{
  "version": "reconciled-tree-39",
  "date": "2026-10-13",
  "scope": "Roman account continuity and the qualified gold-account branch; Bactrian financial records and early Indus monetary boundaries.",
  "new_currency_ids": [
    "CUR-V39-ROB-GOLD-DINAR"
  ],
  "new_claim_ids": [
    "C2075",
    "C2076",
    "C2077",
    "C2078",
    "C2079",
    "C2080",
    "C2081",
    "C2082",
    "C2083",
    "C2084",
    "C2085",
    "C2086",
    "C2087",
    "C2088",
    "C2089",
    "C2090",
    "C2091",
    "C2092",
    "C2093"
  ],
  "new_source_ids": [
    "S1085",
    "S1086",
    "S1087",
    "S1088",
    "S1089",
    "S1090",
    "S1091",
    "S1092",
    "S1093",
    "S1094",
    "S1095",
    "S1096",
    "S1097",
    "S1098",
    "S1099"
  ],
  "source_map": {
    "carbone": "S1085",
    "butcher": "S1086",
    "strobel": "S1087",
    "jones": "S1088",
    "buttrey": "S1089",
    "rovelli": "S483",
    "bransbourg": "S1090",
    "bagnall89": "S1091",
    "vrat": "S1092",
    "clarysse": "S1093",
    "rapin": "S1094",
    "jakobsson": "S1095",
    "deromanis": "S1067",
    "kenoyer": "S1096",
    "museum": "S1097",
    "morris": "S1098",
    "yakubovich": "S1099"
  },
  "claim_map": {
    "scales": "C2075",
    "antoninianus": "C2076",
    "tariff301": "C2077",
    "communis": "C2078",
    "vrat": "C2079",
    "myriads566": "C2080",
    "aureus": "C2081",
    "siliqua": "C2082",
    "floating": "C2083",
    "gold_branch": "C2084",
    "bactria_amphipolis": "C2085",
    "aikhanoum": "C2086",
    "asangorna": "C2087",
    "bactria_scope": "C2088",
    "indian_labels": "C2089",
    "gandhara": "C2090",
    "harappa": "C2091",
    "rob": "C2092",
    "rob_parent": "C2093"
  },
  "relationships": [
    {
      "current_basis_claim_ids": [
        "C2084"
      ],
      "id": "R-V39-001",
      "parent": "CUR-V25-ROMAN-DENARIUS",
      "child": "CUR-V26-EGYPT-SOLIDUS-NOMISMA",
      "kind": "monetary_reform_succession",
      "layer": "primary",
      "date": {
        "earliest_year": 274,
        "latest_year": 375,
        "precision": "range",
        "qualifier": "range",
        "calendar": "CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero",
        "original_text": "274–375"
      },
      "claim_ids": [
        "C2084"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S1089",
        "S1090",
        "S483"
      ],
      "source": "Revision31 earlier accounts",
      "scope": "Admit a qualified gold-account branch through Roman monetary reforms: the aureus was a denomination of denarius/sestertius reckoning; gold valuation separated, and the solidus replaced the aureus and became an independent accounting basis. This is our synthesis of documented monetary transformation, not a quoted genealogical conclusion. The274–375 research envelope compresses reform and account emergence, not a founding date, fixed conversion or end of denarius reckoning.",
      "status": "qualified_draft",
      "valuation_ids": [],
      "creates_currency": true,
      "founding_predecessor": true,
      "ancestry_role": "founding_or_early_ancestry",
      "date_is_creation": false,
      "display_evidence": {
        "status": "qualified",
        "line_style": "dashed",
        "qualification_scope": "this_relationship_only"
      },
      "date_is_research_envelope": true,
      "immediate_parent_established": false,
      "kinship_note": "Ancestry established at the stated scope; no direct sibling derivation without an established immediate parent.",
      "chronology_note": "274–375 research envelope, not a foundation or observation date. Denarius accounting continues alongside the gold branch.",
      "ancestry_evidence_status": "qualified",
      "qualification_reason": "Explicit editorial synthesis of inherited Roman denominations, gold separation, reform succession and independently attested gold accounting; compressed intermediate boundaries.",
      "territorial_scope": "Roman imperial monetary transformation; regional timings vary.",
      "inference_type": "qualified_historical_synthesis"
    }
  ],
  "renamed_profiles": [
    {
      "currency_id": "CUR-V26-ATHENIAN-DRACHMA",
      "previous_label": "Attic drachma accounting — Athenian and Alexandrine traditions",
      "label": "Attic drachma accounting — Athenian, Alexandrine and Bactrian traditions"
    }
  ],
  "adopted_bases": [],
  "navigation_changes": [],
  "holds": [
    "Roman gold-account ancestry is a qualified synthesis. Inspect more regional obligation conversions and independent gold-account emergence before asserting an immediate parent, fixed rate or one universal transition date.",
    "The silver-siliqua name is not sufficient evidence of a hard peg. No new adopted-basis record is created.",
    "Late denarius, myriad and nummus usage needs document-specific semantic review; the566 witness does not establish an unchanged denomination across six centuries.",
    "The earlier bronze/as witness remains retrospectively and chronologically qualified. Roman provincial assaria require their own local identification.",
    "Bactrian drachma observations are qualified associations with the broad Attic tradition; the independent regional identity boundary remains open.",
    "Asangorna staters require denomination and identity adjudication before creating or merging a currency profile.",
    "Aï Khanoum’s Indian treasury categories do not establish a complete Taxila account regime or equality with drachmas.",
    "Gandharan/Persian weight transmission is a candidate, not yet proven account ancestry. Harappan metrology does not by itself connect to historical kārṣāpaṇa.",
    "Rob’s gold-dinar fines establish a local account. Earlier Kushan gold-account succession and later regional continuation remain to be evidenced."
  ]
}