia replaced its piastre system with the French franc unit in 1891. The Tunisian piastre is a separate local predecessor still to trace.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] }, { "claim_id": "C982", "assertion": "The 1865 convention codifies a common franc coinage standard with France as one participating monetary system. A shared standard, not a new circulating currency replacing member francs.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S114", "S117", "S125", "S267", "S315", "S347", "S348", "S373", "S374", "S375", "S376", "S377", "S378", "S380", "S382", "S383", "S388", "S394", "S396", "S398", "S401", "S406", "S463", "S464", "S465", "S466" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000178", "label": "Papua New Guinean kina", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C504", "C946" ], "source_ids": [ "S239" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C504", "assertion": "The kina entered circulation on 19 April 1975. Australian dollars and kina were accepted together through the end of 1975; the Australian dollar ceased to be legal tender on 1 January 1976.", "source_ids": [ "S239" ] }, { "claim_id": "C946", "assertion": "The kina succeeded Australian dollars in Papua New Guinea. Both circulated through 1975; Australian-dollar legal tender ended on 1 January 1976. Traditional shell names are a separate naming history.", "source_ids": [ "S239" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000187", "label": "Tongan pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C939", "C940", "C941" ], "source_ids": [ "S240" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C939", "assertion": "Tongan government pound notes supplemented the British currency already in use.", "source_ids": [ "S240" ] }, { "claim_id": "C940", "assertion": "One Tongan pound converted to two paʻanga.", "source_ids": [ "S240" ] }, { "claim_id": "C941", "assertion": "The Tongan pound moved to 1.25 per sterling pound, matching the Australian pound. A parity change, not Australian-pound ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S240" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000188", "label": "Tongan paʻanga", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C505", "C940" ], "source_ids": [ "S240" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C505", "assertion": "On 3 April 1967 the pa'anga replaced the pound at two pa'anga per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S240" ] }, { "claim_id": "C940", "assertion": "One Tongan pound converted to two paʻanga.", "source_ids": [ "S240" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000189", "label": "Western Samoan pound — local New Zealand-pound issues", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "identity_unresolved", "audit_level": "coordinated_source_review", "rationale": "Retain provisionally with identity unresolved. Current record positively describes local New Zealand-pound issues and issuer succession, but 1959 common-currency clause has uninspected local-law exceptions. The note evidence cannot establish independent denomination, and the incomplete statute cannot establish a merger. Inspect local obligations before changing identity.", "claim_ids": [ "C942", "C943" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S451" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C942", "assertion": "Post-independence Samoa’s local bank issue succeeded the Bank of New Zealand pound-note system. Transition bounded by independence and decimalisation; issuer terminology is imprecise about British versus New Zealand pounds.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S451" ] }, { "claim_id": "C943", "assertion": "Samoa converted its existing pound unit to two tala per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S451" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [], "identity_status_recommendation": "unresolved", "affirmative_instrument_evidence": "Local note or circulation episode established; account-unit distinctness remains open." }, { "id": "FTM000190", "label": "Samoan tālā", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C596", "C943" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S329" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C596", "assertion": "Bundesbank dates the tala's introduction to 10 July 1967 at two tala per former pound.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S329" ] }, { "claim_id": "C943", "assertion": "Samoa converted its existing pound unit to two tala per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S329" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000191", "label": "South African pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C947", "C948" ], "source_ids": [ "S244", "S452" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C947", "assertion": "The South African pound retained the British pound coin system while national notes succeeded commercial-bank issues. 1922 anchors a documented national stage, not a claimed first origin date; derivation rests on the inherited unit, not parity alone.", "source_ids": [ "S244", "S452" ] }, { "claim_id": "C948", "assertion": "South Africa replaced its pound with two rand per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S244", "S452" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000193", "label": "Swazi lilangeni", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C508", "C950" ], "source_ids": [ "S243" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C508", "assertion": "The lilangeni launched on 6 September 1974. The issuer describes a dual-currency system with the rand and lilangeni as legal tender at equal value.", "source_ids": [ "S243" ] }, { "claim_id": "C950", "assertion": "The lilangeni became local money alongside the rand, with equal value and a programme to return rand cash. This was a local-currency succession with continuing co-circulation, not immediate extinction of rand use.", "source_ids": [ "S243" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000194", "label": "Botswana pula", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C498", "C949" ], "source_ids": [ "S233" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C498", "assertion": "The pula launched on 23 August 1976, replacing the South African rand. The issuer reports an initial 100-day rand-for-pula exchange period with parity guaranteed.", "source_ids": [ "S233" ] }, { "claim_id": "C949", "assertion": "Botswana introduced the pula in exchange for the rand at par. The initial guaranteed exchange window lasted 100 days.", "source_ids": [ "S233" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000195", "label": "Lesotho loti", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C592", "C951" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S325" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C592", "assertion": "The IMF history dates the issue of the loti to January 1980.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S325" ] }, { "claim_id": "C951", "assertion": "Lesotho introduced the loti at par with the previously circulating rand. Rand legal tender continued; month precision retained alongside the earlier IMF dossier.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S325" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000198", "label": "Rhodesia and Nyasaland federal pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C626", "C632", "C633", "C634", "C635", "C636", "C1252", "C1253", "C1338" ], "source_ids": [ "S340", "S341", "S342", "S194", "S541" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C626", "assertion": "Bundesbank’s table dates the Zambian pound to 16 November 1964 at parity with a unit it labels Rhodesian pound; precise federal predecessor mapping remains unresolved.", "source_ids": [ "S340", "S341", "S342", "S194", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C632", "assertion": "They describe Central Africa Currency Board succession on 12 March 1954 and Bank of Rhodesia and Nyasaland succession on 1 April 1956; these do not independently prove new units.", "source_ids": [ "S340", "S341", "S342", "S194", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C633", "assertion": "The 1963 dissolution order ends the Federation immediately before 1 January 1964; its currency provisions preserve a separate transitional life.", "source_ids": [ "S340", "S341", "S342", "S194", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C634", "assertion": "Section 66 continues federal currency tender until 1 January 1965, or a ministerially appointed later date no later than 1 June 1965.", "source_ids": [ "S340", "S341", "S342", "S194", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C635", "assertion": "Section 66 preserves the federal pound’s sterling parity until demonetisation; it does not prescribe a national successor’s cash-exchange rate.", "source_ids": [ "S340", "S341", "S342", "S194", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C636", "assertion": "Section 70 provides for bank dissolution on 31 December 1965 or an earlier appointed date, separately from currency demonetisation and asset distribution.", "source_ids": [ "S340", "S341", "S342", "S194", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1252", "assertion": "Federal liabilities and currency were territorially divided into Malawi’s national monetary administration duringNovember 1964–June 1965; connect the already-existing pound profiles, with a bounded transition rather than an invented coin-birth date. ", "source_ids": [ "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1253", "assertion": "The same documented federal monetary liquidation supplies the missing federal-pound ancestry of Zambia’s existing national-pound profile. ", "source_ids": [ "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1338", "assertion": "Nyasaland and Northern/Southern Rhodesia were using the British pound account system in 1933. A qualified direct regional-continuity bridge to the 1950 sfederal pound is plausible, but the 1933 survey alone does not document the 1955 transfer of all accounts. Preserve this candidate instead of treating 1932 regional coinage as a separate unit. ", "source_ids": [ "S541", "S194" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000199", "label": "Malawi pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C621", "C622", "C623", "C625", "C1252" ], "source_ids": [ "S339", "S194" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C621", "assertion": "The Malawi consolidation gives 15 February 1971 for Part III’s currency conversion, separately from Parts I–II commencing on 15 September 1970.", "source_ids": [ "S339", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C622", "assertion": "Section 15 converts covered pound, shilling and pence references at two kwacha per pound and ten tambala per shilling, with contextual exceptions.", "source_ids": [ "S339", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C623", "assertion": "Section 16 requires domestic-currency payments in the new unit while explicitly valuing old notes and coins for continued use; foreign-currency payments are excepted.", "source_ids": [ "S339", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C625", "assertion": "The payment table maps a former florin to twenty tambala and threepence to two and one-half tambala; decimal commencement alone does not prove old-coin extinction.", "source_ids": [ "S339", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1252", "assertion": "Federal liabilities and currency were territorially divided into Malawi’s national monetary administration duringNovember 1964–June 1965; connect the already-existing pound profiles, with a bounded transition rather than an invented coin-birth date. ", "source_ids": [ "S194" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000200", "label": "Malawi kwacha", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C560", "C621", "C622", "C623", "C624", "C625" ], "source_ids": [ "S294", "S339" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C560", "assertion": "The Reserve Bank's conference paper dates introduction of the Malawi kwacha to February 1971.", "source_ids": [ "S294", "S339" ] }, { "claim_id": "C621", "assertion": "The Malawi consolidation gives 15 February 1971 for Part III’s currency conversion, separately from Parts I–II commencing on 15 September 1970.", "source_ids": [ "S294", "S339" ] }, { "claim_id": "C622", "assertion": "Section 15 converts covered pound, shilling and pence references at two kwacha per pound and ten tambala per shilling, with contextual exceptions.", "source_ids": [ "S294", "S339" ] }, { "claim_id": "C623", "assertion": "Section 16 requires domestic-currency payments in the new unit while explicitly valuing old notes and coins for continued use; foreign-currency payments are excepted.", "source_ids": [ "S294", "S339" ] }, { "claim_id": "C624", "assertion": "Section 17 applies conversion to an aggregate or calculated product rather than separately to every component amount.", "source_ids": [ "S294", "S339" ] }, { "claim_id": "C625", "assertion": "The payment table maps a former florin to twenty tambala and threepence to two and one-half tambala; decimal commencement alone does not prove old-coin extinction.", "source_ids": [ "S294", "S339" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000201", "label": "Zambian pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C626", "C627", "C638", "C1253" ], "source_ids": [ "S340", "S343", "S194" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C626", "assertion": "Bundesbank’s table dates the Zambian pound to 16 November 1964 at parity with a unit it labels Rhodesian pound; precise federal predecessor mapping remains unresolved.", "source_ids": [ "S340", "S343", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C627", "assertion": "The same table dates the kwacha to 16 January 1968, at two original-scale kwacha per Zambian pound.", "source_ids": [ "S340", "S343", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C638", "assertion": "That detailed indexed account says pound withdrawal was completed on 31 January 1974; this remains an unconfirmed issuer-history report pending original notice.", "source_ids": [ "S340", "S343", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1253", "assertion": "The same documented federal monetary liquidation supplies the missing federal-pound ancestry of Zambia’s existing national-pound profile. ", "source_ids": [ "S194" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000203", "label": "Zambian kwacha", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C578", "C627", "C628", "C629", "C637", "C638" ], "source_ids": [ "S312", "S340", "S343" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C578", "assertion": "The Bank of Zambia dates the kwacha's rebasing by a factor of 1,000 to 1 January 2013.", "source_ids": [ "S312", "S340", "S343" ] }, { "claim_id": "C627", "assertion": "The same table dates the kwacha to 16 January 1968, at two original-scale kwacha per Zambian pound.", "source_ids": [ "S312", "S340", "S343" ] }, { "claim_id": "C628", "assertion": "It dates the 2013 rescaling to 1 January at one new kwacha for one thousand old kwacha, corroborating the previously inspected Bank of Zambia annual report.", "source_ids": [ "S312", "S340", "S343" ] }, { "claim_id": "C629", "assertion": "The 2013 rebasing is modeled as a unit-epoch change within the Zambian kwacha continuity; the pound-to-kwacha transition remains a separate predecessor conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S312", "S340", "S343" ] }, { "claim_id": "C637", "assertion": "The indexed Bank of Zambia history’s opening mentions a 1965 kwacha, while its detailed account places the change in 1968; the discrepancy is retained for correction checking.", "source_ids": [ "S312", "S340", "S343" ] }, { "claim_id": "C638", "assertion": "That detailed indexed account says pound withdrawal was completed on 31 January 1974; this remains an unconfirmed issuer-history report pending original notice.", "source_ids": [ "S312", "S340", "S343" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000219", "label": "Cayman Islands dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C530", "C945" ], "source_ids": [ "S265" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C530", "assertion": "The currency board began its new issue on 1 May 1972. Jamaican currency returned through banks was exchanged for an equivalent Cayman amount; Jamaican notes and coins remained legal tender through 31 August 1972.", "source_ids": [ "S265" ] }, { "claim_id": "C945", "assertion": "Cayman currency replaced Jamaican dollars at equal unit value during the 1972 changeover. Jamaican cash retained legal tender through 31 August.", "source_ids": [ "S265" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000223", "label": "Falkland Islands pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Statute defines Falkland pound and all local monetary contracts/liabilities in that currency. Distinct unit despite sterling parity;1899 note issue does not prove independent identity then.", "claim_ids": [ "C550", "C989" ], "source_ids": [ "S284", "S469" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C550", "assertion": "The Falkland Islands Currency Note Order 1899 came into operation on 16 October 1899, authorising government paper denominations from five shillings upward.", "source_ids": [ "S284", "S469" ] }, { "claim_id": "C989", "assertion": "Local Falkland pound notes supplemented British sterling under the 1899 order, as reported in 1923.", "source_ids": [ "S284", "S469" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-FKP" ], "boundary_status": "Earliest independent-unit law inspected1987–1990; earlier boundary unresolved." }, { "id": "FTM000225", "label": "Saint Helena pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Local monetary unit and local obligations are explicitly denominated independently of sterling. Statutory parity and UK-note co-circulation do not erase this boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C600", "C1150" ], "source_ids": [ "S332", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C600", "assertion": "The consolidated Currency Ordinance identifies the Saint Helena pound divided into 100 pence and sterling parity; the underlying ordinance dates to 1975.", "source_ids": [ "S332", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1150", "assertion": "Sterling → Saint Helena pound, 1976; local currency separation.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SHP" ] }, { "id": "FTM000229", "label": "Israeli new shekel", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C502", "C1114" ], "source_ids": [ "S237", "S536" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C502", "assertion": "On 4 September 1985 the new sheqel replaced the sheqel at 1,000 old sheqalim per new sheqel.", "source_ids": [ "S237", "S536" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1114", "assertion": "Israel implemented the statutory change from the pound to the sheqel in February 1980. The 1985 new-sheqel rescaling stays within the sheqel profile.", "source_ids": [ "S536", "S237" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000230", "label": "Jordanian dinar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C503", "C1113" ], "source_ids": [ "S238" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C503", "assertion": "The Jordanian dinar became the currency unit on 1 July 1950; use of the Palestinian pound ceased in the Kingdom from 30 September 1950.", "source_ids": [ "S238" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1113", "assertion": "Jordan’s dinar succeeded the locally circulating Palestine pound in 1950.", "source_ids": [ "S238" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000232", "label": "Libyan dinar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C521", "C1134" ], "source_ids": [ "S256", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C521", "assertion": "The central bank traces its national currency to the pound first issued in early 1952, preceding the dinar name.", "source_ids": [ "S256", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1134", "assertion": "Egyptian pound → Libyan pound, Cyrenaica, 1952.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S256" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000233", "label": "East African shilling", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C466", "C467", "C468", "C469", "C472", "C474", "C475", "C476", "C612", "C613", "C614", "C615", "C616", "C617", "C618", "C619", "C620", "C640", "C641", "C991", "C1143", "C1146" ], "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C466", "assertion": "Tanzania’s original Bank Act applies to both Tanganyika and Zanzibar and establishes the shilling divided into 100 cents.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C467", "assertion": "For the transition provisions, one East African shilling equals one Tanzanian shilling.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C468", "assertion": "Former regional notes/coins remain tender until proclamation; free exchange on demand applies while they remain tender, with later exchange periods separately authorisable.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C469", "assertion": "Covered laws and instruments referencing East African shillings, cents or the twenty-shilling pound are converted under the new Act.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C472", "assertion": "CBK distinguishes Legal Notice 252 of 1 July 1966 from banknote issue: the notes were legalised but not yet issued on that date.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C474", "assertion": "CBK reports regional banknotes losing tender in Kenya in September 1967 and regional coins in April 1969.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C475", "assertion": "Churchill’s 1921 statement describes the April 1920 Kenya/Uganda order adopting a local florin worth two sterling shillings and temporarily rating Indian rupees at that value.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C476", "assertion": "The May 1921 decision uses a local shilling equal to half a florin and converts rupee contracts at two local shillings per rupee; extension to Tanganyika is prospective.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C612", "assertion": "Kenyan Proclamation 177 brings the 1921 principal currency order and its No.2 amendment into force on 1 January 1922.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C613", "assertion": "Article 5 converts covered former rupee or florin amounts into twice as many shillings, and former cents into twice as many shilling cents.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C614", "assertion": "Article 9(3) preserves old notes and coins as tender until separately ended, rating each rupee or florin at two shillings.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C615", "assertion": "The 7 November amendment replaces the principal order’s subsidiary-coin exception with two shilling cents for one florin cent, effective alongside the principal order.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C616", "assertion": "Article 9(2) requires commencement by territorial proclamation; Kenya’s 1 January 1922 date does not establish Uganda’s commencement or first physical shilling issue.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C617", "assertion": "Article 5(1) values covered sterling payments at twenty local shillings per pound; this standard relationship is separate from rupee/florin succession.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C618", "assertion": "Kenya Act s.23 requires at-par exchange of EACB notes and coins while they remain tender, with further at-par exchange periods separately authorisable.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C619", "assertion": "Section 22(4) leaves former-board tender duration to ministerial determination; s.24 separately qualifies exchange of damaged currency.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C620", "assertion": "Legal Notice 253 keeps EACB notes as Kenyan tender for one year from the start of their exchange into national currency; it supplies no exchange-start date.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C640", "assertion": "The same indexed timeline says EACB notes ceased Ugandan tender on 1 April 1967; this is retained as a disputed report, not an adjudicated withdrawal date.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C641", "assertion": "Gold’s indexed IMF account reports former-board notes losing tender on 14 September 1967 under a joint decision; original territorial notices are needed to resolve Uganda’s conflicting timeline.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C991", "assertion": "Ugandan shilling issues succeeded the East African Currency Board currency. The national-note history and separate coin timeline differ in milestone dates; retain the 1966–1967 interval. The 1987 confiscatory reform remains a continuity event requiring fuller scope.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S213", "S214", "S215", "S336", "S337", "S338", "S344", "S345", "S255", "S318" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1143", "assertion": "Currency unification brought the northern East African shilling into the Somali-shilling system under the 1961 decree and 1962 issues. This records the northern input only.", "source_ids": [ "S255" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1146", "assertion": "Ethiopia’s 1945 birr/dollar system followed the East African shilling, the preceding official money of account and legal tender.", "source_ids": [ "S318" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000234", "label": "Kenyan shilling", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C472", "C473", "C474", "C618", "C619", "C620", "C641" ], "source_ids": [ "S213", "S337", "S338", "S345" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C472", "assertion": "CBK distinguishes Legal Notice 252 of 1 July 1966 from banknote issue: the notes were legalised but not yet issued on that date.", "source_ids": [ "S213", "S337", "S338", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C473", "assertion": "CBK dates first national shilling coins to 10 April 1967.", "source_ids": [ "S213", "S337", "S338", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C474", "assertion": "CBK reports regional banknotes losing tender in Kenya in September 1967 and regional coins in April 1969.", "source_ids": [ "S213", "S337", "S338", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C618", "assertion": "Kenya Act s.23 requires at-par exchange of EACB notes and coins while they remain tender, with further at-par exchange periods separately authorisable.", "source_ids": [ "S213", "S337", "S338", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C619", "assertion": "Section 22(4) leaves former-board tender duration to ministerial determination; s.24 separately qualifies exchange of damaged currency.", "source_ids": [ "S213", "S337", "S338", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C620", "assertion": "Legal Notice 253 keeps EACB notes as Kenyan tender for one year from the start of their exchange into national currency; it supplies no exchange-start date.", "source_ids": [ "S213", "S337", "S338", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C641", "assertion": "Gold’s indexed IMF account reports former-board notes losing tender on 14 September 1967 under a joint decision; original territorial notices are needed to resolve Uganda’s conflicting timeline.", "source_ids": [ "S213", "S337", "S338", "S345" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000235", "label": "Ugandan shilling", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C477", "C478", "C639", "C640", "C641", "C991" ], "source_ids": [ "S215", "S216", "S344", "S345" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C477", "assertion": "The indexed Bank of Uganda history dates first national currency issue to 1966; the full page was not retrieved.", "source_ids": [ "S215", "S216", "S344", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C478", "assertion": "The World Bank reports that the 1987 Ugandan currency conversion confiscated 30 percent of the value of balances; this is not adequately described by a nominal rescaling ratio alone.", "source_ids": [ "S215", "S216", "S344", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C639", "assertion": "The indexed Bank of Uganda timeline dates its first national coin to 2 January 1967, a distinct milestone from opening the bank in August 1966.", "source_ids": [ "S215", "S216", "S344", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C640", "assertion": "The same indexed timeline says EACB notes ceased Ugandan tender on 1 April 1967; this is retained as a disputed report, not an adjudicated withdrawal date.", "source_ids": [ "S215", "S216", "S344", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C641", "assertion": "Gold’s indexed IMF account reports former-board notes losing tender on 14 September 1967 under a joint decision; original territorial notices are needed to resolve Uganda’s conflicting timeline.", "source_ids": [ "S215", "S216", "S344", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C991", "assertion": "Ugandan shilling issues succeeded the East African Currency Board currency. The national-note history and separate coin timeline differ in milestone dates; retain the 1966–1967 interval. The 1987 confiscatory reform remains a continuity event requiring fuller scope.", "source_ids": [ "S215", "S216", "S344", "S345" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000236", "label": "Tanzanian shilling", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C466", "C467", "C468", "C469", "C470", "C471", "C641" ], "source_ids": [ "S211", "S212", "S217", "S345" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C466", "assertion": "Tanzania’s original Bank Act applies to both Tanganyika and Zanzibar and establishes the shilling divided into 100 cents.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S212", "S217", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C467", "assertion": "For the transition provisions, one East African shilling equals one Tanzanian shilling.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S212", "S217", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C468", "assertion": "Former regional notes/coins remain tender until proclamation; free exchange on demand applies while they remain tender, with later exchange periods separately authorisable.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S212", "S217", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C469", "assertion": "Covered laws and instruments referencing East African shillings, cents or the twenty-shilling pound are converted under the new Act.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S212", "S217", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C470", "assertion": "The Bank of Tanzania dates the beginning of its operations to 14 June 1966.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S212", "S217", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C471", "assertion": "The specialist Banknote Book catalogue dates introduction of the first 5-, 10-, 20- and 100-shilling issues to 14 June 1966.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S212", "S217", "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C641", "assertion": "Gold’s indexed IMF account reports former-board notes losing tender on 14 September 1967 under a joint decision; original territorial notices are needed to resolve Uganda’s conflicting timeline.", "source_ids": [ "S211", "S212", "S217", "S345" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000237", "label": "Ethiopian birr", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C585", "C1129", "C1146" ], "source_ids": [ "S318", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C585", "assertion": "The issuer's history dates the introduction of its described 1945 banknote series to 23 July 1945.", "source_ids": [ "S318", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1129", "assertion": "Ethiopian birr → nakfa, 1997.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1146", "assertion": "Ethiopia’s 1945 birr/dollar system followed the East African shilling, the preceding official money of account and legal tender.", "source_ids": [ "S318" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000238", "label": "Eritrean nakfa", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C564", "C1129" ], "source_ids": [ "S298", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C564", "assertion": "The government retrospective dates introduction of the nakfa to 1997.", "source_ids": [ "S298", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1129", "assertion": "Ethiopian birr → nakfa, 1997.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000240", "label": "Somali shilling", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C520", "C1143" ], "source_ids": [ "S255" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C520", "assertion": "The issuer distinguishes a 1961 northern currency-unification decree from first Somali-shilling banknotes in 1962.", "source_ids": [ "S255" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1143", "assertion": "Currency unification brought the northern East African shilling into the Somali-shilling system under the 1961 decree and 1962 issues. This records the northern input only.", "source_ids": [ "S255" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000242", "label": "Iraqi dinar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C572", "C1115" ], "source_ids": [ "S306", "S537" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C572", "assertion": "The CPA scheduled the note exchange for 15 October 2003–15 January 2004: one old dinar for one new dinar, but one Iraqi 'Swiss' dinar for 150 new dinars.", "source_ids": [ "S306", "S537" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1115", "assertion": "The Iraqi currency-board system succeeded Indian-rupee circulation, which the Central Bank dates through 1932.", "source_ids": [ "S537" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000243", "label": "Kuwaiti dinar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C499", "C968" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C499", "assertion": "The first dinar issue entered circulation on 1 April 1961, replacing what the issuer calls the Indian rupee, under Currency Law/Amiri Decree 41 of 1960.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234" ] }, { "claim_id": "C968", "assertion": "Kuwait’s dinar replaced the circulating Gulf rupee. CBK calls the predecessor Indian rupee; Bundesbank identifies the external Gulf issue. One rupee converted to 0.075 dinar; inverse is not rounded.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000244", "label": "Omani rial — Saidi and Omani naming stages", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C538", "C975", "C976" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S272" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C538", "assertion": "The issuer dates introduction of the rial Omani name/currency to 1972, following the earlier national-currency phase managed by the Muscat Currency Authority.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S272" ] }, { "claim_id": "C975", "assertion": "Oman replaced Gulf rupees with the rial Saidi. 100 Gulf rupees converted to 7.5 rials; other circulating coin inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S272" ] }, { "claim_id": "C976", "assertion": "The Omani rial continued the rial Saidi at equal value. A naming/issue stage on one currency line.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S272" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000245", "label": "Swiss franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C511", "C779", "C780", "C781", "C785", "C1161", "C1162", "C1163" ], "source_ids": [ "S246", "S388", "S398", "S401", "S551" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C511", "assertion": "Switzerland established the national Swiss franc in 1850, before a single central bank existed; central-bank establishment in 1907 is a separate milestone.", "source_ids": [ "S246", "S388", "S398", "S401", "S551" ] }, { "claim_id": "C779", "assertion": "The Helvetic experiment precedes federal unification. Cantonal fragmentation intervenes; not an uninterrupted national currency.", "source_ids": [ "S246", "S388", "S398", "S401", "S551" ] }, { "claim_id": "C780", "assertion": "Federal Swiss money replaces a plurality of local currencies. No universal cantonal 1:1 exchange rate is supplied.", "source_ids": [ "S246", "S388", "S398", "S401", "S551" ] }, { "claim_id": "C781", "assertion": "The federal Swiss franc adopts the French silver-franc standard. Standard relationship, not French currency replacement in Switzerland.", "source_ids": [ "S246", "S388", "S398", "S401", "S551" ] }, { "claim_id": "C785", "assertion": "Switzerland participates in the common coinage convention.", "source_ids": [ "S246", "S388", "S398", "S401", "S551" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1161", "assertion": "Zurich legislation converted Zurich-gulden money contracts into federal Swiss francs at one gulden to 2⅓ francs. The legislative act dates from 28 January 1851; implementation is scoped to the 1851–1852 federal reform.", "source_ids": [ "S551" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1162", "assertion": "The 1851 Zurich law converted contracts labelled Reichswährung, including Schaffhausen, Thurgau and St. Gall currency, into federal francs through a separate statutory rate. The legislative act dates from 28 January 1851; implementation is scoped to the 1851–1852 federal reform.", "source_ids": [ "S551" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1163", "assertion": "Section 3 converted old Swiss-franc contracts at sixteen old francs to ten Zurich gulden, then to federal francs. The legislative act dates from 28 January 1851; implementation is scoped to the 1851–1852 federal reform.", "source_ids": [ "S551" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000246", "label": "Belgian franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C664", "C665", "C782", "C784", "C787", "C788", "C789", "C790", "C794" ], "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S398", "S399", "S409" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C664", "assertion": "1 EUR = 40.3399 BEF.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S398", "S399", "S409" ] }, { "claim_id": "C665", "assertion": "Belgium: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S398", "S399", "S409" ] }, { "claim_id": "C782", "assertion": "Belgium legislates the French decimal silver-franc standard. Law date; does not assert a blanket 1:1 exchange of every preceding local unit.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S398", "S399", "S409" ] }, { "claim_id": "C784", "assertion": "Belgium participates in the common coinage convention.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S398", "S399", "S409" ] }, { "claim_id": "C787", "assertion": "Luxembourg–Belgium parity is formalized.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S398", "S399", "S409" ] }, { "claim_id": "C788", "assertion": "Luxembourg does not follow the full Belgian devaluation.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S398", "S399", "S409" ] }, { "claim_id": "C789", "assertion": "Equal Luxembourg–Belgium parity is restored.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S398", "S399", "S409" ] }, { "claim_id": "C790", "assertion": "Belgian euro conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S398", "S399", "S409" ] }, { "claim_id": "C794", "assertion": "Belgian banknotes are provisionally accepted for colonial taxes and duties. Legal circulation relationship; not a new Congo currency or universal predecessor conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S398", "S399", "S409" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000247", "label": "Italian lira", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C676", "C677" ], "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C676", "assertion": "1 EUR = 1936.27 ITL.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348" ] }, { "claim_id": "C677", "assertion": "Italy: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000248", "label": "Congolese franc, pre-1967", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C792", "C793", "C794", "C795", "C798", "C1260", "C1426", "C1431" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S389", "S390", "S409", "S658", "S711", "S712" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C792", "assertion": "The Congo Free State establishes its franc unit. This is the Congo / Belgian colonial branch, not the Central African CFA franc of the other Congo.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S389", "S390", "S409", "S658", "S711", "S712" ] }, { "claim_id": "C793", "assertion": "The Congo adopts a franc system conforming to the Latin Union standard. Standard adoption does not establish treaty membership or direct replacement of Belgian francs.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S389", "S390", "S409", "S658", "S711", "S712" ] }, { "claim_id": "C794", "assertion": "Belgian banknotes are provisionally accepted for colonial taxes and duties. Legal circulation relationship; not a new Congo currency or universal predecessor conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S389", "S390", "S409", "S658", "S711", "S712" ] }, { "claim_id": "C795", "assertion": "Zaire replaces the old Congolese franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S389", "S390", "S409", "S658", "S711", "S712" ] }, { "claim_id": "C798", "assertion": "Rwanda–Burundi adopts a shared franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S389", "S390", "S409", "S658", "S711", "S712" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1260", "assertion": "Congolese franc principal account unit replaced by zaire principal unit in1967. Existing zaire node continues through later scale phases; no merger with franc required. ", "source_ids": [ "S658" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1426", "assertion": "Katanga separated a franc payment unit from the existing Congolese system during secession.", "source_ids": [ "S711", "S712" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1431", "assertion": "Katangese francs were replaced by existing Congolese francs at 1:1 in January 1963.", "source_ids": [ "S712" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000249", "label": "Zaire — 1967 and 1993 unit scales", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C795", "C796", "C797", "C1260", "C1348" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S389", "S390", "S658" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C795", "assertion": "Zaire replaces the old Congolese franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S389", "S390", "S658" ] }, { "claim_id": "C796", "assertion": "New zaire replaces zaire at three million to one. Bundesbank dates introduction 22 October; BCC dates the reform 28 September. Keep both milestones without pretending their legal distinction is verified.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S389", "S390", "S658" ] }, { "claim_id": "C797", "assertion": "The Congolese franc returns.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S389", "S390", "S658" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1260", "assertion": "Congolese franc principal account unit replaced by zaire principal unit in1967. Existing zaire node continues through later scale phases; no merger with franc required. ", "source_ids": [ "S658" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1348", "assertion": "1000 former Congolese francs = 1 zaire. Congolese franc principal account unit replaced by zaire principal unit in1967. Existing zaire node continues through later scale phases; no merger with franc required.", "source_ids": [ "S658" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000250", "label": "Congolese franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C543", "C797" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S277", "S390" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C543", "assertion": "The Congolese franc was instituted by Decree-Law 080 of 17 June 1998 and put into circulation on 30 June 1998, at 100,000 nouveaux zaïres or 14,000,000 old zaïres per franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S277", "S390" ] }, { "claim_id": "C797", "assertion": "The Congolese franc returns.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S277", "S390" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000251", "label": "Rwanda–Burundi franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C798", "C799", "C800" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S400" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C798", "assertion": "Rwanda–Burundi adopts a shared franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S400" ] }, { "claim_id": "C799", "assertion": "Rwanda adopts its national franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S400" ] }, { "claim_id": "C800", "assertion": "Burundi adopts its national franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S400" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000252", "label": "Rwandan franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C595", "C799" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S328" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C595", "assertion": "The contemporary IMF article describes separate Rwandan and Burundian currencies being introduced after the creation of separate central banks in spring 1964.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S328" ] }, { "claim_id": "C799", "assertion": "Rwanda adopts its national franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S328" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000253", "label": "Burundian franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C583", "C800" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S316", "S400" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C583", "assertion": "The issuer history describes Rwanda-Burundi bank notes and coins overprinted for Burundi from February 1964, and gives 31 December 1965 as the circulation limit for those notes.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S316", "S400" ] }, { "claim_id": "C800", "assertion": "Burundi adopts its national franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S316", "S400" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000254", "label": "Serbian dinar — nineteenth-century national currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C916", "C917", "C918", "C919" ], "source_ids": [ "S445", "S446", "S447" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C916", "assertion": "Serbia’s silver-currency law established the modern dinar. Gregorian date; 30 November in the Julian calendar.", "source_ids": [ "S445", "S446", "S447" ] }, { "claim_id": "C917", "assertion": "Modern Serbia revived the medieval dinar name.", "source_ids": [ "S445", "S446", "S447" ] }, { "claim_id": "C918", "assertion": "Modern Serbian silver dinar coins followed the earlier copper issues.", "source_ids": [ "S445", "S446", "S447" ] }, { "claim_id": "C919", "assertion": "The new South Slav kingdom retained the Serbian dinar as its monetary unit. Territorial extension and unification occurred over a transition period.", "source_ids": [ "S445", "S446", "S447" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000255", "label": "Postwar Yugoslav dinar — before successor separations", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C840", "C842", "C923", "C924", "C925", "C926", "C933" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S419", "S443", "S444", "S445", "S448" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C840", "assertion": "Croatian dinars replaced Yugoslav dinars at par.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S419", "S443", "S444", "S445", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C842", "assertion": "Slovenian tolars replaced Yugoslav dinars at par.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S419", "S443", "S444", "S445", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C923", "assertion": "Postwar Yugoslav dinars replaced occupation money, including Serbian occupation dinars. Non-exclusive incoming branch; exact conversion and other occupation currencies remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S419", "S443", "S444", "S445", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C924", "assertion": "The Yugoslav dinar was rescaled by 100 during the 1965–1966 reform. Slovenian statistical effective date: 1 January 1966. Serbian compilation: 1 August 1965. The event boundary remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S419", "S443", "S444", "S445", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C925", "assertion": "One new Yugoslav dinar replaced 10,000 previous dinars.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S419", "S443", "S444", "S445", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C926", "assertion": "Federal Yugoslavia introduced a dinar scale worth ten preceding dinars. Successor territorial branch after other republics separated.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S419", "S443", "S444", "S445", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C933", "assertion": "Macedonia replaced the Yugoslav dinar with its denar at par.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S419", "S443", "S444", "S445", "S448" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000256", "label": "Federal Yugoslav / Serbian dinar — successor continuity", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C566", "C926", "C927", "C928", "C929", "C930", "C931", "C932" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S443", "S444" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C566", "assertion": "The issuer describes a new-dinar series after the 1994 reform, later Yugoslav issues in 2000–2002, and National Bank of Serbia notes in 2003.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S443", "S444" ] }, { "claim_id": "C926", "assertion": "Federal Yugoslavia introduced a dinar scale worth ten preceding dinars. Successor territorial branch after other republics separated.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S443", "S444" ] }, { "claim_id": "C927", "assertion": "One October dinar replaced one million July-1992-scale dinars.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S443", "S444" ] }, { "claim_id": "C928", "assertion": "One January dinar replaced one billion October-scale dinars.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S443", "S444" ] }, { "claim_id": "C929", "assertion": "The stabilised new dinar entered at thirteen million January dinars per new dinar. Dated rate only; the table gives twelve million from 26 January through 30 June.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S443", "S444" ] }, { "claim_id": "C930", "assertion": "The new Yugoslav dinar was initially equal in value to Deutsche Mark. A value anchor, not a Deutsche Mark conversion ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S443", "S444" ] }, { "claim_id": "C931", "assertion": "The Yugoslav new dinar became the Serbian dinar without another rescaling. Later ISO-code change in 2006 is not a new monetary unit.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S443", "S444" ] }, { "claim_id": "C932", "assertion": "The Serbian dinar’s ISO code changed from CSD to RSD.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S300", "S443", "S444" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000258", "label": "Macedonian denar — national continuity", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C593", "C933", "C934", "C935" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S326", "S443", "S448" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C593", "assertion": "The national bank's statistical footnote identifies a factor-of-100 denar denomination in May 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S326", "S443", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C933", "assertion": "Macedonia replaced the Yugoslav dinar with its denar at par.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S326", "S443", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C934", "assertion": "One new denar replaced 100 temporary denars. Issuer-derived statistical sources disagree on May 7 versus May 10; month precision avoids false exactness.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S326", "S443", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C935", "assertion": "Macedonia adopted a stable exchange-rate strategy against Deutsche Mark. Policy anchor; the immediate parent remains the Yugoslav dinar.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S326", "S443", "S448" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000260", "label": "Romanian leu", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C589", "C1185", "C1207", "C1218" ], "source_ids": [ "S322", "S553", "S554", "S602", "S603" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C589", "assertion": "Article 1 provides for redenomination on 1 July 2005 at 10,000 old lei per new leu.", "source_ids": [ "S322", "S553", "S554", "S602", "S603" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1185", "assertion": "The 1831–1832 Organic Regulations recognized leu accounting. The 1867 reform decimalized and rescaled it: one new leu equalled two old lei and 28 parale.", "source_ids": [ "S553", "S554" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1207", "assertion": "Regional leu accounting continued the lion-thaler convention after the trade coin receded. This qualified branch compresses regional differentiation and later Ottoman influence; it does not equate every local leu with Dutch or Ottoman money.", "source_ids": [ "S602", "S603", "S553", "S554" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1218", "assertion": "A published study reports a 1757 Moldavian document reckoning 5,000 lei as ten bags. It extends the qualified regional leu profile; the underlying manuscript and every later local transition have not been independently verified.", "source_ids": [ "S602", "S553", "S554" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000262", "label": "Albanian lek", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C514", "C1103" ], "source_ids": [ "S249" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C514", "assertion": "In the 1965 reform, ten lek of the 1947/1957 issues were equated to one lek of the 1964 and later issues.", "source_ids": [ "S249" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1103", "assertion": "The July 1947 law replaced the Albanian frang with the lek as the monetary unit.", "source_ids": [ "S249" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000263", "label": "CFA franc (BCEAO)", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C532", "C750", "C752", "C754", "C757", "C760", "C761", "C762", "C764", "C1254" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S267", "S379", "S380", "S381", "S383", "S384", "S654", "S655" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C532", "assertion": "The BCEAO dates the common CFA framework to 26 December 1945. This is an ancestral framework anchor, not a claim that today's western and central issuing zones were already identical to their later form.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S267", "S379", "S380", "S381", "S383", "S384", "S654", "S655" ] }, { "claim_id": "C750", "assertion": "The western CFA branch develops under BCEAO. 1959 is an institutional marker, not a fresh redenomination or first CFA coinage.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S267", "S379", "S380", "S381", "S383", "S384", "S654", "S655" ] }, { "claim_id": "C752", "assertion": "Western CFA devaluation takes effect. Decision on 11 January; not a new CFA unit.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S267", "S379", "S380", "S381", "S383", "S384", "S654", "S655" ] }, { "claim_id": "C754", "assertion": "Western CFA euro anchor.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S267", "S379", "S380", "S381", "S383", "S384", "S654", "S655" ] }, { "claim_id": "C757", "assertion": "Guinea leaves CFA currency for its own franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S267", "S379", "S380", "S381", "S383", "S384", "S654", "S655" ] }, { "claim_id": "C760", "assertion": "Mali introduces its own franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S267", "S379", "S380", "S381", "S383", "S384", "S654", "S655" ] }, { "claim_id": "C761", "assertion": "Mali returns to CFA currency. Territorial return to an existing currency, not creation of XOF from the Malian franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S267", "S379", "S380", "S381", "S383", "S384", "S654", "S655" ] }, { "claim_id": "C762", "assertion": "Mauritania introduces the ouguiya. Effective date per Bundesbank; earlier political decisions should be separate events.