Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan.
Supported C603
Article 4 retains the British Indian silver rupee as the standard coin of East Africa and Uganda, governing money transactions unless expressly agreed otherwise.
British Crown; East Africa and Uganda Official Gazette; Kenya Law scan · East Africa and Uganda (Currency) Order in Council, 1905 — Gazette 1 June 1905 Citation S334 ·
Open source ↗art.4(1)–(2), printed p.162
Source access and limitations
Order dated 10 February 1905; territorial commencement proclamations and first note issue are not established by this text.
The 1898 measure is known here through its recital, not inspection of the 1898 original.
Supported C604
Article 5 provides subsidiary coins expressed in cents or hundredths of a rupee.
British Crown; East Africa and Uganda Official Gazette; Kenya Law scan · East Africa and Uganda (Currency) Order in Council, 1905 — Gazette 1 June 1905 Citation S334 ·
Open source ↗art.5(2), printed p.162
Source access and limitations
Order dated 10 February 1905; territorial commencement proclamations and first note issue are not established by this text.
The 1898 measure is known here through its recital, not inspection of the 1898 original.
Supported C605
Articles 14 and 16 authorise local government currency notes, payable on demand in current coin and legal tender with a Currency Board-office exception.
British Crown; East Africa and Uganda Official Gazette; Kenya Law scan · East Africa and Uganda (Currency) Order in Council, 1905 — Gazette 1 June 1905 Citation S334 ·
Open source ↗arts.14 and 16, printed pp.163–164
Source access and limitations
Order dated 10 February 1905; territorial commencement proclamations and first note issue are not established by this text.
The 1898 measure is known here through its recital, not inspection of the 1898 original.
Inference C606
The 1905 order requires territorial commencement proclamations and allows different provisions to start on different dates; its signature date is not first note issue.
British Crown; East Africa and Uganda Official Gazette; Kenya Law scan · East Africa and Uganda (Currency) Order in Council, 1905 — Gazette 1 June 1905 Citation S334 ·
Open source ↗arts.22–25, printed p.165
Source access and limitations
Order dated 10 February 1905; territorial commencement proclamations and first note issue are not established by this text.
The 1898 measure is known here through its recital, not inspection of the 1898 original.
Inference C607
Article 13 accepts qualifying sovereigns at fifteen rupees each; this is a tender valuation, not evidence of a sterling-to-rupee replacement.
British Crown; East Africa and Uganda Official Gazette; Kenya Law scan · East Africa and Uganda (Currency) Order in Council, 1905 — Gazette 1 June 1905 Citation S334 ·
Open source ↗art.13, printed p.163; final classification editorial
Source access and limitations
Order dated 10 February 1905; territorial commencement proclamations and first note issue are not established by this text.
The 1898 measure is known here through its recital, not inspection of the 1898 original.
Supported C608
Kenya’s 1920–21 report describes the 26 April 1920 order converting rupee references in contracts to florins at one florin per rupee.
Government of Kenya; His Majesty’s Stationery Office; University of Illinois scan · Colony and Protectorate of Kenya: Report for 1920–21, Colonial Reports Annual No.1122 (1922) Citation S335 ·
Open source ↗Currency, printed pp.4–5
Source access and limitations
Retrospective official account of instruments, not their complete original text.
The 19 July proclamation date must not be assumed to be its effective date without the proclamation.
Supported C610
The report dates transfer of the local Currency Board’s powers, duties and liabilities to the East African Currency Board to 31 July 1920.
Government of Kenya; His Majesty’s Stationery Office; University of Illinois scan · Colony and Protectorate of Kenya: Report for 1920–21, Colonial Reports Annual No.1122 (1922) Citation S335 ·
Open source ↗printed p.4, paragraph under Currency; date visually confirmed
Source access and limitations
Retrospective official account of instruments, not their complete original text.
The 19 July proclamation date must not be assumed to be its effective date without the proclamation.
