← Read the currency articleLivre parisis: research record
Evidence coverage: 1204–1204. This is the span of collected observations, not the currency’s lifetime.
This record includes associated currencies and earlier interpretations. The article selects the evidence relevant to its own history.
← Locate this currency on the treeCurrency continuity
Livre parisis
T-FTM000815 · Research draft
One scoped currency identity. Changes to subdivisions, scale, standard, instruments or issuers do not by themselves create children. A distinct account unit can remain a successor.
Dated observations: 1204; this does not establish the entire lifetime.
Parents / predecessors
Children / successors
No distinct successor currency is established in the loaded view.
Siblings
Unit and issue records 1 records
Evidence within this identity, not separate currencies.
Parisis systemFTM000815 · C726
Monetary history 1 events
Includes dated issues, standards, subdivisions and institutional changes. Each event retains the source's date qualifications.
after 1204Coexisting systemsRoyal tournois adoption coexists with the parisis system. Parallel systems; this edge is neither descent nor a fixed-rate conversion.
C726
Evidence & research notes 2 claims
Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan.
Supported C726
Royal tournois adoption coexists with the parisis system. Parallel systems; this edge is neither descent nor a fixed-rate conversion.
Jean Lafaurie, 1970, pp. 117–137 · Numismatique. Des Carolingiens aux Capétiens Citation S127 ·
Open source ↗p.136
Source access and limitations
Older scholarly synthesis; adopt bounded royal-adoption and relative-value claims, not approximate metallic reconstructions.
Inference C1033
Parisis can likewise be treated as a qualified regional descendant of Frankish reckoning.
Jean Lafaurie, 1970, pp. 117–137 · Numismatique. Des Carolingiens aux Capétiens Citation S127 ·
Open source ↗Lafaurie pp. 134–136; Rovelli pp. 81–82
Source access and limitations
Older scholarly synthesis; adopt bounded royal-adoption and relative-value claims, not approximate metallic reconstructions.
Alessia Rovelli, in Rory Naismith (ed.), Money and Coinage in the Middle Ages (2018), pp. 63–92 · From the Fall of Rome to Charlemagne (c.400–800) Citation S483 ·
Open source ↗Lafaurie pp. 134–136; Rovelli pp. 81–82
Source access and limitations
Coinage continuity supports a qualified seventh-century extension, not a complete local account sequence.