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S267", "S379", "S380", "S381", "S383", "S384", "S654", "S655" ] }, { "claim_id": "C764", "assertion": "Guinea-Bissau exchanges pesos for CFA francs. Currency changeover is separate from union accession.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S267", "S379", "S380", "S381", "S383", "S384", "S654", "S655" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1254", "assertion": "Reconnect western CFA profile to the existing early CFA account lineage. Evidence documents inherited notes and same-unit recognition through 1955/1959/1962 institutions. Do not add BAO/institute/BCEAO issuer nodes or label 1962 a monetary birth. This is regional continuity of an existing currency; exact west/central differentiation remains unadjudicated. An identity merge/alias may be preferable if the parent is only an issuer-era duplicate.", "source_ids": [ "S654", "S655" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000264", "label": "CFA franc (BEAC)", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C533", "C751", "C753", "C755", "C765", "C1255" ], "source_ids": [ "S267", "S381", "S382", "S407", "S656", "S657" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C533", "assertion": "The BCEAO traces both western and central CFA terminology to the framework created on 26 December 1945; this does not settle the later separate issuing zones' formation.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S381", "S382", "S407", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C751", "assertion": "The central CFA branch develops through its own central-bank institutions. Retain a separate currency identity. Exact predecessor-bank operational dates are not asserted here.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S381", "S382", "S407", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C753", "assertion": "Central CFA devaluation takes effect. Decision signed 11 January; publication on 24 March is not the effective date.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S381", "S382", "S407", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C755", "assertion": "Central CFA euro anchor. Equal parity does not merge XAF with XOF.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S381", "S382", "S407", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C765", "assertion": "Equatorial Guinea adopts CFA currency. Contemporary notice specifies 2 January; preferred over the 1 January date in later Bundesbank metadata.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S381", "S382", "S407", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1255", "assertion": "Reconnect central CFA profile to the early CFA lineage, supported by institutional history and 1972 transfer of monetary liabilities. Retain a qualified regional edge and avoid treating 1972 institutional renaming as a new currency. Regional division existed before 1972; date range labels evidence coverage, not a claim the split occurred in 1972.", "source_ids": [ "S656", "S657" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000265", "label": "Guinean franc, first unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C757", "C758" ], "source_ids": [ "S383", "S397" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C757", "assertion": "Guinea leaves CFA currency for its own franc.", "source_ids": [ "S383", "S397" ] }, { "claim_id": "C758", "assertion": "The syli replaces the first Guinean franc. Contemporary notice establishes changeover; 1971 note-series dates are not adoption dates.", "source_ids": [ "S383", "S397" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000266", "label": "Guinean franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C517", "C759" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S252" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C517", "assertion": "The governor dates the Guinean franc's introduction as official currency to 1 March 1960.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S252" ] }, { "claim_id": "C759", "assertion": "Guinea restores the franc. Use changeover date rather than 1985 note-series dating.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S252" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000268", "label": "Mauritanian ouguiya", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C551", "C762", "C763" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S285" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C551", "assertion": "The BCM communiqué dates launch of the ouguiya reform to 1 January 2018 and announces extension of specified old coin denominations' validity through 2019.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S285" ] }, { "claim_id": "C762", "assertion": "Mauritania introduces the ouguiya. Effective date per Bundesbank; earlier political decisions should be separate events.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S285" ] }, { "claim_id": "C763", "assertion": "Mauritania changes the size of the ouguiya unit.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S285" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000270", "label": "Malagasy franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C767", "C768", "C769", "C766", "C980" ], "source_ids": [ "S402", "S464" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C767", "assertion": "The Malagasy franc designation marks the independent national branch. Do not erase prior Madagascar issues or equate 1963 with its first franc notes.", "source_ids": [ "S402", "S464" ] }, { "claim_id": "C768", "assertion": "National franc issues continue the local franc monetary history.", "source_ids": [ "S402", "S464" ] }, { "claim_id": "C769", "assertion": "The ariary becomes the accounting unit. Ariary-denominated new notes had already launched on 31 July 2003.", "source_ids": [ "S402", "S464" ] }, { "claim_id": "C766", "assertion": "A distinct banknote issuer begins Madagascar franc issues following the 1925 law. French money circulated earlier; this is not the beginning of all money or all francs on the island.", "source_ids": [ "S402", "S464" ] }, { "claim_id": "C980", "assertion": "Distinct Malagasy franc issues followed the French currency introduced after annexation in 1896.", "source_ids": [ "S402", "S464" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000271", "label": "Malagasy ariary", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C548", "C769", "C770" ], "source_ids": [ "S282", "S402" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C548", "assertion": "On 1 January 2005 the ariary replaced the Malagasy franc as official unit of account at one ariary per five francs.", "source_ids": [ "S282", "S402" ] }, { "claim_id": "C769", "assertion": "The ariary becomes the accounting unit. Ariary-denominated new notes had already launched on 31 July 2003.", "source_ids": [ "S282", "S402" ] }, { "claim_id": "C770", "assertion": "New ariary-denominated notes precede the accounting change.", "source_ids": [ "S282", "S402" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000272", "label": "Comorian franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C771", "C772", "C582", "C773", "C774", "C775" ], "source_ids": [ "S315", "S381", "S385", "S406" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C771", "assertion": "Comoros has local franc issues under BMC and then IEC. Institutional and regional continuity; exact birth of a distinct national unit is not forced.", "source_ids": [ "S315", "S381", "S385", "S406" ] }, { "claim_id": "C772", "assertion": "The cooperation agreement and BCC succession formalize the Comorian branch. Agreement signed 23 November 1979 names the franc; BCC succeeds IEC on 1 July 1981. Treaty entry into force depends on notifications.", "source_ids": [ "S315", "S381", "S385", "S406" ] }, { "claim_id": "C582", "assertion": "The 23 November 1979 agreement provides that the central bank assumes the former Institut d'Emission's monetary-issuance rights and obligations and identifies its currency as the Comorian franc.", "source_ids": [ "S315", "S381", "S385", "S406" ] }, { "claim_id": "C773", "assertion": "Signed cooperation agreement defines the Comorian parity. Date of signature; not asserted as the legal effective date.", "source_ids": [ "S315", "S381", "S385", "S406" ] }, { "claim_id": "C774", "assertion": "Comoros adopts its distinct devalued parity. Not the CFA rate of 100 per French franc.", "source_ids": [ "S315", "S381", "S385", "S406" ] }, { "claim_id": "C775", "assertion": "Comorian euro anchor. Use published legal parity; do not replace it with an unrounded arithmetic product.", "source_ids": [ "S315", "S381", "S385", "S406" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000273", "label": "CFP franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C531", "C744", "C746", "C747", "C756", "C805", "C978", "C979" ], "source_ids": [ "S266", "S387", "S396", "S463" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C531", "assertion": "The IEOM dates creation of the CFP franc to 1945.", "source_ids": [ "S266", "S387", "S396", "S463" ] }, { "claim_id": "C744", "assertion": "The same decree separately establishes the Pacific-franc grouping. New Caledonia, French Oceania and New Hebrides; CFP is a sibling of CFA.", "source_ids": [ "S266", "S387", "S396", "S463" ] }, { "claim_id": "C746", "assertion": "Initial Pacific/metropolitan parity.", "source_ids": [ "S266", "S387", "S396", "S463" ] }, { "claim_id": "C747", "assertion": "Early CFP dollar parity. Exchange anchor, not US-dollar ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S266", "S387", "S396", "S463" ] }, { "claim_id": "C756", "assertion": "CFP euro anchor. Keep this exact orientation; a rounded reciprocal is not the legal definition.", "source_ids": [ "S266", "S387", "S396", "S463" ] }, { "claim_id": "C805", "assertion": "The 1945 Pacific grouping explicitly includes the New Hebrides. This does not date the subsequent separation of its monetary arrangements from the other CFP territories.", "source_ids": [ "S266", "S387", "S396", "S463" ] }, { "claim_id": "C978", "assertion": "The Pacific franc separates from the metropolitan-franc monetary system in the same reform.", "source_ids": [ "S266", "S387", "S396", "S463" ] }, { "claim_id": "C979", "assertion": "New Hebrides franc issues continue the Pacific-franc system established in 1945, with IEOM issuance from 1967. This is a regional issue lineage; the date of separate exchange arrangements is not claimed.", "source_ids": [ "S266", "S387", "S396", "S463" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000275", "label": "Vanuatu vatu / New Hebrides franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C539", "C805", "C806", "C979" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S273", "S396", "S463" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C539", "assertion": "The New Hebrides franc was renamed vatu on 1 January 1981; vatu notes followed on 22 March 1982. Old New Hebrides-franc notes and Australian currency ceased legal tender on 1 April 1983.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S273", "S396", "S463" ] }, { "claim_id": "C805", "assertion": "The 1945 Pacific grouping explicitly includes the New Hebrides. This does not date the subsequent separation of its monetary arrangements from the other CFP territories.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S273", "S396", "S463" ] }, { "claim_id": "C806", "assertion": "Vatu succeeds the New Hebrides franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S273", "S396", "S463" ] }, { "claim_id": "C979", "assertion": "New Hebrides franc issues continue the Pacific-franc system established in 1945, with IEOM issuance from 1967. This is a regional issue lineage; the date of separate exchange arrangements is not claimed.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S273", "S396", "S463" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000276", "label": "Algerian franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C801", "C802", "C1296" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S541" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C801", "assertion": "Algeria restates its franc unit.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C802", "assertion": "The dinar replaces the Algerian new franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1296", "assertion": "Algerian franc monetary-unit observation reaches 1933, preceding the 1960 anchor. Treat later new-franc rescaling as a profile change, not a reason to discard the earlier unit. No claim that 1933 is creation or that 1848 was the actual monetary separation date.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000277", "label": "Algerian dinar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C547", "C802" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S281" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C547", "assertion": "The Algerian dinar was created in 1964, and the central bank issued its first four note denominations that year.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S281" ] }, { "claim_id": "C802", "assertion": "The dinar replaces the Algerian new franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S281" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000278", "label": "Tunisian franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C804", "C981" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S465" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C804", "assertion": "Tunisia introduces the dinar.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S465" ] }, { "claim_id": "C981", "assertion": "Tunisia replaced its piastre system with the French franc unit in 1891. The Tunisian piastre is a separate local predecessor still to trace.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S465" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000279", "label": "Tunisian dinar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C579", "C804" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S313" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C579", "assertion": "Article 1 of the translated 18 October 1958 law defines the dinar as the monetary unit, divided into 1,000 Tunisian francs or millimes.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S313" ] }, { "claim_id": "C804", "assertion": "Tunisia introduces the dinar.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S313" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000280", "label": "Moroccan franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C803" ], "source_ids": [ "S405" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C803", "assertion": "Morocco’s dirham reform takes effect. Signed 17 October; gazette and effective date 19 October. Old francs temporarily remain legal tender.", "source_ids": [ "S405" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000281", "label": "Moroccan dirham", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C553", "C803" ], "source_ids": [ "S287", "S405" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C553", "assertion": "Bank Al-Maghrib dates adoption of the dirham as the new monetary unit to October 1959.", "source_ids": [ "S287", "S405" ] }, { "claim_id": "C803", "assertion": "Morocco’s dirham reform takes effect. Signed 17 October; gazette and effective date 19 October. Old francs temporarily remain legal tender.", "source_ids": [ "S287", "S405" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000283", "label": "Djiboutian franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C518", "C776", "C777" ], "source_ids": [ "S253", "S396", "S403", "S404" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C518", "assertion": "The issuer attributes creation of the local Djibouti franc to French Decree 49/374 of 20 March 1949.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S396", "S403", "S404" ] }, { "claim_id": "C776", "assertion": "Djibouti’s separate dollar-linked franc follows the territorial CFA period. Treaty cites decrees dated 17 March; local gazette labels 20 March. No local redemption ratio is asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S396", "S403", "S404" ] }, { "claim_id": "C777", "assertion": "Initial Djibouti dollar anchor. This exchange anchor is not a predecessor-currency conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S396", "S403", "S404" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000285", "label": "Indian rupee", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C603", "C604", "C605", "C606", "C607", "C608", "C610", "C611", "C613", "C614", "C586", "C963", "C964", "C967", "C602", "C961", "C962", "C965", "C990", "C1115", "C1127", "C1138", "C1153", "C1156", "C1422" ], "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C603", "assertion": "Article 4 retains the British Indian silver rupee as the standard coin of East Africa and Uganda, governing money transactions unless expressly agreed otherwise.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C604", "assertion": "Article 5 provides subsidiary coins expressed in cents or hundredths of a rupee.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C605", "assertion": "Articles 14 and 16 authorise local government currency notes, payable on demand in current coin and legal tender with a Currency Board-office exception.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C606", "assertion": "The 1905 order requires territorial commencement proclamations and allows different provisions to start on different dates; its signature date is not first note issue.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C607", "assertion": "Article 13 accepts qualifying sovereigns at fifteen rupees each; this is a tender valuation, not evidence of a sterling-to-rupee replacement.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C608", "assertion": "Kenya’s 1920–21 report describes the 26 April 1920 order converting rupee references in contracts to florins at one florin per rupee.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C610", "assertion": "The report dates transfer of the local Currency Board’s powers, duties and liabilities to the East African Currency Board to 31 July 1920.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C611", "assertion": "The report records one-rupee EACB notes made unlimited tender on 11 May 1920, and December legislation authorising florin/pound notes. Unit change and note denomination overlap.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C613", "assertion": "Article 5 converts covered former rupee or florin amounts into twice as many shillings, and former cents into twice as many shilling cents.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C614", "assertion": "Article 9(3) preserves old notes and coins as tender until separately ended, rating each rupee or florin at two shillings.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C586", "assertion": "RBI describes monetary continuity during 1947–1950 and dates the Republic's distinctive coin issue to 15 August 1950.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C963", "assertion": "Independent India retained the inherited rupee and then introduced Republic designs. Independence and the 1950 coin issue did not rescale the rupee.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C964", "assertion": "India decimalised the rupee without changing its value or name. Subdivision reform stays on the rupee line.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C967", "assertion": "India introduced a separate rupee-note currency for Gulf circulation. The original domestic notes were displaced through a regional changeover; no modern peg is being promoted into ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C602", "assertion": "The 1905 order recites a 19 May 1898 order making British India’s silver rupee the East Africa Protectorate’s standard coin.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C961", "assertion": "Bombay Mughal-style rupees were one input to the uniform British Indian rupee coinage. Madras and Bengal presidency branches remain additional inputs to research; no blanket old-rupee conversion ratio.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C962", "assertion": "Crown coinage followed Company coinage in the rupee system. Change of sovereign and coin design, not a new unit of account.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C965", "assertion": "Pakistan initially used Indian notes and then modified and national rupee issues. A phased territorial separation; no change in rupee face-unit inferred from the redesign.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C990", "assertion": "Mauritius combined local currency-board notes with the Indian rupee as its prescribed monetary unit. The history supports unit descent; precise changeover terms and early local-note denominations remain expandable.", "source_ids": [ "S319", "S334", "S335", "S336", "S457", "S458", "S459", "S460", "S461", "S470", "S537", "S98", "S541", "S242", "S549", "S189", "S327", "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1115", "assertion": "The Iraqi currency-board system succeeded Indian-rupee circulation, which the Central Bank dates through 1932.", "source_ids": [ "S537" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1127", "assertion": "Indian rupee → ngultrum, 1974.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1138", "assertion": "Ceylon’s local currency notes were redeemable in rupees under the 1884 ordinance; the 1892 order prescribed the British Indian rupee as standard. A qualified regional branch records local currency development, not a new unit invented by decimal coins.", "source_ids": [ "S541", "S242" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1153", "assertion": "The 1836 act ended Calcutta sicca-rupee tender status from January 1838; its Treasury notice prescribed exchange into the Company rupees of the 1835 act. Retrieval is limited to the indexed statutory passage.", "source_ids": [ "S549" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1156", "assertion": "Burma’s separate currency developed from Indian-rupee circulation through the 1937 issues, postwar currency board and 1952 central-bank succession. The compressed regional link to the continuing rupee/kyat profile is qualified; wartime occupation currency remains a separate unresolved input.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S327" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1422", "assertion": "Hyderabad local rupees were replaced by Indianrupees; the regional branch joins an already existing Indianunit. Does not assert that Indianrupee originated 1955.", "source_ids": [ "S699" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000286", "label": "Pakistani rupee", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C541", "C965", "C966" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S275", "S459" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C541", "assertion": "The issuer museum dates modified Indian notes for Pakistan to 1 April 1948 and a government emergency note series to 1 October 1948.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S275", "S459" ] }, { "claim_id": "C965", "assertion": "Pakistan initially used Indian notes and then modified and national rupee issues. A phased territorial separation; no change in rupee face-unit inferred from the redesign.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S275", "S459" ] }, { "claim_id": "C966", "assertion": "Bangladesh’s taka succeeded the Pakistani rupee at equal unit value. Year precision distinguishes the accounting transition from first national banknote issue.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S275", "S459" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000287", "label": "Bangladeshi taka", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C506", "C966" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S241" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C506", "assertion": "The taka replaced the Pakistani rupee in 1972; regular-circulation coins followed in 1973.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S241" ] }, { "claim_id": "C966", "assertion": "Bangladesh’s taka succeeded the Pakistani rupee at equal unit value. Year precision distinguishes the accounting transition from first national banknote issue.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S241" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000288", "label": "Bhutanese ngultrum", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C540", "C1127" ], "source_ids": [ "S274", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C540", "assertion": "Bhutan's Ministry of Finance first issued banknotes during the 1974 monetary reform, standardising the unit at 100 chhetrum per ngultrum.", "source_ids": [ "S274", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1127", "assertion": "Indian rupee → ngultrum, 1974.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000290", "label": "Myanmar kyat", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C594", "C1156", "C1159" ], "source_ids": [ "S327", "S189" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C594", "assertion": "The government history dates the transfer of currency issuance from the Burma Currency Board to the Union Bank's currency department to 1 July 1952.", "source_ids": [ "S327", "S189" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1156", "assertion": "Burma’s separate currency developed from Indian-rupee circulation through the 1937 issues, postwar currency board and 1952 central-bank succession. The compressed regional link to the continuing rupee/kyat profile is qualified; wartime occupation currency remains a separate unresolved input.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S327" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1159", "assertion": "The regional currency profile extends through the postwar Burmese rupee and 1952 transfer to the Union Bank of Burma. The rupee/kyat naming and subdivision transition is kept within this qualified profile.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S327" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000291", "label": "Ceylon / Sri Lankan rupee", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "boundary_unresolved", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Retain later territorial/national rupee identity; earliest colonial note and coin evidence does not by itself date independent account denomination. Do not merge entire later currency into INR because early circulating standard was Indian rupee.", "claim_ids": [ "C507", "C1138", "C1176" ], "source_ids": [ "S242", "S541", "S579" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C507", "assertion": "The central bank's history dates decimal coinage to 17 March 1872, with 100 cents per rupee. It describes the central bank as inheriting the existing currency system in 1950.", "source_ids": [ "S242", "S541", "S579" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1138", "assertion": "Ceylon’s local currency notes were redeemable in rupees under the 1884 ordinance; the 1892 order prescribed the British Indian rupee as standard. A qualified regional branch records local currency development, not a new unit invented by decimal coins.", "source_ids": [ "S541", "S242" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1176", "assertion": "The Maldivian rupee, later called rufiyaa, replaced the Ceylonese rupee in 1947. No exact conversion rate or exclusive currency use asserted; local coin and larin history remains open.", "source_ids": [ "S579" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SILVER1933" ], "boundary_status": "Earlier distinct-account boundary requires statute/contracts; local issuer date is not currency birth." }, { "id": "FTM000292", "label": "Maldivian rufiyaa", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C527", "C1176" ], "source_ids": [ "S262", "S579" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C527", "assertion": "The Maldives issued its first banknotes in 1947 in denominations of one-half, one, two, five and ten rufiyaa.", "source_ids": [ "S262", "S579" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1176", "assertion": "The Maldivian rupee, later called rufiyaa, replaced the Ceylonese rupee in 1947. No exact conversion rate or exclusive currency use asserted; local coin and larin history remains open.", "source_ids": [ "S579" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000293", "label": "Mauritian rupee", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "boundary_unresolved", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Retain later territorial/national rupee identity; earliest colonial note and coin evidence does not by itself date independent account denomination. Do not merge entire later currency into INR because early circulating standard was Indian rupee.", "claim_ids": [ "C522", "C990", "C1137" ], "source_ids": [ "S257", "S470", "S540" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C522", "assertion": "An Order in Council made the rupee the sole legal tender in Mauritius from 1876, according to the issuer's museum history.", "source_ids": [ "S257", "S470", "S540" ] }, { "claim_id": "C990", "assertion": "Mauritius combined local currency-board notes with the Indian rupee as its prescribed monetary unit. The history supports unit descent; precise changeover terms and early local-note denominations remain expandable.", "source_ids": [ "S257", "S470", "S540" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1137", "assertion": "Seychelles developed a separate local rupee issue from its Mauritian-rupee circulation; most Mauritian currency lost tender status in 1947. This gradual territorial separation is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S540" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SILVER1933" ], "boundary_status": "Earlier distinct-account boundary requires statute/contracts; local issuer date is not currency birth." }, { "id": "FTM000294", "label": "Seychellois rupee", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "boundary_unresolved", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Retain later territorial/national rupee identity; earliest colonial note and coin evidence does not by itself date independent account denomination. Do not merge entire later currency into INR because early circulating standard was Indian rupee.", "claim_ids": [ "C575", "C1137" ], "source_ids": [ "S309", "S540" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C575", "assertion": "The 1974 Currency Act assigned currency issue, reissue and redemption jointly to the Financial Secretary and Accountant General acting as currency commissioners.", "source_ids": [ "S309", "S540" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1137", "assertion": "Seychelles developed a separate local rupee issue from its Mauritian-rupee circulation; most Mauritian currency lost tender status in 1947. This gradual territorial separation is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S540" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [], "boundary_status": "Earlier distinct-account boundary requires statute/contracts; local issuer date is not currency birth." }, { "id": "FTM000298", "label": "Afghan afghani", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C591", "C1136" ], "source_ids": [ "S324", "S539" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C591", "assertion": "The IMF reports that the afghani conversion began on 7 October 2002 and was completed on 2 January 2003.", "source_ids": [ "S324", "S539" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1136", "assertion": "The afghani standards introduced in 1925–1926 replaced Kabuli-rupee reckoning. Later afghani rescalings remain within the modern currency profile.", "source_ids": [ "S539", "S324" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000299", "label": "Gulf rupee — external Indian note currency", "verdict": "merge", "confidence": "supported_inference", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Inspected enabling law authorizes special notes of the Indian rupee for external circulation, not a new account denomination. Fold Gulf episode into Indian rupee and retain its regional conversion observations. This rejects a note-series identity; any later independently denominated Gulf contract unit requires new evidence.", "claim_ids": [ "C967", "C968", "C969", "C970", "C975" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234", "S460", "S461" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C967", "assertion": "India introduced a separate rupee-note currency for Gulf circulation. The original domestic notes were displaced through a regional changeover; no modern peg is being promoted into ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234", "S460", "S461" ] }, { "claim_id": "C968", "assertion": "Kuwait’s dinar replaced the circulating Gulf rupee. CBK calls the predecessor Indian rupee; Bundesbank identifies the external Gulf issue. One rupee converted to 0.075 dinar; inverse is not rounded.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234", "S460", "S461" ] }, { "claim_id": "C969", "assertion": "Ten Gulf rupees converted to one Bahraini dinar.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234", "S460", "S461" ] }, { "claim_id": "C970", "assertion": "Qatar temporarily substituted borrowed Saudi-riyal notes for Gulf rupees. This concerns Qatar’s circulation only, not the Saudi currency’s origin.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234", "S460", "S461" ] }, { "claim_id": "C975", "assertion": "Oman replaced Gulf rupees with the rial Saidi. 100 Gulf rupees converted to 7.5 rials; other circulating coin inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S234", "S460", "S461" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-GULF-LAW" ], "merge_target": "FTM000285" }, { "id": "FTM000300", "label": "Bahraini dinar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C552", "C969", "C974" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S286", "S462" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C552", "assertion": "The central bank dates the first Bahraini dinar issue to 1965.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S286", "S462" ] }, { "claim_id": "C969", "assertion": "Ten Gulf rupees converted to one Bahraini dinar.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S286", "S462" ] }, { "claim_id": "C974", "assertion": "Abu Dhabi converted Bahraini dinars into ten UAE dirhams each. Territorial adoption, not replacement of Bahrain’s currency in Bahrain.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S286", "S462" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000301", "label": "Qatar and Dubai riyal", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C971", "C972", "C973" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S462" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C971", "assertion": "Qatar–Dubai riyals replaced the interim Saudi notes. 100 Saudi riyals converted to 106.5 Qatar–Dubai riyals; inverse is not rounded.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S462" ] }, { "claim_id": "C972", "assertion": "Qatar continued with a separate riyal at par after the joint issue ended.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S462" ] }, { "claim_id": "C973", "assertion": "Qatar–Dubai riyals converted into UAE dirhams at par. The non-Abu Dhabi branch; day precision remains unresolved.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S462" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000302", "label": "Qatari riyal", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C537", "C972" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S271" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C537", "assertion": "The Qatar–Dubai riyal period ended with a separate Qatari issue in 1973; the issuer dates the authority's founding Law 7 to 19 June 1973.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S271" ] }, { "claim_id": "C972", "assertion": "Qatar continued with a separate riyal at par after the joint issue ended.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S271" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000303", "label": "UAE dirham", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C500", "C973", "C974" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S235", "S462" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C500", "assertion": "The UAE Currency Board first issued UAE currency on 19 May 1973. The issuer explicitly excepts the 1,000-dirham note, which entered circulation in January 1976.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S235", "S462" ] }, { "claim_id": "C973", "assertion": "Qatar–Dubai riyals converted into UAE dirhams at par. The non-Abu Dhabi branch; day precision remains unresolved.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S235", "S462" ] }, { "claim_id": "C974", "assertion": "Abu Dhabi converted Bahraini dinars into ten UAE dirhams each. Territorial adoption, not replacement of Bahrain’s currency in Bahrain.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S235", "S462" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000304", "label": "Saudi riyal", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C501", "C1208", "C1219", "C1228" ], "source_ids": [ "S236", "S611", "S612" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Arabian histories", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C501", "assertion": "The Saudi Central Bank dates the first Saudi silver riyal to 1346 AH/1928 CE and the first silver riyal bearing the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's name to 1354 AH/1935 CE.", "source_ids": [ "S236", "S611", "S612" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1208", "assertion": "Saudi reckoning adapted Ottoman gold-piastre accounting in the Hejazi monetary system. Contemporary reporting describes the 1928 substitution and inherited theoretical piastres; the qualified branch concerns this local account tradition, not uniform replacement across Najd or ancestry inferred from coin weight.", "source_ids": [ "S611", "S612" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1219", "assertion": "Instructions effective 23 March 1936 abolished gold-piastre reckoning, required affected government revenues to be doubled in Saudi piastres, and retained revenues already based on Saudi piastres. This is an account conversion within the Saudi profile.", "source_ids": [ "S612" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1228", "assertion": "The 1936 diplomatic report describes the 1928 Saudi rules as adapting older Turkish gold-account reckoning while substituting the Saudi riyal for the mejidie. It separately reports continued non-Saudi currency use in Najd.", "source_ids": [ "S611" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000307", "label": "Prussian thaler — nineteenth-century unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C879" ], "source_ids": [ "S435" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C879", "assertion": "Prussian thalers entered the imperial mark at three marks per thaler. Conversion framework; not an instantaneous withdrawal of every coin.", "source_ids": [ "S435" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000309", "label": "German mark — 1871–1948 continuity", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C879", "C880", "C881", "C882", "C883", "C884", "C886", "C847", "C848", "C885", "C887", "C888", "C891", "C1423", "C1430" ], "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C879", "assertion": "Prussian thalers entered the imperial mark at three marks per thaler. Conversion framework; not an instantaneous withdrawal of every coin.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C880", "assertion": "South German florins entered at twelve marks per seven florins. Exact rational stated in prose; no rounded decimal valuation.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C881", "assertion": "The mark became the common currency of the German Reich.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C882", "assertion": "Gold redemption ended; the mark continued on an inconvertible basis. An internal monetary-regime change, not a new currency born at par.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C883", "assertion": "Goldmark was a gold-value accounting unit, distinct from circulating marks. Date anchors divergence from gold parity, not the birth of this accounting convention.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C884", "assertion": "Rentenmark notes entered alongside marks; one Rentenmark equalled one trillion marks. Issue date differs from the 1 November date printed on notes; no exclusive replacement asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C886", "assertion": "Reichsmark replaced the mark at one Reichsmark per trillion marks. Effective introduction; the legislation was dated August.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C847", "assertion": "Austria adopted the Reichsmark at 1.5 schillings per Reichsmark.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C848", "assertion": "Postwar Austrian schillings replaced Reichsmarks at 1:1 under restricted exchange rules. One of two incoming monetary instruments; no exclusive single parent assigned.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C885", "assertion": "The monetary legislation established the Reichsmark framework.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C887", "assertion": "Rentenmark notes continued alongside Reichsmarks at equal unit value. Not immediate extinction of Rentenmark notes.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C888", "assertion": "Deutsche Mark displaced Reichsmark in western Germany under differentiated conversion rules. No universal 10:1 factor; ongoing payments and financial holdings received different treatment.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C891", "assertion": "The Soviet occupation zone began issuing its separate mark currency. Reichsmark-system territorial successor; individual occupation-note conversions are not fully catalogued.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425", "S435", "S436", "S437", "S438", "S702", "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1423", "assertion": "Existing merchant transfer accounting shifted to Reichsmark; later institutional absorption must not be called founding.", "source_ids": [ "S702" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1430", "assertion": "Danzig gulden was absorbed into the existing German-mark system in September 1939 at 1 gulden = 0.70 Reichsmark.", "source_ids": [ "S710" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000312", "label": "Deutsche Mark", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C666", "C667", "C704", "C888", "C889", "C890", "C894", "C930", "C935" ], "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S358", "S437", "S438", "S444", "S448" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C666", "assertion": "1 EUR = 1.95583 DEM.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S358", "S437", "S438", "S444", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C667", "assertion": "Germany: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S358", "S437", "S438", "S444", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C704", "assertion": "German-mark legal tender ended on 31 December 2001; voluntary retail/banking acceptance continued through 28 February 2002.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S358", "S437", "S438", "S444", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C888", "assertion": "Deutsche Mark displaced Reichsmark in western Germany under differentiated conversion rules. No universal 10:1 factor; ongoing payments and financial holdings received different treatment.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S358", "S437", "S438", "S444", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C889", "assertion": "The western reform also invalidated Rentenmark notes.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S358", "S437", "S438", "S444", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C890", "assertion": "Allied military marks also ceased validity in the western currency reform.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S358", "S437", "S438", "S444", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C894", "assertion": "East Germany adopted Deutsche Mark; wages and savings followed different conversion rules. No blanket 1:1 or 2:1 valuation.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S358", "S437", "S438", "S444", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C930", "assertion": "The new Yugoslav dinar was initially equal in value to Deutsche Mark. A value anchor, not a Deutsche Mark conversion ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S358", "S437", "S438", "S444", "S448" ] }, { "claim_id": "C935", "assertion": "Macedonia adopted a stable exchange-rate strategy against Deutsche Mark. Policy anchor; the immediate parent remains the Yugoslav dinar.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S358", "S437", "S438", "S444", "S448" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000313", "label": "Bosnian convertible mark", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C510", "C1126" ], "source_ids": [ "S245", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C510", "assertion": "The first convertible-mark notes of 50 fening, 1, 5 and 10 marks were issued on 22 June 1998; 20, 50 and 100 marks followed on 27 July 1998.", "source_ids": [ "S245", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1126", "assertion": "Bosnian dinar → convertible mark, 1997–1998.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S245" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000316", "label": "Polish złoty", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C588", "C1122" ], "source_ids": [ "S321", "S535" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C588", "assertion": "NBP dates the redenomination to 1 January 1995 at 10,000 old złoty per new złoty.", "source_ids": [ "S321", "S535" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1122", "assertion": "The 1924 złoty replaced the Polish mark. Its association with the modern złoty profile compresses later wartime and postwar stages and remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S535" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000320", "label": "Yemeni rial", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C597", "C1151" ], "source_ids": [ "S329", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Arabian histories", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C597", "assertion": "Bundesbank records reciprocal legal-tender recognition in North and South Yemen on 4 May 1990 at one Yemeni dinar to 26 Yemeni rials, preceding political unification on 22 May.", "source_ids": [ "S329", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1151", "assertion": "South Yemeni dinar → Yemeni rial; shared tender from 1990, final exchange in 1996.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000321", "label": "Austrian gulden — pre-1892 unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C844" ], "source_ids": [ "S426" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C844", "assertion": "The krone replaced the gulden at two kronen per gulden. Gulden notes continued through the transition to 1900.", "source_ids": [ "S426" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000322", "label": "Austro-Hungarian krone", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C844", "C845", "C852", "C920" ], "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S424", "S426", "S445" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C844", "assertion": "The krone replaced the gulden at two kronen per gulden. Gulden notes continued through the transition to 1900.", "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S424", "S426", "S445" ] }, { "claim_id": "C845", "assertion": "The imperial currency area broke into successor systems, including the Austrian crown. Period-level separation; no precise stamping date or universal conversion procedure asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S424", "S426", "S445" ] }, { "claim_id": "C852", "assertion": "Czechoslovak currency separated from the Austro-Hungarian crown through the 1919 reform. Stamping occurred in March; national koruna legislation followed. No confiscated/blocked holdings treated as freely convertible cash.", "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S424", "S426", "S445" ] }, { "claim_id": "C920", "assertion": "Imperial crown notes continued in the kingdom’s former Habsburg territories. Local successor circulation; administrative stamping details remain to be expanded.", "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S424", "S426", "S445" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000323", "label": "Austrian schilling — postwar currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C662", "C663", "C848", "C849", "C850", "C851" ], "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S424", "S425" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C662", "assertion": "1 EUR = 13.7603 ATS.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S424", "S425" ] }, { "claim_id": "C663", "assertion": "Austria: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S424", "S425" ] }, { "claim_id": "C848", "assertion": "Postwar Austrian schillings replaced Reichsmarks at 1:1 under restricted exchange rules. One of two incoming monetary instruments; no exclusive single parent assigned.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S424", "S425" ] }, { "claim_id": "C849", "assertion": "Allied military schillings were also exchanged into Austrian schillings at 1:1. The military issue and Reichsmark were coexisting predecessors; per-person cash limits applied.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S424", "S425" ] }, { "claim_id": "C850", "assertion": "Austria restored the schilling after the Reichsmark interval.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S424", "S425" ] }, { "claim_id": "C851", "assertion": "The 1947 reform exchanged schilling notes at 3:1, except 150 per person at par. Cash reform only. No new universally rescaled account unit or blanket deposit conversion is asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S424", "S425" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000324", "label": "Czechoslovak koruna — postwar currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C855", "C856", "C857", "C858", "C859" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S421", "S423" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C855", "assertion": "Czech and Slovak monetary areas were reunified into the Czechoslovak koruna at 1:1. Parity of monetary units; unrestricted conversion of all cash or deposits is not implied.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S421", "S423" ] }, { "claim_id": "C856", "assertion": "The wartime Slovak koruna joined the restored Czechoslovak currency at 1:1.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S421", "S423" ] }, { "claim_id": "C857", "assertion": "The 1953 Czechoslovak reform used differentiated conversion rates. No single universal ratio stored. The source summarizes rates from 5:1 to 50:1.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S421", "S423" ] }, { "claim_id": "C858", "assertion": "Czech korunas replaced Czechoslovak korunas at par.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S421", "S423" ] }, { "claim_id": "C859", "assertion": "Slovak korunas replaced Czechoslovak korunas at par.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S421", "S423" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000325", "label": "Czech koruna — 1993 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C515", "C858" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S250" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C515", "assertion": "The issuer dates the Currency Separation Act's effect to 8 February 1993, following a temporary shared Czechoslovak-koruna arrangement.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S250" ] }, { "claim_id": "C858", "assertion": "Czech korunas replaced Czechoslovak korunas at par.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S250" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000327", "label": "Hungarian forint", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C513", "C1121" ], "source_ids": [ "S248", "S534" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C513", "assertion": "Hungary introduced the forint monetary system on 1 August 1946.", "source_ids": [ "S248", "S534" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1121", "assertion": "Hungary’s 1946 stabilization replaced the pengő with the forint.", "source_ids": [ "S534" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000330", "label": "Swedish krona", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C529", "C1155", "C1158" ], "source_ids": [ "S264", "S550" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C529", "assertion": "The Riksbank dates adoption of the krona coinage unit with the gold standard to 1873.", "source_ids": [ "S264", "S550" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1155", "assertion": "Edvinsson distinguishes riksdaler specie from the riksgälds unit emerging in 1789, and groups riksgälds, riksmynt and krona in one continuing unit. This supports a qualified branch from specie, rather than an invented new currency at every name change.", "source_ids": [ "S550" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1158", "assertion": "The Riksbank research treats riksdaler riksgälds, riksdaler riksmynt and krona as the same continuing monetary unit under successive names. The earlier riksdaler specie is a different parent unit.", "source_ids": [ "S550" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000332", "label": "Danish krone", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C516", "C1110", "C1147" ], "source_ids": [ "S251", "S546" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C516", "assertion": "The issuer's research dates the account-unit change from rigsdaler to kroner to 1875 at two kroner per rigsdaler. It separately reports that new gold coins became legal tender on 1 January 1874.", "source_ids": [ "S251", "S546" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1110", "assertion": "Danish legislation changed the account unit from rigsdaler to krone; new gold coins became tender in 1874 and the accounting conversion followed in 1875.", "source_ids": [ "S251" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1147", "assertion": "Iceland’s currency developed from the Danish-krone system through local notes, separate monetary authority and eventual withdrawal of Scandinavian coins. The gradual regional separation is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S546" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000333", "label": "Icelandic króna", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C512", "C1147" ], "source_ids": [ "S247", "S546" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C512", "assertion": "At the beginning of 1981 Iceland issued new notes and coins and redeemed older money at one-hundredth of its old face value.", "source_ids": [ "S247", "S546" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1147", "assertion": "Iceland’s currency developed from the Danish-krone system through local notes, separate monetary authority and eventual withdrawal of Scandinavian coins. The gradual regional separation is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S546" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000336", "label": "Norwegian krone", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C528", "C1111" ], "source_ids": [ "S263" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C528", "assertion": "The Money Act of 17 April 1875 replaced speciedaler and skilling with kroner and øre; the subsequent banknote series began in 1877.", "source_ids": [ "S263" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1111", "assertion": "Norway’s 1875 Money Act replaced the speciedaler and skilling system with kroner and øre.", "source_ids": [ "S263" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000337", "label": "Dutch guilder (euro predecessor)", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C680", "C681", "C1167", "C1246", "C1269", "C1270", "C1304", "C1424" ], "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S563", "S564", "S562", "S622", "S623", "S619", "S620", "S621", "S700" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C680", "assertion": "1 EUR = 2.20371 NLG.