Inference C611
The report records one-rupee EACB notes made unlimited tender on 11 May 1920, and December legislation authorising florin/pound notes. Unit change and note denomination overlap.
Corrected interpretation: Revision 27 supplies a new evidence basis for R0152. Direct legal-account substitution with note overlap; no universal cash extinction. Replacement evidence: C1629.
Government of Kenya; His Majesty’s Stationery Office; University of Illinois scan · Colony and Protectorate of Kenya: Report for 1920–21, Colonial Reports Annual No.1122 (1922) Citation S335 ·
Open source ↗printed p.5, 11 May and 29 December entries
Source access and limitations
Retrospective official account of instruments, not their complete original text.
The 19 July proclamation date must not be assumed to be its effective date without the proclamation.
Supported C613
Article 5 converts covered former rupee or florin amounts into twice as many shillings, and former cents into twice as many shilling cents.
Government of Kenya; Laws.Africa Gazettes archive · Kenya Gazette No.804, 16 December 1921: Proclamation 177 and Government Notices 461–462 Citation S336 ·
Open source ↗10 August 1921 order, art.5(2)–(3), printed p.1067
Source access and limitations
Kenya commencement is not automatically Uganda or Tanganyika commencement.
The same-date amendment replaces the principal order’s subsidiary-coin exception.
First physical shilling issue and actual later demonetisation remain separate questions.
Supported C614
Article 9(3) preserves old notes and coins as tender until separately ended, rating each rupee or florin at two shillings.
Government of Kenya; Laws.Africa Gazettes archive · Kenya Gazette No.804, 16 December 1921: Proclamation 177 and Government Notices 461–462 Citation S336 ·
Open source ↗art.9(3), printed p.1067; subsidiary exception must be read as amended
Source access and limitations
Kenya commencement is not automatically Uganda or Tanganyika commencement.
The same-date amendment replaces the principal order’s subsidiary-coin exception.
First physical shilling issue and actual later demonetisation remain separate questions.
Supported C586
RBI describes monetary continuity during 1947–1950 and dates the Republic's distinctive coin issue to 15 August 1950.
Reserve Bank of India · Republic India Coinage Citation S319 ·
Open source ↗Indexed Republic India Coinage historical paragraphs
Source access and limitations
Recover an accessible full issuer page, legal continuity after independence and the separate 1957 decimal change; continue earlier rupee ancestry.
Substantive search-indexed passage inspected; direct full-document retrieval failed or returned blocking/error content.
Supported C963
Independent India retained the inherited rupee and then introduced Republic designs. Independence and the 1950 coin issue did not rescale the rupee.
Government of India, Ministry of Finance / Press Information Bureau · Decimal Coinage — a Fascinating History, 30 March 2007 Citation S458 ·
Open source ↗Independence, Anna Series and 1957 decimalisation paragraphs
Source access and limitations
Use explicit continuity of the rupee.
The article’s opening broad age-of-coins statement and confused use of paise/pies are not adopted.
Supported C964
India decimalised the rupee without changing its value or name. Subdivision reform stays on the rupee line.
Government of India, Ministry of Finance / Press Information Bureau · Decimal Coinage — a Fascinating History, 30 March 2007 Citation S458 ·
Open source ↗Independence, Anna Series and 1957 decimalisation paragraphs
Source access and limitations
Use explicit continuity of the rupee.
The article’s opening broad age-of-coins statement and confused use of paise/pies are not adopted.
Supported C967
India introduced a separate rupee-note currency for Gulf circulation. The original domestic notes were displaced through a regional changeover; no modern peg is being promoted into ancestry.
Reserve Bank of India Monetary Museum · Persian Gulf Issues Citation S460 ·
Open source ↗Indexed museum body: separate Gulf-only note series and later withdrawal
Source access and limitations
Full page retrieval unavailable; substantive institutional indexed passage inspected.
Gulf-only notes are distinguished from domestic Indian legal tender.
