← Read the currency articleUr III Girsu barley-gur reckoning: research record
Evidence coverage: 2100 BC–2000 BC. This is the span of collected observations, not the currency’s lifetime.
This record includes associated currencies and earlier interpretations. The article selects the evidence relevant to its own history.
← Locate this currency on the treeCurrency continuity
Ur III Girsu barley-gur reckoning
CUR-V29-GIRSU-BARLEY-GUR · Research draft
One scoped currency identity. Changes to subdivisions, scale, standard, instruments or issuers do not by themselves create children. A distinct account unit can remain a successor.
Dated observations: 2100 BC–2000 BC; this does not establish the entire lifetime.
Parents / predecessors
No distinct predecessor currency is established in the loaded view.
Children / successors
No distinct successor currency is established in the loaded view.
Latest research
Earlier account evidenceGirsu MVN8,179 offsets a barley obligation of1826⅓sila with silver credited as1450sila of barley and delivery of376⅓sila. Barley remains the account denomination while silver can settle part of the obligation.
Sources and qualifications → Earlier account evidenceCripps distinguishes Girsu institutional barley accounting from Umma merchant silver accounting. Shared exchange calculations do not make these a chronological succession or a single universal Mesopotamian currency.
Sources and qualifications → Unit-of-account identity reviewBarley-denominated obligations can be discharged partly in silver; exceeds a simple commodity inventory. No universal barley currency asserted.
Sources and qualifications → Account-unit observations
Dated evidence, not exact birth or extinction dates.
-2100–-2000supportedGirsu MVN8,179 offsets a barley obligation of1826⅓sila with silver credited as1450sila of barley and delivery of376⅓sila. Barley remains the account denomination while silver can settle part of the obligation.
C1827
Evidence & research notes 3 claims
Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan.
Supported C1827
Girsu MVN8,179 offsets a barley obligation of1826⅓sila with silver credited as1450sila of barley and delivery of376⅓sila. Barley remains the account denomination while silver can settle part of the obligation.
Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative · MVN8,179, Girsu institutional account, CDLI P 115569 Citation S974 ·
Open source ↗Rev.v8–14; Cripps§7.2.1.1
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Eric L. Cripps · The Structure of Prices in the Neo-Sumerian Economy(I): Barley:Silver Price Ratios, CDLJ 2017:2 Citation S975 ·
Open source ↗Rev.v8–14; Cripps§7.2.1.1
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Supported C1848
Cripps distinguishes Girsu institutional barley accounting from Umma merchant silver accounting. Shared exchange calculations do not make these a chronological succession or a single universal Mesopotamian currency.
Eric L. Cripps · The Structure of Prices in the Neo-Sumerian Economy(I): Barley:Silver Price Ratios, CDLJ 2017:2 Citation S975 ·
Open source ↗§§9.4–9.6
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Supported C1859
Barley-denominated obligations can be discharged partly in silver; exceeds a simple commodity inventory. No universal barley currency asserted.
Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative · MVN8,179, Girsu institutional account, CDLI P 115569 Citation S974 ·
Open source ↗See scoped account observations.
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Eric L. Cripps · The Structure of Prices in the Neo-Sumerian Economy(I): Barley:Silver Price Ratios, CDLJ 2017:2 Citation S975 ·
Open source ↗See scoped account observations.
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.