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S563", "S564", "S562", "S622", "S623", "S619", "S620", "S621", "S700" ] }, { "claim_id": "C681", "assertion": "Netherlands: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S563", "S564", "S562", "S622", "S623", "S619", "S620", "S621", "S700" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1167", "assertion": "The Curaçao/Antillean guilder developed from the Dutch monetary system introduced in 1827 into a separate territorial system documented by the wartime period. The 1827–1945 range is a research envelope; the legal separation date remains unresolved.", "source_ids": [ "S563", "S564", "S562" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1246", "assertion": "The autonomous Surinamese guilder branched from the Dutch monetary system used locally since 1827. Official history identifies monetary autonomy, corroborated by later separate exchange values; not an ancestry claim from the US-dollar peg.", "source_ids": [ "S622", "S623" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1269", "assertion": "The Dutch guilder was the statutory account unit divided into 100 cents under the 28 September 1816 monetary law. Independent dated account-unit witness; not a research-envelope endpoint.", "source_ids": [ "S619" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1270", "assertion": "Amounts were required to be expressed in 20-stuiver Carolusguilders in 1526; this provides an earlier accounting observation for a qualified Dutch-guilder continuity profile. Grouping across later territorial and French-period changes is qualified. No new Carolus, 1694 coin or 1816 decimalization nodes. Amsterdam bank money remains distinct.", "source_ids": [ "S620", "S621", "S619" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1304", "assertion": "The Dutch monetary system took effect in Suriname on 1 January 1827 under the published 1826 provisions. ", "source_ids": [ "S623" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1424", "assertion": "Established florin obligations differentiated into current and bank accounting scopes; child date is emergence envelope, not bank foundation 1609. Parent profile includes qualified Dutch current-guilder continuity before 1680.", "source_ids": [ "S700" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000340", "label": "Indonesian rupiah", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C523", "C1148" ], "source_ids": [ "S258", "S547" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C523", "assertion": "The Republic's ORI became officially effective on 30 October 1946, following Hatta's broadcast the preceding evening.", "source_ids": [ "S258", "S547" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1148", "assertion": "The general Indonesian rupiah replaced the separately circulating Riau Islands rupiah in July 1964. This is one regional convergence, not the origin of all rupiah money.", "source_ids": [ "S547" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000342", "label": "Curaçao / Antillean / Caribbean guilder", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C544", "C1167", "C1190", "C1125", "C1297" ], "source_ids": [ "S278", "S563", "S564", "S562", "S98", "S541" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C544", "assertion": "The Caribbean guilder became legal tender in Curaçao and Sint Maarten on 31 March 2025; the announcement records the first ceremonial exchange from Netherlands Antillean guilders that day.", "source_ids": [ "S278", "S563", "S564", "S562", "S98", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1167", "assertion": "The Curaçao/Antillean guilder developed from the Dutch monetary system introduced in 1827 into a separate territorial system documented by the wartime period. The 1827–1945 range is a research envelope; the legal separation date remains unresolved.", "source_ids": [ "S563", "S564", "S562" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1190", "assertion": "The 2025 Caribbean-guilder legislation carries Antillean-guilder deposits and legal instruments forward at 1:1. The two names are grouped as a continuing account unit under the project identity rule; this classification is an explicit inference.", "source_ids": [ "S562" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1125", "assertion": "Antillean guilder → Aruban florin, 1986.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1297", "assertion": "Curaçao is reported within the Dutch monetary system in 1933. Add this territorial observation to the existing 1827–1945 qualified branch; it does not solve the exact separation date. ", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000343", "label": "Aruban florin", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C525", "C1125" ], "source_ids": [ "S260", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C525", "assertion": "The Aruban florin entered circulation with the central bank's inception on 1 January 1986.", "source_ids": [ "S260", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1125", "assertion": "Antillean guilder → Aruban florin, 1986.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000346", "label": "Imperial Russian ruble — nineteenth-century silver unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C860", "C899", "C902", "C1096", "C1097", "C1098", "C1099", "C1100", "C1101", "C1102" ], "source_ids": [ "S427", "S440", "S441", "S522", "S523", "S524", "S525", "S526", "S527" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C860", "assertion": "Finland introduced the markka as one quarter of a silver ruble in 1860, replacing rubles in accounts and transactions from 1863. A staged unit derivation within the Russian Empire, not instantaneous withdrawal of every Russian coin.", "source_ids": [ "S427", "S440", "S441", "S522", "S523", "S524", "S525", "S526", "S527" ] }, { "claim_id": "C899", "assertion": "The later imperial silver ruble belongs to the ruble coinage tradition. Intermediate weight and tariff reforms remain untraced; no direct conversion factor asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S427", "S440", "S441", "S522", "S523", "S524", "S525", "S526", "S527" ] }, { "claim_id": "C902", "assertion": "State credit notes used the silver-ruble unit and exchanged at face value.", "source_ids": [ "S427", "S440", "S441", "S522", "S523", "S524", "S525", "S526", "S527" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1096", "assertion": "Goznak reports that the wire-kopeck standard fell to 0.28 g in 1698 so that 100 kopecks corresponded to a thaler; its indexed account supports deliberate weight alignment.", "source_ids": [ "S522" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1097", "assertion": "Efimov documents imported thalers as Russian mint material and distinguishes official exchange rates, market rates and silver-content equivalence before and after Peter’s reform.", "source_ids": [ "S523" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1098", "assertion": "Gokhran describes thaler overstrikes as rubles in 1654 and countermarked thalers rated at 64 kopecks in 1655. Peter’s 1704 issue was not the first physical silver ruble.", "source_ids": [ "S524" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1099", "assertion": "HSE identifies PSZ III No.1616 as the 23 January 1698 decree concerning land grants to foreigners, not a kopeck-weight decree.", "source_ids": [ "S525" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1100", "assertion": "HSE identifies PSZ IV No.1969 as the 23 February 1704 decree concerning captured horses and their sale, not ruble coinage.", "source_ids": [ "S526" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1101", "assertion": "PSZ IV No.1950, printed p.228, is dated 19 November 1703 and orders a forest survey near rivers; the original scan does not support the claimed January 1704 monetary decree.", "source_ids": [ "S527" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1102", "assertion": "The reviewed evidence supports thaler influence on the existing ruble’s coinage standard, not a newly established thaler-to-ruble account-unit ancestry edge. The earlier-ruble to nineteenth-century identity boundary remains to be adjudicated.", "source_ids": [ "S522", "S523", "S524" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000347", "label": "Soviet ruble and inherited ruble-zone unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C820", "C822", "C823", "C824", "C827", "C828", "C833", "C837", "C905", "C906", "C907", "C908", "C910", "C911", "C1104", "C1105", "C1128", "C1130", "C1131" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C820", "assertion": "Estonia introduced Soviet rubles at 1.25 rubles per kroon. Kroons temporarily co-circulated; the displayed ratio is kroons per ruble.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C822", "assertion": "The Soviet ruble underwent monetary reform in 1947. No uniform conversion ratio asserted: cash, deposits and other claims require separate treatment.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C823", "assertion": "The 1961 reform rescaled the Soviet ruble tenfold.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C824", "assertion": "Estonia generally exchanged 10 rubles per kroon. Cash above 1,500 rubles used 50:1; do not apply 10:1 to every holding.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C827", "assertion": "The Soviet currency system displaced the lats, withdrawn on 25 March 1941.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C828", "assertion": "Latvian rubles entered alongside Soviet and Russian notes at 1:1. The inherited ruble-zone unit, not the later 1998 Russian ruble scale.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C833", "assertion": "Soviet rubles entered Lithuania at 0.9 ruble per litas. The rate did not protect all deposits. Litas circulated alongside rubles until March 1941.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C837", "assertion": "Lithuania replaced rubles with talonas at 1:1.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C905", "assertion": "One 1922 ruble replaced 10,000 earlier paper rubles.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C906", "assertion": "The 1922 conversion also accepted earlier tsar-era paper money. Conversion in the reform’s jurisdiction; not uniform acceptance across every civil-war territory.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C907", "assertion": "One 1923 ruble replaced 100 rubles of 1922.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C908", "assertion": "One treasury gold ruble replaced 50,000 rubles of the 1923 sovznak scale.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C910", "assertion": "The 1947 reform ended the separate chervonets banknote unit. No universal cash-and-deposit conversion rate inferred.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C911", "assertion": "Russian national issues emerged from the inherited Soviet ruble system. Issuer history dates first Russian circulating issues to 1992. The exact legal separation and July 1993 exchange need a dedicated record.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S410", "S411", "S412", "S414", "S415", "S417", "S439", "S218", "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1104", "assertion": "Armenia introduced the dram against the Soviet rubles circulating locally in November 1993; some Soviet notes remained temporarily valid.", "source_ids": [ "S218" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1105", "assertion": "Azerbaijan introduced the manat alongside rubles in August 1992, prescribing ten rubles per manat in settlements; the manat became sole tender in 1994.", "source_ids": [ "S528", "S219" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1128", "assertion": "Ruble-zone currency → Belarusian ruble, 1992–1994.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1130", "assertion": "Ruble-zone currency → Kyrgyz som, 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1131", "assertion": "Ruble-zone currency → tenge, 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000349", "label": "Russian Federation ruble — national continuity", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C488", "C489", "C911", "C912", "C913", "C1132" ], "source_ids": [ "S224", "S439", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C488", "assertion": "The Bank of Russia’s release ends payment use of specified old notes and coins from 1 January 1999 and describes their exchange for 1997-series money at 1,000:1.", "source_ids": [ "S224", "S439", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C489", "assertion": "Its stated exchange horizon is historical policy; this dossier does not infer present redemption availability or a new ruble species from the scale change.", "source_ids": [ "S224", "S439", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C911", "assertion": "Russian national issues emerged from the inherited Soviet ruble system. Issuer history dates first Russian circulating issues to 1992. The exact legal separation and July 1993 exchange need a dedicated record.", "source_ids": [ "S224", "S439", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C912", "assertion": "The Russian ruble scale changed at 1,000 old rubles per new ruble.", "source_ids": [ "S224", "S439", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C913", "assertion": "Specified old-scale Russian cash ceased payment use after the transition year. Withdrawal does not create another currency; historical exchange rights are not current advice.", "source_ids": [ "S224", "S439", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1132", "assertion": "Russian ruble → Turkmen manat, 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000350", "label": "Mongolian tögrög", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C574", "C1139" ], "source_ids": [ "S308" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C574", "assertion": "The bank dates the monetary reform act naming the togrog to 22 February 1925 and first issue to December 1925.", "source_ids": [ "S308" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1139", "assertion": "Mongolia’s togrog displaced Chinese yanchaan in budgets, accounts, prices and domestic transactions by 1927. The predecessor is scoped to this local accounting use; its exact Chinese currency identity remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S308" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000352", "label": "Ukrainian hryvnia", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C542", "C1109" ], "source_ids": [ "S276", "S538" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C542", "assertion": "Ukraine introduced the hryvnia during the currency reform of 2–16 September 1996.", "source_ids": [ "S276", "S538" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1109", "assertion": "The hryvnia replaced the karbovanets as Ukraine’s official currency in September 1996.", "source_ids": [ "S538" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000354", "label": "Belarusian ruble", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C590", "C1128" ], "source_ids": [ "S323", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C590", "assertion": "The reproduced decree prescribes a 1 July 2016 rescaling at 10,000 units of the 2000 currency series for one unit of the 2009 series.", "source_ids": [ "S323", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1128", "assertion": "Ruble-zone currency → Belarusian ruble, 1992–1994.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000356", "label": "Moldovan leu", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C485", "C1107" ], "source_ids": [ "S222", "S530" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C485", "assertion": "The National Bank states that the Moldovan leu entered circulation on 29 November 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S222", "S530" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1107", "assertion": "Moldovan lei replaced the temporary cupon currency in 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S530" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000359", "label": "Georgian lari", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C559", "C1106" ], "source_ids": [ "S293", "S529" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C559", "assertion": "The lari was introduced on 25 September 1995 and became Georgia's sole legal tender on 2 October 1995.", "source_ids": [ "S293", "S529" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1106", "assertion": "Georgia replaced its coupon unit with the lari in 1995.", "source_ids": [ "S529" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000360", "label": "Armenian dram", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C479", "C480", "C1104" ], "source_ids": [ "S218" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C479", "assertion": "Armenia introduced dram notes on 22 November 1993 at 200 rubles per dram.", "source_ids": [ "S218" ] }, { "claim_id": "C480", "assertion": "Specified 1–500-ruble Soviet notes dated 1961–1992 were allowed to circulate alongside the dram until 17 March 1994.", "source_ids": [ "S218" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1104", "assertion": "Armenia introduced the dram against the Soviet rubles circulating locally in November 1993; some Soviet notes remained temporarily valid.", "source_ids": [ "S218" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000362", "label": "Azerbaijani manat", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C481", "C482", "C1105" ], "source_ids": [ "S219", "S528" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C481", "assertion": "The manat entered circulation on 15 August 1992 and became sole legal tender on 1 January 1994.", "source_ids": [ "S219", "S528" ] }, { "claim_id": "C482", "assertion": "On 1 January 2006 the new scale replaced 5,000 old manats per new manat; both scales circulated during 2006.", "source_ids": [ "S219", "S528" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1105", "assertion": "Azerbaijan introduced the manat alongside rubles in August 1992, prescribing ten rubles per manat in settlements; the manat became sole tender in 1994.", "source_ids": [ "S528", "S219" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000363", "label": "Kazakhstani tenge", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C483", "C1131" ], "source_ids": [ "S220", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C483", "assertion": "Kazakhstan’s national-bank timeline dates introduction of the tenge into circulation to 15 November 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S220", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1131", "assertion": "Ruble-zone currency → tenge, 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000364", "label": "Kyrgyzstani som", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C568", "C1130" ], "source_ids": [ "S302", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C568", "assertion": "The som was introduced on 10 May 1993, divided into 100 tyiyn.", "source_ids": [ "S302", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1130", "assertion": "Ruble-zone currency → Kyrgyz som, 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000366", "label": "Uzbekistani sum", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C486", "C487", "C1108" ], "source_ids": [ "S223" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C486", "assertion": "Uzbekistan introduced the sum on 1 July 1994 at 1,000 sum-coupons per sum, according to its central bank’s account of Decree UP-870.", "source_ids": [ "S223" ] }, { "claim_id": "C487", "assertion": "The same account dates the interim sum-coupon to 15 November 1993 and its sole-tender status to 1 January 1994.", "source_ids": [ "S223" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1108", "assertion": "The Uzbek sum replaced the interim sum-coupon as the official currency in July 1994.", "source_ids": [ "S223" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000368", "label": "Turkmen manat", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C557", "C1132" ], "source_ids": [ "S291", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C557", "assertion": "Turkmenistan introduced the manat on 1 November 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S291", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1132", "assertion": "Russian ruble → Turkmen manat, 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000370", "label": "Tajikistani somoni", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C484", "C1133" ], "source_ids": [ "S221", "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C484", "assertion": "The National Bank dates introduction of the somoni to 30 October 2000 and defines 100 dirams per somoni.", "source_ids": [ "S221", "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1133", "assertion": "Tajikistani ruble → somoni, 2000.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000374", "label": "Turkish lira", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C577", "C1186", "C1187", "C1206", "C1208", "C1216", "C1217", "C1227", "C1282", "C1316", "C1317", "C1318", "C1319" ], "source_ids": [ "S311", "S555", "S556", "S557", "S601", "S599", "S611", "S612", "S600", "S636", "S637" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ottoman", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C577", "assertion": "The central bank reports that the 2005 currency reform removed six zeros from the currency.", "source_ids": [ "S311", "S555", "S556", "S557", "S601", "S599", "S611", "S612", "S600", "S636", "S637" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1186", "assertion": "Ottoman and republican lira are grouped as one continuing account unit. The 1925 law replaced Ottoman paper with paper of the same amount and legal character. CBRT dates the Republic first issue to 5 December 1927. In 1844 silver kuruş and gold lira were convertible at 100:1. The 1927 note replacement is an instrument transition; this continuity assessment remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S555", "S556", "S557" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1187", "assertion": "By the mid-eighteenth century, Ottoman prices and state obligations were expressed in kuruş. Its association with the continuing lira profile is qualified through the retained kuruş–lira accounting structure; circa 1750 is an observation, not a birth date.", "source_ids": [ "S557" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1206", "assertion": "Domestically managed Ottoman esedi/kuruş accounting developed from the Dutch esedi trade-unit convention. This qualified regional transition compresses local stages; it does not assert universal redemption of Dutch coins or obligations.", "source_ids": [ "S601", "S599", "S557" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1208", "assertion": "Saudi reckoning adapted Ottoman gold-piastre accounting in the Hejazi monetary system. Contemporary reporting describes the 1928 substitution and inherited theoretical piastres; the qualified branch concerns this local account tradition, not uniform replacement across Najd or ancestry inferred from coin weight.", "source_ids": [ "S611", "S612" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1216", "assertion": "The esedi account unit reported in 1690 is associated with the continuing Ottoman kuruş/lira identity. Regular coin minting in 1719 and later lira-scale changes do not create separate currency nodes.", "source_ids": [ "S599", "S600", "S601" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1217", "assertion": "An April–May 1704 mint account reckons output and profit in esedi kuruş, corroborating account use before regular kuruş coin production. Association with the continuing identity remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S599" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1227", "assertion": "Akçe accounting is documented by 1525, and a 1704 mint order specifies 120 akçe per esedi kuruş. That ratio alone cannot decide whether akçe and kuruş require distinct currency identities or a same-unit scale history.", "source_ids": [ "S557", "S600" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1282", "assertion": "Under the project policy that rescaling and subdivision changes do not create currencies, the retained akçe account scale supports a qualified continuation within the Ottoman kuruş/lira profile. Extend the profile to 1431–1432 fiscal evidence; do not create a denomination-only akçe predecessor node.", "source_ids": [ "S636", "S637", "S557" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1316", "assertion": "The published 1431–1432 Arvanid register excerpt records estimated revenue of 531 akçe for Lagos village within Petro's timar. This is fiscal accounting evidence, not a mint-date proxy.", "source_ids": [ "S636" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1317", "assertion": "Sahillioğlu describes akçe becoming the third of a para and surviving as an account unit after the monetary focus shifted to kuruş and para. Pamuk describes the new kuruş scale as 120 akçe and the continuing use of its lower subdivisions.", "source_ids": [ "S637", "S557" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1318", "assertion": "Under the project policy that rescaling and subdivision changes do not create currencies, the retained akçe account scale supports a qualified continuation within the Ottoman kuruş/lira profile. Extend the profile to 1431–1432 fiscal evidence; do not create a denomination-only akçe predecessor node.", "source_ids": [ "S636", "S637", "S557", "S599", "S600" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1319", "assertion": "With qualified akçe continuity admitted, the Dutch lion-dollar contribution around 1690 is a later account-unit contribution to an already existing Ottoman system, not the founding origin of that system.", "source_ids": [ "S601", "S557", "S637" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000375", "label": "Egyptian pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C546", "C1134", "C1145", "C1189", "C1229", "C1259", "C1289", "C1290", "C1291", "C1188", "C1230", "C1334", "C1335" ], "source_ids": [ "S280", "S98", "S256", "S289", "S558", "S613", "S667", "S647", "S649", "S648", "S557" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ottoman", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C546", "assertion": "The National Bank of Egypt first issued banknotes on 3 April 1899, according to the central bank's currency history.", "source_ids": [ "S280", "S98", "S256", "S289", "S558", "S613", "S667", "S647", "S649", "S648", "S557" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1134", "assertion": "Egyptian pound → Libyan pound, Cyrenaica, 1952.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S256" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1145", "assertion": "The Banque de Syrie currency succeeded Egyptian currency under the French mandate. The link compresses the initial Syrian/shared Syrian-Lebanese stages and remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S289" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1189", "assertion": "The 14 November 1885 decree defines Egypt’s pound as 100 piastres and temporarily retains earlier silver at official tariff.", "source_ids": [ "S558" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1229", "assertion": "Alleaume identifies a Majlis-i Mülkiyye decree of 14 April 1836 establishing a bimetallic reform and tariff. The study also reproduces an 1834 tariff in paras. These milestones do not themselves establish the identity boundary between earlier Egyptian para accounting and the continuing pound.", "source_ids": [ "S613" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1259", "assertion": "Egyptian pound as actually used in Sudan replaced at parity by first Sudanese pound. Original1964 study supports local currency settlement and account-series continuity; exact1956Act uninspected. Original article passages retrieved from index, not complete download. Date1957 versus1956note dating must be kept separate. ", "source_ids": [ "S667" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1289", "assertion": "Browne’s Egyptian observations of 1792–1798 describe public allocations in piastres and expenses in paras, also called medines. This is dated local accounting evidence, not a currency founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S647" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1290", "assertion": "The 1834 reform retained a silver piastre divided into forty paras; the 1885 reform expressed the pound as one hundred piastres and changed the smaller subdivisions. Continuity of the nineteenth-century local account system is supported.", "source_ids": [ "S649", "S648", "S558" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1291", "assertion": "Egyptian medin/para accounting attested in 1524 is grouped with the later local piastre/pound identity as a qualified continuity inference. Late-eighteenth-century medin/para prices and nineteenth-century piastre subdivisions bridge the scales; unresolved regional details are not presented as a complete legal sequence.", "source_ids": [ "S557", "S647", "S648", "S649" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1188", "assertion": "Egypt’s medin, called para in the 1524 code, remained its leading account unit into the eighteenth century.", "source_ids": [ "S557" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1230", "assertion": "Pamuk describes the Egyptian medin/para as an account unit retained under Ottoman rule and continuing into the late eighteenth century. Local links to Istanbul money and later standard reforms do not by themselves identify a distinct predecessor transition to EGP.", "source_ids": [ "S557" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1334", "assertion": "Clot-Bey in 1840 describes the Egyptian piastre as forty paras and lists both older para/piastre issues and current larger piastre denominations within the same system.", "source_ids": [ "S648" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1335", "assertion": "Foreign sovereigns were valued in Egyptian piastres under official tariffs. Their circulation and later sterling alignment do not establish a British-pound origin for Egyptian accounting.", "source_ids": [ "S649", "S558" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000378", "label": "Sudanese pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C567", "C1117", "C1135", "C1257", "C1302", "C1345" ], "source_ids": [ "S301", "S254", "S98", "S663", "S664", "S665" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ottoman", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C567", "assertion": "The statistical note uses one Sudanese pound equal to 100 Sudanese dinars from 1 July 2007.", "source_ids": [ "S301", "S254", "S98", "S663", "S664", "S665" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1117", "assertion": "South Sudan introduced its pound in July 2011, replacing Sudanese pounds.", "source_ids": [ "S254" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1135", "assertion": "Sudanese dinar → pound, 2007.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S301" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1257", "assertion": "Principal Sudanese dinar to new Sudanese pound replacement, verified by converted deposits, credit and central-bank accounts. Add January account/currency introduction and phased withdrawal observations; do not treat inherited July table date as the only start event.", "source_ids": [ "S663", "S664", "S665" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1302", "assertion": "Bank exchanges into the new pound began10January2007. The annual report restates deposits,loans and monetary accounts at100dinars per pound; banknote and coin withdrawal followed different later dates.", "source_ids": [ "S663" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1345", "assertion": "100 SDD = 1 SDG. Principal Sudanese dinar to new Sudanese pound replacement, verified by converted deposits, credit and central-bank accounts.", "source_ids": [ "S663", "S664", "S665" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000379", "label": "South Sudanese pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C519", "C1117" ], "source_ids": [ "S254" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ottoman", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C519", "assertion": "South Sudan introduced its pound on 18 July 2011, replacing the Sudanese pound.", "source_ids": [ "S254" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1117", "assertion": "South Sudan introduced its pound in July 2011, replacing Sudanese pounds.", "source_ids": [ "S254" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000381", "label": "Syrian pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C576", "C1144", "C1145" ], "source_ids": [ "S310", "S289" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ottoman", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C576", "assertion": "The decree report provides for a new Syrian-pound scale from 1 January 2026 at 100 old pounds per new pound, with withdrawal and coexistence governed separately.", "source_ids": [ "S310", "S289" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1144", "assertion": "The shared Syrian-Lebanese currency divided into separate Lebanese and Syrian issues under the 1937 concession extension. The local separation is qualified because the issuer’s historical summary gives differing milestones.", "source_ids": [ "S289" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1145", "assertion": "The Banque de Syrie currency succeeded Egyptian currency under the French mandate. The link compresses the initial Syrian/shared Syrian-Lebanese stages and remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S289" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000382", "label": "Lebanese pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C555", "C1144" ], "source_ids": [ "S289" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ottoman", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C555", "assertion": "Banque du Liban began issuing Lebanese-pound notes in 1964.", "source_ids": [ "S289" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1144", "assertion": "The shared Syrian-Lebanese currency divided into separate Lebanese and Syrian issues under the 1937 concession extension. The local separation is qualified because the issuer’s historical summary gives differing milestones.", "source_ids": [ "S289" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000383", "label": "Thai baht", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C563", "C1157", "C1196", "C1214", "C1261" ], "source_ids": [ "S297", "S541", "S578", "S590", "S614" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Southeast Asian histories", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C563", "assertion": "The Siamese Currency Notes Act was promulgated on 24 June 1902; the new Banknotes Department first served the public on 23 September 1902, inaugurating the modern government note system.", "source_ids": [ "S297", "S541", "S578", "S590", "S614" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1157", "assertion": "The contemporary survey of Siam’s 1928 law says the silver tical remained unlimited legal tender under the name baht. A naming and standard change is retained as profile continuity, not a separate ancestral currency.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1196", "assertion": "The 1856 Anglo-Siamese agreement reckoned duties and fees in ticals and salungs, documenting the earlier baht/tical account unit. 1826 duty is reported retrospectively; 1856 is direct dated observation. Same-unit extension, not tical→baht replacement.", "source_ids": [ "S578" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1214", "assertion": "La Loubère records tribute obligations in ticals and identifies Baat as the Siamese name for the tical. Association with the continuing baht is qualified across the intervening centuries; alternative names and foreign exchange comparisons create no separate parent.", "source_ids": [ "S590" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1261", "assertion": "The1536 Vat Khema inscription records a six-tical silk purchase, providing a dated monetary-price anchor earlier than the1687–88 embassy observation. Assigning the local Sukhothai-region tical to the broader Thai baht continuity is qualified; the translation establishes a price unit, while exact regional metrological and legal continuity through later centuries remains incomplete. ", "source_ids": [ "S614" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000384", "label": "Nepalese rupee", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C526", "C1195", "C1205", "C1213" ], "source_ids": [ "S261", "S575", "S576", "S577" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C526", "assertion": "The treasury began issuing Nepali currency notes in 1945; the account dates issuance from 17 September 1945 and describes continuing dual circulation with Indian currency.", "source_ids": [ "S261", "S575", "S576", "S577" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1195", "assertion": "Nepal’s rupee was already an account unit in an 1807 royal endowment. The nineteenth-century mohar rupee was reckoned as two silver mohars; 1945 paper currency exchanged at par with mohar-rupee coins. Earlier 1807 and 1945 observations firm; long-span continuity qualified. Do not add a 1932 mohar→rupee edge based on coin catalogue labels. Distinct paisa-rupee and Gorakhpuri-rupee accounts remain candidate branches.", "source_ids": [ "S575", "S576", "S577" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1205", "assertion": "The 16-ganda paisa rupee was absorbed into standardized mohar-rupee accounting during the reforms reported in 1908. This is a qualified later consolidation of concurrent account units, not the founding of the Nepalese rupee; exact decree and balance-conversion rules remain unlocated.", "source_ids": [ "S577", "S577", "S576" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1213", "assertion": "The 1908 reform retrospective reports the abolition of several local ganda reckonings and nationwide use of the standardized mohar rupee. The report supplies a reform interval, not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S577" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000385", "label": "Iranian rial", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C565", "C1116" ], "source_ids": [ "S299" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Iranian histories", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C565", "assertion": "The scholarly account dates Bank-e Melli's first rial-denominated notes to April 1932 and connects the rial unit to the 1931 currency law.", "source_ids": [ "S299" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1116", "assertion": "The currency law and 1932 rial notes replaced the official qerān–toman reckoning. Qerān-denominated obligations establish an account unit, not merely a coin type.", "source_ids": [ "S299" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000386", "label": "European Currency Unit (ECU)", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C642", "C651", "C654", "C655", "C656", "C1427", "C1428", "C1440" ], "source_ids": [ "S346", "S352", "S354", "S355", "S356", "S717" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C642", "assertion": "Defined ECU references in legal instruments become euro references at 1:1 from 1 January 1999; an undefined ECU reference carries a rebuttable presumption.", "source_ids": [ "S346", "S352", "S354", "S355", "S356", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C651", "assertion": "The 1994 ECU definition includes sterling and Danish-krone components; basket inclusion is distinct from later national euro adoption.", "source_ids": [ "S346", "S352", "S354", "S355", "S356", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C654", "assertion": "The December 1978 resolution specifies identical initial ECU and EUA value/composition and plans EMS establishment for 1 January 1979.", "source_ids": [ "S346", "S352", "S354", "S355", "S356", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C655", "assertion": "BIS dates signature of the EMS/ECU agreement in Basel to 13 March 1979, separately from the earlier planned January start.", "source_ids": [ "S346", "S352", "S354", "S355", "S356", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C656", "assertion": "Decision 80/1184 replaces the EUA with ECU for covered ACP assistance and previous-convention operations from 1 January 1981.", "source_ids": [ "S346", "S352", "S354", "S355", "S356", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1427", "assertion": "Official ECU references in legal instruments were replaced by euro references at one euro per ECU from 1 January 1999. Existing C 642 retains the rebuttable presumption for undefined ECU references.", "source_ids": [ "S717", "S346" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1428", "assertion": "From 1 January 1981, specified ACP financial assistance and operations under previous conventions switched from EUA to ECU accounting. This is a sectoral absorption into the existing ECU, not proof of the final use of every EUA account.", "source_ids": [ "S355" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1440", "assertion": "Official ECU legal-account references converted to euro; undefined contractual references retain the recorded legal qualification.", "source_ids": [ "S717", "S346" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000387", "label": "Euro — converging national replacements", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C642", "C643", "C644", "C645", "C646", "C647", "C648", "C649", "C650", "C657", "C658", "C659", "C660", "C661", "C662", "C663", "C664", "C665", "C666", "C667", "C668", "C669", "C670", "C671", "C672", "C673", "C674", "C675", "C676", "C677", "C678", "C679", "C680", "C681", "C682", "C683", "C684", "C685", "C686", "C687", "C688", "C689", "C690", "C691", "C692", "C693", "C694", "C695", "C696", "C697", "C698", "C699", "C700", "C701", "C702", "C703", "C704", "C705", "C706", "C738", "C739", "C754", "C755", "C756", "C775", "C790", "C791", "C1427" ], "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C642", "assertion": "Defined ECU references in legal instruments become euro references at 1:1 from 1 January 1999; an undefined ECU reference carries a rebuttable presumption.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C643", "assertion": "Euro introduction alone neither discharges obligations nor permits unilateral alteration or termination; parties’ agreements remain relevant.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C644", "assertion": "Use the full six-significant-figure national-units-per-euro rate without truncation; derived inverse rates are prohibited for operational conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C645", "assertion": "National-unit cross-conversions pass through euro, allowing an intermediate amount rounded to at least three decimals; final payment rounding follows article 5.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C646", "assertion": "Regulation 974/98 substitutes the euro for each participating state’s currency on its adoption date; cash changeover is separately defined.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C647", "assertion": "During transition the national units remain subdivisions of the euro; existing instrument denominations and specified payment choices are preserved.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C648", "assertion": "National cash can retain territorial legal tender after adoption; article 15 allows national shortening of its maximum post-cash-changeover period.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C649", "assertion": "Article 16 continues issuer exchange under national laws or practices; tender loss is therefore distinct from the last possible redemption.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C650", "assertion": "ECB distinguishes agreed euro use in Andorra, Monaco, San Marino and Vatican City from use without a formal arrangement in Montenegro and Kosovo.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C657", "assertion": "Euro banknotes and coins entered use on 1 January 2002, following the currency’s 1 January 1999 launch.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C658", "assertion": "ECB reports area-wide completion of the first cash changeover by 1 March 2002; this is not a common last-tender date for every predecessor.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C659", "assertion": "ECB’s 2026 table separates note/coin redemption: France 17 February 2012/2005, Croatia unlimited/31 December 2025; national eligibility rules still apply.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C660", "assertion": "The ECB table gives Dutch banknote exchange until 1 January 2032 but excludes guilders obtained from commercial activity after 27 January 2002.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C661", "assertion": "ECB’s 1 January 2026 announcement confirms Bulgarian euro cash circulation and the twenty-first euro-area membership.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C662", "assertion": "1 EUR = 13.7603 ATS.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C663", "assertion": "Austria: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C664", "assertion": "1 EUR = 40.3399 BEF.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C665", "assertion": "Belgium: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C666", "assertion": "1 EUR = 1.95583 DEM.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C667", "assertion": "Germany: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C668", "assertion": "1 EUR = 166.386 ESP.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C669", "assertion": "Spain: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C670", "assertion": "1 EUR = 5.94573 FIM.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C671", "assertion": "Finland: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C672", "assertion": "1 EUR = 6.55957 FRF.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C673", "assertion": "France: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C674", "assertion": "1 EUR = 0.787564 IEP.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C675", "assertion": "Ireland: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C676", "assertion": "1 EUR = 1936.27 ITL.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C677", "assertion": "Italy: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C678", "assertion": "1 EUR = 40.3399 LUF.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C679", "assertion": "Luxembourg: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C680", "assertion": "1 EUR = 2.20371 NLG.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C681", "assertion": "Netherlands: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C682", "assertion": "1 EUR = 200.482 PTE.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C683", "assertion": "Portugal: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C684", "assertion": "1 EUR = 340.750 GRD.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C685", "assertion": "Greece: euro adoption 2001-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C686", "assertion": "1 EUR = 239.640 SIT.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C687", "assertion": "Slovenia: euro adoption 2007-01-01; cash 2007-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C688", "assertion": "1 EUR = 0.585274 CYP.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C689", "assertion": "Cyprus: euro adoption 2008-01-01; cash 2008-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C690", "assertion": "1 EUR = 0.429300 MTL.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C691", "assertion": "Malta: euro adoption 2008-01-01; cash 2008-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C692", "assertion": "1 EUR = 30.1260 SKK.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C693", "assertion": "Slovakia: euro adoption 2009-01-01; cash 2009-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C694", "assertion": "1 EUR = 15.6466 EEK.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C695", "assertion": "Estonia: euro adoption 2011-01-01; cash 2011-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C696", "assertion": "1 EUR = 0.702804 LVL.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C697", "assertion": "Latvia: euro adoption 2014-01-01; cash 2014-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C698", "assertion": "1 EUR = 3.45280 LTL.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C699", "assertion": "Lithuania: euro adoption 2015-01-01; cash 2015-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C700", "assertion": "1 EUR = 7.53450 HRK.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C701", "assertion": "Croatia: euro adoption 2023-01-01; cash 2023-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C702", "assertion": "1 EUR = 1.95583 BGN.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C703", "assertion": "Bulgaria: euro adoption 2026-01-01; cash 2026-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C704", "assertion": "German-mark legal tender ended on 31 December 2001; voluntary retail/banking acceptance continued through 28 February 2002.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C705", "assertion": "The ECB evaluation preserves a December 2001 plan with distinct national last-tender dates; the table is not treated as proof of all actual outcomes.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C706", "assertion": "The graph represents 21 national substitutions as converging conversion branches, with ECU reference succession separately typed; no country is chosen as the euro’s sole primary parent.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C738", "assertion": "The euro succeeds the French franc at the irrevocable conversion rate. Book-money adoption; cash followed in 2002.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C739", "assertion": "Euro notes and coins enter circulation in France.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C754", "assertion": "Western CFA euro anchor.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C755", "assertion": "Central CFA euro anchor. Equal parity does not merge XAF with XOF.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C756", "assertion": "CFP euro anchor. Keep this exact orientation; a rounded reciprocal is not the legal definition.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C775", "assertion": "Comorian euro anchor. Use published legal parity; do not replace it with an unrounded arithmetic product.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C790", "assertion": "Belgian euro conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C791", "assertion": "Luxembourg euro conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S267", "S346", "S347", "S348", "S349", "S350", "S351", "S357", "S358", "S359", "S377", "S378", "S381", "S385", "S387", "S717" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1427", "assertion": "Official ECU references in legal instruments were replaced by euro references at one euro per ECU from 1 January 1999. Existing C 642 retains the rebuttable presumption for undefined ECU references.", "source_ids": [ "S717", "S346" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000117", "label": "Japanese yen", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C02", "C54", "C57", "C59", "C60", "C61", "C62", "C63", "C64", "C65", "C66", "C67", "C68", "C69", "C167", "C1418" ], "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C02", "assertion": "The 1871 act introduced yen as the basic unit.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C54", "assertion": "The 1871 reform adopted decimal yen in place of ryo.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C57", "assertion": "The first Bank of Japan notes appeared in May 1885, denominated at ten yen.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C59", "assertion": "The 1897 gold standard defined one yen as 0.75 grams of gold.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C60", "assertion": "Japan suspended gold convertibility in 1917.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C61", "assertion": "Japan returned to the gold standard in January 1930.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C62", "assertion": "Japan stopped gold conversion in December 1931.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C63", "assertion": "The 1942 Bank of Japan law formalized managed currency.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C64", "assertion": "The 1946 emergency measures introduced new banknotes and withdrawal restrictions.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C65", "assertion": "Japan fixed the exchange rate at 360 yen per dollar in April 1949.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C66", "assertion": "The December 1971 Smithsonian agreement set 308 yen per dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C67", "assertion": "Japan moved to flexible exchange rates in 1973.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C68", "assertion": "The Kitasato 1,000-yen note was first issued on July 3, 2024.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C69", "assertion": "The NPB catalogues an old-type twenty-yen national banknote with an 1873 issue date.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C167", "assertion": "NLB describes Spanish/Mexican dollar use and the 1874 acceptance of Japanese yen and U.S. trade dollars in the Straits.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S31", "S32", "S33", "S34", "S82", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1418", "assertion": "Mitsui Kyoto moneychanger accounts switched fully from ryo to yen in March–April1873, after earlier yen instruments had still been settled in ryo. This supplies an actual ledger transition supporting existing ryo→yen succession.", "source_ids": [ "S695" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000410", "label": "Japanese ryō", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C14", "C25", "C26", "C27", "C53", "C54", "C353", "C355", "C359", "C1262", "C1263", "C1417", "C1419" ], "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S18", "S32", "S182", "S695" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C14", "assertion": "Gold accounting used ryo, bu and shu.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S18", "S32", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C25", "assertion": "An eighteenth-century official rating equated one ryo with 60 monme or 4,000 mon.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S18", "S32", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C26", "assertion": "The seventeenth-century museum section gives one ryo as 50 monme or 4,000 mon.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S18", "S32", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C27", "assertion": "The 1697 specimen's inscription associates 64 monme of notes with one gold ryo.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S18", "S32", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C53", "assertion": "Dajokan notes used the existing gold-ryo unit of account.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S18", "S32", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C54", "assertion": "The 1871 reform adopted decimal yen in place of ryo.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S18", "S32", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C353", "assertion": "The BOJ Museum traces Koshu gold’s ryo–bu–shu reckoning into Edo-period gold accounting.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S18", "S32", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C355", "assertion": "The BOJ Museum dates gold-unit-denominated Meiwa Nishu silver coins to 1772, distinguishing denomination from metal.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S18", "S32", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C359", "assertion": "Kamiki contrasts the official gold/copper rating with actual transactions; the abstract alone is insufficient to define a universal market rate.