Relevant indexed passage inspected in revision 15; Indexed museum body: separate Gulf-only note series and later withdrawal
Michael Edo / International Monetary Fund · Currency Arrangements and Banking Legislation in the Arabian Peninsula, 1975 Citation S461 ·
Open source ↗Indexed historical paragraph: 11 May 1959 issue and six-week changeover
Source access and limitations
Direct HTML and PDF retrieval failed; only the indexed dated historical passage is used.
Relevant indexed passage inspected in revision 15; Indexed historical paragraph: 11 May 1959 issue and six-week changeover
Supported C602
The 1905 order recites a 19 May 1898 order making British India’s silver rupee the East Africa Protectorate’s standard coin.
British Crown; East Africa and Uganda Official Gazette; Kenya Law scan · East Africa and Uganda (Currency) Order in Council, 1905 — Gazette 1 June 1905 Citation S334 ·
Open source ↗Preamble, printed p.161; 1898 original not inspected
Source access and limitations
Order dated 10 February 1905; territorial commencement proclamations and first note issue are not established by this text.
The 1898 measure is known here through its recital, not inspection of the 1898 original.
Supported C961
Bombay Mughal-style rupees were one input to the uniform British Indian rupee coinage. Madras and Bengal presidency branches remain additional inputs to research; no blanket old-rupee conversion ratio.
The Royal Mint · Empire to Independence Six-Coin Rupee Set Citation S457 ·
Open source ↗Introductory monetary history; William IV section; Victoria section
Source access and limitations
Mint-authored numismatic account accompanying a commercial set.
Use historical passages only; no purchase recommendation.
Bombay is one presidency input, not every local rupee.
Supported C962
Crown coinage followed Company coinage in the rupee system. Change of sovereign and coin design, not a new unit of account.
The Royal Mint · Empire to Independence Six-Coin Rupee Set Citation S457 ·
Open source ↗Introductory monetary history; William IV section; Victoria section
Source access and limitations
Mint-authored numismatic account accompanying a commercial set.
Use historical passages only; no purchase recommendation.
Bombay is one presidency input, not every local rupee.
Supported C965
Pakistan initially used Indian notes and then modified and national rupee issues. A phased territorial separation; no change in rupee face-unit inferred from the redesign.
State Bank of Pakistan · Rupay ko Pehchano — History of Pakistani Banknotes Citation S459 ·
Open source ↗Reserve Bank of India Issue; Government of Pakistan Issue
Inference C990
Mauritius combined local currency-board notes with the Indian rupee as its prescribed monetary unit. The history supports unit descent; precise changeover terms and early local-note denominations remain expandable.
Corrected interpretation: Revision 27 supplies a new evidence basis for R0408. Account adoption, local loan accounts and later independent valuation establish regional descent, not a metal-standard resemblance. Replacement evidence: C1610.
Bank of Mauritius · Annual Report 2019–2020 Citation S470 ·
Open source ↗Page 124, Board of Currency Commissioners: Indian rupee legal tender 1876–1934; local note issues
Supported C1115
The Iraqi currency-board system succeeded Indian-rupee circulation, which the Central Bank dates through 1932.
Central Bank of Iraq · History of the formation of Iraqi currency Citation S537 ·
Open source ↗Opening history: Indian rupee circulation to 1932 and currency-board succession
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Supported C1127
Indian rupee → ngultrum, 1974.
Deutsche Bundesbank · Metadata on the Exchange Rate Statistics, 24 September 2025 Citation S98 ·
Open source ↗BTN entry, currency history; Bundesbank PDF, 24 September 2025 edition.
Source access and limitations
Historical reference, not a 2026 legal-status audit.
Only selected country milestones used.
Inference C1138
Ceylon’s local currency notes were redeemable in rupees under the 1884 ordinance; the 1892 order prescribed the British Indian rupee as standard. A qualified regional branch records local currency development, not a new unit invented by decimal coins.
