Evidence coverage: 1939–1945. This is the span of collected observations, not the currency’s lifetime.
This record includes associated currencies and earlier interpretations. The article selects the evidence relevant to its own history.
Protectorate budgets and interbank claims continued to be denominated in koruna, even after the loss of independent external monetary policy in 1940.
Sources and qualifications →The Protectorate retained the inherited Czechoslovak koruna locally after the 1939 territorial partition. Article 10 retained koruna payments and article 12 existing law; subsequent Protectorate budgets and claims remained koruna-denominated within the distinct occupation monetary regime. The connection is local continuation of the former common account system after territorial separation. There was no new unit created merely by renaming the bank or printing new notes. The 10:1 Reichsmark rating is a peg/control relation, not its ancestry.
Sources and qualifications →Dated evidence, not exact birth or extinction dates.
Protectorate budgets and interbank claims continued to be denominated in koruna, even after the loss of independent external monetary policy in 1940.
C1500Includes dated issues, standards, subdivisions and institutional changes. Each event retains the source's date qualifications.
Corrected interpretation: Revision 27 supplies a new evidence basis for R0297. The connection is local continuation of the former common account system after territorial separation. There was no new unit created merely by renaming the bank or printing new notes. The 10:1 Reichsmark rating is a peg/control relation, not its ancestry. Current evidence: The Protectorate retained the inherited Czechoslovak koruna locally after the 1939 territorial partition. Article 10 retained koruna payments and article 12 existing law; subsequent Protectorate budgets and claims remained koruna-denominated within the distinct occupation monetary regime.
C853Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan.
The Protectorate koruna succeeded the Czechoslovak currency in Bohemia and Moravia.
Corrected interpretation: Revision 27 supplies a new evidence basis for R0297. The connection is local continuation of the former common account system after territorial separation. There was no new unit created merely by renaming the bank or printing new notes. The 10:1 Reichsmark rating is a peg/control relation, not its ancestry. Replacement evidence: C1631.
Opening historical overview of monetary units, 1892–1993
Czech and Slovak monetary areas were reunified into the Czechoslovak koruna at 1:1. Parity of monetary units; unrestricted conversion of all cash or deposits is not implied.
Obnova československej meny: proposed ratios rejected; 1 November 1945 actual 1:1 unification
Monetary timeline on PDF page 2: 1919, 1939, 1945, 1953, 1993
Protectorate budgets and interbank claims continued to be denominated in koruna, even after the loss of independent external monetary policy in 1940.
Body paragraphs 2–5
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
The Protectorate retained the inherited Czechoslovak koruna locally after the 1939 territorial partition. Article 10 retained koruna payments and article 12 existing law; subsequent Protectorate budgets and claims remained koruna-denominated within the distinct occupation monetary regime.
Decree articles 10, 12; central-bank history paragraphs 1–5
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Full legal transcription inspected.
Decree articles 10, 12; central-bank history paragraphs 1–5
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.