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S08", "S18", "S32", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1262", "assertion": "The17th-century Japanese monetary system reckoned gold values in ryo, independently from silver monme and copper mon. ", "source_ids": [ "S06" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1263", "assertion": "Later16th-century Koshu gold used ryo/bu/shu units that the Bank of Japan identifies as continuing into Edo gold reckoning. Regional-to-general continuity is explicit but the observed evidence is denomination and large-transaction use, less direct than a surviving dated account. Optional earlier anchor; retain17th-century firm observation independently. ", "source_ids": [ "S06" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1417", "assertion": "Mitsui Kyoto moneychanger accounts switched fully from ryo to yen in March–April1873, after earlier yen instruments had still been settled in ryo. This supplies an actual ledger transition supporting existing ryo→yen succession.", "source_ids": [ "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1419", "assertion": "Silver-account lending was forbidden and converted to gold/cash accounts, with gold-denominated government notes subsequently specified. Gold ryo reckoning thus received the silver account branch. Regional historical absorption, not founding unit of ryo.", "source_ids": [ "S695" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000412", "label": "Japanese mon", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C16", "C25", "C26", "C354", "C359", "C1264", "C1265", "C1420" ], "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S182", "S695" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C16", "assertion": "Copper accounting used mon.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C25", "assertion": "An eighteenth-century official rating equated one ryo with 60 monme or 4,000 mon.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C26", "assertion": "The seventeenth-century museum section gives one ryo as 50 monme or 4,000 mon.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C354", "assertion": "The BOJ Museum describes medieval one-coin/one-mon usage breaking down as coins were selected by type and quality.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C359", "assertion": "Kamiki contrasts the official gold/copper rating with actual transactions; the abstract alone is insufficient to define a universal market rate.", "source_ids": [ "S05", "S06", "S182", "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1264", "assertion": "Early14th–early16th-century saifu transfer/payment bills commonly expressed10kanmon, providing an accounting observation for the existing mon identity. ", "source_ids": [ "S06" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1265", "assertion": "Imported Chinese coins were locally reckoned at one mon each from the mid12thcentury; tax payments in coins spread in the13thcentury. ", "source_ids": [ "S06" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1420", "assertion": "The same order explicitly permitted conversion of silver-denominated lending into cash reckoning at the transaction-date rate. Alternative local destination within monetary unification; do not imply every silver balance converted to mon.", "source_ids": [ "S695" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000456", "label": "Republic of China yuan — mainland continuity", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C110", "C111", "C112", "C109", "C126", "C1421" ], "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S60", "S541", "S697" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C110", "assertion": "The Archives essay gives the August 1948 reform as three million fabi yuan per gold yuan.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S60", "S541", "S697" ] }, { "claim_id": "C111", "assertion": "The CBC describes gold-yuan reform in August 1948 and silver-dollar/certificate reform in July 1949.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S60", "S541", "S697" ] }, { "claim_id": "C112", "assertion": "The CBC says those silver dollars and certificates did not circulate in Taiwan.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S60", "S541", "S697" ] }, { "claim_id": "C109", "assertion": "The CBC dates the move from silver to legal-tender notes to 4 November 1935.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S60", "S541", "S697" ] }, { "claim_id": "C126", "assertion": "NMTH attributes fabi note accession 2013.002.0020 to a 1945 1,000-yuan issue.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S60", "S541", "S697" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1421", "assertion": "Shanghai tael-based payments and contracts were replaced by Republic of China yuan accounting. Shanghai local absorption only; yuan already existed; do not infer all local taels abolished simultaneously.", "source_ids": [ "S541", "S697" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000459", "label": "Renminbi", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C113", "C114", "C1149" ], "source_ids": [ "S52", "S548" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C113", "assertion": "The first RMB series was issued on 1 December 1948.", "source_ids": [ "S52", "S548" ] }, { "claim_id": "C114", "assertion": "Second-series RMB began on 1 March 1955 at one new yuan per 10,000 old yuan.", "source_ids": [ "S52", "S548" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1149", "assertion": "Jinan Bank currency was withdrawn into the first renminbi issue from December 1948 through spring 1950. This documents one named regional input.", "source_ids": [ "S548" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000462", "label": "Taiwan dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C112", "C116", "C117", "C118", "C451", "C452", "C453", "C454", "C455", "C115", "C1141" ], "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S57", "S205", "S543" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C112", "assertion": "The CBC says those silver dollars and certificates did not circulate in Taiwan.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S57", "S205", "S543" ] }, { "claim_id": "C116", "assertion": "The Archives essay dates New Taiwan dollars to 15 June 1949 at 40,000 old dollars per new dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S57", "S205", "S543" ] }, { "claim_id": "C117", "assertion": "The Archives essay describes geographically restricted Kinmen and Matsu overprints and ending that distinction in 1989.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S57", "S205", "S543" ] }, { "claim_id": "C118", "assertion": "CBC regulations effective 1 July 2000 specify New Taiwan dollars as the national currency and permit delegation of issuance-related management.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S57", "S205", "S543" ] }, { "claim_id": "C451", "assertion": "The archived 1949 issuance rules explicitly set 40,000 old Taiwan dollars equal to one new Taiwan dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S57", "S205", "S543" ] }, { "claim_id": "C452", "assertion": "Article 6 initially provides unrestricted exchange before 1 December 1949 and temporary old-note circulation at the conversion rate during the exchange period.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S57", "S205", "S543" ] }, { "claim_id": "C453", "assertion": "Article 7 switches provincial public/private accounts to the new unit upon publication and allows six months to amend registered amounts.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S57", "S205", "S543" ] }, { "claim_id": "C454", "assertion": "Article 5 defines one new Taiwan dollar as US$0.20; this exchange standard is distinct from old-Taiwan-dollar succession.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S57", "S205", "S543" ] }, { "claim_id": "C455", "assertion": "The inspected copy’s art.8 points to art.5 for existing-debt conversion although the old/new rate is in art.6. The discrepancy requires Gazette comparison, not silent correction.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S57", "S205", "S543" ] }, { "claim_id": "C115", "assertion": "The Archives essay dates Taiwan-dollar issuance to 22 May 1946 and exchange of earlier Taiwan banknotes to September–November.", "source_ids": [ "S50", "S51", "S57", "S205", "S543" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1141", "assertion": "Taiwan dollars replaced Taiwanese yen in May 1946. The 1949 dollar rescaling belongs to the same Taiwan-dollar profile.", "source_ids": [ "S543" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000464", "label": "Hong Kong dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C119", "C120", "C121", "C123", "C165", "C954", "C955", "C1164", "C1165" ], "source_ids": [ "S53", "S54", "S56", "S85", "S453", "S560" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C119", "assertion": "Hong Kong’s museum records foreign coins in 1841, local coins in 1863, and the 1935 local-unit declaration.", "source_ids": [ "S53", "S54", "S56", "S85", "S453", "S560" ] }, { "claim_id": "C120", "assertion": "The museum describes Japanese military notes during occupation and resumption of local currency afterwards.", "source_ids": [ "S53", "S54", "S56", "S85", "S453", "S560" ] }, { "claim_id": "C121", "assertion": "HKMA dates the Linked Exchange Rate System to 17 October 1983 and describes today’s 7.75–7.85 HKD per USD band.", "source_ids": [ "S53", "S54", "S56", "S85", "S453", "S560" ] }, { "claim_id": "C123", "assertion": "AMCM’s 2010 review reports a fixed middle rate of 1.03 patacas per Hong Kong dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S53", "S54", "S56", "S85", "S453", "S560" ] }, { "claim_id": "C165", "assertion": "HKMA distinguishes coins dated 1863 from their 1864 arrival and notes the mint’s closure in 1868.", "source_ids": [ "S53", "S54", "S56", "S85", "S453", "S560" ] }, { "claim_id": "C954", "assertion": "Hong Kong’s local silver-dollar issue developed from circulating Spanish and Mexican silver dollars. One traced standard input; the 1935 sterling link is not its origin.", "source_ids": [ "S53", "S54", "S56", "S85", "S453", "S560" ] }, { "claim_id": "C955", "assertion": "Mexican dollars were another input to Hong Kong’s local silver-dollar standard.", "source_ids": [ "S53", "S54", "S56", "S85", "S453", "S560" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1164", "assertion": "Hong Kong law converted specified public sterling payments into dollar payments at 4s2d per dollar from 16 February 1864. Assignment to the later distinct Hong Kong dollar is a qualified regional-continuity inference. This is a public-account contribution, not its sole founding ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S560" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1165", "assertion": "Hong Kong’s locally issued dollar system developed within accounting legally denominated by reference to the Mexican dollar; the 1864 law makes local cents and mils fractions of that dollar and converts public sterling obligations into it. Qualified local differentiation; compresses development into a territorial unit. No exact date of separate currency identity is inferred from the first local coin issue. Supersedes standard-only treatment of the existing MXN reference, rather than adding duplicate edge.", "source_ids": [ "S560" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000466", "label": "Macao pataca", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C122", "C123", "C124", "C1169", "C1192" ], "source_ids": [ "S55", "S56", "S58", "S566", "S567", "S568" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C122", "assertion": "Macao’s government history distinguishes the 1901 BNU agreement, 1905 issuing function and first notes in 1906.", "source_ids": [ "S55", "S56", "S58", "S566", "S567", "S568" ] }, { "claim_id": "C123", "assertion": "AMCM’s 2010 review reports a fixed middle rate of 1.03 patacas per Hong Kong dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S55", "S56", "S58", "S566", "S567", "S568" ] }, { "claim_id": "C124", "assertion": "The IMF’s June 2025 account identifies BNU and Bank of China as issuers of the same pataca currency.", "source_ids": [ "S55", "S56", "S58", "S566", "S567", "S568" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1169", "assertion": "Macao adopted the local practice of accounting for a Mexican silver dollar as one pataca into its territorial currency. The 1894–1906 association is qualified; neither the first note issue nor the later Hong Kong-dollar peg establishes a currency birth.", "source_ids": [ "S566", "S567" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1192", "assertion": "An 1895 inquiry into Macao lottery finances recorded pataca-denominated arrears to the provincial treasury. Association with the continuing pataca identity remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S568" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000476", "label": "Spanish real / peso de a ocho", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C134", "C135", "C336", "C369", "C953", "C138", "C142", "C146", "C160", "C167", "C177", "C182", "C183", "C863", "C954", "C1177", "C1178", "C1181", "C1182", "C1209", "C1210", "C1247", "C1278" ], "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C134", "assertion": "MAN places Iberian real coinage in the early fourteenth-century expansion of larger silver denominations.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C135", "assertion": "MAN identifies the eight-reales piece as a major sixteenth-century onward international silver coin, also called peso or duro.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C336", "assertion": "The 1497 reform summary rates a real at 34 maravedís, a ducado at 375, and a blanca at one-half.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C369", "assertion": "Rivero Hernández’s 1497 summary distinguishes the disappearance of older gold types from continuation of the real and blanca.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C953", "assertion": "The Spanish dollar or piece of eight represented eight reales. A denomination relationship within the real system; date bounds the source’s seventeenth/eighteenth-century account, not first minting.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C138", "assertion": "Banxico says the 1823 Republic retained reales and escudos while changing coin designs.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C142", "assertion": "The 1792 Act defines the dollar by the current Spanish milled dollar and specifies 371¼ grains fine silver, 416 grains gross.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C146", "assertion": "The Smithsonian’s 1778 fifty-dollar Continental bill promises Spanish milled dollars or equivalent gold or silver value.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C160", "assertion": "Powell describes Halifax’s 1758 legal rating of a Spanish dollar at five local shillings, equivalent to four dollars per account pound.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C167", "assertion": "NLB describes Spanish/Mexican dollar use and the 1874 acceptance of Japanese yen and U.S. trade dollars in the Straits.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C177", "assertion": "BSP describes imported colonial silver coins and Spanish-period pesos fuertes banknotes issued by Banco Español Filipino.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C182", "assertion": "Shanghai Museum documents Spanish and Mexican silver-dollar use in coastal China and later domestic silver-dollar reforms.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C183", "assertion": "RBA describes early Spanish-dollar circulation in Australia, later sterling institutions, and national paper money.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C863", "assertion": "The phoenix was valued at one sixth of the Spanish dollar. A valuation standard, not evidence that all dollars were compulsorily converted into phoenixes.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C954", "assertion": "Hong Kong’s local silver-dollar issue developed from circulating Spanish and Mexican silver dollars. One traced standard input; the 1935 sterling link is not its origin.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1177", "assertion": "The federal dollar formalized a Spanish-dollar unit already used for public debt, requisitions and value reckoning, rather than borrowing only a coin weight. The regional account-unit association is qualified; provincial pound conversions remain unresolved.", "source_ids": [ "S582", "S70" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1178", "assertion": "Colombian peso/real reckoning continued the inherited Spanish-American monetary system, with the 1821 Congress ordering return to its eight-real silver peso. This is a qualified regional branch; local wartime stages and incomplete implementation remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S584" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1181", "assertion": "Independent Mexico retained Spanish peso/real reckoning while developing its own monetary system. A qualified territorial continuity based on the retained accounting system; contemporary fiscal law is still sought.", "source_ids": [ "S67" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1182", "assertion": "Salvadoran peso/colón accounting developed from the Spanish-colonial peso of eight reales retained during the Central American Federation. This is a qualified regional branch with unresolved local stages, not an exact founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S589" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1209", "assertion": "National gourde reckoning in Pétion’s republic developed from the Spanish gourde/peso rated in local law. The 1811–1813 laws combine national denomination, commercial acceptance, tax accounts and treasury conversion. The regional identity grouping is qualified; northern Haiti and French-livre inputs remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S592", "S593" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1210", "assertion": "The Uruguayan peso corriente developed as a regional branch of inherited Spanish-American peso accounting amid Portuguese, Brazilian and local monetary changes. Official history identifies inherited reckoning and original research documents an independent eight-real account unit. Intervening regional stages remain qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S594", "S595", "S596" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1247", "assertion": "The Buenos Aires local peso branch developed from inherited Spanish-American peso reckoning as local bank money became the contractual currency. Compressed local sequence; not a claim that every Argentine province adopted this unit.", "source_ids": [ "S595" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1278", "assertion": "A 1473 cathedral inventory rated the Castilian silver real at 31 maravedís, following explicit 1471 real tariffs; this predates the existing 1497 observation. Evidence is valued real money in accounts, not proof that every payment was denominated primarily in reales. Association with the later real/peso profile is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S630" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000478", "label": "Mexican peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C138", "C139", "C140", "C167", "C182", "C955", "C956", "C1165", "C1166", "C1169", "C1181", "C1202" ], "source_ids": [ "S61", "S67", "S68", "S82", "S453", "S560", "S561", "S566", "S567" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C138", "assertion": "Banxico says the 1823 Republic retained reales and escudos while changing coin designs.", "source_ids": [ "S61", "S67", "S68", "S82", "S453", "S560", "S561", "S566", "S567" ] }, { "claim_id": "C139", "assertion": "Banxico describes decimal coinage in 1869–1905, with interruptions, and a gold-standard reform in 1905.", "source_ids": [ "S61", "S67", "S68", "S82", "S453", "S560", "S561", "S566", "S567" ] }, { "claim_id": "C140", "assertion": "Mexico introduced one new peso for 1,000 old pesos on 1 January 1993; dropping “new” in 1996 did not repeat the conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S61", "S67", "S68", "S82", "S453", "S560", "S561", "S566", "S567" ] }, { "claim_id": "C167", "assertion": "NLB describes Spanish/Mexican dollar use and the 1874 acceptance of Japanese yen and U.S. trade dollars in the Straits.", "source_ids": [ "S61", "S67", "S68", "S82", "S453", "S560", "S561", "S566", "S567" ] }, { "claim_id": "C182", "assertion": "Shanghai Museum documents Spanish and Mexican silver-dollar use in coastal China and later domestic silver-dollar reforms.", "source_ids": [ "S61", "S67", "S68", "S82", "S453", "S560", "S561", "S566", "S567" ] }, { "claim_id": "C955", "assertion": "Mexican dollars were another input to Hong Kong’s local silver-dollar standard.", "source_ids": [ "S61", "S67", "S68", "S82", "S453", "S560", "S561", "S566", "S567" ] }, { "claim_id": "C956", "assertion": "The Straits dollar displaced Mexican dollars among several circulating silver-dollar currencies. Other trade-dollar inputs remain to be individually traced; 1899 note issue predates the new coin.", "source_ids": [ "S61", "S67", "S68", "S82", "S453", "S560", "S561", "S566", "S567" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1165", "assertion": "Hong Kong’s locally issued dollar system developed within accounting legally denominated by reference to the Mexican dollar; the 1864 law makes local cents and mils fractions of that dollar and converts public sterling obligations into it. Qualified local differentiation; compresses development into a territorial unit. No exact date of separate currency identity is inferred from the first local coin issue. Supersedes standard-only treatment of the existing MXN reference, rather than adding duplicate edge.", "source_ids": [ "S560" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1166", "assertion": "Act 1045 made obligations in Mexican local currency enforceable as Philippine-peso judgments, allowed settlement in Philippine pesos, and extinguished the old obligation upon payment. Partial input to a multiple-currency replacement. The conversion was adjudicated by value, not a universal 1:1 exchange. Do not infer merely from purchase of Mexican silver as bullion.", "source_ids": [ "S561" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1169", "assertion": "Macao adopted the local practice of accounting for a Mexican silver dollar as one pataca into its territorial currency. The 1894–1906 association is qualified; neither the first note issue nor the later Hong Kong-dollar peg establishes a currency birth.", "source_ids": [ "S566", "S567" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1181", "assertion": "Independent Mexico retained Spanish peso/real reckoning while developing its own monetary system. A qualified territorial continuity based on the retained accounting system; contemporary fiscal law is still sought.", "source_ids": [ "S67" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1202", "assertion": "Independent Mexico issued compulsory peso-denominated paper in December 1822 while continuing real-denominated coinage.", "source_ids": [ "S67" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000481", "label": "United States dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C133", "C142", "C143", "C144", "C148", "C149", "C150", "C151", "C152", "C153", "C155", "C156", "C157", "C158", "C159", "C178", "C190", "C195", "C198", "C203", "C205", "C207", "C208", "C209", "C390", "C747", "C777", "C993", "C994", "C995", "C996", "C998", "C1170", "C1177", "C1199", "C1245", "C1256", "C1349", "C1429" ], "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C133", "assertion": "Berlin gives 1519 for Joachimsthal Guldengroschen; the CNB brochure gives 1520 and links Joachimsthaler, thaler and American dollar names.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C142", "assertion": "The 1792 Act defines the dollar by the current Spanish milled dollar and specifies 371¼ grains fine silver, 416 grains gross.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C143", "assertion": "The 1792 Act sets the relative value of pure silver to pure gold at fifteen to one and establishes decimal public accounting.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C144", "assertion": "The U.S. Mint dates the first U.S. silver-dollar coinage to 1794.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C148", "assertion": "The 1834 Act reduces the gold eagle to 232 grains fine gold; the 1837 Act specifies 258 grains at .900 fineness.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C149", "assertion": "The 1837 Act gives the silver dollar a gross weight of 412½ grains at .900 fineness, retaining 371¼ fine grains.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C150", "assertion": "The 1857 Act ends the legal-tender status of foreign gold and silver coins under prior acts.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C151", "assertion": "The 1862 Legal Tender Act authorizes U.S. notes, with exceptions including import duties and interest on public debt.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C152", "assertion": "The 1863–1864 National Banking Acts establish national bank charters and bond-backed notes; a later tax discourages state-bank notes.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C153", "assertion": "The 1873 Act specifies a 420-grain trade dollar at .900 fineness and initially limits its legal-tender use to five dollars per payment.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C155", "assertion": "The 1878 Act restores coinage of the 412½-grain standard silver dollar and authorizes certificates against deposited coins.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C156", "assertion": "The 1900 Act defines the gold dollar as 25.8 grains at .900 fineness.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C157", "assertion": "Federal Reserve History dates Federal Reserve notes to 1914 and describes their coexistence with other dollar-note families.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C158", "assertion": "Federal Reserve History distinguishes the 1933 suspension of gold arrangements from the 1934 restructuring and revaluation.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C159", "assertion": "The Bretton Woods account distinguishes the $35 official gold link, its 1971 suspension for foreign official holders, and generalized floating in 1973.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C178", "assertion": "BSP dates the U.S.-approved Philippine coinage reform to 1903 with two Philippine pesos per U.S. dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C190", "assertion": "ECCB records EC$4.80 per pound before the July 1976 switch to EC$2.70 per U.S. dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C195", "assertion": "Barbados fixed two local dollars per U.S. dollar on 5 July 1975.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C198", "assertion": "BMA dates the Bermudian dollar’s U.S.-dollar parity to 31 July 1972.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C203", "assertion": "The CBL working paper describes nineteenth-century local/U.S. coin coexistence, a 1913–1942 West African pound phase, and official USD adoption in 1943.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C205", "assertion": "The IMF describes Zimbabwe’s local-currency collapse in late 2008 and official multicurrency arrangements in early 2009, including a rand reference.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C207", "assertion": "BCE records Ecuador’s January 2000 dollarization announcement at 25,000 sucres per USD and the March legal reform.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C208", "assertion": "Bundesbank dates U.S.-dollar legal tender in El Salvador to 1 January 2001.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C209", "assertion": "Bundesbank lists USD legal tender alongside Panama’s balboa context.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C390", "assertion": "Section 3 makes qualifying post-1-July-1834 US eagles weighing ten pennyweights eighteen grains tender for ten dollars, with proportional multiples and divisions.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C747", "assertion": "Early CFP dollar parity. Exchange anchor, not US-dollar ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C777", "assertion": "Initial Djibouti dollar anchor. This exchange anchor is not a predecessor-currency conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C993", "assertion": "The new quetzal was defined as equal to one US dollar at its creation. Founding unit definition, not inference from a later exchange-rate peg.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C994", "assertion": "National Dominican peso notes replaced circulating US dollars in the 1947 monetary reform. Earlier Dominican and foreign-currency inputs remain additional historical branches.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C995", "assertion": "The new Panamanian gold peso, named balboa, used the contemporary US dollar weight and fineness at parity. A founding unit-standard relationship. The Colombian circulation it displaced remains a separate input.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C996", "assertion": "The 1903 Philippine reform defined a gold peso and made US gold dollars tender at two pesos per dollar. The date is enactment; commencement depended on the stipulated coin supply. Spanish and Mexican predecessors are additional inputs, not erased by the new standard.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C998", "assertion": "The first córdoba was established at the value of one US dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S62", "S64", "S70", "S71", "S75", "S76", "S77", "S78", "S79", "S80", "S84", "S97", "S98", "S102", "S103", "S107", "S109", "S111", "S187", "S253", "S387", "S471", "S472", "S473", "S474", "S475", "S345", "S582", "S604", "S605", "S662", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1170", "assertion": "Liberia’s 1935 dollar definition matched the US dollar gold content; later law provided parity and interchangeability. This is an optional founding-standard reference, not demonstrated account-unit succession.", "source_ids": [ "S345" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1177", "assertion": "The federal dollar formalized a Spanish-dollar unit already used for public debt, requisitions and value reckoning, rather than borrowing only a coin weight. The regional account-unit association is qualified; provincial pound conversions remain unresolved.", "source_ids": [ "S582", "S70" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1199", "assertion": "Jefferson recorded the dollar’s established use in US public debts and requisitions before the federal mint statute.", "source_ids": [ "S582" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1245", "assertion": "The 1839 Commonwealth constitution adopted United States monetary standards; local dollar obligations and currency redemption are documented by 1843. This supports an earlier optional founding-unit reference, while a distinct USD-to-Liberian account transition remains unestablished.", "source_ids": [ "S604", "S605" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1256", "assertion": "United States dollar local Zimbabwe obligations and USD RTGS balances converted to RTGS dollar. Scope expressly excludes protected foreign-currency accounts and foreign loans/obligations. Treat as local account succession, not ancestry of all USD contracts everywhere. ", "source_ids": [ "S662" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1349", "assertion": "The1839adoption of US monetary standards, together with local dollar-denominated public obligations and redemption recorded by1843, supports a qualified regional USD-to-Liberian-dollar branch. Neither exclusive parentage nor universal redemption is asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S604", "S605" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1429", "assertion": "Ecuador implemented replacement of sucres by US dollars at 25,000 sucres per dollar during 2000. This local adoption and conversion joins the existing USD; it does not make the sucre a founding parent of USD.", "source_ids": [ "S718" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000491", "label": "Halifax pound of account", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C160", "C316" ], "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C160", "assertion": "Powell describes Halifax’s 1758 legal rating of a Spanish dollar at five local shillings, equivalent to four dollars per account pound.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156" ] }, { "claim_id": "C316", "assertion": "McCullough reports that Nova Scotia’s 1758 five-shilling dollar act was disallowed; the Halifax rating persisted by custom.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000492", "label": "Canadian dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C161", "C162", "C163", "C164", "C305", "C312", "C313", "C314", "C317", "C394" ], "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S160", "S188" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C161", "assertion": "Canada required dollar accounts from 31 December 1857 and issued decimal coins in 1858.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S160", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C162", "assertion": "Powell dates Nova Scotia’s decimal transition to 1860 and the 1871 alignment at 75 Nova Scotia cents for 73 Canadian cents.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S160", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C163", "assertion": "Newfoundland’s 1863 decimal law took effect in 1865; its currency was aligned with Canada in 1895.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S160", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C164", "assertion": "Powell dates Canada’s return to a floating dollar to June 1970.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S160", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C305", "assertion": "New Brunswick permitted decimal accounts in 1852 and required them from 1 November 1860; its dollar standard matched Canada’s.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S160", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C312", "assertion": "The 1906 consolidation requires equivalent Canadian-currency payment of earlier BC and PEI debts payable after the 1 July 1881 boundary.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S160", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C313", "assertion": "Section 6 applies the 75-Nova-Scotia-cent to 73-Canadian-cent conversion to covered payments from 1 July 1871, rounding fractional Canadian cents to the nearest whole cent.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S160", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C314", "assertion": "Newfoundland aligned its dollar with Canada’s in 1895; parity is not proof that its local coinage ended.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S160", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C317", "assertion": "Canada’s 1853 act, proclaimed 1 August 1854, recognized both pound and dollar accounts; mandatory decimal accounts and coinage followed separately.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S160", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C394", "assertion": "New Brunswick’s council reported on 10 November 1860 that its decimal-account act was operating, but Canadian coins were not legal tender locally.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S160", "S188" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000493", "label": "Nova Scotia decimal dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C162", "C313" ], "source_ids": [ "S11", "S160" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C162", "assertion": "Powell dates Nova Scotia’s decimal transition to 1860 and the 1871 alignment at 75 Nova Scotia cents for 73 Canadian cents.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S160" ] }, { "claim_id": "C313", "assertion": "Section 6 applies the 75-Nova-Scotia-cent to 73-Canadian-cent conversion to covered payments from 1 July 1871, rounding fractional Canadian cents to the nearest whole cent.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S160" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000494", "label": "Newfoundland dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C163", "C314", "C315" ], "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S161" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C163", "assertion": "Newfoundland’s 1863 decimal law took effect in 1865; its currency was aligned with Canada in 1895.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S161" ] }, { "claim_id": "C314", "assertion": "Newfoundland aligned its dollar with Canada’s in 1895; parity is not proof that its local coinage ended.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S161" ] }, { "claim_id": "C315", "assertion": "Newfoundland’s last coins were minted in 1947; Canadian notes and coins circulated at par before its 1949 entry into Canada.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S161" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000497", "label": "Pound sterling", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C556", "C988", "C169", "C174", "C190", "C253", "C254", "C255", "C256", "C257", "C258", "C264", "C265", "C268", "C270", "C271", "C296", "C297", "C309", "C310", "C387", "C400", "C405", "C607", "C617", "C635", "C868", "C870", "C873", "C936", "C937", "C938", "C939", "C944", "C947", "C983", "C985", "C986", "C987", "C989", "C1024", "C1025", "C1057", "C1058", "C1059", "C1060", "C1061", "C1062", "C1063", "C1064", "C1092", "C1093", "C1094", "C1095", "C1150", "C1164", "C1280", "C1281", "C1311", "C1312", "C1313", "C1314", "C1315" ], "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C556", "assertion": "Gibraltar's first government banknotes were issued in 1914 under emergency Ordinance 10 of 1914.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C988", "assertion": "Gibraltar began local emergency sterling-note issues in 1914. The issuer explicitly describes sterling as the unit; this is a local issue branch, not proof of a separate monetary unit.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C169", "assertion": "The 1906 Commons reply records the Straits dollar fixed at two shillings and fourpence sterling.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C174", "assertion": "BNM dates Malaysia’s new dollar to 12 June 1967 and describes old-currency redemption at two shillings and fourpence sterling.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C190", "assertion": "ECCB records EC$4.80 per pound before the July 1976 switch to EC$2.70 per U.S. dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C253", "assertion": "Decimalisation on 15 February 1971 retained the pound and changed its subdivision from 240 old pence to 100 new pence.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C254", "assertion": "The pre-decimal pound comprised 20 shillings, each of 12 pence.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C255", "assertion": "Britain suspended the gold standard in September 1931.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C256", "assertion": "The 1925 Act provided bullion purchases at £3 17s 10½d per standard troy ounce, in bars of approximately 400 fine ounces.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C257", "assertion": "The Bank’s obligation to exchange notes for gold was suspended during the Restriction Period, 1797–1821.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C258", "assertion": "The Bank began partially printed denominated notes in 1725; earlier notes were handwritten for deposited amounts.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C264", "assertion": "The Royal Mint undertook a major recoinage of old silver during Newton’s first years as Warden from 1696.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C265", "assertion": "The 1489 sovereign first represented the established pound of account in a single coin.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C268", "assertion": "The Museum links more consistent penny weight under William I to the development of sterling reckoning.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C270", "assertion": "Fox interprets the 1707 union as harmonisation of coinage standards, without creation of a new account unit.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C271", "assertion": "Twelve pounds Scots equalled one pound sterling in accounting; Fox distinguishes this from rates for actual circulating coins.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C296", "assertion": "Kelly dates completion of the assimilation of the earlier Irish currency into that of the UK to 1826.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C297", "assertion": "The 1825 Commons debate described £100 British as equivalent to £108 6s 8d Irish and proposed discharging Irish debts at twelve-thirteenths in British currency.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C309", "assertion": "Vancouver Island’s 1862 act specifies dollar public accounts from 1 January 1863 and $4.85 per pound sterling.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C310", "assertion": "British Columbia’s 1865 ordinance specifies dollar public accounts from 1 January 1866 and $4.85 per pound sterling, subject to its approval-proclamation clause.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C387", "assertion": "The 1852 act rates a lawful British sovereign at one local pound, four shillings and four pence.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C400", "assertion": "The WACB pound exchanged at sterling parity, with commissions; parity did not imply costless remittance.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C405", "assertion": "British silver already circulated locally before the WACB; the proposed sterling ancestry is scoped to that monetary replacement context.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C607", "assertion": "Article 13 accepts qualifying sovereigns at fifteen rupees each; this is a tender valuation, not evidence of a sterling-to-rupee replacement.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C617", "assertion": "Article 5(1) values covered sterling payments at twenty local shillings per pound; this standard relationship is separate from rupee/florin succession.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C635", "assertion": "Section 66 preserves the federal pound’s sterling parity until demonetisation; it does not prescribe a national successor’s cash-exchange rate.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C868", "assertion": "The Saorstat pound established a national currency at sterling parity under the 1927 Act, followed by the 1928 issue. National monetary separation with continuing sterling circulation; not a revival conversion from the pre-1826 Irish unit.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C870", "assertion": "Malta’s local pound-note system developed within the British pound framework before the independent decimal coinage. Gradual lineage supported; the exact legal moment of a separate Maltese currency remains open. Central-bank founding in 1968 is not treated as its birth.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C873", "assertion": "Cyprus introduced a local coinage system of 180 piastres per English gold pound. Sterling-derived local unit; gradual replacement of non-British coins. Exact autonomous-currency separation and Ottoman exchange terms remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C936", "assertion": "Australian national pounds developed from the sterling currency adopted in the colonies. 1825 is the colonial framework; 1910 national legislation does not erase earlier local money.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C937", "assertion": "New Zealand local pound coinage and national notes succeeded the British-coin and trading-bank system. Staged monetary separation; no blanket 1:1 sterling conversion asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C938", "assertion": "Fiji’s local pound issues developed from an English-coin currency system. The board began in 1914 and local coins followed in 1934; this is unit descent, not a fixed exchange-rate claim.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C939", "assertion": "Tongan government pound notes supplemented the British currency already in use.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C944", "assertion": "Jamaica adopted British currency as the basis of its pound system. Spanish doubloons remained a legal-tender exception until 1901.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C947", "assertion": "The South African pound retained the British pound coin system while national notes succeeded commercial-bank issues. 1922 anchors a documented national stage, not a claimed first origin date; derivation rests on the inherited unit, not parity alone.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C983", "assertion": "Barbados’s colonial currency combined sterling coinage with local dollar-denominated bank notes by 1850. The issuer history supports mixed-system descent; intermediate local dollar ratings remain to be expanded.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C985", "assertion": "The Bahamas Currency Board issued local pounds against sterling at par. An issue-system derivation; the later dollar peg is a different relationship.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C986", "assertion": "British Honduras reorganised a sterling-based mixed circulation into a gold-basis system with local dollar notes in 1894. Sterling is one documented monetary input; Spanish-American coins and US dollars require separate branches. No exchange ratio inferred.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C987", "assertion": "The Bermuda pound replaced in 1970 was the locally issued sterling-denominated predecessor of the Bermuda dollar. The transition attests the inherited pound system; 1970 is not its origin date.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C989", "assertion": "Local Falkland pound notes supplemented British sterling under the 1899 order, as reported in 1923.", "source_ids": [ "S83", "S88", "S93", "S97", "S99", "S104", "S133", "S134", "S135", "S137", "S139", "S140", "S142", "S152", "S153", "S157", "S158", "S186", "S189", "S202", "S240", "S244", "S290", "S334", "S336", "S342", "S432", "S433", "S434", "S449", "S450", "S452", "S467", "S468", "S469", "S493", "S495", "S494", "S496", "S497", "S498", "S521", "S146", "S98", "S560", "S631", "S632", "S633", "S634", "S635" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1024", "assertion": "William I’s reign supplies the Royal Mint Museum’s 240-pence currency-pound anchor.", "source_ids": [ "S140" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1025", "assertion": "The museum qualifies the early transmission of Frankish reckoning to England.", "source_ids": [ "S140" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1057", "assertion": "Alfred’s will assigns 500 pounds to each son and other sums in pounds, while using mancuses for other bequests.", "source_ids": [ "S493" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1058", "assertion": "Sawyer dates S 1507 to 873–888; the British Library uses c.885. The earliest listed copy is eleventh-century.", "source_ids": [ "S493", "S495" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1059", "assertion": "S 1287 requires three pounds in annual rent at the autumnal equinox and is catalogued to 879–908.", "source_ids": [ "S494" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1060", "assertion": "VI Æthelstan, dated approximately 935 by Screen, values a horse for indemnity at half a pound, subject to actual value.", "source_ids": [ "S496" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1061", "assertion": "Hines identifies the four-penny shilling in the London code of the 930s and explains a sixty-shilling, 240-pence pound reckoning.", "source_ids": [ "S497" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1062", "assertion": "The Grately code, c.926–930, regulates transactions valued above twenty pennies.", "source_ids": [ "S498" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1063", "assertion": "The ninth- and tenth-century English pound observations are suitable for a qualified early extension of the existing sterling profile.", "source_ids": [ "S493", "S494", "S495", "S496", "S497", "S498" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1064", "assertion": "Early Kentish and West Saxon legal units cannot yet be connected to the pound by a fully dated local sequence.", "source_ids": [ "S497" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1092", "assertion": "Naismith identifies Pippin III’s reformed Frankish coinage and Beonna’s East Anglian issues as models for Offa’s broad pennies.", "source_ids": [ "S521" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1093", "assertion": "Naismith gives an approximate 1.30 g target for Offa’s light pennies, matching contemporary Frankish coinage; the 792/3 heavy reform used about 1.45 g.", "source_ids": [ "S521" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1094", "assertion": "The 2024 silver-provenance study places Offa’s coinage within continental silver-supply connections. This is evidence about metal supply, not by itself ancestry of the English pound.", "source_ids": [ "S146" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1095", "assertion": "Frankish models and silver-supply connections do not yet establish a dated Frankish-to-English account-unit succession. No new ancestry edge is admitted.", "source_ids": [ "S521", "S146" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1150", "assertion": "Sterling → Saint Helena pound, 1976; local currency separation.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1164", "assertion": "Hong Kong law converted specified public sterling payments into dollar payments at 4s2d per dollar from 16 February 1864. Assignment to the later distinct Hong Kong dollar is a qualified regional-continuity inference. This is a public-account contribution, not its sole founding ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S560" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1280", "assertion": "The 799–801 Mercian annual render and 805–807 Kentish penny valuation can extend the existing English monetary profile with qualified regional continuity; neither text establishes a 240-penny pound or a Frankish-to-English conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S631", "S632", "S521" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1281", "assertion": "The 799–801 Mercian annual render and 805–807 Kentish penny valuation can extend the existing English monetary profile with qualified regional continuity; neither text establishes a 240-penny pound or a Frankish-to-English conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S632", "S521" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1311", "assertion": "S1186 a, dated 799–801 and catalogued as an original document, records 200 solidi for estate immunities and an annual 30-solidus obligation.", "source_ids": [ "S631" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1312", "assertion": "S41, dated 805–807 and preserved in contemporary sheets, prices the Eythorne land grant at 3,000 denarii, translated as pence.", "source_ids": [ "S632" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1313", "assertion": "S164 records a thirty-pound valuation in 809, confirmed 810, but survives in a later copy and has disputed authenticity.", "source_ids": [ "S633" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1314", "assertion": "The 796 Purton restoration records 2,000 silver solidi, but its disputed transmission makes it qualified corroboration rather than the firm earliest English anchor.", "source_ids": [ "S634" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1315", "assertion": "S9 reports ten pounds of silver in a charter dated 686; authenticity questions and possible weight usage prevent adopting 686 as a demonstrated currency-pound origin.", "source_ids": [ "S635" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000499", "label": "Straits / Malayan / Malaya–British Borneo dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C171", "C173", "C168", "C169", "C170", "C956", "C172" ], "source_ids": [ "S82", "S83" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C171", "assertion": "NLB distinguishes the 1952 Malaya–British Borneo board from its 1953 coinage.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S83" ] }, { "claim_id": "C173", "assertion": "NLB identifies the 1967 end of shared issuance and separate Singapore, Malaysian and Brunei currencies.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S83" ] }, { "claim_id": "C168", "assertion": "NLB dates British trade dollars to 1895, Straits notes to 1899, and local Straits dollar coins to 1903.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S83" ] }, { "claim_id": "C169", "assertion": "The 1906 Commons reply records the Straits dollar fixed at two shillings and fourpence sterling.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S83" ] }, { "claim_id": "C170", "assertion": "NLB dates the Malayan board to 1938 and legal issue of its new coins to 24 January 1940.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S83" ] }, { "claim_id": "C956", "assertion": "The Straits dollar displaced Mexican dollars among several circulating silver-dollar currencies. Other trade-dollar inputs remain to be individually traced; 1899 note issue predates the new coin.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S83" ] }, { "claim_id": "C172", "assertion": "NLB describes occupation notes in 1942–1945 while prewar notes retained legal status.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S83" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000500", "label": "Singapore dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C173", "C175", "C176" ], "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88", "S89", "S90" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C173", "assertion": "NLB identifies the 1967 end of shared issuance and separate Singapore, Malaysian and Brunei currencies.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88", "S89", "S90" ] }, { "claim_id": "C175", "assertion": "MAS describes Singapore–Brunei interchangeability at par; BDCB distinguishes customary tender from legal tender.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88", "S89", "S90" ] }, { "claim_id": "C176", "assertion": "BNM records Malaysia’s 1973 withdrawal from interchangeability and floating from 21 June 1973.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88", "S89", "S90" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000501", "label": "Malaysian dollar / ringgit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C173", "C174", "C176" ], "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C173", "assertion": "NLB identifies the 1967 end of shared issuance and separate Singapore, Malaysian and Brunei currencies.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88" ] }, { "claim_id": "C174", "assertion": "BNM dates Malaysia’s new dollar to 12 June 1967 and describes old-currency redemption at two shillings and fourpence sterling.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88" ] }, { "claim_id": "C176", "assertion": "BNM records Malaysia’s 1973 withdrawal from interchangeability and floating from 21 June 1973.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000502", "label": "Brunei dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C173", "C175", "C176" ], "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88", "S89", "S90" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C173", "assertion": "NLB identifies the 1967 end of shared issuance and separate Singapore, Malaysian and Brunei currencies.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88", "S89", "S90" ] }, { "claim_id": "C175", "assertion": "MAS describes Singapore–Brunei interchangeability at par; BDCB distinguishes customary tender from legal tender.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88", "S89", "S90" ] }, { "claim_id": "C176", "assertion": "BNM records Malaysia’s 1973 withdrawal from interchangeability and floating from 21 June 1973.", "source_ids": [ "S82", "S88", "S89", "S90" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000503", "label": "Philippine peso, twentieth-century reform lineage", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C178", "C179", "C996", "C1166" ], "source_ids": [ "S84", "S474", "S561" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C178", "assertion": "BSP dates the U.S.