Corrected interpretation: Revision 27 supplies a new evidence basis for R-V22-036. Regional descent is documented; the broad interval represents differentiation, not uncertainty that the ancestry exists. Do not equate local note issue with the sole creation date. Replacement evidence: C1608.
United States Department of Commerce · Monetary Use of Silver in 1933 Citation S541 ·
Open source ↗Country entries Ceylon and Siam; contemporary account of currency legislation; PDF p.101, currency history paragraph and footnotes 2–4
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Central Bank of Sri Lanka · 60th Anniversary Commemorative Volume, 1950–2010 Citation S242 ·
Open source ↗Country entries Ceylon and Siam; contemporary account of currency legislation; PDF p.101, currency history paragraph and footnotes 2–4
Inference C1153
The 1836 act ended Calcutta sicca-rupee tender status from January 1838; its Treasury notice prescribed exchange into the Company rupees of the 1835 act. Retrieval is limited to the indexed statutory passage.
Corrected interpretation: Revision 28 supplies a new evidence basis for R-V22-051. Replacement evidence: C1794.
Governor General in Council, India Code archive · Act XIII of 1836: Sicca Rupees and Pice; financial notice of 23 May 1836 Citation S549 ·
Open source ↗Act section I and appended Treasury notice: legal tender ends in 1838; exchange into Company rupees
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Search-indexed statutory text inspected; full PDF retrieval returned 404.
Inference C1156
Burma’s separate currency developed from Indian-rupee circulation through the 1937 issues, postwar currency board and 1952 central-bank succession. The compressed regional link to the continuing rupee/kyat profile is qualified; wartime occupation currency remains a separate unresolved input.
Corrected interpretation: Revision 27 supplies a new evidence basis for R-V22-054. The parent relationship is supported despite multiple institutional stages. Kyat naming/decimalization remains within the existing Myanmar identity under project policy. Replacement evidence: C1609.
Nicholas Krus and Kurt Schuler · Currency Board Financial Statements, Studies in Applied Economics No.22 (December 2014) Citation S189 ·
Open source ↗Burma pp.58–59; Italian Somaliland p.141; legislation and annual reports; RBI functions inherited in 1948; currency-board functions transferred in 1952
Source access and limitations
Underlying annual reports and ordinances not independently inspected.
Gambia coin date conflicts with the indexed central-bank account.
Institutional liquidation is not currency termination.
Myanmar government national portal · Central Bank Citation S327 ·
Open source ↗Burma pp.58–59; Italian Somaliland p.141; legislation and annual reports; RBI functions inherited in 1948; currency-board functions transferred in 1952
Source access and limitations
Substantive search-indexed passage inspected; direct full-document retrieval failed or returned blocking/error content.
Supported C1422
Hyderabad local rupees were replaced by Indianrupees; the regional branch joins an already existing Indianunit. Does not assert that Indianrupee originated 1955.
Reserve Bank of India · Reserve Bank of India, Chronology of Events 1950–1960 Citation S699 ·
Open source ↗1April1955entry
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Original notification not inspected.
Supported C1608
The Ceylon rupee developed from local Indian-rupee accounting: public accounts used rupees and cents from1872; an independent Ceylon rupee subsequently separated from INR, with the link explicitly severed in 1949.
B. W. Fernando, Ceylon Government Press (1939) · Ceylon Currency British Period, Chapter III Citation S804 ·
Open source ↗Fernando §§14,17,19; Exter pp.3–5
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Full chapter transcription inspected.
John Exter (1949) · Report on Establishment of a Central Bank for Ceylon, Sessional Paper XIV Citation S805 ·
Open source ↗Fernando §§14,17,19; Exter pp.3–5
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Supported C1609
Burma differentiated its rupee from the Indian rupee system: the1937 arrangement retained INR linkage and RBI management; the1946 currency law established local rupee accounting, and the currency board assumed prior liabilities in 1947.
