← Read the currency article

Calcutta sicca rupee: research record

Evidence coverage: 1765–1838. This is the span of collected observations, not the currency’s lifetime.

This record includes associated currencies and earlier interpretations. The article selects the evidence relevant to its own history.

← Locate this currency on the tree
Currency continuity

Calcutta sicca rupee

CUR-V22-CALCUTTA-SICCA · Research draft

A documented account-unit or currency-system transition supports this predecessor identity; not admitted from a specimen or inherited label alone.

One scoped currency identity. Changes to subdivisions, scale, standard, instruments or issuers do not by themselves create children. A distinct account unit can remain a successor.
Dated observations: 1765–1838; this does not establish the entire lifetime.

Parents / predecessors

Patna Sanwat / Azeemabadee rupee accountabsorbed into existing currency · 1793–1802 · later absorption or contribution
↗
Mughal rupee–dam accountingregional currency continuity · qualified · 1700–1794
↗

Children / successors

Indian rupeeaccount unit replacement · 1835–1838
↗
Unit and issue records 2 records

Evidence within this identity, not separate currencies.

Earlier accounting observation · C1197
Earlier accounting observation · C1198

Latest research

Earlier unit continuity

A July 1765 agreement allocates the Bengal Nawab’s annual government allowance in sicca rupees. Association with the later Calcutta sicca profile is a qualified regional continuity; intervening standards and local ratings are not fully adjudicated.

Sources and qualifications →
Earlier unit continuity

The Hooghly collector’s March 1773 remittance records revenue collections in sicca rupees. This is a direct accounting observation; grouping it with the later Calcutta sicca remains qualified.

Sources and qualifications →
Earlier account evidence

Regulation XXXV required sicca-denominated new contracts and revenue payments, as quoted by the Privy Council.

Sources and qualifications →
Modern account-unit review

Sicca obligations passed into Company-rupee accounting: the1835 Act governs contractual discharge, and the court follows an actual converted rent through the change. The1838 tender endpoint does not erase statutory exceptions.

Sources and qualifications →
Unit-of-account identity review

Calcutta sicca is independently established as a contractual and fiscal account unit by the1793 regulation quoted and applied in the1874 Privy Council judgment. ActXVII1835 explicitly recognizes sicca-denominated contracts separately from Company-rupee discharge. This replaces the indexed-only identity basis for the1793–1838 scope.

Sources and qualifications →
Qualified inherited ancestry

Bengal and Company sicca accounting inherited the Mughal rupee system through regional Nawabi arrangements. Admit compressed regional ancestry, retaining distinctions among sicca, current and Patna accounts. The immediate stages and differentiation dates remain qualified.

Sources and qualifications →

Account-unit observations

Dated evidence, not exact birth or extinction dates.

1793supported

Regulation XXXV required sicca-denominated new contracts and revenue payments, as quoted by the Privy Council.

C1761
Evidence & research notes 8 claims

Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan.

Inference C1153

The 1836 act ended Calcutta sicca-rupee tender status from January 1838; its Treasury notice prescribed exchange into the Company rupees of the 1835 act. Retrieval is limited to the indexed statutory passage.

Corrected interpretation: Revision 28 supplies a new evidence basis for R-V22-051. Replacement evidence: C1794.

Governor General in Council, India Code archive · Act XIII of 1836: Sicca Rupees and Pice; financial notice of 23 May 1836 Citation S549 · Open source ↗

Act section I and appended Treasury notice: legal tender ends in 1838; exchange into Company rupees

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Search-indexed statutory text inspected; full PDF retrieval returned 404.

Inference C1197

A July 1765 agreement allocates the Bengal Nawab’s annual government allowance in sicca rupees. Association with the later Calcutta sicca profile is a qualified regional continuity; intervening standards and local ratings are not fully adjudicated.

William Bolts; agreement of the Nawab of Bengal with Francis Sykes, edited by University of Exeter · Considerations on India Affairs (1772), Articles of Resignation, July 1765 Citation S580 · Open source ↗

Appendix no. XXIII, pp.37–38, agreement dated July 1765

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

University transcription of the 1772 printed primary document inspected.