-approved Philippine coinage reform to 1903 with two Philippine pesos per U.S. dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S84", "S474", "S561" ] }, { "claim_id": "C179", "assertion": "BSP describes Japanese occupation notes and local resistance issues during 1942–1945, followed by postwar and central-bank issues.", "source_ids": [ "S84", "S474", "S561" ] }, { "claim_id": "C996", "assertion": "The 1903 Philippine reform defined a gold peso and made US gold dollars tender at two pesos per dollar. The date is enactment; commencement depended on the stipulated coin supply. Spanish and Mexican predecessors are additional inputs, not erased by the new standard.", "source_ids": [ "S84", "S474", "S561" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1166", "assertion": "Act 1045 made obligations in Mexican local currency enforceable as Philippine-peso judgments, allowed settlement in Philippine pesos, and extinguished the old obligation upon payment. Partial input to a multiple-currency replacement. The conversion was adjudicated by value, not a universal 1:1 exchange. Do not infer merely from purchase of Mexican silver as bullion.", "source_ids": [ "S561" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000507", "label": "Australian dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C183", "C184", "C185", "C188", "C434", "C435", "C436", "C437", "C438", "C946" ], "source_ids": [ "S91", "S92", "S93", "S96", "S200", "S239" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C183", "assertion": "RBA describes early Spanish-dollar circulation in Australia, later sterling institutions, and national paper money.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S92", "S93", "S96", "S200", "S239" ] }, { "claim_id": "C184", "assertion": "RBA’s 1966 report values the new Australian dollar at ten old shillings, or two dollars per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S92", "S93", "S96", "S200", "S239" ] }, { "claim_id": "C185", "assertion": "RBA records public issue of Australian dollar notes on 14 February 1966 and subsequent retirement of pound notes.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S92", "S93", "S96", "S200", "S239" ] }, { "claim_id": "C188", "assertion": "CBSI dates Solomon Islands dollar introduction to October 1977, replacing Australian currency in the changeover.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S92", "S93", "S96", "S200", "S239" ] }, { "claim_id": "C434", "assertion": "Currency Act 1965 s.2 makes its remaining provisions operative on 14 February 1966.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S92", "S93", "S96", "S200", "S239" ] }, { "claim_id": "C435", "assertion": "Section 8 sets two Australian dollars per pound, ten cents per shilling and five-sixths of a cent per penny.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S92", "S93", "S96", "S200", "S239" ] }, { "claim_id": "C436", "assertion": "Sections 9–11 convert covered legal references, contracts and payments, with foreign-currency and rounding qualifications.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S92", "S93", "S96", "S200", "S239" ] }, { "claim_id": "C437", "assertion": "The federal Act excludes Papua, New Guinea and Christmas Island from its territorial extension.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S92", "S93", "S96", "S200", "S239" ] }, { "claim_id": "C438", "assertion": "Sections 18–21 allow transitional old-currency dealings and old/new coin tender; s.23 permits later coin call-ins. Decimal launch is not a universal old-cash extinction date.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S92", "S93", "S96", "S200", "S239" ] }, { "claim_id": "C946", "assertion": "The kina succeeded Australian dollars in Papua New Guinea. Both circulated through 1975; Australian-dollar legal tender ended on 1 January 1976. Traditional shell names are a separate naming history.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S92", "S93", "S96", "S200", "S239" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000508", "label": "Australian pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C184", "C435", "C936" ], "source_ids": [ "S91", "S93", "S200" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C184", "assertion": "RBA’s 1966 report values the new Australian dollar at ten old shillings, or two dollars per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S93", "S200" ] }, { "claim_id": "C435", "assertion": "Section 8 sets two Australian dollars per pound, ten cents per shilling and five-sixths of a cent per penny.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S93", "S200" ] }, { "claim_id": "C936", "assertion": "Australian national pounds developed from the sterling currency adopted in the colonies. 1825 is the colonial framework; 1910 national legislation does not erase earlier local money.", "source_ids": [ "S91", "S93", "S200" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000509", "label": "New Zealand dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C186", "C465" ], "source_ids": [ "S94", "S210" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C186", "assertion": "RBNZ dates decimal changeover to 10 July 1967 at two New Zealand dollars per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S94", "S210" ] }, { "claim_id": "C465", "assertion": "Price Order 2044 takes effect on 10 July 1967 and converts covered maximum prices at one dollar per ten shillings, with rounding and a transitional machine-conversion exception.", "source_ids": [ "S94", "S210" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000510", "label": "New Zealand pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C186", "C937", "C942" ], "source_ids": [ "S94", "S98", "S449", "S451" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C186", "assertion": "RBNZ dates decimal changeover to 10 July 1967 at two New Zealand dollars per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S94", "S98", "S449", "S451" ] }, { "claim_id": "C937", "assertion": "New Zealand local pound coinage and national notes succeeded the British-coin and trading-bank system. Staged monetary separation; no blanket 1:1 sterling conversion asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S94", "S98", "S449", "S451" ] }, { "claim_id": "C942", "assertion": "Post-independence Samoa’s local bank issue succeeded the Bank of New Zealand pound-note system. Transition bounded by independence and decimalisation; issuer terminology is imprecise about British versus New Zealand pounds.", "source_ids": [ "S94", "S98", "S449", "S451" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000511", "label": "Fiji dollar, 1969 reform", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C187" ], "source_ids": [ "S95" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C187", "assertion": "RBF dates Fiji’s dollar changeover to 13 January 1969 and describes gradual withdrawal of pound currency.", "source_ids": [ "S95" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000512", "label": "Fiji pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C187", "C938" ], "source_ids": [ "S95", "S450" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C187", "assertion": "RBF dates Fiji’s dollar changeover to 13 January 1969 and describes gradual withdrawal of pound currency.", "source_ids": [ "S95", "S450" ] }, { "claim_id": "C938", "assertion": "Fiji’s local pound issues developed from an English-coin currency system. The board began in 1914 and local coins followed in 1934; this is unit descent, not a fixed exchange-rate claim.", "source_ids": [ "S95", "S450" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000513", "label": "Solomon Islands dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C188" ], "source_ids": [ "S96" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C188", "assertion": "CBSI dates Solomon Islands dollar introduction to October 1977, replacing Australian currency in the changeover.", "source_ids": [ "S96" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000515", "label": "British Caribbean / East Caribbean dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C189", "C190", "C194", "C191", "C193", "C984" ], "source_ids": [ "S97", "S98", "S100", "S101", "S467" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C189", "assertion": "ECCB’s report dates ECCA’s succession to BCCB and its first notes to 1965; ECCB was established in 1983 and issued notes in 1984.", "source_ids": [ "S97", "S98", "S100", "S101", "S467" ] }, { "claim_id": "C190", "assertion": "ECCB records EC$4.80 per pound before the July 1976 switch to EC$2.70 per U.S. dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S97", "S98", "S100", "S101", "S467" ] }, { "claim_id": "C194", "assertion": "Barbados’s central bank describes BCCB/ECCA predecessors and national banknotes from 1973.", "source_ids": [ "S97", "S98", "S100", "S101", "S467" ] }, { "claim_id": "C191", "assertion": "Bundesbank dates Trinidad and Tobago’s 1:1 dollar changeover to 14 December 1964.", "source_ids": [ "S97", "S98", "S100", "S101", "S467" ] }, { "claim_id": "C193", "assertion": "Bank of Guyana dates national notes replacing BCCB notes to 15 November 1965 and national coins to mid-1967.", "source_ids": [ "S97", "S98", "S100", "S101", "S467" ] }, { "claim_id": "C984", "assertion": "BCCB notes took over the note circulation of Barbados, British Guiana and Trinidad in 1951. The Barbados system is one documented input, not the only one.", "source_ids": [ "S97", "S98", "S100", "S101", "S467" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000516", "label": "Trinidad and Tobago dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C191", "C460", "C461", "C462" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S207" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C191", "assertion": "Bundesbank dates Trinidad and Tobago’s 1:1 dollar changeover to 14 December 1964.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S207" ] }, { "claim_id": "C460", "assertion": "The consolidated Trinidad and Tobago Act gives 12 December 1964 as commencement for the relevant currency provisions; this is distinct from the previously sourced 14 December cash transition.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S207" ] }, { "claim_id": "C461", "assertion": "Section 21(4) preserves former British Caribbean Currency Board tender until 1 January 1966 or an earlier date specified by Gazette notice.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S207" ] }, { "claim_id": "C462", "assertion": "The consolidation’s one-year claim window after 1 December 1994 is a later amended provision, not proof of the original 1964 redemption schedule.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S207" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000517", "label": "Jamaican dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C192", "C463", "C464", "C945" ], "source_ids": [ "S99", "S208", "S209", "S265" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C192", "assertion": "BOJ dates Jamaica’s decimal currency to 8 September 1969 on a ten-shilling dollar basis.", "source_ids": [ "S99", "S208", "S209", "S265" ] }, { "claim_id": "C463", "assertion": "BOJ’s statutory extracts define a 100-cent dollar and show the 1969 amendment; later amended call-in provisions do not by themselves establish the 1969 withdrawal schedule.", "source_ids": [ "S99", "S208", "S209", "S265" ] }, { "claim_id": "C464", "assertion": "Ministry Paper 7 explains the ten-shilling dollar recommendation and abandons the earlier 2½-cent coin/halfpenny proposal; policy proposals must not be graphed as enacted currencies.", "source_ids": [ "S99", "S208", "S209", "S265" ] }, { "claim_id": "C945", "assertion": "Cayman currency replaced Jamaican dollars at equal unit value during the 1972 changeover. Jamaican cash retained legal tender through 31 August.", "source_ids": [ "S99", "S208", "S209", "S265" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000518", "label": "Jamaican pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C192", "C944" ], "source_ids": [ "S99" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C192", "assertion": "BOJ dates Jamaica’s decimal currency to 8 September 1969 on a ten-shilling dollar basis.", "source_ids": [ "S99" ] }, { "claim_id": "C944", "assertion": "Jamaica adopted British currency as the basis of its pound system. Spanish doubloons remained a legal-tender exception until 1901.", "source_ids": [ "S99" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000519", "label": "Guyana dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C193" ], "source_ids": [ "S100" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C193", "assertion": "Bank of Guyana dates national notes replacing BCCB notes to 15 November 1965 and national coins to mid-1967.", "source_ids": [ "S100" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000520", "label": "Barbados dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C194", "C195" ], "source_ids": [ "S101", "S102" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C194", "assertion": "Barbados’s central bank describes BCCB/ECCA predecessors and national banknotes from 1973.", "source_ids": [ "S101", "S102" ] }, { "claim_id": "C195", "assertion": "Barbados fixed two local dollars per U.S. dollar on 5 July 1975.", "source_ids": [ "S101", "S102" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000521", "label": "Bahamian dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C196" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C196", "assertion": "Bundesbank records 25 May 1966: seven Bahamas shillings per Bahamian dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000522", "label": "Bahamas pound", "verdict": "merge", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "coordinated_source_review", "rationale": "British Currency Act expressly keeps local contracts/payments/liabilities in sterling even alongside local-note issue. Preserve Bahamas use as sterling regional observation and dollar conversion.", "claim_ids": [ "C196", "C985" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S468" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C196", "assertion": "Bundesbank records 25 May 1966: seven Bahamas shillings per Bahamian dollar.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S468" ] }, { "claim_id": "C985", "assertion": "The Bahamas Currency Board issued local pounds against sterling at par. An issue-system derivation; the later dollar peg is a different relationship.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S468" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-BAHAMAS" ], "merge_target": "T-FTM000497" }, { "id": "T-FTM000523", "label": "Bermudian dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C197", "C198", "C439", "C440", "C441", "C442", "C443" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S103", "S201", "S202" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C197", "assertion": "Bundesbank records 6 February 1970: 2.40 Bermudian dollars per Bermuda pound.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S103", "S201", "S202" ] }, { "claim_id": "C198", "assertion": "BMA dates the Bermudian dollar’s U.S.-dollar parity to 31 July 1972.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S103", "S201", "S202" ] }, { "claim_id": "C439", "assertion": "Bermuda Act s.9 converts covered sterling references and transactions from 6 February 1970.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S103", "S201", "S202" ] }, { "claim_id": "C440", "assertion": "Bermuda conversion rounding discards fractions below half a cent and rounds half a cent or more upwards.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S103", "S201", "S202" ] }, { "claim_id": "C441", "assertion": "BMA records a dollar launch on 6 February 1970 at eight shillings and fourpence: 12/5 dollars per former pound.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S103", "S201", "S202" ] }, { "claim_id": "C442", "assertion": "BMA reports that all old Bermuda currency had been demonetised by 30 June 1970 after gradual withdrawal.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S103", "S201", "S202" ] }, { "claim_id": "C443", "assertion": "BMA separately dates the formal US-dollar link to 31 July 1972; this is not the 1970 predecessor conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S103", "S201", "S202" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000524", "label": "Bermuda pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C197", "C441", "C987" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S202" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C197", "assertion": "Bundesbank records 6 February 1970: 2.40 Bermudian dollars per Bermuda pound.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S202" ] }, { "claim_id": "C441", "assertion": "BMA records a dollar launch on 6 February 1970 at eight shillings and fourpence: 12/5 dollars per former pound.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S202" ] }, { "claim_id": "C987", "assertion": "The Bermuda pound replaced in 1970 was the locally issued sterling-denominated predecessor of the Bermuda dollar. The transition attests the inherited pound system; 1970 is not its origin date.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S202" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000525", "label": "British Honduras / Belize dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C199", "C986" ], "source_ids": [ "S104" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C199", "assertion": "Belize’s central bank dates local government dollar notes and a gold-basis reform to 1894.", "source_ids": [ "S104" ] }, { "claim_id": "C986", "assertion": "British Honduras reorganised a sterling-based mixed circulation into a gold-basis system with local dollar notes in 1894. Sterling is one documented monetary input; Spanish-American coins and US dollars require separate branches. No exchange ratio inferred.", "source_ids": [ "S104" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000526", "label": "Surinamese dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C200", "C444", "C445", "C446", "C447", "C448", "C449", "C450" ], "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S204" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C200", "assertion": "Suriname’s 1 January 2004 reform exchanged 1,000 guilders for one dollar, except coins and muntbiljetten retaining nominal values.", "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S204" ] }, { "claim_id": "C444", "assertion": "S.B.2003 no.88 changes the statutory unit to the Surinamese dollar, SRD, divided into 100 cents, from 1 January 2004.", "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S204" ] }, { "claim_id": "C445", "assertion": "S.B.2003 no.89 converts covered guilder amounts to dollars at 1,000 guilders per dollar from 1 January 2004 while preserving other contractual terms.", "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S204" ] }, { "claim_id": "C446", "assertion": "Article 5 excepts qualifying government coins and one-/two-and-a-half-guilder government notes: their corresponding cent/dollar face values are retained; commemorative coins are excluded.", "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S204" ] }, { "claim_id": "C447", "assertion": "Article 6 prescribes cent rounding and special aggregation of banknotes ending in five; the aggregation rule does not govern individual-note exchange.", "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S204" ] }, { "claim_id": "C448", "assertion": "Old central-bank notes continue as tender until the recall period ends, valued at one-thousandth of their guilder face values.", "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S204" ] }, { "claim_id": "C449", "assertion": "The law qualifies its application to rights and obligations governed by foreign law; it is not a universal rewrite of every contract worldwide.", "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S204" ] }, { "claim_id": "C450", "assertion": "The central bank states that old banknotes and government notes remained valid through 31 May 2004; it describes later banknote exchange for 30 years but no later government-note exchange.", "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S204" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000527", "label": "Surinamese guilder", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C200", "C445", "C1246", "C1271" ], "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S622", "S623" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C200", "assertion": "Suriname’s 1 January 2004 reform exchanged 1,000 guilders for one dollar, except coins and muntbiljetten retaining nominal values.", "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S622", "S623" ] }, { "claim_id": "C445", "assertion": "S.B.2003 no.89 converts covered guilder amounts to dollars at 1,000 guilders per dollar from 1 January 2004 while preserving other contractual terms.", "source_ids": [ "S105", "S203", "S622", "S623" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1246", "assertion": "The autonomous Surinamese guilder branched from the Dutch monetary system used locally since 1827. Official history identifies monetary autonomy, corroborated by later separate exchange values; not an ancestry claim from the US-dollar peg.", "source_ids": [ "S622", "S623" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1271", "assertion": "The central bank dates the autonomous Surinamese monetary period from 1940. An observed independent territorial system, not an exact first-day birth assertion.", "source_ids": [ "S622" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000528", "label": "Namibia dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C201", "C202", "C952" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S106" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C201", "assertion": "Bank of Namibia dates the national dollar’s introduction to 15 September 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S106" ] }, { "claim_id": "C202", "assertion": "Bundesbank records NAD–rand parity and continuing rand legal tender in Namibia.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S106" ] }, { "claim_id": "C952", "assertion": "Namibia introduced its dollar at par with the previously circulating rand. Rand remained legal tender alongside the new local currency.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S106" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000529", "label": "South African rand — origin and Namibia context", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C202", "C509", "C948", "C949", "C950", "C951", "C952" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S233", "S243", "S244" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C202", "assertion": "Bundesbank records NAD–rand parity and continuing rand legal tender in Namibia.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S233", "S243", "S244" ] }, { "claim_id": "C509", "assertion": "The rand replaced the South African pound on 14 February 1961; the issuer's decimal-coin account equates one pound with two rand.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S233", "S243", "S244" ] }, { "claim_id": "C948", "assertion": "South Africa replaced its pound with two rand per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S233", "S243", "S244" ] }, { "claim_id": "C949", "assertion": "Botswana introduced the pula in exchange for the rand at par. The initial guaranteed exchange window lasted 100 days.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S233", "S243", "S244" ] }, { "claim_id": "C950", "assertion": "The lilangeni became local money alongside the rand, with equal value and a programme to return rand cash. This was a local-currency succession with continuing co-circulation, not immediate extinction of rand use.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S233", "S243", "S244" ] }, { "claim_id": "C951", "assertion": "Lesotho introduced the loti at par with the previously circulating rand. Rand legal tender continued; month precision retained alongside the earlier IMF dossier.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S233", "S243", "S244" ] }, { "claim_id": "C952", "assertion": "Namibia introduced its dollar at par with the previously circulating rand. Rand remained legal tender alongside the new local currency.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S233", "S243", "S244" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000532", "label": "Zimbabwe Gold (ZiG), 2024 introduction", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C206", "C1118" ], "source_ids": [ "S110" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C206", "assertion": "RBZ’s 2024 report dates Zimbabwe Gold’s introduction to 5 April 2024.", "source_ids": [ "S110" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1118", "assertion": "Zimbabwe’s 2024 legal amendments introduced ZiG as the unit of account replacing Zimbabwe dollars, including conversion of existing balances.", "source_ids": [ "S110" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000533", "label": "Ecuadorian sucre", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C207", "C1429", "C1441" ], "source_ids": [ "S111", "S718" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C207", "assertion": "BCE records Ecuador’s January 2000 dollarization announcement at 25,000 sucres per USD and the March legal reform.", "source_ids": [ "S111", "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1429", "assertion": "Ecuador implemented replacement of sucres by US dollars at 25,000 sucres per dollar during 2000. This local adoption and conversion joins the existing USD; it does not make the sucre a founding parent of USD.", "source_ids": [ "S718" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1441", "assertion": "Ecuador adopted dollar accounting in 2000; the reported final cash-exchange deadline was 8 June 2001. Residual redemption is separate from active unit replacement.", "source_ids": [ "S718" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000535", "label": "Livre tournois", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C210", "C219", "C221", "C222", "C227", "C725", "C726", "C727", "C728", "C731", "C733", "C735", "C741", "C1032" ], "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "France and western antecedents", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C210", "assertion": "Chicago dates the first assignat authorization to December 1789, linking livre-denominated claims to sales of state lands.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C219", "assertion": "The law of 18 Germinal III names the monetary unit franc instead of livre and calls its hundredths centimes.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C221", "assertion": "Delage dates decimal subdivision of the monetary livre to 24 August 1793.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C222", "assertion": "Bindseil dates the Caisse d’Escompte charter to 24 March 1776 and describes its livre-tournois banknotes.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C227", "assertion": "Monnaie de Paris dates Henri III’s silver franc to 1575, valued at one livre tournois.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C725", "assertion": "Philippe Auguste adopts the Saint-Martin type for western royal money after the Norman conquest. Parisis money coexisted. This does not establish a universal replacement in 1203.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C726", "assertion": "Royal tournois adoption coexists with the parisis system. Parallel systems; this edge is neither descent nor a fixed-rate conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C727", "assertion": "Tournois is the Tours-derived variant of the livre–sou–denier system. No claim that metal content stayed fixed from the Carolingian period.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C728", "assertion": "The franc à cheval is authorized at one livre tournois. One account livre equals one franc coin at this tariff; the coin did not replace the accounting system.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C731", "assertion": "Henri III’s silver franc is valued at one livre tournois.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C733", "assertion": "The law of 18 germinal III names the franc in place of the livre. Naming law; separate from silver specification and later conversion tariff.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C735", "assertion": "The tariff equates 1.0125 livres tournois with 1 franc. Preferred reported date: 25 germinal IV / 14 April 1796 (S16). S17 says 24 germinal. Day remains withheld pending the original act.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C741", "assertion": "Assignats are monetary instruments denominated in the monetary units of the period. Do not insert them as a separate universal parent currency between livre and franc.", "source_ids": [ "S12", "S112", "S114", "S115", "S117", "S125", "S127", "S371", "S372", "S373", "S374", "S391", "S394", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1032", "assertion": "Tournois can be treated as a qualified regional descendant of Frankish denier–livre reckoning.", "source_ids": [ "S127", "S371", "S483" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000560", "label": "Frankish denier–livre reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C232", "C1026", "C1027", "C1031", "C1046", "C1028", "C1029", "C1030", "C1032", "C1033", "C1034", "C1043", "C1047", "C1048", "C1056", "C1065", "C1066", "C1067", "C1068", "C1069", "C1070", "C1071", "C1092", "C1093", "C1094", "C1095", "C1320", "C1321" ], "source_ids": [ "S115", "S483", "S487", "S488", "S127", "S371", "S486", "S489", "S492", "S499", "S500", "S501", "S502", "S503", "S521", "S146", "S638", "S639" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "France and western antecedents", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C232", "assertion": "Monnaie de Paris describes Carolingian accounting as one pound, twenty sous, or 240 deniers.", "source_ids": [ "S115", "S483", "S487", "S488", "S127", "S371", "S486", "S489", "S492", "S499", "S500", "S501", "S502", "S503", "S521", "S146", "S638", "S639" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1026", "assertion": "Rovelli interprets the 755 reckoning as twelve denarii per account solidus.", "source_ids": [ "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1027", "assertion": "By the 794 reform, the reckoning comprised 240 denarii, twenty solidi and an account pound.", "source_ids": [ "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1031", "assertion": "A qualified identity profile can extend Frankish reckoning to late-Merovingian deniers.", "source_ids": [ "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1046", "assertion": "Liptines requires an annual solidus, defined as twelve denarii, per casada of retained church property; the text is dated 743–744.", "source_ids": [ "S487", "S488" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1028", "assertion": "Rovelli dates Merovingian silver denarii approximately to 670–675.", "source_ids": [ "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1029", "assertion": "Pepin reformed existing pennies; Charlemagne later strengthened their weight.", "source_ids": [ "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1030", "assertion": "The medieval denarius reused a Roman name without its classical metrology.", "source_ids": [ "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1032", "assertion": "Tournois can be treated as a qualified regional descendant of Frankish denier–livre reckoning.", "source_ids": [ "S127", "S371", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1033", "assertion": "Parisis can likewise be treated as a qualified regional descendant of Frankish reckoning.", "source_ids": [ "S127", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1034", "assertion": "The solidus survived chiefly as an account unit in the early medieval West.", "source_ids": [ "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1043", "assertion": "Sgambati offers a broad Roman-to-medieval account-money narrative through Bloch.", "source_ids": [ "S486" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1047", "assertion": "The 816 rule pays Salic-law debts in twelve-denarius solidi, retaining forty for a Saxon or Frisian killing a Salic Frank.", "source_ids": [ "S489" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1048", "assertion": "The 816 rule establishes scoped legal reckonings, not a universal late-Roman-to-Frankish identity or conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S489" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1056", "assertion": "The 797 Saxon commodity tariff explicitly reckons twelve silver denarii per solidus.", "source_ids": [ "S492" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1065", "assertion": "Angers 22 models a silver loan reckoned in solidi, secured by a vineyard and its produce until repayment.", "source_ids": [ "S499" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1066", "assertion": "Walther places the underlying private documents of the Angers collection in the late sixth century.", "source_ids": [ "S500" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1067", "assertion": "The inspected Lex Salica text equates 120 denarii with three solidi and 1,200 denarii with thirty solidi.", "source_ids": [ "S501" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1068", "assertion": "The Cologne catalogue distinguishes Merovingian versions A/C from eighth- and ninth-century versions, including K associated with 802.", "source_ids": [ "S502" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1069", "assertion": "BK 39 c.9 (803) settles debts to the king in twelve-denarius solidi, with an exception for Salic-law freda.", "source_ids": [ "S503" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1070", "assertion": "The 816 clauses explicitly apply twelve-denarius settlement to Salic-law obligations while retaining a specified forty-denarius exception.", "source_ids": [ "S489" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1071", "assertion": "The 803/816 provisions demonstrate legal settlement continuity across different solidus reckonings, without proving a single universal unit.", "source_ids": [ "S501", "S502", "S503", "S489" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1092", "assertion": "Naismith identifies Pippin III’s reformed Frankish coinage and Beonna’s East Anglian issues as models for Offa’s broad pennies.", "source_ids": [ "S521" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1093", "assertion": "Naismith gives an approximate 1.30 g target for Offa’s light pennies, matching contemporary Frankish coinage; the 792/3 heavy reform used about 1.45 g.", "source_ids": [ "S521" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1094", "assertion": "The 2024 silver-provenance study places Offa’s coinage within continental silver-supply connections. This is evidence about metal supply, not by itself ancestry of the English pound.", "source_ids": [ "S146" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1095", "assertion": "Frankish models and silver-supply connections do not yet establish a dated Frankish-to-English account-unit succession. No new ancestry edge is admitted.", "source_ids": [ "S521", "S146" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1320", "assertion": "Bothe reports the hypothesis that Salic forty-denarius reckoning refers to the late-Roman siliqua of Honorius and successors, while emphasizing disputed dating of the law's formation.", "source_ids": [ "S638" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1321", "assertion": "Drew identifies the Salic forty-denarius equation as distinct from both Roman imperial and Carolingian reckoning and flags unresolved monetary interpretation; the ratio alone cannot establish a Roman currency identity bridge.", "source_ids": [ "S639" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000590", "label": "Pound Scots", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C271", "C272", "C294" ], "source_ids": [ "S142" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C271", "assertion": "Twelve pounds Scots equalled one pound sterling in accounting; Fox distinguishes this from rates for actual circulating coins.", "source_ids": [ "S142" ] }, { "claim_id": "C272", "assertion": "Scots pounds continued in prices and accounts for decades after the 1707 union.", "source_ids": [ "S142" ] }, { "claim_id": "C294", "assertion": "Before union, Scottish accounting used pounds of 20 shillings of 12 pence, alongside a merk worth two-thirds of a pound.", "source_ids": [ "S142" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000604", "label": "Irish pound — pre-1826 account unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C296", "C297", "C298", "C303", "C304" ], "source_ids": [ "S152", "S153", "S155" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C296", "assertion": "Kelly dates completion of the assimilation of the earlier Irish currency into that of the UK to 1826.", "source_ids": [ "S152", "S153", "S155" ] }, { "claim_id": "C297", "assertion": "The 1825 Commons debate described £100 British as equivalent to £108 6s 8d Irish and proposed discharging Irish debts at twelve-thirteenths in British currency.", "source_ids": [ "S152", "S153", "S155" ] }, { "claim_id": "C298", "assertion": "The debate described Irish circulation as a mixture of banknotes, bills, British coins, tokens and Irish copper.", "source_ids": [ "S152", "S153", "S155" ] }, { "claim_id": "C303", "assertion": "The Museum describes coin production outside Dublin under Prince John and distinctive triangular devices on thirteenth-century Irish coins.", "source_ids": [ "S152", "S153", "S155" ] }, { "claim_id": "C304", "assertion": "The Museum reports virtually no local minting during 1310–1460, alongside continued use of mixed Irish, English, Scottish and other coins.", "source_ids": [ "S152", "S153", "S155" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000606", "label": "New Brunswick decimal dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C305", "C385", "C386", "C388", "C389", "C390", "C391", "C392", "C393", "C394", "C395", "C396", "C397" ], "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C305", "assertion": "New Brunswick permitted decimal accounts in 1852 and required them from 1 November 1860; its dollar standard matched Canada’s.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C385", "assertion": "The 1852 act retains the local pound of twenty shillings while permitting amounts and accounts in dollars and decimal parts.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C386", "assertion": "The printed commencement note records royal approval on 30 June 1852, provincial declaration on 11 August, and operation from 1 October, following Gazette publication on 15 September.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C388", "assertion": "The 1860 act requires accounts rendered to government in dollars and cents, allowing a parallel pounds–shillings–pence column.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C389", "assertion": "Section 4 equates four dollars with one existing local pound, twenty cents with one shilling, and divides dollars into 100 cents and cents into ten mills.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C390", "assertion": "Section 3 makes qualifying post-1-July-1834 US eagles weighing ten pennyweights eighteen grains tender for ten dollars, with proportional multiples and divisions.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C391", "assertion": "Sections 5–6 limit the specified royal-authorized silver coins to ten dollars per payment and copper/bronze coins to twenty cents.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C392", "assertion": "The 1860 act was passed on 9 April and specifies commencement on 1 November 1860.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C393", "assertion": "On 16 December 1861 the Royal Mint reported the copper coinage complete; New Brunswick silver remained to follow, with March delivery expected.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C394", "assertion": "New Brunswick’s council reported on 10 November 1860 that its decimal-account act was operating, but Canadian coins were not legal tender locally.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C395", "assertion": "The original 1852 act is 15 Victoria, chapter 85; UNB’s 14-Victoria metadata label conflicts with the printed heading and the 1860 cross-reference.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C396", "assertion": "Section 2 permits the Governor in Council to prescribe fractional-cent equivalents by published order; it supplies no universal nearest-cent rounding rule.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] }, { "claim_id": "C397", "assertion": "Section 8 keeps the 1852 act in force subject to the 1860 provisions, supporting an accounting reform rather than wholesale legal cancellation.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000607", "label": "Prince Edward Island pound of account", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C306", "C307" ], "source_ids": [ "S156" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C306", "assertion": "Prince Edward Island used a £150-local-to-£100-sterling reporting par in 1848; sterling rents had a separate rule.", "source_ids": [ "S156" ] }, { "claim_id": "C307", "assertion": "Prince Edward Island changed to decimal accounts during December 1871–February 1872, with its dollar equal to Canada’s.", "source_ids": [ "S156" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000608", "label": "Prince Edward Island decimal dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C307", "C308", "C312" ], "source_ids": [ "S156", "S160" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C307", "assertion": "Prince Edward Island changed to decimal accounts during December 1871–February 1872, with its dollar equal to Canada’s.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S160" ] }, { "claim_id": "C308", "assertion": "Practical PEI assimilation in 1873 preceded legal integration in 1881.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S160" ] }, { "claim_id": "C312", "assertion": "The 1906 consolidation requires equivalent Canadian-currency payment of earlier BC and PEI debts payable after the 1 July 1881 boundary.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S160" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000609", "label": "Vancouver Island decimal dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C309", "C311" ], "source_ids": [ "S157", "S159" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C309", "assertion": "Vancouver Island’s 1862 act specifies dollar public accounts from 1 January 1863 and $4.85 per pound sterling.", "source_ids": [ "S157", "S159" ] }, { "claim_id": "C311", "assertion": "The 1867 ordinance establishes uniform dollar accounts across British Columbia, with an ordinary sovereign rating of $4.85 and a separate Crown-revenue schedule using $5 per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S157", "S159" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000610", "label": "British Columbia decimal dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C310", "C311", "C312" ], "source_ids": [ "S158", "S159", "S160" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C310", "assertion": "British Columbia’s 1865 ordinance specifies dollar public accounts from 1 January 1866 and $4.85 per pound sterling, subject to its approval-proclamation clause.", "source_ids": [ "S158", "S159", "S160" ] }, { "claim_id": "C311", "assertion": "The 1867 ordinance establishes uniform dollar accounts across British Columbia, with an ordinary sovereign rating of $4.85 and a separate Crown-revenue schedule using $5 per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S158", "S159", "S160" ] }, { "claim_id": "C312", "assertion": "The 1906 consolidation requires equivalent Canadian-currency payment of earlier BC and PEI debts payable after the 1 July 1881 boundary.", "source_ids": [ "S158", "S159", "S160" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000621", "label": "Castilian maravedí of account", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C335", "C336", "C1279" ], "source_ids": [ "S171", "S630" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C335", "assertion": "Rivero Hernández distinguishes the later Castilian maravedí unit of account from earlier physical coinage.", "source_ids": [ "S171", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C336", "assertion": "The 1497 reform summary rates a real at 34 maravedís, a ducado at 375, and a blanca at one-half.", "source_ids": [ "S171", "S630" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1279", "assertion": "Gonzalo de Baeza’s treasury accounts beginning in 1477 converted payment amounts into maravedís. Firm account-unit witness; does not create an ancestry edge to the concurrent real.", "source_ids": [ "S630" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000639", "label": "New Brunswick pound of account", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C385", "C386", "C387", "C388", "C389", "C395", "C396", "C397" ], "source_ids": [ "S186", "S187" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C385", "assertion": "The 1852 act retains the local pound of twenty shillings while permitting amounts and accounts in dollars and decimal parts.", "source_ids": [ "S186", "S187" ] }, { "claim_id": "C386", "assertion": "The printed commencement note records royal approval on 30 June 1852, provincial declaration on 11 August, and operation from 1 October, following Gazette publication on 15 September.", "source_ids": [ "S186", "S187" ] }, { "claim_id": "C387", "assertion": "The 1852 act rates a lawful British sovereign at one local pound, four shillings and four pence.", "source_ids": [ "S186", "S187" ] }, { "claim_id": "C388", "assertion": "The 1860 act requires accounts rendered to government in dollars and cents, allowing a parallel pounds–shillings–pence column.", "source_ids": [ "S186", "S187" ] }, { "claim_id": "C389", "assertion": "Section 4 equates four dollars with one existing local pound, twenty cents with one shilling, and divides dollars into 100 cents and cents into ten mills.", "source_ids": [ "S186", "S187" ] }, { "claim_id": "C395", "assertion": "The original 1852 act is 15 Victoria, chapter 85; UNB’s 14-Victoria metadata label conflicts with the printed heading and the 1860 cross-reference.", "source_ids": [ "S186", "S187" ] }, { "claim_id": "C396", "assertion": "Section 2 permits the Governor in Council to prescribe fractional-cent equivalents by published order; it supplies no universal nearest-cent rounding rule.", "source_ids": [ "S186", "S187" ] }, { "claim_id": "C397", "assertion": "Section 8 keeps the 1852 act in force subject to the 1860 provisions, supporting an accounting reform rather than wholesale legal cancellation.", "source_ids": [ "S186", "S187" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000640", "label": "West African Currency Board pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C398", "C399", "C400", "C401", "C402", "C403", "C405", "C406", "C412", "C413", "C416", "C418", "C419", "C432", "C433" ], "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C398", "assertion": "Krus and Schuler distinguish WACB establishment on 6 December 1912 from first currency issue on 26 June 1913.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C399", "assertion": "Large-scale WACB banknote issue began on 11 July 1916; the compilation also reports a small £9 balance at June-end.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C400", "assertion": "The WACB pound exchanged at sterling parity, with commissions; parity did not imply costless remittance.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C401", "assertion": "The original WACB area comprised Gambia, Gold Coast, Nigeria and Sierra Leone.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C402", "assertion": "Krus and Schuler report final Gambian WACB note tender ending 1 September 1966 and coin tender ending 1 June 1968.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C403", "assertion": "The WACB remained in liquidation until 31 October 1973, after its monetary role ended.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C405", "assertion": "British silver already circulated locally before the WACB; the proposed sterling ancestry is scoped to that monetary replacement context.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C406", "assertion": "Bank of Ghana first issued national pounds, shillings and pence on 14 July 1958, taking over from WACB.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C412", "assertion": "Nigeria issued its national notes and coins on 1 July 1959 while withdrawing WACB issues.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C413", "assertion": "WACB legal-tender status in Nigeria ended on 1 July 1962, later than national issue.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C416", "assertion": "The Bank of Sierra Leone equates 240 old pence with two leones; its separate divide-the-pound-by-1.2 wording is inconsistent.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C418", "assertion": "The UN reports Sierra Leone introduced the leone on 4 August 1964, equal to ten shillings and subdivided into 100 cents.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C419", "assertion": "The first central-bank statement, dated 31 August 1964, still held WACB notes and coins among its assets.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C432", "assertion": "The WACB chronology separates institutional formation, coin issue, note issue, territorial withdrawal and final liquidation.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] }, { "claim_id": "C433", "assertion": "The CBN’s 1912 start for WACB notes conflicts with the archival compilation’s separation of establishment and 1916 large-scale note issue.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S190", "S191", "S193", "S194" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000641", "label": "Ghanaian pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C406", "C407" ], "source_ids": [ "S190" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C406", "assertion": "Bank of Ghana first issued national pounds, shillings and pence on 14 July 1958, taking over from WACB.", "source_ids": [ "S190" ] }, { "claim_id": "C407", "assertion": "On 19 July 1965 the cedi replaced Ghanaian pounds; one cedi equalled 8s4d, hence 12/5 cedis per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S190" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000642", "label": "Ghanaian cedis", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C407", "C408", "C409", "C410", "C411", "C422", "C423", "C424", "C425", "C426", "C430" ], "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C407", "assertion": "On 19 July 1965 the cedi replaced Ghanaian pounds; one cedi equalled 8s4d, hence 12/5 cedis per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ] }, { "claim_id": "C408", "assertion": "On 17 February 1967 one new cedi replaced 1.20 of the 1965 cedis.", "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ] }, { "claim_id": "C409", "assertion": "In March 1973 the new cedi became known simply as the cedi.", "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ] }, { "claim_id": "C410", "assertion": "The Bank records a 9 March 1979 discounted note exchange, with different discounts around a 5,000-cedi threshold.", "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ] }, { "claim_id": "C411", "assertion": "Cedi recalls cowrie money and pesewa a gold-dust denomination; naming alone does not establish a currency conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ] }, { "claim_id": "C422", "assertion": "The 2007 reform set 10,000 preceding cedis equal to one Ghana cedi, divided into 100 Ghana pesewas.", "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ] }, { "claim_id": "C423", "assertion": "The Bank’s annual report dates new Ghana-cedi cash circulation to 3 July 2007.", "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ] }, { "claim_id": "C424", "assertion": "The transition ran through December 2007; old cash was to lose legal-tender status by 1 January 2008, with exchange continuing.", "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ] }, { "claim_id": "C425", "assertion": "Existing cedi contracts, balances, securities and payment instruments were to convert automatically to equivalent Ghana-cedi amounts.", "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ] }, { "claim_id": "C426", "assertion": "The annual report records redenomination gazetting on 23 March 2007, separately from the later cash launch.", "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ] }, { "claim_id": "C430", "assertion": "The cedi rescalings are modeled as dated unit epochs within one continuity, preserving conversion arithmetic without extra currency branches.", "source_ids": [ "S190", "S196" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000643", "label": "Nigerian pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C412", "C413", "C414", "C415", "C433", "C456", "C1425" ], "source_ids": [ "S189", "S191", "S192", "S206", "S713", "S708" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C412", "assertion": "Nigeria issued its national notes and coins on 1 July 1959 while withdrawing WACB issues.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S191", "S192", "S206", "S713", "S708" ] }, { "claim_id": "C413", "assertion": "WACB legal-tender status in Nigeria ended on 1 July 1962, later than national issue.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S191", "S192", "S206", "S713", "S708" ] }, { "claim_id": "C414", "assertion": "Nigeria redesigned notes in 1965 and again during the civil war in 1968; these are recorded as issue changes.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S191", "S192", "S206", "S713", "S708" ] }, { "claim_id": "C415", "assertion": "Decimal notes and coins began on 1 January 1973; one naira equalled ten old shillings, or two naira per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S191", "S192", "S206", "S713", "S708" ] }, { "claim_id": "C433", "assertion": "The CBN’s 1912 start for WACB notes conflicts with the archival compilation’s separation of establishment and 1916 large-scale note issue.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S191", "S192", "S206", "S713", "S708" ] }, { "claim_id": "C456", "assertion": "The reproduced Nigerian Decimal Currency Act converts one former Nigerian pound into two naira for covered contracts, liabilities and statutory references.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S191", "S192", "S206", "S713", "S708" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1425", "assertion": "The Biafran payment unit separated regionally from the retained Nigerian-pound system in January 1968. The reviewed evidence does not establish a universal conversion ratio.", "source_ids": [ "S713", "S708" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000644", "label": "Nigerian naira", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C415", "C456", "C457", "C458", "C459" ], "source_ids": [ "S192", "S206" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C415", "assertion": "Decimal notes and coins began on 1 January 1973; one naira equalled ten old shillings, or two naira per pound.", "source_ids": [ "S192", "S206" ] }, { "claim_id": "C456", "assertion": "The reproduced Nigerian Decimal Currency Act converts one former Nigerian pound into two naira for covered contracts, liabilities and statutory references.", "source_ids": [ "S192", "S206" ] }, { "claim_id": "C457", "assertion": "The reproduced exchange notice keeps pound-denominated notes as tender through 14 February 1973, ending that status on 15 February.", "source_ids": [ "S192", "S206" ] }, { "claim_id": "C458", "assertion": "The same reproduced notice keeps former coins as tender through 30 September 1973, ending that status on 1 October.", "source_ids": [ "S192", "S206" ] }, { "claim_id": "C459", "assertion": "The reproduced act’s commencement header and exchange-notice identifier contain unresolved dating/section inconsistencies, so they do not independently establish the legal commencement chronology.", "source_ids": [ "S192", "S206" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000645", "label": "Sierra Leonean leone", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C416", "C417", "C418", "C419", "C427", "C429", "C431" ], "source_ids": [ "S193", "S194", "S197", "S199" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C416", "assertion": "The Bank of Sierra Leone equates 240 old pence with two leones; its separate divide-the-pound-by-1.2 wording is inconsistent.", "source_ids": [ "S193", "S194", "S197", "S199" ] }, { "claim_id": "C417", "assertion": "The modern leone rescaling divides nominal amounts by 1,000.", "source_ids": [ "S193", "S194", "S197", "S199" ] }, { "claim_id": "C418", "assertion": "The UN reports Sierra Leone introduced the leone on 4 August 1964, equal to ten shillings and subdivided into 100 cents.", "source_ids": [ "S193", "S194", "S197", "S199" ] }, { "claim_id": "C419", "assertion": "The first central-bank statement, dated 31 August 1964, still held WACB notes and coins among its assets.", "source_ids": [ "S193", "S194", "S197", "S199" ] }, { "claim_id": "C427", "assertion": "BSL’s newsletter reports new leone circulation on 1 July 2022 at one new unit for 1,000 old.", "source_ids": [ "S193", "S194", "S197", "S199" ] }, { "claim_id": "C429", "assertion": "The IMF reports old-leone legal tender ended in December 2023; old notes remained exchangeable at BSL in its 2024 account.", "source_ids": [ "S193", "S194", "S197", "S199" ] }, { "claim_id": "C431", "assertion": "The 2022 leone rescaling remains a same-line event; the old-note withdrawal does not terminate the leone continuity.", "source_ids": [ "S193", "S194", "S197", "S199" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000646", "label": "Gambian pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C404", "C420", "C421", "C428" ], "source_ids": [ "S189", "S195", "S198" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C404", "assertion": "Gambian national notes began on 5 October 1964; the central bank took over on 1 March 1971.