UK Parliament, A. Henderson · Burma Monetary Arrangements, 17 July 1946 Citation S807 ·
Open source ↗Hansard17July1946 opening; Diehl pp.8–9, Act1946 §§10,25
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Alexandra Diehl (2017) · The Burma Currency Board Citation S806 ·
Open source ↗Hansard17July1946 opening; Diehl pp.8–9, Act1946 §§10,25
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Section 10 rupee unit, section 25 assumption of prior note liabilities, and actual 1948–1952 accounts read through original researcher; Act 1946 not independently retrieved.
Supported C1610
Mauritius adopted the Indian rupee at par effective1January1877, replacing its earlier dollar at two rupees per dollar; local rupee accounting later separated its anchor from India in 1934.
Nicholas Krus and Kurt Schuler · Currency Board Financial Statements, Studies in Applied Economics No.22 (December 2014) Citation S189 ·
Open source ↗Printed pp.174–175 and178
Source access and limitations
Underlying annual reports and ordinances not independently inspected.
Gambia coin date conflicts with the indexed central-bank account.
Institutional liquidation is not currency termination.
Supported C1629
Covered rupee contractual references became florins1:1 under the1920Order; local commencement proclamation dated July19.
Government of Kenya; His Majesty’s Stationery Office; University of Illinois scan · Colony and Protectorate of Kenya: Report for 1920–21, Colonial Reports Annual No.1122 (1922) Citation S335 ·
Open source ↗Printed pp4–5, Currency
Source access and limitations
Retrospective official account of instruments, not their complete original text.
The 19 July proclamation date must not be assumed to be its effective date without the proclamation.
Supported C1673
The new Qatar-Dubai currency was established to replace Gulf rupees, and governments guaranteed existing Gulf-rupee banking balances at pre-devaluation value before the temporary Saudi-note bridge.
Saksham Bhandari · An analysis of Qatar and Dubai’s Currency Board (1966–1973), Journal of Economics Library 5(2), 2018, pp 134–145 Citation S767 ·
Open source ↗Printed pp135–136; Currency Agreement amended31August1966 art27; Board1966 appendices3–4
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Supported C968
Kuwait’s dinar replaced the circulating Gulf rupee. CBK calls the predecessor Indian rupee; Bundesbank identifies the external Gulf issue. One rupee converted to 0.075 dinar; inverse is not rounded.
Deutsche Bundesbank · Metadata on the Exchange Rate Statistics, 24 September 2025 Citation S98 ·
Open source ↗CBK First Issue; Bundesbank Kuwait conversion entry
Source access and limitations
Historical reference, not a 2026 legal-status audit.
Only selected country milestones used.
Supported C969
Ten Gulf rupees converted to one Bahraini dinar.
Deutsche Bundesbank · Metadata on the Exchange Rate Statistics, 24 September 2025 Citation S98 ·
Open source ↗Bahrain: Currency history
Source access and limitations
Historical reference, not a 2026 legal-status audit.
Only selected country milestones used.
Supported C970
Qatar temporarily substituted borrowed Saudi-riyal notes for Gulf rupees. This concerns Qatar’s circulation only, not the Saudi currency’s origin.
Deutsche Bundesbank · Metadata on the Exchange Rate Statistics, 24 September 2025 Citation S98 ·
Open source ↗Qatar: late June 1966 currency history
Source access and limitations
Historical reference, not a 2026 legal-status audit.
Only selected country milestones used.
Supported C975
Oman replaced Gulf rupees with the rial Saidi. 100 Gulf rupees converted to 7.5 rials; other circulating coin inputs remain open.
Deutsche Bundesbank · Metadata on the Exchange Rate Statistics, 24 September 2025 Citation S98 ·
Open source ↗Oman: May 1970 currency history
Source access and limitations
Historical reference, not a 2026 legal-status audit.
Only selected country milestones used.