Inference C1198

The Hooghly collector’s March 1773 remittance records revenue collections in sicca rupees. This is a direct accounting observation; grouping it with the later Calcutta sicca remains qualified.

Bengal Revenue Board; William Lushington; University of Exeter critical transcription · Revenue Board Consisting of the Whole Council, 5 February–30 March 1773 Citation S581 · Open source ↗

Manuscript p.1088; Lushington letter, Hooghly, 26 March 1773

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Supported C1761

Regulation XXXV required sicca-denominated new contracts and revenue payments, as quoted by the Privy Council.

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council · Meer Mahomed Hossein v A. J. Forbes (1874) Citation S910 · Open source ↗

Judgment paragraph2

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Mirror has date/fraction transcription discrepancies; omit disputed precision.

Supported C1794

Sicca obligations passed into Company-rupee accounting: the1835 Act governs contractual discharge, and the court follows an actual converted rent through the change. The1838 tender endpoint does not erase statutory exceptions.

Governor-General of India in Council · Act XVII of 1835: Gold and Silver Coinage Act Citation S909 · Open source ↗

ActXVII1835 §§III–VI; judgment paragraphs1–2

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Read operative statute sections I–VIII in the full transcription.

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council · Meer Mahomed Hossein v A. J. Forbes (1874) Citation S910 · Open source ↗

ActXVII1835 §§III–VI; judgment paragraphs1–2

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Mirror has date/fraction transcription discrepancies; omit disputed precision.

Supported C1798

Parties converted the grant's existing rent into sicca after the1793 regulation and before the1802 settlement. This is a documented local obligation transition, not universal abolition.

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council · Meer Mahomed Hossein v A. J. Forbes (1874) Citation S910 · Open source ↗

Judgment paragraph2

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Mirror has date/fraction transcription discrepancies; omit disputed precision.

Supported C1808

Calcutta sicca is independently established as a contractual and fiscal account unit by the1793 regulation quoted and applied in the1874 Privy Council judgment. ActXVII1835 explicitly recognizes sicca-denominated contracts separately from Company-rupee discharge. This replaces the indexed-only identity basis for the1793–1838 scope.

Governor-General of India in Council · Act XVII of 1835: Gold and Silver Coinage Act Citation S909 · Open source ↗

ActXVII1835 §§III–VI; Meer Mahomed Hossein v Forbes1874, judgment paragraph2, quoting RegulationXXXV1793 and ActXIII1836

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Read operative statute sections I–VIII in the full transcription.

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council · Meer Mahomed Hossein v A. J. Forbes (1874) Citation S910 · Open source ↗

ActXVII1835 §§III–VI; Meer Mahomed Hossein v Forbes1874, judgment paragraph2, quoting RegulationXXXV1793 and ActXIII1836

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Mirror has date/fraction transcription discrepancies; omit disputed precision.

Qualified C2010

Bengal and Company sicca accounting inherited the Mughal rupee system through regional Nawabi arrangements. Admit compressed regional ancestry, retaining distinctions among sicca, current and Patna accounts. The immediate stages and differentiation dates remain qualified.

Sushil Chaudhury · Trade, Politics and Society (2017), chapter 5: Multiple Currencies and their Complementary Relationship Citation S913

Chapter 5, pp. 99–111; imperial, Nawabi and Company account arrangements; Ain 10, Silver Coins and Copper Coins, pp. 31–32; salary and accountants’ reckoning

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Abul Fazl; English translation transcription · Ain-i-Akbari, volume I, Book I Citation S1041 · Open source ↗

Chapter 5, pp. 99–111; imperial, Nawabi and Company account arrangements; Ain 10, Silver Coins and Copper Coins, pp. 31–32; salary and accountants’ reckoning

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

English transcription inspected; site header attribution inconsistent with translation/pagination, so no Persian manuscript verification claimed.

Find a currency