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S195", "S198" ] }, { "claim_id": "C420", "assertion": "Indexed CBG text dates the currency ordinance’s operation to 1 October 1964 and the national notes four days later.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S195", "S198" ] }, { "claim_id": "C421", "assertion": "Indexed CBG text gives 21 November 1966 for national coin introduction, conflicting with the 1965 date repeated by Krus–Schuler.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S195", "S198" ] }, { "claim_id": "C428", "assertion": "A US Treasury notice records Gambian decimalisation effective 1 July 1971, with five dalasis replacing one pound.", "source_ids": [ "S189", "S195", "S198" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000647", "label": "Gambian dalasi", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C428" ], "source_ids": [ "S198" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C428", "assertion": "A US Treasury notice records Gambian decimalisation effective 1 July 1971, with five dalasis replacing one pound.", "source_ids": [ "S198" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000719", "label": "Cambodian riel", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C545", "C1175", "C1226", "C1292" ], "source_ids": [ "S279", "S574", "S591", "S650" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C545", "assertion": "The National Bank commemorates 20 March 1980 as the reintroduction of the Khmer riel.", "source_ids": [ "S279", "S574", "S591", "S650" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1175", "assertion": "The riel was reintroduced 20 March 1980 after its 1975 abolition, including use for civil-servant salaries. This is a restoration of the named account-unit tradition, not established redemption of old balances or uninterrupted monetary use. The restoration is retained as an optional relationship.", "source_ids": [ "S574" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1226", "assertion": "Vickery describes the 1980 riel entering use through state salaries and purchases. This evidence does not establish redemption of pre-1975 balances; the restoration relationship remains optional and qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S591" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1292", "assertion": "The riel was reintroduced on20March1980 after abolition. This fixes the restoration milestone; continuity of old balances and uninterrupted use remain unproved.", "source_ids": [ "S650" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000776", "label": "Kenya and Uganda florin", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C608", "C609", "C610", "C611", "C612", "C613", "C614", "C615" ], "source_ids": [ "S335", "S336" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C608", "assertion": "Kenya’s 1920–21 report describes the 26 April 1920 order converting rupee references in contracts to florins at one florin per rupee.", "source_ids": [ "S335", "S336" ] }, { "claim_id": "C609", "assertion": "The report says the 1920 currency order was brought into force by a proclamation dated 19 July; its precise operative clause was not inspected.", "source_ids": [ "S335", "S336" ] }, { "claim_id": "C610", "assertion": "The report dates transfer of the local Currency Board’s powers, duties and liabilities to the East African Currency Board to 31 July 1920.", "source_ids": [ "S335", "S336" ] }, { "claim_id": "C611", "assertion": "The report records one-rupee EACB notes made unlimited tender on 11 May 1920, and December legislation authorising florin/pound notes. Unit change and note denomination overlap.", "source_ids": [ "S335", "S336" ] }, { "claim_id": "C612", "assertion": "Kenyan Proclamation 177 brings the 1921 principal currency order and its No.2 amendment into force on 1 January 1922.", "source_ids": [ "S335", "S336" ] }, { "claim_id": "C613", "assertion": "Article 5 converts covered former rupee or florin amounts into twice as many shillings, and former cents into twice as many shilling cents.", "source_ids": [ "S335", "S336" ] }, { "claim_id": "C614", "assertion": "Article 9(3) preserves old notes and coins as tender until separately ended, rating each rupee or florin at two shillings.", "source_ids": [ "S335", "S336" ] }, { "claim_id": "C615", "assertion": "The 7 November amendment replaces the principal order’s subsidiary-coin exception with two shilling cents for one florin cent, effective alongside the principal order.", "source_ids": [ "S335", "S336" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000791", "label": "Finnish markka — 1860 to euro continuity", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C670", "C671", "C860", "C861" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S427" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C670", "assertion": "1 EUR = 5.94573 FIM.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S427" ] }, { "claim_id": "C671", "assertion": "Finland: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S427" ] }, { "claim_id": "C860", "assertion": "Finland introduced the markka as one quarter of a silver ruble in 1860, replacing rubles in accounts and transactions from 1863. A staged unit derivation within the Russian Empire, not instantaneous withdrawal of every Russian coin.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S427" ] }, { "claim_id": "C861", "assertion": "One new Finnish markka replaced 100 old markkaa.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S427" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000793", "label": "Irish pound — modern currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C674", "C675", "C868", "C869" ], "source_ids": [ "S153", "S347", "S348" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C674", "assertion": "1 EUR = 0.787564 IEP.", "source_ids": [ "S153", "S347", "S348" ] }, { "claim_id": "C675", "assertion": "Ireland: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S153", "S347", "S348" ] }, { "claim_id": "C868", "assertion": "The Saorstat pound established a national currency at sterling parity under the 1927 Act, followed by the 1928 issue. National monetary separation with continuing sterling circulation; not a revival conversion from the pre-1826 Irish unit.", "source_ids": [ "S153", "S347", "S348" ] }, { "claim_id": "C869", "assertion": "Saorstat pound was renamed Irish pound without a new unit scale.", "source_ids": [ "S153", "S347", "S348" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000795", "label": "Luxembourg franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C678", "C679", "C786", "C787", "C788", "C789", "C791" ], "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S399" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C678", "assertion": "1 EUR = 40.3399 LUF.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S399" ] }, { "claim_id": "C679", "assertion": "Luxembourg: euro adoption 1999-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S399" ] }, { "claim_id": "C786", "assertion": "The name Luxembourg franc first appears in a grand-ducal decree. Local monetary history and franc use are older; name attestation is not a simple currency birth.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S399" ] }, { "claim_id": "C787", "assertion": "Luxembourg–Belgium parity is formalized.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S399" ] }, { "claim_id": "C788", "assertion": "Luxembourg does not follow the full Belgian devaluation.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S399" ] }, { "claim_id": "C789", "assertion": "Equal Luxembourg–Belgium parity is restored.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S399" ] }, { "claim_id": "C791", "assertion": "Luxembourg euro conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S399" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000798", "label": "Modern Greek drachma — 1833 to euro continuity", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C684", "C685", "C864", "C865", "C866", "C867" ], "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S428", "S430", "S431" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C684", "assertion": "1 EUR = 340.750 GRD.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S428", "S430", "S431" ] }, { "claim_id": "C685", "assertion": "Greece: euro adoption 2001-01-01; cash 2002-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S428", "S430", "S431" ] }, { "claim_id": "C864", "assertion": "Otto’s decree replaced the phoenix with the drachma.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S428", "S430", "S431" ] }, { "claim_id": "C865", "assertion": "The modern drachma deliberately reused the ancient Greek currency name. No continuous ancient-to-modern currency or fixed conversion asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S428", "S430", "S431" ] }, { "claim_id": "C866", "assertion": "The postwar drachma replaced 50 billion occupation-era drachmas. Date of the first postwar banknotes; the underlying law is dated 10 November 1944.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S428", "S430", "S431" ] }, { "claim_id": "C867", "assertion": "One new drachma replaced 1,000 postwar drachmas.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S428", "S430", "S431" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000799", "label": "Slovenian tolar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C686", "C687", "C842", "C843" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S419" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C686", "assertion": "1 EUR = 239.640 SIT.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S419" ] }, { "claim_id": "C687", "assertion": "Slovenia: euro adoption 2007-01-01; cash 2007-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S419" ] }, { "claim_id": "C842", "assertion": "Slovenian tolars replaced Yugoslav dinars at par.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S419" ] }, { "claim_id": "C843", "assertion": "Regular tolar banknotes followed the 1991 temporary payment notes. A cash-series milestone, not a second currency birth.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S419" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000800", "label": "Cypriot pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C688", "C689", "C873", "C874", "C875" ], "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S434" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C688", "assertion": "1 EUR = 0.585274 CYP.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S434" ] }, { "claim_id": "C689", "assertion": "Cyprus: euro adoption 2008-01-01; cash 2008-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S434" ] }, { "claim_id": "C873", "assertion": "Cyprus introduced a local coinage system of 180 piastres per English gold pound. Sterling-derived local unit; gradual replacement of non-British coins. Exact autonomous-currency separation and Ottoman exchange terms remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S434" ] }, { "claim_id": "C874", "assertion": "The Cyprus pound was divided into 1,000 mils.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S434" ] }, { "claim_id": "C875", "assertion": "Cyprus replaced mils with 100 cents to the same pound. Subdivision change, not a hundredfold rescaling of pounds.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S434" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000801", "label": "Maltese pound / lira", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C690", "C691", "C870", "C871", "C872" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S432", "S433" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C690", "assertion": "1 EUR = 0.429300 MTL.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S432", "S433" ] }, { "claim_id": "C691", "assertion": "Malta: euro adoption 2008-01-01; cash 2008-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S432", "S433" ] }, { "claim_id": "C870", "assertion": "Malta’s local pound-note system developed within the British pound framework before the independent decimal coinage. Gradual lineage supported; the exact legal moment of a separate Maltese currency remains open. Central-bank founding in 1968 is not treated as its birth.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S432", "S433" ] }, { "claim_id": "C871", "assertion": "Malta decimalized while retaining the pound as its unit.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S432", "S433" ] }, { "claim_id": "C872", "assertion": "Maltese pound was renamed Maltese lira.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S432", "S433" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000802", "label": "Slovak koruna — 1993 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C692", "C693", "C859" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C692", "assertion": "1 EUR = 30.1260 SKK.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348" ] }, { "claim_id": "C693", "assertion": "Slovakia: euro adoption 2009-01-01; cash 2009-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348" ] }, { "claim_id": "C859", "assertion": "Slovak korunas replaced Czechoslovak korunas at par.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000803", "label": "Estonian kroon — restored 1992 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C694", "C695", "C824", "C825" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S410" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C694", "assertion": "1 EUR = 15.6466 EEK.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S410" ] }, { "claim_id": "C695", "assertion": "Estonia: euro adoption 2011-01-01; cash 2011-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S410" ] }, { "claim_id": "C824", "assertion": "Estonia generally exchanged 10 rubles per kroon. Cash above 1,500 rubles used 50:1; do not apply 10:1 to every holding.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S410" ] }, { "claim_id": "C825", "assertion": "The restored kroon revived the interwar currency name and symbols.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S410" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000804", "label": "Latvian lats — restored 1993 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C696", "C697", "C830", "C831" ], "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S412" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C696", "assertion": "1 EUR = 0.702804 LVL.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S412" ] }, { "claim_id": "C697", "assertion": "Latvia: euro adoption 2014-01-01; cash 2014-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S412" ] }, { "claim_id": "C830", "assertion": "The lats entered at 200 Latvian rubles per lats. Five-lats notes came first. The June date in Bundesbank metadata refers to later denominations; it is not first lats circulation.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S412" ] }, { "claim_id": "C831", "assertion": "Latvia restored the lats name after the Soviet-era interruption.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S412" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000805", "label": "Lithuanian litas — restored 1993 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C698", "C699", "C838", "C839" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S416" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C698", "assertion": "1 EUR = 3.45280 LTL.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S416" ] }, { "claim_id": "C699", "assertion": "Lithuania: euro adoption 2015-01-01; cash 2015-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S416" ] }, { "claim_id": "C838", "assertion": "Lithuania exchanged 100 talonas per litas.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S416" ] }, { "claim_id": "C839", "assertion": "The 1993 litas revived the interwar national currency name. The timeline establishes two introductions separated by Soviet incorporation; no direct interwar-to-modern conversion implied.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S416" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000806", "label": "Croatian kuna — 1994 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C700", "C701", "C841" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S418" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C700", "assertion": "1 EUR = 7.53450 HRK.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S418" ] }, { "claim_id": "C701", "assertion": "Croatia: euro adoption 2023-01-01; cash 2023-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S418" ] }, { "claim_id": "C841", "assertion": "One kuna replaced 1,000 Croatian dinars.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S418" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000807", "label": "Bulgarian lev — linked twentieth-century scales", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C702", "C703", "C876", "C877", "C878" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C702", "assertion": "1 EUR = 1.95583 BGN.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348" ] }, { "claim_id": "C703", "assertion": "Bulgaria: euro adoption 2026-01-01; cash 2026-01-01.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348" ] }, { "claim_id": "C876", "assertion": "Bulgaria’s 1952 reform converted cash at 100:1, with different rules for prices and deposits. No universal valuation stored.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348" ] }, { "claim_id": "C877", "assertion": "One new lev replaced 10 old leva.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348" ] }, { "claim_id": "C878", "assertion": "One new lev replaced 1,000 old leva.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000808", "label": "European unit of account (EUA)", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C652", "C653", "C654", "C656", "C1428" ], "source_ids": [ "S353", "S354", "S355" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Single roots and euro", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C652", "assertion": "Decision 75/250 defines the Lomé aid EUA as a nine-currency basket valued using daily market rates.", "source_ids": [ "S353", "S354", "S355" ] }, { "claim_id": "C653", "assertion": "The decision’s preamble benchmarks the initial EUA value to the IMF’s 28 June 1974 SDR value; it does not establish SDR-to-EUA currency replacement.", "source_ids": [ "S353", "S354", "S355" ] }, { "claim_id": "C654", "assertion": "The December 1978 resolution specifies identical initial ECU and EUA value/composition and plans EMS establishment for 1 January 1979.", "source_ids": [ "S353", "S354", "S355" ] }, { "claim_id": "C656", "assertion": "Decision 80/1184 replaces the EUA with ECU for covered ACP assistance and previous-convention operations from 1 January 1981.", "source_ids": [ "S353", "S354", "S355" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1428", "assertion": "From 1 January 1981, specified ACP financial assistance and operations under previous conventions switched from EUA to ECU accounting. This is a sectoral absorption into the existing ECU, not proof of the final use of every EUA account.", "source_ids": [ "S355" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000815", "label": "Livre parisis", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C726", "C1033" ], "source_ids": [ "S127", "S483" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "France and western antecedents", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C726", "assertion": "Royal tournois adoption coexists with the parisis system. Parallel systems; this edge is neither descent nor a fixed-rate conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S127", "S483" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1033", "assertion": "Parisis can likewise be treated as a qualified regional descendant of Frankish reckoning.", "source_ids": [ "S127", "S483" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000819", "label": "CFA franc — early shared unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C743", "C745", "C748", "C749", "C750", "C751", "C767", "C771", "C776", "C977", "C1254", "C1255" ], "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "France and western antecedents", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C743", "assertion": "The decree establishes the CFA grouping and its metropolitan-franc parity. Signed 25 December; effective 26 December. It groups existing territorial francs, not a single universal cash exchange.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C745", "assertion": "Initial CFA/metropolitan parity.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C748", "assertion": "The CFA parity becomes two old French francs.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C749", "assertion": "France’s new unit restates the CFA parity. The CFA unit itself is not divided by 100.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C750", "assertion": "The western CFA branch develops under BCEAO. 1959 is an institutional marker, not a fresh redenomination or first CFA coinage.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C751", "assertion": "The central CFA branch develops through its own central-bank institutions. Retain a separate currency identity. Exact predecessor-bank operational dates are not asserted here.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C767", "assertion": "The Malagasy franc designation marks the independent national branch. Do not erase prior Madagascar issues or equate 1963 with its first franc notes.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C771", "assertion": "Comoros has local franc issues under BMC and then IEC. Institutional and regional continuity; exact birth of a distinct national unit is not forced.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C776", "assertion": "Djibouti’s separate dollar-linked franc follows the territorial CFA period. Treaty cites decrees dated 17 March; local gazette labels 20 March. No local redemption ratio is asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C977", "assertion": "The CFA unit separates from the metropolitan-franc monetary system in the 1945 reform. Earlier territorial issues remain expandable; this records shared unit descent, not a 1.70-to-one exchange of old local notes.", "source_ids": [ "S253", "S267", "S379", "S381", "S385", "S396", "S402", "S403", "S404", "S463", "S654", "S655", "S656", "S657" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1254", "assertion": "Reconnect western CFA profile to the existing early CFA account lineage. Evidence documents inherited notes and same-unit recognition through 1955/1959/1962 institutions. Do not add BAO/institute/BCEAO issuer nodes or label 1962 a monetary birth. This is regional continuity of an existing currency; exact west/central differentiation remains unadjudicated. An identity merge/alias may be preferable if the parent is only an issuer-era duplicate.", "source_ids": [ "S654", "S655" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1255", "assertion": "Reconnect central CFA profile to the early CFA lineage, supported by institutional history and 1972 transfer of monetary liabilities. Retain a qualified regional edge and avoid treating 1972 institutional renaming as a new currency. Regional division existed before 1972; date range labels evidence coverage, not a claim the split occurred in 1972.", "source_ids": [ "S656", "S657" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000824", "label": "Guinean syli", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C758", "C759" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S397" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "France and western antecedents", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C758", "assertion": "The syli replaces the first Guinean franc. Contemporary notice establishes changeover; 1971 note-series dates are not adoption dates.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S397" ] }, { "claim_id": "C759", "assertion": "Guinea restores the franc. Use changeover date rather than 1985 note-series dating.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S397" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000826", "label": "Malian franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C760", "C761" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S380", "S384" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "France and western antecedents", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C760", "assertion": "Mali introduces its own franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S380", "S384" ] }, { "claim_id": "C761", "assertion": "Mali returns to CFA currency. Territorial return to an existing currency, not creation of XOF from the Malian franc.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S380", "S384" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000829", "label": "Guinea-Bissau peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C764" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "France and western antecedents", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C764", "assertion": "Guinea-Bissau exchanges pesos for CFA francs. Currency changeover is separate from union accession.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000830", "label": "Equatorial Guinean ekwele", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C765" ], "source_ids": [ "S407" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "France and western antecedents", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C765", "assertion": "Equatorial Guinea adopts CFA currency. Contemporary notice specifies 2 January; preferred over the 1 January date in later Bundesbank metadata.", "source_ids": [ "S407" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000839", "label": "Helvetic franc, 1799", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Keep Helvetic franc including its post-1803 old-franc contract usage; collapse redundant Zurich old-franc node, not federal Swiss franc.", "claim_ids": [ "C778", "C779" ], "source_ids": [ "S401" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "France and western antecedents", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C778", "assertion": "The Helvetic franc uses a French-inspired decimal scheme on a Bernese monetary basis. Different silver standard; no 1:1 French-franc identity.", "source_ids": [ "S401" ] }, { "claim_id": "C779", "assertion": "The Helvetic experiment precedes federal unification. Cantonal fragmentation intervenes; not an uninterrupted national currency.", "source_ids": [ "S401" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-ZURICH" ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000876", "label": "Ostmark — eastern occupation mark", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C818", "C832" ], "source_ids": [ "S410", "S416" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C818", "assertion": "The Estonian mark was initially defined at parity with the ostmark. Initial standard, not proof of exclusive replacement of every circulating currency.", "source_ids": [ "S410", "S416" ] }, { "claim_id": "C832", "assertion": "Lithuania introduced litas and began exchanging ostmarks. A floating ostmark conversion is not assigned an invented single fixed ratio.", "source_ids": [ "S410", "S416" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000878", "label": "Estonian interwar currency — mark and kroon", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C818", "C819", "C820", "C821", "C825" ], "source_ids": [ "S410", "S411" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C818", "assertion": "The Estonian mark was initially defined at parity with the ostmark. Initial standard, not proof of exclusive replacement of every circulating currency.", "source_ids": [ "S410", "S411" ] }, { "claim_id": "C819", "assertion": "The kroon replaced 100 Estonian marks.", "source_ids": [ "S410", "S411" ] }, { "claim_id": "C820", "assertion": "Estonia introduced Soviet rubles at 1.25 rubles per kroon. Kroons temporarily co-circulated; the displayed ratio is kroons per ruble.", "source_ids": [ "S410", "S411" ] }, { "claim_id": "C821", "assertion": "Estonian kroons lost validity under Soviet occupation.", "source_ids": [ "S410", "S411" ] }, { "claim_id": "C825", "assertion": "The restored kroon revived the interwar currency name and symbols.", "source_ids": [ "S410", "S411" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000880", "label": "Latvian ruble — 1919-era currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C826" ], "source_ids": [ "S413" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C826", "assertion": "Latvia defined one lats as 50 Latvian rubles. Regulation date; this does not date every cash issue.", "source_ids": [ "S413" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000881", "label": "Latvian lats — interwar currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C826", "C827", "C831" ], "source_ids": [ "S412", "S413", "S414" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C826", "assertion": "Latvia defined one lats as 50 Latvian rubles. Regulation date; this does not date every cash issue.", "source_ids": [ "S412", "S413", "S414" ] }, { "claim_id": "C827", "assertion": "The Soviet currency system displaced the lats, withdrawn on 25 March 1941.", "source_ids": [ "S412", "S413", "S414" ] }, { "claim_id": "C831", "assertion": "Latvia restored the lats name after the Soviet-era interruption.", "source_ids": [ "S412", "S413", "S414" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000882", "label": "Latvian ruble — temporary 1992 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C828", "C829", "C830" ], "source_ids": [ "S412" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C828", "assertion": "Latvian rubles entered alongside Soviet and Russian notes at 1:1. The inherited ruble-zone unit, not the later 1998 Russian ruble scale.", "source_ids": [ "S412" ] }, { "claim_id": "C829", "assertion": "The Latvian ruble became the sole mandatory domestic payment unit; bank accounts were converted.", "source_ids": [ "S412" ] }, { "claim_id": "C830", "assertion": "The lats entered at 200 Latvian rubles per lats. Five-lats notes came first. The June date in Bundesbank metadata refers to later denominations; it is not first lats circulation.", "source_ids": [ "S412" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000883", "label": "Lithuanian litas — interwar currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C832", "C833", "C834", "C839" ], "source_ids": [ "S416", "S417" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C832", "assertion": "Lithuania introduced litas and began exchanging ostmarks. A floating ostmark conversion is not assigned an invented single fixed ratio.", "source_ids": [ "S416", "S417" ] }, { "claim_id": "C833", "assertion": "Soviet rubles entered Lithuania at 0.9 ruble per litas. The rate did not protect all deposits. Litas circulated alongside rubles until March 1941.", "source_ids": [ "S416", "S417" ] }, { "claim_id": "C834", "assertion": "Lithuania’s interwar litas was prohibited under Soviet rule.", "source_ids": [ "S416", "S417" ] }, { "claim_id": "C839", "assertion": "The 1993 litas revived the interwar national currency name. The timeline establishes two introductions separated by Soviet incorporation; no direct interwar-to-modern conversion implied.", "source_ids": [ "S416", "S417" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000885", "label": "Lithuanian talonas — temporary currency 1992–1993", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C836", "C837", "C838" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S415", "S416" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C836", "assertion": "General coupons became ruble substitutes before the talonas became the sole currency.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S415", "S416" ] }, { "claim_id": "C837", "assertion": "Lithuania replaced rubles with talonas at 1:1.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S415", "S416" ] }, { "claim_id": "C838", "assertion": "Lithuania exchanged 100 talonas per litas.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S415", "S416" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000887", "label": "Croatian dinar — 1991–1994 transitional currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C840", "C841" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S418" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C840", "assertion": "Croatian dinars replaced Yugoslav dinars at par.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S418" ] }, { "claim_id": "C841", "assertion": "One kuna replaced 1,000 Croatian dinars.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S418" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000890", "label": "Austrian krone — post-imperial currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C845", "C846" ], "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C845", "assertion": "The imperial currency area broke into successor systems, including the Austrian crown. Period-level separation; no precise stamping date or universal conversion procedure asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425" ] }, { "claim_id": "C846", "assertion": "The schilling replaced the Austrian crown at 10,000 crowns per schilling. Year-level date distinguishes the accounting law from the March cash milestones.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000891", "label": "Austrian schilling — 1925–1938 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C846", "C847", "C850" ], "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C846", "assertion": "The schilling replaced the Austrian crown at 10,000 crowns per schilling. Year-level date distinguishes the accounting law from the March cash milestones.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425" ] }, { "claim_id": "C847", "assertion": "Austria adopted the Reichsmark at 1.5 schillings per Reichsmark.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425" ] }, { "claim_id": "C850", "assertion": "Austria restored the schilling after the Reichsmark interval.", "source_ids": [ "S424", "S425" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000896", "label": "Czechoslovak koruna — 1919–1939 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C852", "C853", "C854" ], "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S422" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C852", "assertion": "Czechoslovak currency separated from the Austro-Hungarian crown through the 1919 reform. Stamping occurred in March; national koruna legislation followed. No confiscated/blocked holdings treated as freely convertible cash.", "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S422" ] }, { "claim_id": "C853", "assertion": "The Protectorate koruna succeeded the Czechoslovak currency in Bohemia and Moravia.", "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S422" ] }, { "claim_id": "C854", "assertion": "Slovakia established its own koruna in place of the Czechoslovak currency.", "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S422" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000897", "label": "Bohemian and Moravian / Protectorate koruna", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C853", "C855" ], "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S423" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C853", "assertion": "The Protectorate koruna succeeded the Czechoslovak currency in Bohemia and Moravia.", "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S423" ] }, { "claim_id": "C855", "assertion": "Czech and Slovak monetary areas were reunified into the Czechoslovak koruna at 1:1. Parity of monetary units; unrestricted conversion of all cash or deposits is not implied.", "source_ids": [ "S420", "S421", "S423" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000898", "label": "Slovak koruna — 1939–1945 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C854", "C856" ], "source_ids": [ "S422", "S423" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C854", "assertion": "Slovakia established its own koruna in place of the Czechoslovak currency.", "source_ids": [ "S422", "S423" ] }, { "claim_id": "C856", "assertion": "The wartime Slovak koruna joined the restored Czechoslovak currency at 1:1.", "source_ids": [ "S422", "S423" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000905", "label": "Greek phoenix", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C862", "C863", "C864" ], "source_ids": [ "S428", "S429" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C862", "assertion": "Greece selected the phoenix in 1828; the first coins were minted in 1829 bearing 1828 dates. Decision, inscription date and minting are distinct observations.", "source_ids": [ "S428", "S429" ] }, { "claim_id": "C863", "assertion": "The phoenix was valued at one sixth of the Spanish dollar. A valuation standard, not evidence that all dollars were compulsorily converted into phoenixes.", "source_ids": [ "S428", "S429" ] }, { "claim_id": "C864", "assertion": "Otto’s decree replaced the phoenix with the drachma.", "source_ids": [ "S428", "S429" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000915", "label": "South German florin — nineteenth-century unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C880" ], "source_ids": [ "S435" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C880", "assertion": "South German florins entered at twelve marks per seven florins. Exact rational stated in prose; no rounded decimal valuation.", "source_ids": [ "S435" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000922", "label": "East German mark — 1948 currency and later names", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C891", "C892", "C893", "C894" ], "source_ids": [ "S437", "S438" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C891", "assertion": "The Soviet occupation zone began issuing its separate mark currency. Reichsmark-system territorial successor; individual occupation-note conversions are not fully catalogued.", "source_ids": [ "S437", "S438" ] }, { "claim_id": "C892", "assertion": "The eastern currency became Mark der Deutschen Notenbank.", "source_ids": [ "S437", "S438" ] }, { "claim_id": "C893", "assertion": "The eastern currency became Mark der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik.", "source_ids": [ "S437", "S438" ] }, { "claim_id": "C894", "assertion": "East Germany adopted Deutsche Mark; wages and savings followed different conversion rules. No blanket 1:1 or 2:1 valuation.", "source_ids": [ "S437", "S438" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000937", "label": "Post-imperial crown circulating in the South Slav kingdom", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Retain regional crown account unit: treasuries, prices and debts used crowns; local monetary separation is established. Stamping alone is not the admission basis.", "claim_ids": [ "C920", "C921" ], "source_ids": [ "S445" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C920", "assertion": "Imperial crown notes continued in the kingdom’s former Habsburg territories. Local successor circulation; administrative stamping details remain to be expanded.", "source_ids": [ "S445" ] }, { "claim_id": "C921", "assertion": "Crown exchange into dinars began at four crowns per dinar.", "source_ids": [ "S445" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-MIJATOVIC" ], "identity_status_recommendation": "supported", "boundary_status": "Regional separation bounded1919–1920; exact onset is date uncertainty, not uncertain relationship." }, { "id": "T-FTM000938", "label": "Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes / Yugoslav dinar", "verdict": "merge", "confidence": "supported_inference", "audit_level": "coordinated_source_review", "rationale": "Original research explicitly says new kingdom retained Serbian dinar as monetary unit. National extension and renamed issuing bank do not create a new unit; retain all unification and later-partition observations. This is a qualified continuity merge, not invented conversion.", "claim_ids": [ "C919", "C921", "C922" ], "source_ids": [ "S300", "S445", "S446" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C919", "assertion": "The new South Slav kingdom retained the Serbian dinar as its monetary unit. Territorial extension and unification occurred over a transition period.", "source_ids": [ "S300", "S445", "S446" ] }, { "claim_id": "C921", "assertion": "Crown exchange into dinars began at four crowns per dinar.", "source_ids": [ "S300", "S445", "S446" ] }, { "claim_id": "C922", "assertion": "Occupied Serbia acquired a separate Serbian dinar after Yugoslavia’s partition. This was one of several occupation monetary areas.", "source_ids": [ "S300", "S445", "S446" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SERBIA" ], "merge_target": "FTM000254" }, { "id": "T-FTM000939", "label": "Serbian dinar — occupation-era currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C922", "C923" ], "source_ids": [ "S300", "S445" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C922", "assertion": "Occupied Serbia acquired a separate Serbian dinar after Yugoslavia’s partition. This was one of several occupation monetary areas.", "source_ids": [ "S300", "S445" ] }, { "claim_id": "C923", "assertion": "Postwar Yugoslav dinars replaced occupation money, including Serbian occupation dinars. Non-exclusive incoming branch; exact conversion and other occupation currencies remain open.", "source_ids": [ "S300", "S445" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000960", "label": "Barbados colonial dollar accounts and note issues", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C983", "C984" ], "source_ids": [ "S467" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "1500 coverage branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C983", "assertion": "Barbados’s colonial currency combined sterling coinage with local dollar-denominated bank notes by 1850. The issuer history supports mixed-system descent; intermediate local dollar ratings remain to be expanded.", "source_ids": [ "S467" ] }, { "claim_id": "C984", "assertion": "BCCB notes took over the note circulation of Barbados, British Guiana and Trinidad in 1951. The Barbados system is one documented input, not the only one.", "source_ids": [ "S467" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V19-DARIC", "label": "Achaemenid daric payment unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1038", "C1037", "C1039", "C1040", "C1041", "C1055", "C1072", "C1073", "C1074", "C1075", "C1333" ], "source_ids": [ "S485", "S129", "S504", "S505", "S507", "S506", "S491", "S646" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ancient account units — disconnected", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1038", "assertion": "Persian military pay was conventionally reckoned at one daric monthly.", "source_ids": [ "S485" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1037", "assertion": "Persian rulers continued Croeseids before introducing royal archer issues.", "source_ids": [ "S129", "S485" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1039", "assertion": "An Athenian treasury account records gold darics in 429/428 BCE.", "source_ids": [ "S485" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1040", "assertion": "Alram reports an official rating of twenty sigloi per daric.", "source_ids": [ "S485" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1041", "assertion": "Macedonian gold displaced the daric’s prominence; daric-type production also continued under Alexander.", "source_ids": [ "S485" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1055", "assertion": "Kroll and Alram describe the Persian gold-weight transition differently; this review leaves the Croeseid/daric identity boundary open.", "source_ids": [ "S129", "S485" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1072", "assertion": "Descat reconstructs a Persian assessment behind the later Sardian tribute; Thonemann endorses conversion from daric reckoning to Macedonian gold accounting.", "source_ids": [ "S504", "S505" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1073", "assertion": "Yegül’s notes report objections to the one-twelfth assessment and to inferring tax rates from the mortgage amount.", "source_ids": [ "S507" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1074", "assertion": "In the Cambridge dossier, Greek I.9 reads four gold obols for Nagrioa, while its English translation reads three.", "source_ids": [ "S506", "S491" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1075", "assertion": "The dossier dates the inscription to 214 BCE; Yegül’s note 31 discusses c.220–200 BCE. Both distinguish it from the earlier land grant.", "source_ids": [ "S506", "S507" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1333", "assertion": "Yegül distinguishes the earlier Mnesimachos mortgage from its later wall copy and notes substantial disagreement over their dates. The post-conquest mortgage remains a real obligation, but it cannot be assigned a 334 BCE daric-conversion date.", "source_ids": [ "S646" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-ALBANIAN-FRANG", "label": "Albanian gold franc / frang", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1103" ], "source_ids": [ "S249" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1103", "assertion": "The July 1947 law replaced the Albanian frang with the lek as the monetary unit.", "source_ids": [ "S249" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000358", "label": "Georgian coupon", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1106" ], "source_ids": [ "S529" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1106", "assertion": "Georgia replaced its coupon unit with the lari in 1995.", "source_ids": [ "S529" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000355", "label": "Moldovan cupon", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1107" ], "source_ids": [ "S530" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1107", "assertion": "Moldovan lei replaced the temporary cupon currency in 1993.", "source_ids": [ "S530" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000365", "label": "Uzbekistani sum-coupon", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1108" ], "source_ids": [ "S223" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1108", "assertion": "The Uzbek sum replaced the interim sum-coupon as the official currency in July 1994.", "source_ids": [ "S223" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000351", "label": "Ukrainian karbovanets", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1109" ], "source_ids": [ "S538" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1109", "assertion": "The hryvnia replaced the karbovanets as Ukraine’s official currency in September 1996.", "source_ids": [ "S538" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000331", "label": "Danish rigsdaler", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1110" ], "source_ids": [ "S251" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1110", "assertion": "Danish legislation changed the account unit from rigsdaler to krone; new gold coins became tender in 1874 and the accounting conversion followed in 1875.", "source_ids": [ "S251" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000335", "label": "Norwegian speciedaler", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1111" ], "source_ids": [ "S263" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1111", "assertion": "Norway’s 1875 Money Act replaced the speciedaler and skilling system with kroner and øre.", "source_ids": [ "S263" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000120", "label": "South Korean hwan", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Retain hwan as genuinely named principal unit under explicit user ontology. Exact conversion to won does not establish a same-unit rescale.", "claim_ids": [ "C1112", "C1268" ], "source_ids": [ "S259", "S618" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1112", "assertion": "The 1962 Korean reform replaced the hwan account unit with the won; some hwan coins remained valid at their converted value.", "source_ids": [ "S259" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1268", "assertion": "The hwan was used from the15February1953 reform, earlier than its current1962-only anchor. ", "source_ids": [ "S618" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "FTM000226", "label": "Palestine pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1113" ], "source_ids": [ "S238" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1113", "assertion": "Jordan’s dinar succeeded the locally circulating Palestine pound in 1950.", "source_ids": [ "S238" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000227", "label": "Israeli pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1114" ], "source_ids": [ "S536", "S237" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1114", "assertion": "Israel implemented the statutory change from the pound to the sheqel in February 1980. The 1985 new-sheqel rescaling stays within the sheqel profile.", "source_ids": [ "S536", "S237" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000031", "label": "Persian qerān / toman accounting", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1116" ], "source_ids": [ "S299" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Iranian histories", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1116", "assertion": "The currency law and 1932 rial notes replaced the official qerān–toman reckoning. Qerān-denominated obligations establish an account unit, not merely a coin type.", "source_ids": [ "S299" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000164", "label": "Zimbabwe dollar — restored 2019 currency", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1118", "C1256", "C1344" ], "source_ids": [ "S110", "S662" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1118", "assertion": "Zimbabwe’s 2024 legal amendments introduced ZiG as the unit of account replacing Zimbabwe dollars, including conversion of existing balances.", "source_ids": [ "S110" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1256", "assertion": "United States dollar local Zimbabwe obligations and USD RTGS balances converted to RTGS dollar. Scope expressly excludes protected foreign-currency accounts and foreign loans/obligations. Treat as local account succession, not ancestry of all USD contracts everywhere. ", "source_ids": [ "S662" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1344", "assertion": "1 USD in covered balances = 1 RTGS dollar. United States dollar local Zimbabwe obligations and USD RTGS balances converted to RTGS dollar. Scope expressly excludes protected foreign-currency accounts and foreign loans/obligations. Treat as local account succession, not ancestry of all USD contracts everywhere.", "source_ids": [ "S662" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000072", "label": "Costa Rican peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1119", "C1273" ], "source_ids": [ "S227", "S626" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1119", "assertion": "Costa Rica’s colón reform followed the local peso-denominated monetary system documented by its central bank.", "source_ids": [ "S227" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1273", "assertion": "Costa Rica authorized peso-denominated vouchers in 1839 specifically to pay public employees. Public remuneration establishes account/payment use before the first peso-labelled coin issues. Earlier Federal and Spanish account succession remains unproved here.", "source_ids": [ "S626" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000088", "label": "Paraguayan peso fuerte", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1120", "C1274", "C1305", "C1306" ], "source_ids": [ "S533", "S627" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1120", "assertion": "The guaraní law replaced the peso fuerte monetary unit in 1943.", "source_ids": [ "S533" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1274", "assertion": "A 16 May 1820 Paraguayan order specified a monthly public salary of six pesos fuertes. The salary fact is supported. Grouping this earlier local peso fuerte with the existing predecessor profile is qualified across the war and later monetary reorganizations.", "source_ids": [ "S627" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1305", "assertion": "Paraguay’s 10 January 1823 decree assessed cattle and market-cart taxes in reales. ", "source_ids": [ "S627" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1306", "assertion": "The 27 November 1842 Paraguayan coinage law instructed the government to retain the familiar old monetary system. Supports retained reckoning, but coinage authorization does not by itself establish a complete Spanish-to-modern branch.", "source_ids": [ "S627" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-PENGO", "label": "Hungarian pengő", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1121" ], "source_ids": [ "S534" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1121", "assertion": "Hungary’s 1946 stabilization replaced the pengő with the forint.", "source_ids": [ "S534" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000314", "label": "Polish mark", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1122" ], "source_ids": [ "S535" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1122", "assertion": "The 1924 złoty replaced the Polish mark. Its association with the modern złoty profile compresses later wartime and postwar stages and remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S535" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000157", "label": "Mozambican escudo", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1123", "C1250", "C1293" ], "source_ids": [ "S532", "S652", "S541" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1123", "assertion": "The metical replaced the escudo circulating in Mozambique in June 1980.", "source_ids": [ "S532" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1250", "assertion": "The 1913 law expressly imports metropolitan account rules and requires equivalence of existing obligations; represent a qualified Portuguese-system regional branch into Mozambique, with unresolved earlier territorial differentiation. This is account adoption, not inferred solely from a peg. 1911–1914 is a legal-adoption window, not first circulation. Do not treat the Chartered Company territory as covered by every later state-administered monetary reform.", "source_ids": [ "S652", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1293", "assertion": "Add Mozambique’s statutory public/private account-system anchor effective 1 January 1914; include earlier real reckoning as an internal pre-1914 phase where independently evidenced. Do not split the unit solely at real-to-escudo rescaling. ", "source_ids": [ "S652", "S541" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000154", "label": "Angolan escudo", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1124", "C1298", "C1337", "C1339" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S659", "S652", "S653", "S541" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1124", "assertion": "Angolan escudo → kwanza, 1977.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1298", "assertion": "The1953Organic Law prescribes escudo as monetary unit in all Portuguese overseas provinces,including Angola. This is a legal-unit anchor; the date is promulgation,not an established local cash changeover or exact commencement.", "source_ids": [ "S659" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1337", "assertion": "1913 law and 1926 reform prove Angolan escudo account reckoning before 1926. Extend the local account lineage with an angolar reform phase only after adjudicating the 1953–1958 return to escudo. Do not silently identify first and later escudos across that interval or create a new node only for the name angolar. ", "source_ids": [ "S652", "S653", "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1339", "assertion": "Whether earlier Angolan escudo,1926angolar and1950sescudo form one continuing account identity is not settled by the inspected evidence. No new angolar parent or silent merge is recommended in this pass.", "source_ids": [ "S659", "S652", "S653" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-BOSNIAN-DINAR", "label": "Bosnia and Herzegovina dinar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1126" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S245" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1126", "assertion": "Bosnian dinar → convertible mark, 1997–1998.