{
  "version": "reconciled-tree-33",
  "date": "2026-10-12",
  "scope": "Roman accounts, first directional pass. Republican literary witnesses are added; no newly proved ancestry or adopted-basis edge is claimed.",
  "rows": [
    {
      "id": "ROM33-EARLIER",
      "route": "Earlier Roman bronze/as → denarius reckoning",
      "decision": "Open predecessor boundary",
      "finding": "An internal bronze-to-silver accounting history is plausible, but retrospective ratios are not a dated transition record.",
      "next_evidence": "Collate early obligations and the bronze/silver reform chronology; decide whether continuity, rescaling or a distinct successor unit is supported.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C1973",
        "C1972"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S1028",
        "S1027"
      ],
      "new_ancestry_edge": false,
      "new_adopted_basis_edge": false
    },
    {
      "id": "ROM33-GREEK",
      "route": "Greek / South Italian systems → Rome",
      "decision": "No ancestry or step-parent admitted",
      "finding": "The inspected sources do not establish deliberate adoption of a named Greek account unit. A Greek-looking coin, shared weight or translated drachma label is insufficient.",
      "next_evidence": "Find an explicit founding-unit adoption or conversion of obligations; identify the particular Greek account community rather than generic Greek coinage.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C1972"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S1027"
      ],
      "new_ancestry_edge": false,
      "new_adopted_basis_edge": false
    },
    {
      "id": "ROM33-INTERNAL",
      "route": "Republican → imperial denarius / sestertius accounts",
      "decision": "Same profile, earlier witnesses added",
      "finding": "The profile now has Republican literary evidence alongside the retained 57 CE debt and 301 price-ceiling witnesses. These observations do not certify an uninterrupted lifespan.",
      "next_evidence": "Add contemporary Republican inscriptions or surviving accounts; investigate early boundaries without splitting denominations into currencies.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C1970",
        "C1971",
        "C1976",
        "C1844",
        "C1283"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S1023",
        "S1024",
        "S1025",
        "S1026",
        "S1027",
        "S641",
        "S966",
        "S642",
        "S643"
      ],
      "new_ancestry_edge": false,
      "new_adopted_basis_edge": false
    },
    {
      "id": "ROM33-EGYPT",
      "route": "Roman-Egyptian drachma/talent → denarius accounts",
      "decision": "Existing qualified later absorption retained",
      "relationship_ids": [
        "R-V25-004"
      ],
      "finding": "This local integration is already represented. Its 296–351 interval is a research envelope, not a founding date or instant extinction of Egyptian accounting. It does not make Egypt Rome's original parent.",
      "next_evidence": "Trace local obligations across the reforms and distinguish the earlier Ptolemaic/bronze-drachma question from this later integration.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C1323",
        "C1325",
        "C1849"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S640",
        "S641"
      ],
      "new_ancestry_edge": false,
      "new_adopted_basis_edge": false
    },
    {
      "id": "ROM33-GOLD",
      "route": "Denarius reckoning → solidus / nomisma accounts",
      "decision": "Transition researched; ancestry edge held",
      "finding": "The available evidence describes gold's growing role alongside older reckoning, not a demonstrated universal replacement. The existing solidus account profile remains separate.",
      "next_evidence": "Inspect the primary 352 transaction and dated conversions or succession of account obligations; do not equate a mint reform with unit replacement.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C1974",
        "C1327",
        "C1846"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S641",
        "S640",
        "S968"
      ],
      "new_ancestry_edge": false,
      "new_adopted_basis_edge": false
    },
    {
      "id": "ROM33-WEST",
      "route": "Late Roman money → Frankish denier / livre",
      "decision": "Western bridge remains open",
      "finding": "Gallic solidus revenues and Merovingian obligations are real leads. Forty-denar legal reckoning cannot be equated automatically with Roman denarii or the later twelve-denier solidus.",
      "next_evidence": "Collate the monetary clauses by manuscript/redaction and connect dated Gallic transactions to the later Frankish account system.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C1975",
        "C1832",
        "C1833",
        "C1834"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S1029",
        "S951",
        "S949",
        "S950",
        "S947",
        "S948"
      ],
      "new_ancestry_edge": false,
      "new_adopted_basis_edge": false
    },
    {
      "id": "ROM33-EAST",
      "route": "East Roman solidus / nomisma → later Byzantine accounts",
      "decision": "Regional expansion not yet adjudicated",
      "finding": "Egyptian solidus/nomisma accounting is already evidenced, but that scoped identity is not automatically a universal Byzantine unit extending through every later coin reform.",
      "next_evidence": "Inspect dated imperial and regional account texts through later nomisma and hyperpyron usage; test continuity versus local differentiation. A requested Dumbarton Oaks coinage resource returned 403 and supplies no new admitted evidence.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C1380",
        "C1381",
        "C1846"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S694",
        "S693",
        "S640",
        "S968"
      ],
      "new_ancestry_edge": false,
      "new_adopted_basis_edge": false
    },
    {
      "id": "ROM33-ARAB",
      "route": "East Roman accounts → early Arab administration / dinar usage",
      "decision": "Existing local continuity retained; later dinar branch open",
      "finding": "Inherited nomisma obligations survive the conquest in the existing Egyptian profile; the Palestinian bilingual dinar/solidus equation remains a qualified regional association. Neither conquest nor a new coin inscription alone creates a child.",
      "next_evidence": "Connect the local obligations to later explicitly denominated dinar accounts and identify any genuine new unit boundary; do not jump to a modern dinar by name.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C1838",
        "C1839",
        "C1840",
        "C1841",
        "C1842",
        "C1852"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S957",
        "S960",
        "S958",
        "S959"
      ],
      "new_ancestry_edge": false,
      "new_adopted_basis_edge": false
    }
  ],
  "claim_map": {
    "denarius70": "C1970",
    "sesterces70": "C1971",
    "scales": "C1972",
    "bronze": "C1973",
    "gold_transition": "C1974",
    "salic40": "C1975",
    "identity": "C1976"
  },
  "source_map": {
    "cicero_grain": "S1023",
    "cicero_grain_latin": "S1024",
    "cicero_accounts": "S1025",
    "cicero_accounts_latin": "S1026",
    "pliny": "S1027",
    "gaius": "S1028",
    "salic": "S1029",
    "constantian": "S641"
  },
  "new_claim_ids": [
    "C1970",
    "C1971",
    "C1972",
    "C1973",
    "C1974",
    "C1975",
    "C1976"
  ],
  "new_source_ids": [
    "S1023",
    "S1024",
    "S1025",
    "S1026",
    "S1027",
    "S1028",
    "S1029"
  ],
  "changed_currency_ids": [
    "CUR-V25-ROMAN-DENARIUS"
  ],
  "no_new_relationships": true
}