← Read the currency articleShanghai tael: research record
Evidence coverage: 1857–1933. This is the span of collected observations, not the currency’s lifetime.
This record includes associated currencies and earlier interpretations. The article selects the evidence relevant to its own history.
← Locate this currency on the treeCurrency continuity
Shanghai tael
CUR-V26-SHANGHAI-TAEL · Research draft
Local Shanghai commercial/contractual silver account unit, not all Chinese taels and not a sycee ingot type.
One scoped currency identity. Changes to subdivisions, scale, standard, instruments or issuers do not by themselves create children. A distinct account unit can remain a successor.
Dated observations: 1857–1933; this does not establish the entire lifetime.
Parents / predecessors
No distinct predecessor currency is established in the loaded view.
Children / successors
Unit and issue records 1 records
Evidence within this identity, not separate currencies.
Shanghai abstract account standard · C2007
Latest research
Historical account researchShanghai business used its local tael as a monetary unit; existing obligations were expressed in taels and required a yuan conversion rule.
Sources and qualifications → Historical account researchLocal contracts and payments denominated in Shanghai taels required account conversion into yuan; independent account denomination rather than weight standard alone.
Sources and qualifications → Unit-of-account identity reviewLocal contracts and payments denominated in Shanghai taels required account conversion into yuan; independent account denomination rather than weight standard alone.
Sources and qualifications → Shanghai abstract account standardChinese and Western merchants adopted Shanghai’s abstract tael money of account in 1857. This reported adoption is not a universal origin date for all Shanghai silver references.
Sources and qualifications → Account-unit observations
Dated evidence, not exact birth or extinction dates.
1933supportedShanghai business used its local tael as a monetary unit; existing obligations were expressed in taels and required a yuan conversion rule.
C1384 1857supportedChinese and Western merchants adopted Shanghai’s abstract tael money of account in 1857. This reported adoption is not a universal origin date for all Shanghai silver references.
C2007
Evidence & research notes 5 claims
Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan.
Supported C1384
Shanghai business used its local tael as a monetary unit; existing obligations were expressed in taels and required a yuan conversion rule.
United States Department of Commerce · Monetary Use of Silver in 1933 Citation S541 ·
Open source ↗printed38–39, including footnotes33and37
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Supported C1421
Shanghai tael-based payments and contracts were replaced by Republic of China yuan accounting. Shanghai local absorption only; yuan already existed; do not infer all local taels abolished simultaneously.
United States Department of Commerce · Monetary Use of Silver in 1933 Citation S541 ·
Open source ↗Bratterprinted39; BOCparagraphApril5
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Bank of China · Bank of China, The Choice for Silver Dollar in the Currency Reform 1932–1933 Citation S697 ·
Open source ↗Bratterprinted39; BOCparagraphApril5
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Limits: Original decree not inspected; article supports payment/contract transition, not universal enforcement across every Chinese locality.
Supported C1433
Shanghai banks, exchanges and businesses discontinued tael valuation in favour of yuan following the central order.
United States Department of Commerce · Monetary Use of Silver in 1933 Citation S541 ·
Open source ↗printed39; BOCApril5announcement
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Bank of China · Bank of China, The Choice for Silver Dollar in the Currency Reform 1932–1933 Citation S697 ·
Open source ↗printed39; BOCApril5announcement
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Limits: Original decree not inspected; article supports payment/contract transition, not universal enforcement across every Chinese locality.
Supported C1569
Local contracts and payments denominated in Shanghai taels required account conversion into yuan; independent account denomination rather than weight standard alone.
United States Department of Commerce · Monetary Use of Silver in 1933 Citation S541 ·
Open source ↗China customs-gold discussion, printed p.40 footnote 38; Ceylon and Mauritius country sections (Mauritius printed p.79)
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Supported C2007
Chinese and Western merchants adopted Shanghai’s abstract tael money of account in 1857. This reported adoption is not a universal origin date for all Shanghai silver references.
Richard von Glahn · The Changing Significance of Latin American Silver in the Chinese Economy, 16th–19th Centuries, RHE 38/3 (2020), 553–585 Citation S1044 ·
Open source ↗Abstract and sections 5–6; dollar accounts and Shanghai tael
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.