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S245" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000369", "label": "Tajikistani ruble", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1133" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ruble", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1133", "assertion": "Tajikistani ruble → somoni, 2000.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000377", "label": "Sudanese dinar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1135", "C1257", "C1258", "C1301", "C1346" ], "source_ids": [ "S98", "S301", "S663", "S664", "S665", "S666" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ottoman", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1135", "assertion": "Sudanese dinar → pound, 2007.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S301" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1257", "assertion": "Principal Sudanese dinar to new Sudanese pound replacement, verified by converted deposits, credit and central-bank accounts. Add January account/currency introduction and phased withdrawal observations; do not treat inherited July table date as the only start event.", "source_ids": [ "S663", "S664", "S665" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1258", "assertion": "Earlier Sudanese pound to dinar, introduction/co-circulation followed by replacement. Exact account law not obtained; classify the edge qualified because first-issue and final-replacement dates differ. ", "source_ids": [ "S664", "S665", "S666" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1301", "assertion": "The2002Bank of Sudan Act defines the dinar as the national currency unit and expresses bank capital in dinars.", "source_ids": [ "S664" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1346", "assertion": "10 old Sudanese pounds = 1 dinar. Earlier Sudanese pound to dinar, introduction/co-circulation followed by replacement. Exact account law not obtained; classify the edge qualified because first-issue and final-replacement dates differ.", "source_ids": [ "S664", "S665", "S666" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000296", "label": "Afghan rupee — Kabuli account unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1136" ], "source_ids": [ "S539", "S324" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1136", "assertion": "The afghani standards introduced in 1925–1926 replaced Kabuli-rupee reckoning. Later afghani rescalings remain within the modern currency profile.", "source_ids": [ "S539", "S324" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-MONGOLIA-YANCHAAN", "label": "Chinese yanchaan accounting in Mongolia", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1139" ], "source_ids": [ "S308" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1139", "assertion": "Mongolia’s togrog displaced Chinese yanchaan in budgets, accounts, prices and domestic transactions by 1927. The predecessor is scoped to this local accounting use; its exact Chinese currency identity remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S308" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000160", "label": "São Tomé escudo", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1140", "C1251", "C1294" ], "source_ids": [ "S542", "S652" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1140", "assertion": "Decree-law 23/76 governed the transition from the São Tomé escudo to the dobra, whose first series circulated in 1977.", "source_ids": [ "S542" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1251", "assertion": "Connect São Tomé’s local escudo account profile to the explicitly adopted metropolitan monetary system, qualified for unresolved earlier local history. ", "source_ids": [ "S652" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1294", "assertion": "Add São Tomé’s statutory public/private account-system anchor effective 1 January 1914. Independence overprinting is an issuer phase. ", "source_ids": [ "S652", "S542" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN", "label": "Taiwanese yen", "verdict": "merge", "confidence": "supported_inference", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Merge issuer-defined Taiwan yen profile into Japanese yen for the established common-unit period. Contemporary1933–1934report expressly identifies the same monetary unit;1933USsurvey confirms Japanese currency law. Preserve1898–1904silver dealings as held regional accounting scope, not an automatic founding date of this merged unit.", "claim_ids": [ "C1141", "C1266" ], "source_ids": [ "S543", "S615" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1141", "assertion": "Taiwan dollars replaced Taiwanese yen in May 1946. The 1949 dollar rescaling belongs to the same Taiwan-dollar profile.", "source_ids": [ "S543" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1266", "assertion": "Taiwan's existing yen identity is attested by circulating Bank of Taiwan notes denominated in yuan/yen in1899. This is a denomination/circulation observation, not an independently inspected1899ledger or proof of its precise founding date. A parent edge from Japan or earlier silver-dollar units remains open.", "source_ids": [ "S615" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-TAIWAN-UNIT", "ONT27-SILVER1933", "ONT27-BRYAN" ], "identity_status_recommendation": "merged_alias", "merge_target": "T-FTM000117", "boundary_status": "1933–1934common-unit observation firm;1911law extension corroborates. Earlier silver account and1945–1946regional separation require distinct observations, not blanket continuity." }, { "id": "FTM000094", "label": "Venezolano", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1142", "C1277", "C1310" ], "source_ids": [ "S544" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1142", "assertion": "Venezuela’s 1879 reform established the bolívar as monetary unit after the venezolano introduced in 1871. Later bolívar scales remain within the modern profile.", "source_ids": [ "S544" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1277", "assertion": "The 11 May 1871 reform established the venezolano, with conversion of public and private accounts required from 1 January 1872. Earlier account-unit observation than the existing 1879 replacement anchor; exact primary decree still sought.", "source_ids": [ "S544" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1310", "assertion": "A 12 June 1865 law called the peso fuerte the venezolano de oro; continuity to the 1871 system needs direct comparison of both laws. Do not create a node from the gold/silver naming distinction alone.", "source_ids": [ "S544" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-RIAU-RUPIAH", "label": "Riau Islands rupiah", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "coordinated_source_review", "rationale": "Separate KR-rupiah salary/payment liabilities and explicit subsequent conversion into national rupiah establish independent account unit, beyond regional notes.", "claim_ids": [ "C1148" ], "source_ids": [ "S547" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1148", "assertion": "The general Indonesian rupiah replaced the separately circulating Riau Islands rupiah in July 1964. This is one regional convergence, not the origin of all rupiah money.", "source_ids": [ "S547" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-RIAU" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-JINAN-YUAN", "label": "Jinan Bank yuan", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "coordinated_source_review", "rationale": "Designated unit for fiscal accounting, commercial dealings and creditor/debtor settlement. Rename label Jinan yuan; bank issuer belongs in profile metadata.", "claim_ids": [ "C1149", "C1267" ], "source_ids": [ "S548", "S616" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1149", "assertion": "Jinan Bank currency was withdrawn into the first renminbi issue from December 1948 through spring 1950. This documents one named regional input.", "source_ids": [ "S548" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1267", "assertion": "A1940 joint administrative programme designated Jinan banknotes the region's basic currency; this predates its1948RMB unification anchor. Policy quoted in historical research, original archival order not inspected. Protection of fabi and mixed circulation do not by themselves establish fabi→Jinan ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S616" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-JINAN" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-YEMEN-DINAR", "label": "South Arabian / South Yemeni dinar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1151" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Arabian histories", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1151", "assertion": "South Yemeni dinar → Yemeni rial; shared tender from 1990, final exchange in 1996.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-SOUTH-VIETNAM-DONG", "label": "South Vietnamese đồng", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1152" ], "source_ids": [ "S98" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1152", "assertion": "South Vietnamese đồng → unified đồng, 1978.", "source_ids": [ "S98" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-CALCUTTA-SICCA", "label": "Calcutta sicca rupee", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1153", "C1197", "C1198" ], "source_ids": [ "S549", "S580", "S581" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1153", "assertion": "The 1836 act ended Calcutta sicca-rupee tender status from January 1838; its Treasury notice prescribed exchange into the Company rupees of the 1835 act. Retrieval is limited to the indexed statutory passage.", "source_ids": [ "S549" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1197", "assertion": "A July 1765 agreement allocates the Bengal Nawab’s annual government allowance in sicca rupees. Association with the later Calcutta sicca profile is a qualified regional continuity; intervening standards and local ratings are not fully adjudicated.", "source_ids": [ "S580" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1198", "assertion": "The Hooghly collector’s March 1773 remittance records revenue collections in sicca rupees. This is a direct accounting observation; grouping it with the later Calcutta sicca remains qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S581" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000076", "label": "Honduran peso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1154", "C1299", "C1343" ], "source_ids": [ "S545" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1154", "assertion": "The historical trade-account study reports the peso-to-lempira reform under decree 102 of 1926, with circulation beginning in 1931. The repository’s indexed passage was available; its full PDF could not be retrieved.", "source_ids": [ "S545" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1299", "assertion": "Honduran peso plata was established as official currency in1879, divided into100centavos, and was the peso later replaced under the1926lempira legislation.", "source_ids": [ "S545" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1343", "assertion": "Original scholarship reconstructs Honduran official trade accounts and explicitly identifies peso plata as one of their valuation units.", "source_ids": [ "S545" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V22-SWEDISH-SPECIE", "label": "Swedish riksdaler specie", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1155" ], "source_ids": [ "S550" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1155", "assertion": "Edvinsson distinguishes riksdaler specie from the riksgälds unit emerging in 1789, and groups riksgälds, riksmynt and krona in one continuing unit. This supports a qualified branch from specie, rather than an invented new currency at every name change.", "source_ids": [ "S550" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000118", "label": "Korean yen / won before the North–South currency separation", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "boundary_unresolved", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Baseline 1947 regional settlement reform supports common Korean obligation scope before bifurcation. Japanese-parent versus common Korean-unit boundary remains uninspected; do not infer independence from Bank of Chosen note issuer alone.", "claim_ids": [ "C1171" ], "source_ids": [ "S570", "S571" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1171", "assertion": "North Korea’s December 1947 reform separated its currency from the common Korean account system by replacing Bank of Chosen and Soviet occupation notes with a sole northern settlement currency. The law directly supports conversion; identifying a distinct northern currency is the territorial-branching inference. Soviet notes are instruments in the common accounting unit, not a ruble parent.", "source_ids": [ "S570", "S571" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "FTM000141", "label": "Royal / Vientiane kip", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1172", "C1173" ], "source_ids": [ "S572", "S573" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1172", "assertion": "In June 1976 the Vientiane kip was withdrawn in favour of the separately circulating Liberation kip, at 20:1; the Liberation kip belongs to the modern Lao kip continuity despite its 1979 rescaling. No precise 1976 day asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S572", "S573" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1173", "assertion": "The royal Lao kip replaced the shared Indochinese piastre as legal tender for payments in May 1955. National separation, not mere local banknote design; exact conversion rate not needed or asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S573" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000138", "label": "Indochinese piastre", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1173", "C1174" ], "source_ids": [ "S573", "S574" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Southeast Asian histories", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1173", "assertion": "The royal Lao kip replaced the shared Indochinese piastre as legal tender for payments in May 1955. National separation, not mere local banknote design; exact conversion rate not needed or asserted.", "source_ids": [ "S573" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1174", "assertion": "The Cambodian riel replaced the shared Indochinese piastre in 1955, ending the common monetary arrangement. Applies to pre-abolition riel; not a direct uninterrupted edge to 1980 currency.", "source_ids": [ "S574" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000144", "label": "Cambodian riel before abolition", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1174", "C1175" ], "source_ids": [ "S574" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1174", "assertion": "The Cambodian riel replaced the shared Indochinese piastre in 1955, ending the common monetary arrangement. Applies to pre-abolition riel; not a direct uninterrupted edge to 1980 currency.", "source_ids": [ "S574" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1175", "assertion": "The riel was reintroduced 20 March 1980 after its 1975 abolition, including use for civil-servant salaries. This is a restoration of the named account-unit tradition, not established redemption of old balances or uninterrupted monetary use. The restoration is retained as an optional relationship.", "source_ids": [ "S574" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V23-ZURICH-GULDEN", "label": "Zurich gulden account unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1161", "C1183" ], "source_ids": [ "S551", "S552" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1161", "assertion": "Zurich legislation converted Zurich-gulden money contracts into federal Swiss francs at one gulden to 2⅓ francs. The legislative act dates from 28 January 1851; implementation is scoped to the 1851–1852 federal reform.", "source_ids": [ "S551" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1183", "assertion": "Zurich government sources of 1803 reckon in local gulden.", "source_ids": [ "S552" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V23-EAST-SWISS-REICHSGULDEN", "label": "Eastern Swiss Reichswährung gulden (contract unit)", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1162" ], "source_ids": [ "S551" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1162", "assertion": "The 1851 Zurich law converted contracts labelled Reichswährung, including Schaffhausen, Thurgau and St. Gall currency, into federal francs through a separate statutory rate. The legislative act dates from 28 January 1851; implementation is scoped to the 1851–1852 federal reform.", "source_ids": [ "S551" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH", "label": "Old Swiss franc account unit (Zurich contracts)", "verdict": "merge", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Official archive explicitly identifies old francs in Zurich accounts as Helvetic francs. Regional contract scope is an observation, not a separate unit. Preserve all aliases and 1851 conversion observations.", "claim_ids": [ "C1163", "C1184" ], "source_ids": [ "S551", "S552" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Carolingian pound", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1163", "assertion": "Section 3 converted old Swiss-franc contracts at sixteen old francs to ten Zurich gulden, then to federal francs. The legislative act dates from 28 January 1851; implementation is scoped to the 1851–1852 federal reform.", "source_ids": [ "S551" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1184", "assertion": "Zurich 1803 records also reckon in old/Helvetic francs.", "source_ids": [ "S552" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-ZURICH" ], "merge_target": "T-FTM000839" }, { "id": "FTM000099", "label": "Cuban peso oro español — local Spanish-gold accounting", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Peso oro español is expressly an imaginary unit of account/value distinct from circulating coins; contract/account conversion corroborates denomination. Metal phrase in label does not make it only a gold coin.", "claim_ids": [ "C1180" ], "source_ids": [ "S585", "S586" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1180", "assertion": "Cuba’s national peso replaced local Spanish-gold peso accounting through the 1914–1916 monetary reform.", "source_ids": [ "S585", "S586" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-CUBA" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V24-NPL-PAISA16", "label": "Nepalese 16-ganda paisa rupee", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1205", "C1212" ], "source_ids": [ "S577", "S576" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1205", "assertion": "The 16-ganda paisa rupee was absorbed into standardized mohar-rupee accounting during the reforms reported in 1908. This is a qualified later consolidation of concurrent account units, not the founding of the Nepalese rupee; exact decree and balance-conversion rules remain unlocated.", "source_ids": [ "S577", "S577", "S576" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1212", "assertion": "An October 1855 royal endowment records distinct amounts in mohar rupees and 16-ganda paisa rupees. Their separately valued accounting establishes the latter as an account unit, not merely a coin or subdivision.", "source_ids": [ "S577", "S576" ] } ] }, { "id": "T-FTM000480", "label": "Dutch lion-dollar trade account unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1206", "C1207", "C1215", "C1319" ], "source_ids": [ "S601", "S599", "S557", "S602", "S603", "S553", "S554", "S637" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Guldengroschen", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1206", "assertion": "Domestically managed Ottoman esedi/kuruş accounting developed from the Dutch esedi trade-unit convention. This qualified regional transition compresses local stages; it does not assert universal redemption of Dutch coins or obligations.", "source_ids": [ "S601", "S599", "S557" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1207", "assertion": "Regional leu accounting continued the lion-thaler convention after the trade coin receded. This qualified branch compresses regional differentiation and later Ottoman influence; it does not equate every local leu with Dutch or Ottoman money.", "source_ids": [ "S602", "S603", "S553", "S554" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1215", "assertion": "Dutch esedi/lion-dollar accounting is documented before and during the adoption of domestically managed Ottoman reckoning. This scoped trade account identity excludes generic thalers and undifferentiated kuruş references; 1575 minting is not used as its account-unit birth.", "source_ids": [ "S601", "S557" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1319", "assertion": "With qualified akçe continuity admitted, the Dutch lion-dollar contribution around 1690 is a later account-unit contribution to an already existing Ottoman system, not the founding origin of that system.", "source_ids": [ "S601", "S557", "S637" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V25-BUENOS-AIRES-PESO-CORRIENTE", "label": "Buenos Aires peso moneda corriente", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1247", "C1248", "C1276" ], "source_ids": [ "S595", "S629" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Castilian real", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1247", "assertion": "The Buenos Aires local peso branch developed from inherited Spanish-American peso reckoning as local bank money became the contractual currency. Compressed local sequence; not a claim that every Argentine province adopted this unit.", "source_ids": [ "S595" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1248", "assertion": "Buenos Aires peso moneda corriente was one local input to the national-currency unification and compulsory banknote renewal ordered in 1881. Qualified identification of one input; implementation date and exact conversion schedule require the implementing acts. No claim of exclusive parentage.", "source_ids": [ "S629", "S595" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1276", "assertion": "Buenos Aires had a locally scoped peso moneda corriente distinct from strong silver reckoning, used in contracts and public instruments. Admission relies on distinct accounting and contractual discharge, not simply paper material or a new issuer. Early creation date remains open.", "source_ids": [ "S595" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V25-EPHESOS-GOLD", "label": "Ephesian Artemision gold account unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1288", "C1328", "C1329", "C1330" ], "source_ids": [ "S644" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ancient account units — disconnected", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1288", "assertion": "An Artemision revenue account totals gold and silver receipts in pure-gold minas. Its late seventh/early sixth-century BCE date is an approximate editorial envelope, not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S644" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1328", "assertion": "The Artemision lead account records temple receipts in gold and silver, with Side A aggregating their value in pure-gold minas. Sufficient account use for a narrowly scoped Ephesian treasury identity; no separate mina and stater currencies.", "source_ids": [ "S644" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1329", "assertion": "Kroll dates the lead account’s use to the late seventh or early sixth century BCE, distinguishing its inscription from its later deposition. Use an explicitly approximate date envelope, not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S644" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1330", "assertion": "Kroll interprets the account as bullion reckoning coexisting with early electrum coins; it does not document a Lydian electrum-to-Croeseid account conversion. Keep the Ephesian unit distinct from any proposed Lydian royal currency grouping.", "source_ids": [ "S644" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V25-EGYPT-DRACHMA", "label": "Roman-Egyptian drachma and talent reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1249", "C1284", "C1285", "C1286", "C1323", "C1324", "C1325", "C1326", "C1331", "C1332" ], "source_ids": [ "S640", "S641", "S490", "S645" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ancient account units — disconnected", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1249", "assertion": "Egypt’s integration into denarius accounting can be represented as a qualified local absorption beginning in 296, with older expressions continuing into the fourth century. It is not the origin of Roman currency. Local integration in Egypt; the date range combines reform and later accounting attestation, not a dated one-off conversion. The old scale continued; no claim that all Greek currencies generated Rome’s currency.", "source_ids": [ "S640", "S641" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1284", "assertion": "Edfu receipts dated 71/72–88 CE record local drachma amounts for a tax assessed in denarii. The local Roman-Egyptian drachma/talent profile is scoped to this attested accounting; Ptolemaic continuity remains open.", "source_ids": [ "S490" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1285", "assertion": "A 197 CE papyrus equates a denarius fine to Egyptian drachmas, with an additional agio; this attests local accounting, not the creation of either unit.", "source_ids": [ "S490" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1286", "assertion": "P.Oxy.12.1431, assigned to early 351, explicitly equates 225 myriads of denarii with 1,500 talents in a rug expenditure.", "source_ids": [ "S641" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1323", "assertion": "After the Alexandrian tetradrachm ceased to be minted in 296, Egyptian drachma accounting continued for payments made in denarii, reckoned at four drachmas per denarius. This concerns actual accounting persistence during monetary integration, beyond an isolated exchange quotation.", "source_ids": [ "S640" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1324", "assertion": "The denarius did not wholly displace Egyptian drachma-and-talent accounting; the drachma term declined during the fourth century while talent reckoning persisted. Do not represent 296 as instant extinction of local accounting.", "source_ids": [ "S640", "S641" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1325", "assertion": "P.Oxy.12.1431, assigned to early 351, explicitly equates 225 myriads of denarii with 1,500 talents in a rug expenditure. Documented common valuation: 1,500 denarii per talent. Exact day is uncertain; use year 351.", "source_ids": [ "S641" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1326", "assertion": "Egypt’s integration into denarius accounting can be represented as a qualified local absorption beginning in 296, with older expressions continuing into the fourth century. It is not the origin of Roman currency. One local later-absorption edge; founding_predecessor=false. Do not use it to infer Greek parentage for Rome’s original denarius.", "source_ids": [ "S640", "S641" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1331", "assertion": "Muhs reports that the Egyptian silver deben was equated to twenty drachmas before Alexander, and that this equation survived Ptolemy I’s reductions of coin weight. A useful earlier identity lead; note 133 dates the first attestation to 410–400 BCE, but that document was not independently collated.", "source_ids": [ "S645" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1332", "assertion": "In early Ptolemaic accounts, Demotic deben/kite expressions became accounting units detached from their former theoretical silver weights. Do not create automatic extra currency nodes for alternate-language denominations or each coin-weight change. The Ptolemaic-to-Roman identity boundary still needs local account comparison.", "source_ids": [ "S645" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V25-ROMAN-DENARIUS", "label": "Roman imperial denarius reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1249", "C1283", "C1287", "C1322", "C1323", "C1324", "C1325", "C1326", "C1327" ], "source_ids": [ "S640", "S641", "S642", "S643" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ancient account units — disconnected", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1249", "assertion": "Egypt’s integration into denarius accounting can be represented as a qualified local absorption beginning in 296, with older expressions continuing into the fourth century. It is not the origin of Roman currency. Local integration in Egypt; the date range combines reform and later accounting attestation, not a dated one-off conversion. The old scale continued; no claim that all Greek currencies generated Rome’s currency.", "source_ids": [ "S640", "S641" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1283", "assertion": "The 301 Maximum Prices Edict expresses statutory price ceilings in denarii; its Athenian copy preserves portions covering footwear and leather goods.", "source_ids": [ "S642", "S643" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1287", "assertion": "P.Oxy.12.1431, assigned to early 351, explicitly equates 225 myriads of denarii with 1,500 talents in a rug expenditure.", "source_ids": [ "S641" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1322", "assertion": "The 301 Maximum Prices Edict expresses statutory price ceilings in denarii; its Athenian copy preserves portions covering footwear and leather goods. Admit an account-unit identity rather than a coin issue; 301 is an observation, not a founding year.", "source_ids": [ "S642", "S643" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1323", "assertion": "After the Alexandrian tetradrachm ceased to be minted in 296, Egyptian drachma accounting continued for payments made in denarii, reckoned at four drachmas per denarius. This concerns actual accounting persistence during monetary integration, beyond an isolated exchange quotation.", "source_ids": [ "S640" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1324", "assertion": "The denarius did not wholly displace Egyptian drachma-and-talent accounting; the drachma term declined during the fourth century while talent reckoning persisted. Do not represent 296 as instant extinction of local accounting.", "source_ids": [ "S640", "S641" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1325", "assertion": "P.Oxy.12.1431, assigned to early 351, explicitly equates 225 myriads of denarii with 1,500 talents in a rug expenditure. Documented common valuation: 1,500 denarii per talent. Exact day is uncertain; use year 351.", "source_ids": [ "S641" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1326", "assertion": "Egypt’s integration into denarius accounting can be represented as a qualified local absorption beginning in 296, with older expressions continuing into the fourth century. It is not the origin of Roman currency. One local later-absorption edge; founding_predecessor=false. Do not use it to infer Greek parentage for Rome’s original denarius.", "source_ids": [ "S640", "S641" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1327", "assertion": "Bagnall and Bransbourg identify a property transaction dated 27 March 352, P.Stras.1.9, as their earliest known Egyptian transaction specifying payment in gold coinage. An attestation and scholarly earliest-known claim, not a universal first use or a proved denarius-to-solidus conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S641" ] } ] }, { "id": "FTM000376", "label": "Sudanese pound before the dinar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "baseline_retained_not_recertified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Screened existing scoped currency identity, attached claims and profile scope for ontology risks. No sufficient contradictory evidence found to merge or withhold. This retains baseline admission; it is not a fresh validation of every source or of the earliest identity boundary.", "claim_ids": [ "C1258", "C1259", "C1300", "C1347" ], "source_ids": [ "S664", "S665", "S666", "S667" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ottoman", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1258", "assertion": "Earlier Sudanese pound to dinar, introduction/co-circulation followed by replacement. Exact account law not obtained; classify the edge qualified because first-issue and final-replacement dates differ. ", "source_ids": [ "S664", "S665", "S666" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1259", "assertion": "Egyptian pound as actually used in Sudan replaced at parity by first Sudanese pound. Original1964 study supports local currency settlement and account-series continuity; exact1956Act uninspected. Original article passages retrieved from index, not complete download. Date1957 versus1956note dating must be kept separate. ", "source_ids": [ "S667" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1300", "assertion": "Contemporary1964research records the Sudanese pound replacing local Egyptian-pound use at parity in1957. The earlier Sudanese pound is a scoped account identity; a1956note imprint is not a proved account commencement date.", "source_ids": [ "S665", "S666", "S667" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1347", "assertion": "1 Egyptian pound = 1 first Sudanese pound. Egyptian pound as actually used in Sudan replaced at parity by first Sudanese pound. Original1964 study supports local currency settlement and account-series continuity; exact1956Act uninspected.", "source_ids": [ "S667" ] } ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GAMBIA-BAR", "label": "Gambia River trade bar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Reckoning of multi-good prices and a 300-bar payment liability; bar is account measure, not an iron-object node.", "claim_ids": [ "C1350", "C1351" ], "source_ids": [ "S668" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "African and Pacific account systems", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1350", "assertion": "Bar denominates quantities of different goods, with negotiated assortments adding to a purchase price; Moore explicitly describes reckoning by bars or crowns.", "source_ids": [ "S668" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1351", "assertion": "Narrated dispute at Nackway imposed a 300-bar payment. Retain the author’s partisan framing as source perspective, not verified fairness of the adjudication.", "source_ids": [ "S668" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-ETHIOPIA-AMOLE", "label": "Northern Ethiopian amole reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Tax schedules and a price structure expressed in amoles distinguish accounting from mere salt trade; worn commodity bars are not separate currencies.", "claim_ids": [ "C1352", "C1353" ], "source_ids": [ "S669" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "African and Pacific account systems", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1352", "assertion": "Tax schedules specify 8/6/4 bars per camel/mule/donkey load; analysis describes a price structure reckoned in amoles. Worn bars ceased to be accepted as money and were instead weighed as commodities.", "source_ids": [ "S669" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1353", "assertion": "Alvarez reports widespread salt-bar monetary use and court-expense provision. Earlier 525 salt trade is context, not proof of continuous identity to amole.", "source_ids": [ "S669" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-KONGO-NZIMBU", "label": "Kongo nzimbu reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Counted monetary tribute and obligations establish scoped account reckoning; shell species and counting scales stay in profile.", "claim_ids": [ "C1354" ], "source_ids": [ "S670" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "African and Pacific account systems", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1354", "assertion": "Thesis reports Garcia Simoes letter of 20 October 1575 with monetary reckoning and describes tribute liabilities determining demand.1782 account measures are separately reported; do not impose their factors on 1575.", "source_ids": [ "S670" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CONGO-MITAKO", "label": "Congo state-regulated mitako reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Goods priced in mitako and salary/valuation rules establish account function; original decrees remain uninspected, so scope stays qualified.", "claim_ids": [ "C1355" ], "source_ids": [ "S670" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "African and Pacific account systems", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1355", "assertion": "Goods were priced in mitako, sometimes settled in other goods. Reported decrees 30 July 1886,15 December 1893,28 November 1901 regulated valuation, district conversion to state currency and salary payments. Original laws remain uninspected.", "source_ids": [ "S670" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-ASANTE-PEREDWAN", "label": "Asante gold-account reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Peredwan value scale in fees/fines is an account identity; subsidiary weights do not receive separate nodes.", "claim_ids": [ "C1356" ], "source_ids": [ "S671" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "African and Pacific account systems", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1356", "assertion": "Central peredwan unit and fractional scale used alongside smaller damba,taku,domafo,doma values; small values enter court fines and fee distribution. Metrological relationships to other standards do not establish parentage.", "source_ids": [ "S671" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TOLAI-TAMBU", "label": "Tolai tambu reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Prices and administration work payments are expressed in a common tambu scale; material shell medium does not disqualify accounting.", "claim_ids": [ "C1357", "C1358" ], "source_ids": [ "S672", "S673" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "African and Pacific account systems", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1357", "assertion": "Administration paid tambu for road work.1901 restriction applied to trade with Europeans and did not end covert use. Account-unit function is explicit in the study.", "source_ids": [ "S672" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1358", "assertion": "Reported Matupi price:10–12 small fish for quarter-fathom tambu or one shilling; other goods imply different cash ratios. Do not treat exchange rates as ancestral conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S673" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-KOVE-TAMBU", "label": "Kove tambu obligation reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Quantified loans, interest and bride obligations in fathoms establish local account function; no shared identity with Tolai inferred from name/material.", "claim_ids": [ "C1359" ], "source_ids": [ "S674" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "African and Pacific account systems", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1359", "assertion": "A fathom entails return of two mats; loans to ambitious men carry 100 percent repayment increment. Article records obligations rising from 2–3 to 20–30 fathoms and bride payments exceeding 100. This is quantified obligation money, not merely ornament.", "source_ids": [ "S674" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TLAXCALA-CACAO", "label": "Tlaxcala cacao account unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Dated official ordinary-goods price schedule uses counted cacao units; these are not merely commodity stock quantities.", "claim_ids": [ "C1360" ], "source_ids": [ "S677", "S678" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Indigenous American account systems", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1360", "assertion": "Price ruling gives multiple ordinary goods values in counted cacao beans; quality adjustments are within the account profile.", "source_ids": [ "S677", "S678" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CENTRAL-MEXICO-QUACHTLI", "label": "Central Mexican quachtli reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Land consideration and purchasing reckoning provide unit evidence; geographical continuity between records remains qualified.", "claim_ids": [ "C1361", "C1362" ], "source_ids": [ "S679" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Indigenous American account systems", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1361", "assertion": "Tlatelolco land transaction states 20 quachtli consideration. Assignment to this scoped currency profile is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S679" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1362", "assertion": "Cuernavaca census calls cuachtli a means for purchasing things. Assignment to this scoped currency profile is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S679" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-NEWENGLAND-WAMPUM", "label": "Southern New England wampum reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Treaty installment and per-capita obligations are denominated in white fathoms; token forms/colour ratios stay within scope.", "claim_ids": [ "C1363", "C1364" ], "source_ids": [ "S680", "S681" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Indigenous American account systems", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1363", "assertion": "Williams describes monetary payments and named counting scale in fathoms. Assignment to this scoped currency profile is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S680", "S681" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1364", "assertion": "Treaty specifies 2000 white fathoms in four installments and annual per-capita obligations. Assignment to this scoped currency profile is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S680", "S681" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-PENNSYLVANIA-POUND", "label": "Pennsylvania pound of account", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Local contract accounting and pre-paper-issue reward prices establish unit independently of issuer or notes.", "claim_ids": [ "C1365", "C1366", "C1367" ], "source_ids": [ "S682" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1365", "assertion": "Reproduced notices promise rewards in pounds and shillings before the first provincial paper issue.", "source_ids": [ "S682" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1366", "assertion": "Original scholarship reports 1,687 contract transactions denominated in local pounds, shillings and pence.", "source_ids": [ "S682" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1367", "assertion": "Two hundred servant contracts were registered in pounds; paper-money stock is a separate question.", "source_ids": [ "S682" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-VIRGINIA-POUND", "label": "Virginia pound of account", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Receivables and contracts denominated in Virginia currency, settled in produce if agreed, are direct account evidence.", "claim_ids": [ "C1368", "C1369" ], "source_ids": [ "S683" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1368", "assertion": "The Prentis balance sheet records cash of 631 and receivables of 3,184 Virginia pounds.", "source_ids": [ "S683" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1369", "assertion": "The Jamieson/Campbell iron contract prices goods in Virginia currency while allowing payment in produce.", "source_ids": [ "S683" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-NEWJERSEY-POUND", "label": "New Jersey provincial pound of account", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Local salary reckoning distinguished from note par supports account unit; provincial bill issuer alone would not.", "claim_ids": [ "C1370", "C1371", "C1372", "C1373" ], "source_ids": [ "S684", "S685" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Sterling and early English", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1370", "assertion": "The dated provincial bill form promises value receivable by the treasurer in public payments. Assignment to this scoped currency profile is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S684", "S685" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1371", "assertion": "Research identifieslocal current salary reckoning distinguished from note par. Assignment to this scoped currency profile is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S684", "S685" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1372", "assertion": "Treasurers were instructed to receive taxes according to the western-division money rule. Assignment to this scoped currency profile is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S684", "S685" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1373", "assertion": "The law distinguishes local lawful money from sterling obligations. Assignment to this scoped currency profile is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S684", "S685" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-OLD-ASSYRIAN-SILVER", "label": "Old Assyrian silver reckoning at Kanesh", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Loan principal, repayment term and interest plus aggregate caravan accounts establish one Kanesh silver account scope; mina/shekel/grain are its scales.", "claim_ids": [ "C1374", "C1375" ], "source_ids": [ "S687", "S688", "S168" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ancient account units — disconnected", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1374", "assertion": "AO 8295 records a silver loan in mina, shekel and grain fractions, with a five-week repayment term and late interest reckoned per mina per month. This is a monetary obligation, not merely a weight inventory.", "source_ids": [ "S687" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1375", "assertion": "The Kanesh caravan account aggregates investments and diverse expenses into a silver balance in minas and shekels; another loan specifies staged repayment of six minas.", "source_ids": [ "S688", "S168" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-OLD-BABYLONIAN-SILVER", "label": "Old Babylonian silver shekel reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Hammurabi fee and compensation obligations in silver shekels establish accounting; mina is larger denomination, not another currency.", "claim_ids": [ "C1376" ], "source_ids": [ "S510" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ancient account units — disconnected", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1376", "assertion": "The Hammurabi legal collection fixes physician fees at 10,5,or 2 silver shekels for specified cases and sets divorce compensation in silver; these are value-denominated obligations. The ca.1750 BCE date follows Roth’s dating of the collection under the middle chronology, not its unit’s founding.", "source_ids": [ "S510" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-ATHENIAN-DRACHMA", "label": "Classical Athenian drachma reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Treasury principal/interest and security-inscription debt establish common Athenian account identity; talent/drachma/obol are grouped scales.", "claim_ids": [ "C1377", "C1378" ], "source_ids": [ "S689", "S690" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ancient account units — disconnected", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1377", "assertion": "The Athenian treasury account records principal and interest in talents,drachmas and obol fractions. Detailed disbursements cover 426/5–423/2 BCE, with a retrospective summary for 433/2–427/6.", "source_ids": [ "S689" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1378", "assertion": "An Attic property-security marker specifies a loan of 750 drachmas for Dionysos, corroborating drachma-denominated obligations beyond the fifth-century state treasury ledger.", "source_ids": [ "S690" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-RAMESSIDE-COPPER-DEBEN", "label": "Ramesside copper-deben value reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Bull transaction aggregates dissimilar goods into copper-deben value; qualified Ramesside scope, not each copper ring a currency.", "claim_ids": [ "C1379" ], "source_ids": [ "S691", "S692" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ancient account units — disconnected", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1379", "assertion": "UC 39606 values goods supplied for a bull in copper rings/deben and states an aggregate value. Settlement in goods and valuation in a common account unit are distinct in this record. The dates 1300–1001 BCE are a broad editorial Ramesside envelope, not an exact date or lifespan; the text names year 4 without identifying the king in this edition. Assignment to this scoped currency profile is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S691", "S692" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-EGYPT-SOLIDUS-NOMISMA", "label": "Late antique Egyptian solidus–nomisma reckoning", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "481 loan and 613 debt use solidus/nomisma value with fractions and alternative-kind settlement. Local Syene standard is scoped, not new node per fineness deduction.", "claim_ids": [ "C1380", "C1381" ], "source_ids": [ "S694", "S693" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Ancient account units — disconnected", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1380", "assertion": "BGU III 726 dates a loan to 19 October 481. Its principal is one gold solidus less four keratia; repayment is flax of the equivalent value at repayment, with wheat interest. This demonstrates an account valuation beyond simply counting an unchanged coin.", "source_ids": [ "S694" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1381", "assertion": "P.Lond.V 1737 records a debt of 3⅓ gold nomismata/solidi by the local Syene standard, with interest stated in gold carats per solidus. It is dated 9 February 613.", "source_ids": [ "S693" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-JPN-GINME", "label": "Japanese silver monme / ginme accounting", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Merchants price goods and make loans in monme/ginme even after related silver coins recede; account unit rather than coin weight alone.", "claim_ids": [ "C1382", "C1383", "C1419", "C1420", "C1432" ], "source_ids": [ "S695", "S696" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1382", "assertion": "Early-modern Japanese monetary accounting comprised independent gold, silver and cash units. Silver accounts reckoned 1000 monme perkan and 10 fun permonme.", "source_ids": [ "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1383", "assertion": "Osaka merchants continued pricing goods and making loans in monme/ginme even after monme silver coins largely disappeared from circulation.", "source_ids": [ "S696" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1419", "assertion": "Silver-account lending was forbidden and converted to gold/cash accounts, with gold-denominated government notes subsequently specified. Gold ryo reckoning thus received the silver account branch. Regional historical absorption, not founding unit of ryo.", "source_ids": [ "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1420", "assertion": "The same order explicitly permitted conversion of silver-denominated lending into cash reckoning at the transaction-date rate. Alternative local destination within monetary unification; do not imply every silver balance converted to mon.", "source_ids": [ "S695" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1432", "assertion": "Account-unit abolition: Administrative Proclamation 381 prohibited silver-denominated loans and required conversion into gold or cash reckoning at the transaction-day rate. Later 1868 order specified gold-denominated government notes.", "source_ids": [ "S695" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-SHANGHAI-TAEL", "label": "Shanghai tael", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Local contracts and payments denominated in Shanghai taels required account conversion into yuan; independent account denomination rather than weight standard alone.", "claim_ids": [ "C1384", "C1421", "C1433" ], "source_ids": [ "S541", "S697" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1384", "assertion": "Shanghai business used its local tael as a monetary unit; existing obligations were expressed in taels and required a yuan conversion rule.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1421", "assertion": "Shanghai tael-based payments and contracts were replaced by Republic of China yuan accounting. Shanghai local absorption only; yuan already existed; do not infer all local taels abolished simultaneously.", "source_ids": [ "S541", "S697" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1433", "assertion": "Shanghai banks, exchanges and businesses discontinued tael valuation in favour of yuan following the central order.", "source_ids": [ "S541", "S697" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SILVER1933" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HAIKWAN-TAEL", "label": "Haikwan customs tael", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Customs assessments and trade valuations independently denominated in Haikwan taels. A unit need not have a circulating coin or general retail use.", "claim_ids": [ "C1385", "C1434" ], "source_ids": [ "S541" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1385", "assertion": "The haikwan tael was used by Maritime Customs for export-duty collection and import/export statistical valuation.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1434", "assertion": "Customs announcement reported discontinuance of the haikwan tael.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SILVER1933" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CUSTOMS-GOLD-UNIT", "label": "Chinese customs gold unit", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Fiscal bookkeeping denomination is sufficient under account-unit ontology even where contemporary author contrasts it with circulating currency. Notes are incidental; do not describe gold content or note issue as identity basis.", "claim_ids": [ "C1386" ], "source_ids": [ "S541" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1386", "assertion": "A customs gold unit was created; contemporary report explicitly describes it as a bookkeeping unit rather than general currency.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-SILVER1933" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HYDERABAD-RUPEE", "label": "Hyderabad Osmania / Hali sicca rupee", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Separate Osmania-rupee obligations and reserve accounts, with British-rupee contractual exception, establish local accounting beyond note issuer.", "claim_ids": [ "C1387", "C1388", "C1389", "C1422" ], "source_ids": [ "S541", "S699" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1387", "assertion": "Contemporary report describes the Hyderabad Currency Act as granting Osmania rupees full legal tender, while British rupees could be used by contractual agreement.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1388", "assertion": "The paper-currency reserve separately accounts for 52,660,142 Osmania rupees versus British rupee notes and coin.