← Read the currency articleHamburg mark banco: research record
Evidence coverage: 1619–1873. This is the span of collected observations, not the currency’s lifetime.
This record includes associated currencies and earlier interpretations. The article selects the evidence relevant to its own history.
← Locate this currency on the treeCurrency continuity
Hamburg mark banco
CUR-V26-HAMBURG · Research draft
Documented obligations, prices or public accounting establish a scoped currency identity independently of surviving descendants.
One scoped currency identity. Changes to subdivisions, scale, standard, instruments or issuers do not by themselves create children. A distinct account unit can remain a successor.
Dated observations: 1619–1873; this does not establish the entire lifetime.
Parents / predecessors
No distinct predecessor currency is established in the loaded view.
Children / successors
Latest research
Historical account researchThe 1619 mandate compelled large bills through the banco; lending clauses explicitly measured principal and interest in Mark Banco.
Sources and qualifications → Historical account researchReichsmark accounts opened alongside silver accounts on 15 November 1872; from 15 February 1873 merchants booked transfers in Reichsmark after the silver accounting basis ended.
Sources and qualifications → Historical account researchUnwithdrawn balances transferred to Reichsbank deposits at the end of 1875. This institutional succession postdates the currency conversion.
Sources and qualifications → Account-unit observations
Dated evidence, not exact birth or extinction dates.
1619supportedThe 1619 mandate compelled large bills through the banco; lending clauses explicitly measured principal and interest in Mark Banco.
C1396 1873supportedReichsmark accounts opened alongside silver accounts on 15 November 1872; from 15 February 1873 merchants booked transfers in Reichsmark after the silver accounting basis ended.
C1397
Evidence & research notes 5 claims
Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan.
Supported C1396
The 1619 mandate compelled large bills through the banco; lending clauses explicitly measured principal and interest in Mark Banco.
Ulrich Bindseil, September 2019 · Early French and German central bank charters and regulations, Occasional Paper 234 Citation S112 ·
Open source ↗section3.2 p.20; lending ordinance clausesII–IV p.26
Source access and limitations
Author research and translated primary charters, not ECB institutional views.
Original French legal wording requires independent review; no later central-bank lineage added.
Supported C1397
Reichsmark accounts opened alongside silver accounts on 15 November 1872; from 15 February 1873 merchants booked transfers in Reichsmark after the silver accounting basis ended.
Gustav Kopal · Gustav Kopal, Hamburgs großer Geldschrank, Die Gartenlaube (1875), Heft51 pp.856–858 Citation S702 ·
Open source ↗final paragraphs p.858
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Article opening and final paragraphs; transcription lines 134–183, especially180–181.
LIMIT: Contemporary reportage rather than the conversion ordinance; scan not inspected.
Supported C1398
Unwithdrawn balances transferred to Reichsbank deposits at the end of 1875. This institutional succession postdates the currency conversion.
Ulrich Bindseil, September 2019 · Early French and German central bank charters and regulations, Occasional Paper 234 Citation S112 ·
Open source ↗section3.1 p.19
Source access and limitations
Author research and translated primary charters, not ECB institutional views.
Original French legal wording requires independent review; no later central-bank lineage added.
Supported C1423
Existing merchant transfer accounting shifted to Reichsmark; later institutional absorption must not be called founding.
Gustav Kopal · Gustav Kopal, Hamburgs großer Geldschrank, Die Gartenlaube (1875), Heft51 pp.856–858 Citation S702 ·
Open source ↗Article opening and final paragraphs; transcription lines134–183, especially180–181.
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Article opening and final paragraphs; transcription lines 134–183, especially180–181.
LIMIT: Contemporary reportage rather than the conversion ordinance; scan not inspected.
Supported C1435
Replacement of transfer-account unit; bank itself continued through 1875.
Gustav Kopal · Gustav Kopal, Hamburgs großer Geldschrank, Die Gartenlaube (1875), Heft51 pp.856–858 Citation S702 ·
Open source ↗final paragraphs p.858; section3.1 p.19
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Article opening and final paragraphs; transcription lines 134–183, especially180–181.
LIMIT: Contemporary reportage rather than the conversion ordinance; scan not inspected.
Ulrich Bindseil, September 2019 · Early French and German central bank charters and regulations, Occasional Paper 234 Citation S112 ·
Open source ↗final paragraphs p.858; section3.1 p.19
Source access and limitations
Author research and translated primary charters, not ECB institutional views.
Original French legal wording requires independent review; no later central-bank lineage added.