← Read the currency article

Ur III Girsu barley-gur reckoning: research record

Evidence coverage: 2100 BC–2000 BC. This is the span of collected observations, not the currency’s lifetime.

This record includes associated currencies and earlier interpretations. The article selects the evidence relevant to its own history.

← Locate this currency on the tree
Currency continuity

Ur III Girsu barley-gur reckoning

CUR-V29-GIRSU-BARLEY-GUR · Research draft
One scoped currency identity. Changes to subdivisions, scale, standard, instruments or issuers do not by themselves create children. A distinct account unit can remain a successor.
Dated observations: 2100 BC–2000 BC; this does not establish the entire lifetime.

Parents / predecessors

No distinct predecessor currency is established in the loaded view.

Children / successors

No distinct successor currency is established in the loaded view.

Latest research

Earlier account evidence

Girsu MVN8,179 offsets a barley obligation of1826⅓sila with silver credited as1450sila of barley and delivery of376⅓sila. Barley remains the account denomination while silver can settle part of the obligation.

Sources and qualifications →
Earlier account evidence

Cripps distinguishes Girsu institutional barley accounting from Umma merchant silver accounting. Shared exchange calculations do not make these a chronological succession or a single universal Mesopotamian currency.

Sources and qualifications →
Unit-of-account identity review

Barley-denominated obligations can be discharged partly in silver; exceeds a simple commodity inventory. No universal barley currency asserted.

Sources and qualifications →

Account-unit observations

Dated evidence, not exact birth or extinction dates.

-2100–-2000supported

Girsu MVN8,179 offsets a barley obligation of1826⅓sila with silver credited as1450sila of barley and delivery of376⅓sila. Barley remains the account denomination while silver can settle part of the obligation.

C1827
Evidence & research notes 3 claims

Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan.

Supported C1827

Girsu MVN8,179 offsets a barley obligation of1826⅓sila with silver credited as1450sila of barley and delivery of376⅓sila. Barley remains the account denomination while silver can settle part of the obligation.

Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative · MVN8,179, Girsu institutional account, CDLI P 115569 Citation S974 · Open source ↗

Rev.v8–14; Cripps§7.2.1.1

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Eric L. Cripps · The Structure of Prices in the Neo-Sumerian Economy(I): Barley:Silver Price Ratios, CDLJ 2017:2 Citation S975 · Open source ↗

Rev.v8–14; Cripps§7.2.1.1

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Supported C1848

Cripps distinguishes Girsu institutional barley accounting from Umma merchant silver accounting. Shared exchange calculations do not make these a chronological succession or a single universal Mesopotamian currency.

Eric L. Cripps · The Structure of Prices in the Neo-Sumerian Economy(I): Barley:Silver Price Ratios, CDLJ 2017:2 Citation S975 · Open source ↗

§§9.4–9.6

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Supported C1859

Barley-denominated obligations can be discharged partly in silver; exceeds a simple commodity inventory. No universal barley currency asserted.

Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative · MVN8,179, Girsu institutional account, CDLI P 115569 Citation S974 · Open source ↗

See scoped account observations.

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Eric L. Cripps · The Structure of Prices in the Neo-Sumerian Economy(I): Barley:Silver Price Ratios, CDLJ 2017:2 Citation S975 · Open source ↗

See scoped account observations.

Source access and limitations

Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.

Find a currency