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1389", "assertion": "RBI records Hyderabad Hali Sicca legal-tender cessation and replacement by Indianrupees on 1 April 1955. This is a legal-tender/absorption event; exact final account-unit extinction remains unresolved.", "source_ids": [ "S699" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1422", "assertion": "Hyderabad local rupees were replaced by Indianrupees; the regional branch joins an already existing Indianunit. Does not assert that Indianrupee originated 1955.", "source_ids": [ "S699" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TRAVANCORE-SIRKAR", "label": "Travancore Sirkar rupee", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Government accounts use an unminted full Sirkar rupee; fanam/cash subdivisions belong to same scale. Earlier/later local grouping remains qualified.", "claim_ids": [ "C1390", "C1391" ], "source_ids": [ "S698", "S541" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Rupee", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1390", "assertion": "Sirkar accounts were kept in rupees, fanams and cash; Travancore fanam was then nominal. Grouping the earlier and later local account observations is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S698" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1391", "assertion": "Sirkarrupee described as monetary unit with quarter/seventh subdivisions despite never having been minted as a fullrupee. Grouping the earlier and later local account observations is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-MANCHUKUO-YUAN", "label": "Manchukuo yuan", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Statutory regional yuan and separately denominated exchange/payment area support account unit; central-bank founding alone would not.", "claim_ids": [ "C1392" ], "source_ids": [ "S541" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1392", "assertion": "Currency law defined the regional yuan and decimal subdivisions; the central bank began replacing previously circulating local notes, while separate Chinese exchange and silver-yen markets remained.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-TIBET-TANGKA", "label": "Tibetan tangka accounting", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Contemporary official monetary-unit account description supports qualified tangka scope; tangka/srang regrouping needs accounting evidence, not denomination ratio alone.", "claim_ids": [ "C1393" ], "source_ids": [ "S541" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "East Asian lineages", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1393", "assertion": "Contemporary monetary survey calls the tangka the official monetary unit and reports Britishrupees circulating at 3 tangkas, with several local tangka coinforms. Assignment to this scoped currency profile is qualified.", "source_ids": [ "S541" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-AMSTERDAM", "label": "Amsterdam bank florin / bank guilder", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Banco versus current florins separately denominate bills, accounts and commercial transactions;1659 recognition supports identity beyond issuer credit risk.", "claim_ids": [ "C1394", "C1395", "C1424" ], "source_ids": [ "S700", "S701" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1394", "assertion": "Banco florins measured bill settlements; current florins measured cashier accounts and spot transactions. Their distinction received official recognition in 1659.", "source_ids": [ "S700" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1395", "assertion": "The bank florin collapsed internationally in 1795; the issuing bank was liquidated in 1820. Neither establishes an inspected final conversion tariff.", "source_ids": [ "S701" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1424", "assertion": "Established florin obligations differentiated into current and bank accounting scopes; child date is emergence envelope, not bank foundation 1609. Parent profile includes qualified Dutch current-guilder continuity before 1680.", "source_ids": [ "S700" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-EARLY-BANKS" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-HAMBURG", "label": "Hamburg mark banco", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "1619 charter loan clauses denominate principal and interest in Mark Banco; bill-clearing mandate alone would be insufficient. Retain independently denominated bank unit, with 1873 account conversion distinct from 1875 institution closure.", "claim_ids": [ "C1396", "C1397", "C1398", "C1423", "C1435" ], "source_ids": [ "S112", "S702" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1396", "assertion": "The 1619 mandate compelled large bills through the banco; lending clauses explicitly measured principal and interest in Mark Banco.", "source_ids": [ "S112" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1397", "assertion": "Reichsmark accounts opened alongside silver accounts on 15 November 1872; from 15 February 1873 merchants booked transfers in Reichsmark after the silver accounting basis ended.", "source_ids": [ "S702" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1398", "assertion": "Unwithdrawn balances transferred to Reichsbank deposits at the end of 1875. This institutional succession postdates the currency conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S112" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1423", "assertion": "Existing merchant transfer accounting shifted to Reichsmark; later institutional absorption must not be called founding.", "source_ids": [ "S702" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1435", "assertion": "Replacement of transfer-account unit; bank itself continued through 1875.", "source_ids": [ "S702", "S112" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-VENICE", "label": "Venetian banco ducat — Banco del Giro accounts", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "qualified", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Revise admission argument: premium alone is insufficient. Bank account denomination, its distinct relation to current/coin money and continued unit despite metallic devaluation support scoped banco ducat. Preserve one unit across institutions unless an account split is established.", "claim_ids": [ "C1399", "C1400" ], "source_ids": [ "S703", "S704" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1399", "assertion": "Giro balances settled obligations and traded at a variable premium to coin; the premium turned negative during 1630. This supports a separately valued scriptural unit.", "source_ids": [ "S703" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1400", "assertion": "Venetian bank payments ceased inOctober 1800; after 1805 creditors received government bonds.", "source_ids": [ "S704" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-EARLY-BANKS" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-BANCO", "label": "Genoese lira di banco", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Separately denominated account obligations demonstrated in Felloni: banco transfer accounts, commercial obligations, or permesso taxes/debt-service/distributions. Different banks sharing one lira must not be split. Closure of a bank is not termination of an account unit.", "claim_ids": [ "C1401", "C1402", "C1403" ], "source_ids": [ "S705", "S706" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1401", "assertion": "Lira di banco denominated giro ledgers. The 1 July 1741 tariff separated its legal value from commercial lira fuori banco.", "source_ids": [ "S705" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1402", "assertion": "After the 1746 suspension and 1751 debt consolidation, new 1748 banks retained the same lira di banco.", "source_ids": [ "S705" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1403", "assertion": "Successive banchi correnti operated until 1804–1805.", "source_ids": [ "S706" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-GENOA" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-CURRENT", "label": "Genoese commercial lira — lira fuori banco", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Separately denominated account obligations demonstrated in Felloni: banco transfer accounts, commercial obligations, or permesso taxes/debt-service/distributions. Different banks sharing one lira must not be split. Closure of a bank is not termination of an account unit.", "claim_ids": [ "C1404", "C1405" ], "source_ids": [ "S705" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1404", "assertion": "Lira di banco denominated giro ledgers. The 1 July 1741 tariff separated its legal value from commercial lira fuori banco.", "source_ids": [ "S705" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1405", "assertion": "Pre 1792 contracts remained payable at par after reform. The 1805 decree rated francs in commercial lire; the 26 October 1826 edict required Piedmontese lire for accounting.", "source_ids": [ "S705" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-GENOA" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-PERMESSO", "label": "Genoese lira di permesso", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Separately denominated account obligations demonstrated in Felloni: banco transfer accounts, commercial obligations, or permesso taxes/debt-service/distributions. Different banks sharing one lira must not be split. Closure of a bank is not termination of an account unit.", "claim_ids": [ "C1406", "C1407" ], "source_ids": [ "S705", "S706" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "European predecessor branches", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1406", "assertion": "The 1751 lira di permesso measured taxes, debt service and distributions; it differed from both banco and commercial lire.", "source_ids": [ "S705" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1407", "assertion": "Permesso bank closure is dated 1764 in the essay and 1763 in the inventory.", "source_ids": [ "S705", "S706" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-GENOA" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-CONFEDERATE-DOLLAR", "label": "Confederate dollar", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "fresh_source_adjudication", "rationale": "Court explicitly distinguishes contract dollars in kind and value from US dollars. Admission rests on independently denominated land-price and debt obligations, not merely depreciated notes or issuer risk.", "claim_ids": [ "C1408", "C1409", "C1436" ], "source_ids": [ "S707" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Short-lived modern currencies", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1408", "assertion": "A Montgomery land sale dated 28 November 1864 specified 45,000 Confederate dollars, including a deferred 10,000-dollar obligation; the Court distinguished this unit from US dollars in both kind and value.", "source_ids": [ "S707" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1409", "assertion": "Confederate notes became worthless in 1865. The Court permitted this private debt's historical-value recovery in US money, not note redemption.", "source_ids": [ "S707" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1436", "assertion": "Confederate currency became worthless in 1865; no general successor conversion is established. Judicial recovery of the historical value of a private debt is not currency redemption.", "source_ids": [ "S707" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [ "ONT27-CS-DOLLAR" ] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-BIAFRAN-POUND", "label": "Biafran pound", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Litigated palm-oil debt explicitly Biafran, distinguished from Nigerian pounds; note failure and no conversion do not erase prior account identity.", "claim_ids": [ "C1410", "C1411", "C1412", "C1425", "C1437" ], "source_ids": [ "S708", "S713" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Short-lived modern currencies", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1410", "assertion": "A February 1969 sale of 110 tins of palm oil created a 1,650-Biafran-pound payment obligation expressly distinguished from Nigerian pounds.", "source_ids": [ "S708" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1411", "assertion": "By the suit's filing on 17 February 1972, Biafran currency was no longer in legal use. The Supreme Court rejected replacement consideration in Nigerian pounds or naira and stated there was no official conversion rate.", "source_ids": [ "S708" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1412", "assertion": "Symes reproduces provisions retaining Nigerian money in 1967 and a January 1968 announcement replacing it with Biafran currency. His postwar recall account says no proportional conversion occurred; a flat payment was used instead.", "source_ids": [ "S713" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1425", "assertion": "The Biafran payment unit separated regionally from the retained Nigerian-pound system in January 1968. The reviewed evidence does not establish a universal conversion ratio.", "source_ids": [ "S713", "S708" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1437", "assertion": "Extinct without proportional redemption; no Biafran-pound-to-naira conversion edge.", "source_ids": [ "S708", "S713" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-DANZIG-GULDEN", "label": "Danzig gulden", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Currency law expressly defines gulden unit and subdivisions; sterling valuation is standard relation, not proof of unit identity with sterling.", "claim_ids": [ "C1413", "C1414", "C1430", "C1438" ], "source_ids": [ "S709", "S710" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Short-lived modern currencies", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1413", "assertion": "The law of 20 October 1923 established the Danzig gulden as monetary unit, divided into 100 pfennige and valued at one twenty-fifth pound sterling.", "source_ids": [ "S709" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1414", "assertion": "In September 1939 Danzig currency conversion was fixed at 1 gulden=0.70 Reichsmark. Gulden legal tender ended 30 September; exchange of payment media was required by 15 October, with a subsidiary-currency exception.", "source_ids": [ "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1430", "assertion": "Danzig gulden was absorbed into the existing German-mark system in September 1939 at 1 gulden = 0.70 Reichsmark.", "source_ids": [ "S710" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1438", "assertion": "Absorbed into existing German-mark currency lineage, not an unconverted dead-end.", "source_ids": [ "S709", "S710" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] }, { "id": "CUR-V26-KATANGA-FRANC", "label": "Katangese franc", "verdict": "keep", "confidence": "supported", "audit_level": "baseline_record_screen", "rationale": "Diplomatic payment obligations distinguish Katanga and Congo francs and discuss their conversion; not merely different-bank franc notes.", "claim_ids": [ "C1415", "C1416", "C1426", "C1431", "C1439" ], "source_ids": [ "S711", "S712" ], "identity_status_before": "scoped_draft", "group_before": "Short-lived modern currencies", "evidence_records": [ { "claim_id": "C1415", "assertion": "December 1962 diplomatic payment negotiations distinguished Katanga francs from Congo francs and contemplated conversion between them.", "source_ids": [ "S711" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1416", "assertion": "The World Bank reports that Katanga established its own franc during secession and that it was replaced by the Congolese franc at 1:1 in January 1963.", "source_ids": [ "S712" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1426", "assertion": "Katanga separated a franc payment unit from the existing Congolese system during secession.", "source_ids": [ "S711", "S712" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1431", "assertion": "Katangese francs were replaced by existing Congolese francs at 1:1 in January 1963.", "source_ids": [ "S712" ] }, { "claim_id": "C1439", "assertion": "Absorbed back into pre-1967 Congolese franc. Identity ends but line continues by conversion.", "source_ids": [ "S711", "S712" ] } ], "adjudication_source_keys": [] } ], "proposed_merges": [ { "from": "FTM000299", "to": "FTM000285", "confidence": "supported_inference", "rationale": "Inspected enabling law authorizes special notes of the Indian rupee for external circulation, not a new account denomination. Fold Gulf episode into Indian rupee and retain its regional conversion observations. This rejects a note-series identity; any later independently denominated Gulf contract unit requires new evidence.", "source_keys": [ "ONT27-GULF-LAW" ] }, { "from": "T-FTM000522", "to": "T-FTM000497", "confidence": "supported", "rationale": "British Currency Act expressly keeps local contracts/payments/liabilities in sterling even alongside local-note issue. Preserve Bahamas use as sterling regional observation and dollar conversion.", "source_keys": [ "ONT27-BAHAMAS" ] }, { "from": "T-FTM000938", "to": "FTM000254", "confidence": "supported_inference", "rationale": "Original research explicitly says new kingdom retained Serbian dinar as monetary unit. National extension and renamed issuing bank do not create a new unit; retain all unification and later-partition observations. This is a qualified continuity merge, not invented conversion.", "source_keys": [ "ONT27-SERBIA" ] }, { "from": "CUR-V22-TAIWAN-YEN", "to": "T-FTM000117", "confidence": "supported_inference", "rationale": "Merge issuer-defined Taiwan yen profile into Japanese yen for the established common-unit period. Contemporary1933–1934report expressly identifies the same monetary unit;1933USsurvey confirms Japanese currency law. Preserve1898–1904silver dealings as held regional accounting scope, not an automatic founding date of this merged unit.", "source_keys": [ "ONT27-TAIWAN-UNIT", "ONT27-SILVER1933", "ONT27-BRYAN" ] }, { "from": "CUR-V23-OLD-SWISS-FRANC-ZURICH", "to": "T-FTM000839", "confidence": "supported", "rationale": "Official archive explicitly identifies old francs in Zurich accounts as Helvetic francs. Regional contract scope is an observation, not a separate unit. Preserve all aliases and 1851 conversion observations.", "source_keys": [ "ONT27-ZURICH" ] } ], "withheld": [], "display_group_suggestions": [ { "action": "remove_as_genealogical_family", "label": "Short-lived modern currencies", "reason": "Duration/political history does not supply common ancestry. Use lifecycle/region filters; place each admitted unit by supported parent or display it as unresolved." }, { "action": "distinguish", "label": "Ancient account units — disconnected", "reason": "Research navigation group, not asserted common family. Separate label from actual genealogical root." }, { "action": "rename", "id": "CUR-V22-JINAN-YUAN", "label": "Jinan yuan", "reason": "Issuer belongs in profile metadata; unit belongs in graph label." }, { "action": "retain_profile_events", "reason": "Issuer succession, new banknote issues, changes in coin standard and principal subdivision changes remain dated profile observations." } ], "integration_rules": [ "Preserve merged IDs as aliases, all claims, sources and local observations.", "Rewire legitimate relations only after checking their account-level scope; discard self-edges created by same-unit mergers.", "A qualified merge should remain explicit in audit record, not silently promoted to complete continuity.", "Do not show node counts from this research file until integration validates endpoints and relations." ], "remaining_bounded_questions": [ "Samoa1959local Currency Ordinance exception and local obligations.", "Mauritius,Ceylon,Seychelles earliest distinct-account boundaries.", "CFA and Portuguese colonial-unit boundary decisions owned by territorial_roots; post-Soviet reform decisions by bottlenecks25; reconcile their source-reviewed updates before publication.", "Hwan retained as genuinely named principal unit under the explicit user ontology; exact conversion does not justify merger into won.", "Taiwan early silver-account scope1898–1904 remains held separately; banknote-brand admission is rejected for the documented common-yen period." ], "identity_unresolved": [ { "id": "FTM000189", "reason": "Retain provisionally with identity unresolved. Current record positively describes local New Zealand-pound issues and issuer succession, but 1959 common-currency clause has uninspected local-law exceptions. The note evidence cannot establish independent denomination, and the incomplete statute cannot establish a merger. Inspect local obligations before changing identity." } ] }, "context_relationships": [ { "id": "R0399", "kind": "account_system_adoption", "date": { "earliest_year": 1891, "latest_year": 1891, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1891" }, "claim_ids": [ "C981", "C1588" ], "scope": "Frenchfranc was adopted as Tunisia’s monetaryreference in1891,while the actual localreplacement was Tunisianpiastre→Tunisianfranc. KeepFrenchconnection as context for account-system adoption,not a second replacementparent.", "valuation_ids": [], "parent": "FTM000175", "child": "FTM000278", "layer": "context", "source": "1500 coverage research revision 16", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_policy": "Exact ratio within the written scope, never a universal treatment of all cash and deposits.", "original_parent": "FTM000175", "original_child": "FTM000278", "creates_currency": false, "display_default": true, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "founding_adoption", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "retype", "scope": "fresh_source_review", "reason": "Tunisia expressly substitutes French franc monetary unit for piastre; adoption exceeds coin-standard matching.", "claim_ids": [ "C981" ], "source_ids": [ "S465" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S465" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "The localpiastreparent supplies directsuccession; Frenchmodeladoption alone doesnot prove a separateflow ofFrench-unit debts intoTunisianunit. Excludefromancestryreachmetrics.", "claim_id": "C1588" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1588" ] }, { "id": "R0404", "kind": "multiple_currency_unification", "date": { "earliest_year": 1894, "latest_year": 1894, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1894" }, "claim_ids": [ "C986", "C1592" ], "scope": "Sterlingcoin circulation does not establish sterling as the accountunit immediately replaced in1894. Primary1894ordinance instead makes USDgold the standardforcontracts.", "valuation_ids": [], "parent": "T-FTM000497", "child": "T-FTM000525", "layer": "context", "source": "1500 coverage research revision 16", "status": "qualified_draft", "valuation_policy": "Exact ratio within the written scope, never a universal treatment of all cash and deposits.", "original_parent": "T-FTM000497", "original_child": "T-FTM000525", "creates_currency": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "qualified", "line_style": "dashed", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "display_default": true, "relationship_role": "replacement", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "qualify", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "British Honduras mixed sterling circulation contributes to local dollar system; no exclusive parent or invented rate.", "claim_ids": [ "C986" ], "source_ids": [ "S104" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S732", "S104" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "remove", "reason": "Remove foundingancestry; retainmixedcirculation/standard context. Do not autoaddUSDparent until BZDseparation fromthe adoptedUSDunit is evidenced.", "claim_id": "C1592" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1592" ] }, { "id": "R0411", "kind": "standard_alignment", "date": { "earliest_year": 1924, "latest_year": 1926, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1924–1926" }, "claim_ids": [ "C993", "C1603" ], "scope": "QuetzalUSDfoundingrelation isgoldstandardparity; actuallocalpredecessor wasGuatemalanpeso, exchanged60:1.", "valuation_ids": [ "V0224" ], "parent": "T-FTM000481", "child": "FTM000075", "layer": "context", "source": "1500 coverage research revision 16", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_policy": "Exact ratio within the written scope, never a universal treatment of all cash and deposits.", "original_parent": "T-FTM000481", "original_child": "FTM000075", "creates_currency": false, "display_default": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "standard_reference", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "retain", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "Quetzal dollar parity is founding valuation, not evidence USDaccounts preceded local peso conversion.", "claim_ids": [ "C993" ], "source_ids": [ "S471" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S733" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "ExcludeUSDparity fromancestrypaths; addexistingpeso→quetzal replacement.", "claim_id": "C1603" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1603" ] }, { "id": "R0413", "kind": "standard_alignment", "date": { "earliest_year": 1904, "latest_year": 1904, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1904" }, "claim_ids": [ "C995", "C1604" ], "scope": "Law84of28June1904 establishesbalboa; USDgoldlegal equivalence issharedstandard/legal tender, not evidenceofUSDaccountunit succession.", "valuation_ids": [ "V0225" ], "parent": "T-FTM000481", "child": "FTM000071", "layer": "context", "source": "1500 coverage research revision 16", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_policy": "Exact ratio within the written scope, never a universal treatment of all cash and deposits.", "original_parent": "T-FTM000481", "original_child": "FTM000071", "creates_currency": false, "display_default": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "standard_reference", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "retain", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "Balboa dollar weight/fineness is standard borrowing; Colombian monetary replacement is separate.", "claim_ids": [ "C995" ], "source_ids": [ "S473" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S734" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "Correctlawdate; Colombianlimitedcoinredemption doesnot establishgeneralaccountconversion.", "claim_id": "C1604" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1604" ] }, { "id": "R0416", "kind": "standard_alignment", "date": { "earliest_year": 1912, "latest_year": 1913, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1912–1913" }, "claim_ids": [ "C998", "C1605" ], "scope": "USDparity doesnotestablish córdobaancestry; primary1913law converts localpeso contracts,statutes,feesandfines to córdobas.", "valuation_ids": [ "V0227" ], "parent": "T-FTM000481", "child": "FTM000079", "layer": "context", "source": "1500 coverage research revision 16", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_policy": "Exact ratio within the written scope, never a universal treatment of all cash and deposits.", "original_parent": "T-FTM000481", "original_child": "FTM000079", "creates_currency": false, "display_default": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "standard_reference", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "retain", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "Córdoba initial dollar valuation alone does not establish prior USDaccount succession.", "claim_ids": [ "C998" ], "source_ids": [ "S475" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S726" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "Replaceancestrypath by documentedexistingpeso parent; retainUSDstandard ascontext.", "claim_id": "C1605" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1605" ] }, { "id": "R0414", "kind": "standard_alignment", "date": { "earliest_year": 1903, "latest_year": 1903, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1903" }, "claim_ids": [ "C996", "C1613" ], "scope": "The 1903 Philippine reform defined a gold peso and made US gold dollars tender at two pesos per dollar. The date is enactment; commencement depended on the stipulated coin supply. Spanish and Mexican predecessors are additional inputs, not erased by the new standard.", "valuation_ids": [ "V0226" ], "parent": "T-FTM000481", "child": "T-FTM000503", "layer": "context", "source": "1500 coverage research revision 16", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_policy": "Exact ratio within the written scope, never a universal treatment of all cash and deposits.", "original_parent": "T-FTM000481", "original_child": "T-FTM000503", "creates_currency": false, "display_default": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "founding_adoption", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "retain", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "US gold dollars expressly legal tender at 2 pesos, more than metal specification; optional nonexclusive founding adoption retained.", "claim_ids": [ "C996" ], "source_ids": [ "S474" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S474" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "The1903 US-dollar statutory ratio is monetary-standard/legal-tender influence. It is not in itself conversion of prior USD account obligations into a new Philippine unit. Keep optional standard-adoption context, excluded from ancestry.", "claim_id": "C1613" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1613" ] }, { "id": "R-V23-015", "parent": "FTM000144", "child": "T-FTM000719", "kind": "historical_name_restoration", "layer": "context", "date": { "earliest_year": 1980, "latest_year": 1980, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1980" }, "claim_ids": [ "C1175", "C1614" ], "source_ids": [ "S574", "S591", "S838", "S839" ], "source": "Revision 23 predecessor audit", "scope": "The national currency name was restored after abolition; an account-balance succession between the two riels has not been established.", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_ids": [], "creates_currency": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "display_default": false, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "restoration", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "retain", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "1980 riel restores named account tradition after abolition; optional restoration must not imply redeemed balances or continuous use.", "claim_ids": [ "C1175" ], "source_ids": [ "S574" ] }, "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "Account-unit source adjudication.", "claim_id": "C1614" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1614" ] }, { "id": "R0267", "kind": "standard_alignment", "date": { "earliest_year": 1918, "latest_year": 1918, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1918" }, "claim_ids": [ "C818", "C1648" ], "scope": "The Estonian mark founding standard referenced the Ostmark; this standard reference is retained as context and excluded from ancestry traversal.", "valuation_ids": [ "V0157" ], "parent": "FTM000309", "child": "T-FTM000878", "layer": "context", "source": "European predecessor research revision 13", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_policy": "Exact ratio within the written scope, never a universal treatment of all cash and deposits.", "original_parent": "T-FTM000876", "original_child": "T-FTM000878", "creates_currency": false, "display_default": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "standard_reference", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "retain", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "Ostmark parity at Estonian founding alone is insufficient replacement or regional lineage evidence.", "claim_ids": [ "C818" ], "source_ids": [ "S410" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S780", "S410" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "Retain supported optional standard_reference, not ancestry; keep_qualified denotes unresolved proposed ancestry only. Do not downgrade existing parity fact.", "claim_id": "C1648" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1648" ], "identity_remapped_in": "revision_27" }, { "id": "R0239", "parent": "FTM000175", "child": "FTM000245", "kind": "standard_adoption", "layer": "context", "claim_ids": [ "C781", "C1652" ], "source": "reviewed franc handoff v2", "date": { "earliest_year": 1850, "latest_year": 1850, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1850" }, "scope": "The federal Swiss franc adopts the French silver-franc standard. Standard relationship, not French currency replacement in Switzerland.", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_ids": [], "valuation_policy": "Exact original quantities; pegs, coin tariffs and currency conversions have separate scopes.", "original_parent": "FTM000175", "original_child": "FTM000245", "creates_currency": false, "display_default": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "standard_reference", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "retain", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "French silver specification is a standard reference; no French-franc account replacement in Switzerland demonstrated.", "claim_ids": [ "C781" ], "source_ids": [ "S388" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S388" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "The retained evidence establishes a metal or valuation standard, not succession of the principal unit of account. Keep it as profile context; exclude it from ancestry traversal.", "claim_id": "C1652" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1652" ] }, { "id": "R0240", "parent": "FTM000175", "child": "FTM000246", "kind": "standard_adoption", "layer": "context", "claim_ids": [ "C782", "C1653" ], "source": "reviewed franc handoff v2", "date": { "earliest_year": 1832, "latest_year": 1832, "precision": "day", "qualifier": "exact", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1832-06-05", "iso_date": "1832-06-05" }, "scope": "Belgium legislates the French decimal silver-franc standard. Law date; does not assert a blanket 1:1 exchange of every preceding local unit.", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_ids": [], "valuation_policy": "Exact original quantities; pegs, coin tariffs and currency conversions have separate scopes.", "original_parent": "FTM000175", "original_child": "FTM000246", "creates_currency": false, "display_default": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "standard_reference", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "retain", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "Belgian 1832 law adopts French standard; existing evidence does not show French local obligation succession.", "claim_ids": [ "C782" ], "source_ids": [ "S398" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S398" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "The retained evidence establishes a metal or valuation standard, not succession of the principal unit of account. Keep it as profile context; exclude it from ancestry traversal.", "claim_id": "C1653" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1653" ] }, { "id": "R0306", "kind": "unit_standard_adoption", "date": { "earliest_year": 1828, "latest_year": 1828, "precision": "year", "qualifier": "reported", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1828" }, "claim_ids": [ "C863", "C1654" ], "scope": "The phoenix was valued at one sixth of the Spanish dollar. A valuation standard, not evidence that all dollars were compulsorily converted into phoenixes.", "valuation_ids": [], "parent": "T-FTM000476", "child": "T-FTM000905", "layer": "context", "source": "European predecessor research revision 13", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_policy": "Exact ratio within the written scope, never a universal treatment of all cash and deposits.", "original_parent": "T-FTM000476", "original_child": "T-FTM000905", "creates_currency": false, "display_default": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "standard_reference", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "retain", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "One-sixth Spanish-dollar valuation defines phoenix standard; no local account succession established.", "claim_ids": [ "C863" ], "source_ids": [ "S429" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S429" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "The retained evidence establishes a metal or valuation standard, not succession of the principal unit of account. Keep it as profile context; exclude it from ancestry traversal.", "claim_id": "C1654" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1654" ] }, { "id": "R0375", "kind": "local_issue_on_imported_currency_standard", "date": { "earliest_year": 1863, "latest_year": 1866, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1863–1866" }, "claim_ids": [ "C954", "C1655" ], "scope": "Hong Kong’s local silver-dollar issue developed from circulating Spanish and Mexican silver dollars. One traced standard input; the 1935 sterling link is not its origin.", "valuation_ids": [], "parent": "T-FTM000476", "child": "T-FTM000464", "layer": "context", "source": "1500 coverage research revision 15", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_policy": "Exact ratio within the written scope, never a universal treatment of all cash and deposits.", "original_parent": "T-FTM000476", "original_child": "T-FTM000464", "creates_currency": false, "display_default": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "standard_reference", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "retain", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "Spanish coin circulation alone remains weaker than Mexican-account law; keep optional pending named Spanish obligations.", "claim_ids": [ "C954" ], "source_ids": [ "S453" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S453" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "The retained evidence establishes a metal or valuation standard, not succession of the principal unit of account. Keep it as profile context; exclude it from ancestry traversal.", "claim_id": "C1655" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1655" ] }, { "id": "R0401", "kind": "standard_alignment", "date": { "earliest_year": 1825, "latest_year": 1850, "precision": "range", "qualifier": "range", "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero", "original_text": "1825–1850" }, "claim_ids": [ "C983", "C1656" ], "scope": "Sterling coins and the sterling rating coexisted with the inherited British West Indian dollar account unit. They do not make sterling its account-unit parent.", "valuation_ids": [], "parent": "T-FTM000497", "child": "T-FTM000515", "layer": "context", "source": "1500 coverage research revision 16", "status": "supported_draft", "valuation_policy": "Exact ratio within the written scope, never a universal treatment of all cash and deposits.", "original_parent": "T-FTM000497", "original_child": "T-FTM000960", "creates_currency": false, "display_default": false, "display_evidence": { "status": "supported", "line_style": "solid", "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only" }, "ancestry_role": "non_ancestry_context", "founding_predecessor": false, "relationship_role": "regional_branch", "date_is_creation": false, "revision_25_review": { "disposition": "qualify", "scope": "existing_evidence_review", "reason": "Barbados mixes sterling coins and dollar notes; intermediate dollar-account relation unclear, so keep optional pending actual account conversion.", "claim_ids": [ "C983" ], "source_ids": [ "S467" ] }, "source_ids": [ "S830" ], "revision27_review": { "decision": "retype", "reason": "The independently sourced Spanish-dollar ancestry replaces the earlier mixed-circulation inference.", "claim_id": "C1656" }, "current_basis_claim_ids": [ "C1656" ], "identity_remapped_in": "revision_27" } ], "root_frontier": [ { "currency_id": "FTM000053", "label": "Portuguese real", "earliest_observation": 1435, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S477", "S479", "S480", "S565" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000063", "label": "Boliviano", "earliest_observation": 1863, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S482", "S660", "S661" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000066", "label": "Chilean peso", "earliest_observation": 1851, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S624", "S625" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000145", "label": "Brazilian real (réis)", "earliest_observation": 1568, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S477", "S478", "S479", "S596", "S594" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000166", "label": "Spanish peseta", "earliest_observation": 1969, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S879", "S880" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000246", "label": "Belgian franc", "earliest_observation": 1832, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S377", "S398", "S399", "S409" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000247", "label": "Italian lira", "earliest_observation": 1943, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S815" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000248", "label": "Congolese franc, pre-1967", "earliest_observation": 1887, "scope": "1887 constitutive account-unit law established; Belgian coin adoption does not prove account ancestry.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S389", "S390", "S409", "S658", "S711", "S712", "S724", "S792", "S855" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000276", "label": "Algerian franc", "earliest_observation": 1851, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S541", "S856", "S857", "S764", "S765" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000307", "label": "Prussian thaler — nineteenth-century unit", "earliest_observation": 1873, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S435" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000321", "label": "Austrian gulden — pre-1892 unit", "earliest_observation": 1892, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S426" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000337", "label": "Dutch guilder (euro predecessor)", "earliest_observation": 1526, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S347", "S348", "S563", "S564", "S562", "S622", "S623", "S619", "S620", "S621", "S700", "S735", "S835", "S886" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000346", "label": "Imperial Russian ruble — nineteenth-century silver unit", "earliest_observation": 1839, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S427", "S440", "S441", "S522", "S523", "S524", "S525", "S526", "S527", "S874" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000375", "label": "Egyptian pound", "earliest_observation": 1524, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S280", "S98", "S256", "S289", "S558", "S613", "S667", "S647", "S649", "S648", "S557", "S764", "S765", "S766", "S189", "S877" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000383", "label": "Thai baht", "earliest_observation": 1536, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S297", "S541", "S578", "S590", "S614" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000476", "label": "Spanish real / peso de a ocho", "earliest_observation": 1473, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S61", "S65", "S66", "S67", "S70", "S73", "S82", "S84", "S93", "S99", "S171", "S429", "S453", "S582", "S584", "S589", "S592", "S593", "S594", "S595", "S596", "S630", "S836", "S830", "S189", "S858", "S859", "S860", "S861", "S862", "S586" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000491", "label": "Halifax pound of account", "earliest_observation": null, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000493", "label": "Nova Scotia decimal dollar", "earliest_observation": null, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S160" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000494", "label": "Newfoundland dollar", "earliest_observation": 1865, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S11", "S156", "S161" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000560", "label": "Frankish denier–livre reckoning", "earliest_observation": 670, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S115", "S483", "S487", "S488", "S127", "S371", "S486", "S489", "S492", "S499", "S500", "S501", "S502", "S503", "S521", "S146", "S638", "S639" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000590", "label": "Pound Scots", "earliest_observation": null, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S142" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000604", "label": "Irish pound — pre-1826 account unit", "earliest_observation": null, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S152", "S153", "S155" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000606", "label": "New Brunswick decimal dollar", "earliest_observation": 1852, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S156", "S186", "S187", "S188" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000607", "label": "Prince Edward Island pound of account", "earliest_observation": null, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S156" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000621", "label": "Castilian maravedí of account", "earliest_observation": 1477, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S171", "S630" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000639", "label": "New Brunswick pound of account", "earliest_observation": null, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S186", "S187" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000719", "label": "Cambodian riel", "earliest_observation": 1980, "scope": "1980 restoration after monetary abolition; old-account conversion is not established.", "source_ids": [ "S279", "S574", "S591", "S650", "S838", "S839" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000807", "label": "Bulgarian lev", "earliest_observation": 1880, "scope": "Lev denomination established in1880; earlier account succession is still unestablished.", "source_ids": [ "S98", "S347", "S348", "S883", "S884" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000808", "label": "European unit of account (EUA)", "earliest_observation": 1975, "scope": "1975 basket account unit positively constituted for Lomé aid; sector-specific ancestry from earlier European account units remains unadjudicated.", "source_ids": [ "S353", "S354", "S355" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000839", "label": "Helvetic franc, 1799", "earliest_observation": 1799, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S401", "S552", "S551" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000905", "label": "Greek phoenix", "earliest_observation": 1828, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S428", "S429" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000915", "label": "South German florin — nineteenth-century unit", "earliest_observation": 1873, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S435" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V19-DARIC", "label": "Achaemenid daric payment unit", "earliest_observation": -401, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S485", "S129", "S504", "S505", "S507", "S506", "S491", "S646" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V22-ALBANIAN-FRANG", "label": "Albanian gold franc / frang", "earliest_observation": 1923, "scope": "Gold-franc accounts existed before1925; external account adoption remains unestablished.", "source_ids": [ "S249", "S881" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000331", "label": "Danish rigsdaler", "earliest_observation": 1873, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S251" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000335", "label": "Norwegian speciedaler", "earliest_observation": 1875, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S263" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000031", "label": "Persian toman / dinar accounting — including qeran", "earliest_observation": 1651, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S299", "S811", "S812" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000072", "label": "Costa Rican peso", "earliest_observation": 1839, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S227", "S626" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000088", "label": "Paraguayan peso fuerte", "earliest_observation": 1820, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S533", "S627" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000296", "label": "Afghan rupee — Kabuli account unit", "earliest_observation": 1925, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S539", "S324" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "FTM000094", "label": "Venezolano", "earliest_observation": 1871, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S544" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V22-CALCUTTA-SICCA", "label": "Calcutta sicca rupee", "earliest_observation": 1765, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S549", "S580", "S581" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V22-SWEDISH-SPECIE", "label": "Swedish riksdaler specie", "earliest_observation": 1789, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S550" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V23-ZURICH-GULDEN", "label": "Zurich gulden account unit", "earliest_observation": 1803, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S551", "S552" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V23-EAST-SWISS-REICHSGULDEN", "label": "Eastern Swiss Reichswährung gulden (contract unit)", "earliest_observation": 1851, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S551" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V24-NPL-PAISA16", "label": "Nepalese 16-ganda paisa rupee", "earliest_observation": 1855, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S577", "S576" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "T-FTM000480", "label": "Dutch lion-dollar trade account unit", "earliest_observation": 1690, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S601", "S599", "S557", "S602", "S603", "S553", "S554", "S637" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V25-EPHESOS-GOLD", "label": "Ephesian Artemision gold account unit", "earliest_observation": -650, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S644" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V25-EGYPT-DRACHMA", "label": "Roman-Egyptian drachma and talent reckoning", "earliest_observation": 71, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S640", "S641", "S490", "S645" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-GAMBIA-BAR", "label": "Gambia River trade bar", "earliest_observation": 1730, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S668" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-ETHIOPIA-AMOLE", "label": "Northern Ethiopian amole reckoning", "earliest_observation": 1520, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S669" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-KONGO-NZIMBU", "label": "Kongo nzimbu reckoning", "earliest_observation": 1575, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S670" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-CONGO-MITAKO", "label": "Congo state-regulated mitako reckoning", "earliest_observation": 1886, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S670" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-ASANTE-PEREDWAN", "label": "Asante gold-account reckoning", "earliest_observation": 1800, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S671" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-TOLAI-TAMBU", "label": "Tolai tambu reckoning", "earliest_observation": 1899, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S672", "S673" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-KOVE-TAMBU", "label": "Kove tambu obligation reckoning", "earliest_observation": 1966, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S674" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-TLAXCALA-CACAO", "label": "Tlaxcala cacao account unit", "earliest_observation": 1545, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S677", "S678" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-CENTRAL-MEXICO-QUACHTLI", "label": "Central Mexican quachtli reckoning", "earliest_observation": 1540, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S679" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-NEWENGLAND-WAMPUM", "label": "Southern New England wampum reckoning", "earliest_observation": 1643, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S680", "S681" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-PENNSYLVANIA-POUND", "label": "Pennsylvania pound of account", "earliest_observation": 1720, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S682" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-VIRGINIA-POUND", "label": "Virginia pound of account", "earliest_observation": 1734, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S683" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-NEWJERSEY-POUND", "label": "New Jersey provincial pound of account", "earliest_observation": 1709, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S684", "S685" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-OLD-ASSYRIAN-SILVER", "label": "Old Assyrian silver reckoning at Kanesh", "earliest_observation": -2000, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S687", "S688", "S168" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-OLD-BABYLONIAN-SILVER", "label": "Old Babylonian silver shekel reckoning", "earliest_observation": -1750, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S510" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-ATHENIAN-DRACHMA", "label": "Classical Athenian drachma reckoning", "earliest_observation": -426, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S689", "S690" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-RAMESSIDE-COPPER-DEBEN", "label": "Ramesside copper-deben value reckoning", "earliest_observation": null, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S691", "S692" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-EGYPT-SOLIDUS-NOMISMA", "label": "Late antique Egyptian solidus–nomisma reckoning", "earliest_observation": 481, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S694", "S693" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-JPN-GINME", "label": "Japanese silver monme / ginme accounting", "earliest_observation": 1600, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S695", "S696" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-SHANGHAI-TAEL", "label": "Shanghai tael", "earliest_observation": 1933, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S541", "S697" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-HAIKWAN-TAEL", "label": "Haikwan customs tael", "earliest_observation": 1930, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S541", "S745" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-HYDERABAD-RUPEE", "label": "Hyderabad Osmania / Hali sicca rupee", "earliest_observation": 1912, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S541", "S699" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-TRAVANCORE-SIRKAR", "label": "Travancore Sirkar rupee", "earliest_observation": 1861, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S698", "S541", "S847" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-TIBET-TANGKA", "label": "Tibetan tangka accounting", "earliest_observation": 1933, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S541", "S845" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-HAMBURG", "label": "Hamburg mark banco", "earliest_observation": 1619, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S112", "S702" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-VENICE", "label": "Venetian banco ducat — Banco del Giro accounts", "earliest_observation": 1619, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S703", "S704" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-BANCO", "label": "Genoese lira di banco", "earliest_observation": 1675, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S705", "S706" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-CURRENT", "label": "Genoese commercial lira — lira fuori banco", "earliest_observation": 1675, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S705" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V26-GENOA-PERMESSO", "label": "Genoese lira di permesso", "earliest_observation": 1751, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S705", "S706" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V27-MOROCCO-HASSANI", "label": "Moroccan Hassani reckoning", "earliest_observation": 1907, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S725" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V27-TUNISIAN-PIASTRE", "label": "Tunisian piastre / riyal reckoning", "earliest_observation": 1856, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S465", "S794" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" }, { "currency_id": "CUR-V27-PERUVIAN-SOL-1863", "label": "Peruvian sol — nineteenth-century account unit", "earliest_observation": 1863, "scope": "Earlier account-unit ancestry remains unestablished. The first dated observation is not a founding date.", "source_ids": [ "S853", "S852" ], "de_novo_status": "not_established" } ] }