Inference C1555
Inspected enabling law authorizes special notes of the Indian rupee for external circulation, not a new account denomination. Fold Gulf episode into Indian rupee and retain its regional conversion observations. This rejects a note-series identity; any later independently denominated Gulf contract unit requires new evidence.
Reserve Bank of India Act 1934 · Reserve Bank of India Act 1934, s 28 A inserted 1959; primary legal text in mirror Citation S894 ·
Open source ↗s 28 A(1)–(7)
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Official 1959 PDF retrieval failed; mirror is explicitly identified.
Supported C1760
Act XVII addresses discharge of engagements in Company rupees and expressly preserves particular payment clauses in sicca-denominated contracts.
Governor-General of India in Council · Act XVII of 1835: Gold and Silver Coinage Act Citation S909 ·
Open source ↗Sections III–VI
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Read operative statute sections I–VIII in the full transcription.
Supported C1794
Sicca obligations passed into Company-rupee accounting: the1835 Act governs contractual discharge, and the court follows an actual converted rent through the change. The1838 tender endpoint does not erase statutory exceptions.
Governor-General of India in Council · Act XVII of 1835: Gold and Silver Coinage Act Citation S909 ·
Open source ↗ActXVII1835 §§III–VI; judgment paragraphs1–2
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Read operative statute sections I–VIII in the full transcription.
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council · Meer Mahomed Hossein v A. J. Forbes (1874) Citation S910 ·
Open source ↗ActXVII1835 §§III–VI; judgment paragraphs1–2
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Mirror has date/fraction transcription discrepancies; omit disputed precision.
Qualified C2048
The reported official rate of 5,120 cowries per rupee in 1804 differs from market exchange. Required silver tax payment does not alone prove wholesale account succession or an enduring hard peg. Hold ancestry and adopted-basis links.
Edward Thomas, quoting W. W. Hunter · The Initial Coinage of Bengal, Part II, JRAS6.2 (1873) Citation S1073 ·
Open source ↗p.341 n.4, quoting Hunter, Orissa (1872), I pp.316–317:1803 public accounts and1804 exchange
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Qualified C2066
The 1905 cent design drew on kiasa counting. Denomination design influence is insufficient to make cowrie accounting an ancestor of the existing Indian rupee.
Karin Pallaver · Monetary practices and currency transitions in early colonial Uganda (2016) Citation S1082 ·
Open source ↗From cowries to coins? and The introduction of cents; author summary of2015 archival study
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Author summary inspected; underlying 2015 article not inspected.
Qualified C2072
Madras pagoda accounts converted to rupees in 1818 at one pagoda to 3½ rupees; presidency unification followed in 1835. Admit compressed local absorption into the retained Indian rupee lineage, not the rupee’s founding. The intervening presidency stage remains explicit.
Parvathi Menon · The Carnatic Debts and the Agrarian Crisis of the Eighteenth Century Citation S1069 ·
Open source ↗The Consolidated Loan of1767, n.29; glossary entry pagoda; Chapter I, pp.15–16 and18–23:1750 treasury,1818 Madras reform and1835 common rupee
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
B. R. Ambedkar · The Problem of the Rupee (1923) Citation S1070 ·
Open source ↗The Consolidated Loan of1767, n.29; glossary entry pagoda; Chapter I, pp.15–16 and18–23:1750 treasury,1818 Madras reform and1835 common rupee
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Qualified C2073
The German territorial rupee developed from established Indian-rupee use. Admit qualified regional derivation; the 1890–1904 emergence interval is a research envelope and does not itself date account creation.
Karin Pallaver · From German East African Rupees to British East African Shillings in Tanganyika, African Studies Review66.3 (2023),637–655 Citation S1084 ·
Open source ↗Indian, German, and Italian Rupees; Rupees and Hellers n.8; Currency Policies nn.16–17; Our Special East African Province nn.50–56
Source access and limitations
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Tanganyika-specific all-contract conversion clause not independently inspected.